Endometrial ablation in the Outpatient Setting
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
Second-generation endometrial ablation techniques are safe, feasible, and effective for treating heavy menstrual bleeding in outpatient settings under local anesthesia, with fundal blocks improving pain reduction.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Endometrial ablation techniques are a minimally invasive, safe and satisfying option for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) treatment. The development of new faster devices with smaller diameters has made it possible to perform these procedures in office and outpatient setting under local anaesthesia with high patient satisfaction, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays and quicker recovery time reducing costs. In this article we analyse the management protocols for endometrial ablation in the outpatient setting to provide the best treatment option. A bibliographic search from 2013 in the Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was carried out with the keywords: endometrial ablation, outpatient, local anaesthesia, fundal block. Most studies reviewed show that 2nd generation endometrial ablation techniques are safer, faster, and equally effective for treatment of HMB than 1st generation ones and can be safe and feasible under local anaesthesia in office and outpatient setting. The combination of either intra- or paracervical anaesthesia with intrauterine cornual or fundal block is more effective at reducing pain. Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine are the anaesthetics of choice due to their potency duration with low adverse effects. Women should be encouraged to play an active role in selecting the type of surgery the setting and the model of care, based on a complete information, their personal preferences and expectations. Some aspects such as age, intention to become pregnant, other symptoms or comorbidities and failure of previous treatments will help to make the best choice.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (16)
- doi:10.1016/j.gofs.2020.02.011 via openalex
- W1522615558 via openalex
- W1900878075 via openalex
- W1969545605 via openalex
- W2015985197 via openalex
- W2066478248 via openalex
- W2885640557 via openalex
- W3004551628 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10397-011-0709-1 via openalex
- W3085352875 via openalex
- W3086407542 via openalex
- W3166714304 via openalex
- W3206649127 via openalex
- W4281727314 via openalex
- W4309868892 via openalex
- W4317207080 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK