Taxonomy, nomenclature, and identification of the giant hummingbirds (Patagona spp.) (Aves: Trochilidae)

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,571 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Giant hummingbirds (Patagona spp.) are extraordinarily large hummingbirds whose taxonomy has been muddled for two centuries. Patagona systematics were recently redefined in a study of migration, physiology, and genomics, revealing two species: the Southern Giant Hummingbird and Northern Giant Hummingbird. Here, we re-evaluate taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus in light of its newly-clarified biology and species limits, analyzing data from 608 specimens and wild-caught individuals spanning 1864–2023. The forms gigas and peruviana were both described based on multiple syntypes. No adequate syntypes for P. gigas are extant, so we designate a neotype for this taxon. We then critically consider the identity and usage of gigas and peruviana, respectively, and examine identification challenges that have fostered taxonomic uncertainty. We endorse the names Patagona gigas for the Southern Giant Hummingbird and P. peruviana for the Northern Giant Hummingbird. The genetic identity of the peruviana lectotype remains untested, but its plumage appears to match the northern species. We found that ∼33% of Patagona gigas specimens in major museum collections are misidentified as peruviana; we provide this list to correct the historical record. To facilitate identification and future study of these two cryptic species, we provide comprehensive information on plumage, measurements, and seasonal ranges. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Significant updates to main text; additional data and analyses.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00