MosaicSim: A Novel Mosaic Variant Simulator Reveals Diminishing Returns of Ultra-High Coverage for Mosaic Variant Detection
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Genetic mutations within select cells of a tissue, termed mosaic variants (MV), are being increasingly recognized for their role in human disease. This growing interest underscores the need for specialized tools to detect and analyze MVs. However, such detection methods still lack thorough evaluation, largely due to missing benchmarking datasets that are large, reliable, and reflective of the complexity of biological samples. To address this gap, we developed MosaicSim, a tool for simulating variants in realistic sequencing data. The TweakVar workflow is at the tool’s core and represents a unique simulation pipeline that layers simulated MVs onto empirical whole genome sequencing data, generating a large, realistic ground truth dataset that combines the strengths of both simulation and biological data. To demonstrate the functionality of the workflow, we simulated 1,000 mosaic single nucleotide polymorphisms using TweakVar within whole genome sequencing files of different coverages. MVs were called with Illumina’s DRAGEN and compared to the ground truth. Our results show 150×–445× coverage performed comparably, with a true-positive rate between 50.4% (300×) and 54.9% (150×) and no false-positives detected. Across all samples, increasing variant allele frequency had a significant positive effect on call success. Additionally, we observed that call rates for variants in lower complexity regions improved with increasing read depth. We did not find significant effects attributable to specific mutation patterns or mean read map quality. MosaicSim fills a critical unmet need by providing representative, customizable ground truth datasets for MV benchmarking, enabling systematic evaluation and optimization of variant calling methods.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00