In silico model of axonal pathfinding during spinal cord regeneration in zebrafish larvae

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,592 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Functional spinal cord repair in zebrafish is governed by regeneration-favorable biochemical and mechanical cues within the lesion microenvironment. Alterations in extracellular matrix composition and stiffness are closely associated with axon regeneration. However, experimentally dissecting the interplay between mechanical signals and axonal regrowth in vivo remains technically challenging. Here, we present an agent-based modeling framework to simulate stiffness-mediated axonal growth trajectories across the lesion. We use this model to explore potential mechanisms underlying the characteristic growth patterns observed during zebrafish spinal cord regeneration. Computational predictions were qualitatively compared with confocal imaging data obtained from larval zebrafish. These phenomenological comparisons revealed a close agreement between simulated and experimentally observed axon growth, indicating that experimentally observed patterns could be governed by transient changes in the stiffness profile of the spinal cord and lesion microenvironment. Hence, our computational framework provides an in silico platform for investigating the role of mechanical cues in axon regeneration in the injured spinal cord. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes Minor typographical, grammatical, and formatting corrections were made throughout the manuscript. In addition, two instances were corrected where the terms growth directionality and growth speed had been inadvertently swapped when describing the roles of n and β_link.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00