Radiation dose to the genitalia of women undergoing uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic myomatosis and adenomyosis

OA: green CC0
⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-08 · read from full text ⓘ

This study measured radiation doses to the skin and genitalia of 31 women undergoing uterine artery embolization for symptomatic myomatosis or adenomyosis. The researchers analyzed exposure data from an angiographic facility and subsequently revised examination techniques, such as adjusting frame rates and using additional filters, to reduce cumulative patient doses. Results indicated that initial high frame rates contributed significantly to elevated skin doses, prompting technical adjustments in the latter part of the cohort to mitigate radiation risk. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Poster: ECR 2010 / C-2930 / Radiation dose to the genitalia of women undergoing uterine artery embolization for the treatment of symptomatic myomatosis and adenomyosis by: I. Abatzoglou , V. D. Souftas, I. Tsalafoutas, E. Astrinakis, M. Mantatzis, P. Prassopoulos; Alexandroupolis/GR
Full text 3,549 characters · extracted from oa-html · 5 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Physics Authors: I. Abatzoglou, V. D. Souftas, I. Tsalafoutas, E. Astrinakis, M. Mantatzis, P. Prassopoulos; Alexandroupolis/GR DOI: 10.1594/ecr2010/C-2930 Purpose Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is now recognized as one of the primary therapies available to women for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (myomata), as well as a treatment option alternative to hysterectomy for symptomatic adenomyosis, in premenopausal and potentially fertile women. The major advantage of UAE, as compared to surgery, is its minimal invasive nature. However, the use of ionizing radiation and the associated risks for the patient is a disadvantage that has to be taken into account [1-7].The purpose of this study is...

Methods

and Materials The study included 31 consecutive patients (Group A, first 18 – Group B, last 13 patients) treated with UAE.All UAE procedures were performed using an angiographic C-arm unit (GE Advantx, Buc Cedex, France) equipped with a high frequency generator and an image intensifier of 40 cm nominal diameter with four field of view (FOV) selections (40, 30, 22 and 16 cm). The X-ray tube comprised iris and square collimators. Additional Aluminum and Copper filters were used for dose reduction. For technical reasons, internal Dose Area...

Results

The results of the first and the second stage of the study are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. In Table 1 it is apparent that the calculated skin doses are quite high, as a reasonable consequence of the large number of images acquired during the DSA sequences. A high frame rate (6.3 or 3.1 fps) was used in most of the cases for the first 12 patients. Only in two procedures (patients 9 and 14) the fluoroscopy contribution to the cumulative skin dose...

Conclusion

There are a number of studies in the literature regarding measurement of patient doses during UAE, using various methods [1-7]. In this study the dose to the female patient’s skin and genitalia was measured in a number of UAE procedures performed in an angiographic facility of a General Hospital. Following the analysis of the dose measurements and exposure data in the first group and considering the results of the relevant literature, the examination techniques were revised in an effort to decrease patient doses. Dose measurements...

References

Nikolic B, Spies JB, Lundsten MJ, Abbara S Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization. Radiology 2000; 214:121–125.Nikolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, Walsh SM, Abbara S, Lundsten MJ. Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001; 12(1):39-44.Simonetti G, Romanini C, Pocek M, Piccione E, Guazzaroni M, Zupi E, Gandini R, Gabriele A, Vaquero E. Embolization of the uterine artery in the treatment of uterine myoma, Radiol Med. 2001; 101(3):157-64.Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J. Patient radiation... Personal Information Abatzoglou I1, Souftas V2,Tsalafoutas I3, Astrinakis E2, Mantatzis M2, Prassopoulos P2 Laboratory of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, GreeceDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace, GreeceDepartment of Medical Physics, Agios Savvas Hospital, Athens, [email protected]@[email protected]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK