Comparison of total abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy

In: International Surgery Journal · 2016 · pp. 2007–2011 · doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20163183 · W2519398523
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-13

This study compared hysterectomy routes for benign gynecological diseases, including endometriosis, finding that laparoscopic surgery offers faster recovery and fewer complications than abdominal or vaginal approaches.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-13 · read from full text

This study compared the clinical outcomes of total abdominal, vaginal, and total laparoscopic hysterectomies in a cohort of 198 women undergoing surgery for benign gynecological conditions. The results indicated that laparoscopic procedures offered significant advantages over abdominal and vaginal approaches, including reduced blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and fewer complications, although the authors noted that these benefits require substantial surgeon expertise. Most patients were over forty years old, with dysfunctional uterine bleeding being the primary indication, followed by endometriosis and pelvic pain. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for hysterectomy, though the paper's main focus is comparing surgical routes for benign disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Open abdominal hysterectomies was one of the most common and traditional surgical procedure for the removal of uterus in women for the treatment of benign gynecological disease. Vaginal hysterectomy, on the other hand is one of the minimally invasive surgeries which provides less post operative pain and more rapid recovery with lesser number of days of hospital stay. Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in less blood loss than either vaginal or abdominal surgeries and is also more achievable in nulliparous and obese women.Methods: 198 women who had total abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy were included into the study. The route of hysterectomy is guided by the surgical indication for hysterectomy, patient anatomy, data that support the selected procedure, informed patient preference, and the surgeon’s expertise. All the surgeries were done under general anaethesia and cefotaxim was given as the prophylactic antibiotic prior to the surgery.Results: Most of the women who had come to the hospital for hysterectomy were above the age of 40 years. Most of the women had come for hysterectomy due to dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB), followed by Endometriosis and pelvic pain. Most of the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were in the hospital for less than 5 days while the maximum duration of hospital stay was in the patients who had abdominal surgery. The number of patients who received blood transfusion among all the cases was minimal, though the least requirement was seen among the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. 2 patients who had abdominal surgery had to be readmitted due to complications.Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgeries result in a faster recovery time and lesser hospital stay and minimal pain and complications compared to abdominal and even vaginal hysterectomy. However, this type of a surgery requires surgeon’s experience and expertise.
Full text 6,755 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Open abdominal hysterectomies was one of the most common and traditional surgical procedure for the removal of uterus in women for the treatment of benign gynecological disease. Vaginal hysterectomy, on the other hand is one of the minimally invasive surgeries which provides less post operative pain and more rapid recovery with lesser number of days of hospital stay. Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in less blood loss than either vaginal or abdominal surgeries and is also more achievable in nulliparous and obese women.

Methods

198 women who had total abdominal, vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy were included into the study. The route of hysterectomy is guided by the surgical indication for hysterectomy, patient anatomy, data that support the selected procedure, informed patient preference, and the surgeon’s expertise. All the surgeries were done under general anaethesia and cefotaxim was given as the prophylactic antibiotic prior to the surgery.

Results

Most of the women who had come to the hospital for hysterectomy were above the age of 40 years. Most of the women had come for hysterectomy due to dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB), followed by Endometriosis and pelvic pain. Most of the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were in the hospital for less than 5 days while the maximum duration of hospital stay was in the patients who had abdominal surgery. The number of patients who received blood transfusion among all the cases was minimal, though the least requirement was seen among the patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. 2 patients who had abdominal surgery had to be readmitted due to complications.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgeries result in a faster recovery time and lesser hospital stay and minimal pain and complications compared to abdominal and even vaginal hysterectomy. However, this type of a surgery requires surgeon’s experience and expertise. Metrics

References

Keshavarz H, Hillis SD, Kiele BA, Marchbanks PA. Hysterectomy Surveillance-United States, 1994-1999. MMWR CDC Surveillance Sum. 2002;51(5):1-8. The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The management of menorrhagia in secondary care. The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 2004. National Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines. Available at www.rcog.org.uk. Accessed on 12 February 2016. Clinch J. Length of hospital stay after vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(3):253-4. Wattiez A, Goldchmit R, Durruty G. Minilaparoscopic hysterectomy J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 1999;6:97-100. Montefiore DE, Rouzier R, Chapron C, Darai E. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:260-5. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006:CD003677. Semm K. Endoscopic methods in gastroenterology and gynecology. Completion of diagnostic pelviscopy by endoscopic abdominal surgery. Fortschr Med. 1984;102:534-7. Scribner DR, Walker JL, Johnson GA, Mcmeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:498-503. Possover M, Krause N, Plaul K, Heid KR, Schneider A. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 1998;71:19-28. Kulkarni MM, Rogers RG. Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disease without prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:5-16. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD003677. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. Int J Obst Gyn. 2009;116:492-500. Wattiez A, Soriano D, Cohen SB, Nervo P, Canis M, Botchorishvili R, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9:339-45. Cho HY, Choi KJ, Lee YL, Chang KH, Kim HB, Park SH. Comparison of two bipolar systems in laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Society Laparoendo Surg. 2012;16:456-60. Kluivers KB, Hendriks JC, Mol BW, Bongers MY, Bremer GL, Vet HC, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:145-52. Donnez O, Donnez J. A series of 400 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease: a single centre, single surgeon prospective study of complications confirming previous retrospective study Int J Obst Gyn. 2010;117:752-5. Karaman Y, Bingol B, Gunenç Z. Prevention of complications in laparoscopic hysterectomy: experience with 1120 cases performed by a single surgeon. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:78-84. Bojahr B, Raatz D, Schonleber G, Abri C, Ohlinger R. Perioperative complication rate in 1706 patients after a standardized laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:183-9. Mccracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Ulster Med J. 2006;75(1):54-8. Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Lopez L, Garnier AC. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for oncological indications with outcomes stratified by age. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;95(1):196-203. O'Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Lopez L, Garnier AC. Selective incorporation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for adnexal pathology and body mass index. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93(1):137-43. Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:199-205. Silva CN, Ribeiro SS, Barata S, Alho C, Osório F, Jorge CC. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: retrospective analysis of 262 cases. Acta Med Port. 2014:27:73-81. Warren L, Ladapo JA, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;5:581-8. Malzoni M, Perniola G, Perniola F, Imperato F. Optimizing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy procedure for benign uterine pathology. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11:211-8.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (23)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK