Objective
Validate diagnostic accuracy of new unique biomarker, Gastrointestinal Myoelectrical Activity (GIMA),
detected by Electroviscerography (EVG) with Ai-derived disease threshold score calculation to non-invasively diagnose
endometriosis.
Design: Multicenter prospective blinded trial.
Setting: Women’s healthcare center.
Population of Sample: 165 patients with and without endometriosis diagnosis.
Methods
Initial 50 patients meeting inclusion criteria in 165-patients multicenter prospective GIMA biomarker trial were
selected for interim analysis. Study population included women 27 years-55 years old, 25 with diagnosis of endometriosis
and 25 non-endometriosis controls. Clinical and GIMA data were collected between February 2007 and September 2017,
at all harvesting time points and frequency bands using EVG. Ai-derived threshold score calculations used Area Under
The Curve (AUC), age and standardized pain scores variables.
Main Outcome Measures: Specificity, sensitivity, NPV, PPV and predictive probability or C-statistic from logistical
regression analyses of all AUC frequency and time points.
Results
Non-endometriosis versus endometriosis cohort interim analysis differed significantly (p<0.001) for median
(IQR), AUC values, and percent frequency power distribution at baseline, (10, 20, and 30) minute post water-load at
frequency ranges (15-20, 30-40, 40-50 and 50-60) cpm. GIMA threshold scoring revealed sensitivity and PPV of 96%,
specificity and NPV of 96% and C-statistic of 100%. Ai-derived GIMA biomarkers threshold scoring predicted 25/25
subjects positive and negative for endometriosis, with surgical confirmation. Hormonal therapy, surgical stage, age nor
pain score affected diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion
EVG GIMA biomarker data with Ai-derived threshold scoring accurately distinguished participants with and
without endometriosis. This interim analysis supports continued investigation of GIMA biomarkers to diagnose
endometriosis.
Files
mark q2 accepted file.pdf
Files
(1.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:85e8166aba52a97b6379cb3a61dd975d
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.