Protein Age Bias in Target Degradation by PROTACs

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,646 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Targeted protein degradation (TPD) by PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) has emerged as a powerful chemical biology and therapeutic modality, yet many degraders exhibit incomplete target clearance and characteristic rebound kinetics despite continuous exposure. The mechanistic basis for this behavior remains poorly understood. Here we uncover protein age as a previously unrecognized determinant of PROTAC efficacy. Using CG□SLENP, a chemical genetics strategy that selectively labels newly synthesized and pre □existing proteins within the same living cell, we directly resolve PROTAC□induced degradation of distinct intracellular protein populations. Applying this approach to the bromodomain protein BRD4, we show that two mechanistically and structurally distinct PROTACs, dBET6 and MZ□1, preferentially degrade pre □existing BRD4, while newly synthesized BRD4 is degraded substantially more slowly and incompletely. This age□dependent degradation bias is observed in live□cell imaging, across compound concentrations and time scales, and for both reporter and endogenous BRD4. These findings reveal that PROTAC□mediated degradation is governed not only by target engagement and ternary complex formation, but also by the dynamic balance between protein synthesis and degradation. By identifying temporal proteostasis as a critical parameter in TPD, this work provides a mechanistic framework for incomplete degradation and rebound kinetics and establishes protein maturation state as an important consideration for degrader design and evaluation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00