Management of Pelvic Pain in Older Women

In: Handbook of Gynecology · 2023 · pp. 671–684 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14881-1_51 · W4389252446
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-28

This chapter summarizes chronic pelvic pain management in older women, aiming to facilitate appropriate investigation and treatment for generalist physicians.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,575 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is defined as intermittent or constant pain in the lower abdomen, pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, lower back, or buttocks that has a duration of at least 6 months and is associated with limitations on the ability to attend to daily living activities. Females who suffer from CPP may have several etiologies for their pain; hence, the evaluation should identify specific peripheral causes of pain and differentiate them from centralized pain syndromes, given that the treatments can differ substantially. It is important to recognize that as many as 55% of women presenting with CPP will have no well-defined etiology following completion of all investigations (Whitaker et al., PloS One 11:e0151950, 2016). The socioeconomic CPP cost is considerable, with an estimated direct healthcare cost of $880 million per year in the United States, besides $2 billion direct and indirect costs annually (Ahangari, Pain Physician 17:E141–7, 2014). Of these women, 15% report missing work, and 45% note experiencing reduced productivity. This chapter provides a comprehensive summary of chronic pelvic pain management in older women for the generalist and facilitates appropriate investigation and management. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only

References

Agostinho L, Cruz R, Osorio F, Alves J, Setubal A, Guerra A. MRI for adenomyosis: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(6):549–56. Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician. 2014;17(2):E141–7. Anderson RU, Wise D, Sawyer T, Nathanson BH, Nevin SJ. Equal improvement in men and women in the treatment of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome using a multi-modal protocol with an internal myofascial trigger point wand. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016;41(2):215–24. BC Centre for Disease Control. STI in British Columbia: annual surveillance report 20122014. Camilleri M. Diagnosis and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(9):865–77. Chapron C, Querleu D, Bruhat MA, Madelenat P, Fernandez H, Pierre F, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(4):867–72. Chronic Pelvic Pain. ACOG practice bulletin, number 218. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(3):e98–e109. Collins SA, Joshi G, Quiroz LH, Steinberg AC, Nihira MA. Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery: a review. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(6):310–5. Hartmann D, Sarton J. Chronic pelvic floor dysfunction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(7):977–90. Hindocha A, Beere L, Dias S, Watson A, Ahmad G. Adhesion prevention agents for gynaecological surgery: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD011254. Khilnani NM, Meissner MH, Learman LA, Gibson KD, Daniels JP, Winokur RS, et al. Research priorities in pelvic venous disorders in women: recommendations from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(6):781–9. Kim JH, Han E. Endometriosis and female pelvic pain. Semin Reprod Med. 2018;36(2):143–51. Kirby AC, Luber KM, Menefee SA. An update on the current and future demand for care of pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):584:e1–5. Levy G, Dehaene A, Laurent N, Lernout M, Collinet P, Lucot JP, et al. An update on adenomyosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(1):3–25. Loving S, Thomsen T, Jaszczak P, Nordling J. Female chronic pelvic pain is highly prevalent in Denmark. A cross-sectional population-based study with randomly selected participants. Scand J Pain. 2014;5(2):93–101. Mathias S, Kuppermann M, Liberman R, Lipschutz R, Steege J. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:321–7. Meister MR, Sutcliffe S, Ghetti C, Chu CM, Spitznagle T, Warren DK, et al. Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(3):255.e1–9. Mitchell C, Prabhu M. Pelvic inflammatory disease: current concepts in pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 2013;27(4):793–809. Nickel JC, Shoskes D, Irvine-Bird K. Clinical phenotyping of women with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome: a key to classification and potentially improved management. J Urol. 2009;182(1):155–60. Pape J, Falconi G, De Mattos Lourenco TR, Doumouchtsis SK, Betschart C. Variations in bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (IC) definitions, pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment: a systematic review and evaluation of national and international guidelines. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1795–805. Phillips D, Deipolyi AR, Hesketh RL, Midia M, Oklu R. Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(5):725–33. Rossi FH, Rodrigues TO, Izukawa NM, Kambara AM. Best practices in diagnosis and treatment of chronic iliac vein obstruction. J Vasc Brasileiro. 2020;19:e20190134. Rourke W, Khan SA, Ahmed K, Masood S, Dasgupta P, Khan MS. Painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: aetiology, evaluation and management. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia: organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica. 2014;86(2):126–31. Sharma D, Dahiya K, Duhan N, Bansal R. Diagnostic laparoscopy in chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(2):295–7. Shobeiri SA, White D, Quiroz LH, Nihira MA. Anterior and posterior compartment 3D endovaginal ultrasound anatomy based on direct histologic comparison. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(8):1047–53. Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(5):380–7. Springer KW, Sheridan J, Kuo D, Carnes M. The long-term health outcomes of childhood abuse. An overview and a call to action. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(10):864–70. Trent M, Bass D, Ness RB, Haggerty C. Recurrent PID, subsequent STI, and reproductive health outcomes: findings from the PID evaluation and clinical health (PEACH) study. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(9):879–81. Vannuccini S, Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Research. 2019:8. Vercellini P, Vigan’o P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;20:465–77. Vincent K. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85(999):24–9. Whitaker LH, Reid J, Choa A, McFee S, Seretny M, Wilson J, et al. An exploratory study into objective and reported characteristics of neuropathic pain in women with chronic pelvic pain. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0151950. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Jenkinson CP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(468):541–7. Author information Authors and Affiliations Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this entry Cite this entry Javadian, P., Momeni, M., Nihira, M.A. (2023). Management of Pelvic Pain in Older Women. In: Shoupe, D. (eds) Handbook of Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14881-1_51 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14881-1_51 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14880-4 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14881-1 eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (30)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK