Case
A 61-year-old postmenopausal woman presented with enlargement of the
left ovary in February 2013. A routine USG revealed a left ovarian mass measuring
20.5 × 16.0 × 14.2. At that time, her CA125 level was 37.7 U/mL
(upper limit, 35 U/mL).
In March 2013, the patient underwent a complete cytoreduction
consisting of hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal biopsies, and
peritoneal fluid analysis. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was not reported.
Pathology revealed a high-grade serous carcinoma arising in the left ovary with
positive peritoneal cytology. Postoperative CA125 was within the normal values.
Patient received adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of six cycles of weekly
intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (80 mg/m 2 ) plus IV
carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC], 6.0) on day 1 every 3 weeks, with good tolerance and no severe adverse effects.
The patient remained free of disease for about 24 months. In September 2015, she developed abdominal discomfort and ascites. Imaging
examinations, including magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission computed
tomography, showed peritoneal and hepatic metastases in association with normal CA125
levels. Second- and third-line treatment with IV carboplatin (AUC, 5.0) on day 1, IV
gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 8, and IV
bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks and
weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 , respectively, were
administered with no response.
At that time, an expert comprehensive pathology review sample from
the initial surgery was undertaken, which excluded the first pathology diagnosis
based on morphology and immunohistochemical profile. The tumor presented areas of YST
(60%) coexisting with an endometrioid carcinoma (40%). The YST component present with
solid, microcystic, polyvesicular, and glandular patterns with extensive tumoral
necrosis, while the endometrioid component was mostly adenofibromatous with glandular
structures, histologic grade 2. The immunohistochemical profile highlighted the two
different patterns. Endometrioid component presented positive hormonal receptors,
cytokeratin 7 and diffuse PAX-8, while the YST component was hormonal receptors and
cytokeratin 7 negative, and SALL-4 positive.
The YST component showed solid, microcystic, polyvesicular, and
glandular patterns. The epithelial component was an endometrioid carcinoma grade 2
( Fig. 1 ). β Human chorionic gonadotropin and alpha fetoprotein levels
(AFP) were normal, and lactate dehydrogenase level was two times higher than the
upper limit of normal. Fig. 1 Yolk-sac tumor associated with endometrioid carcinoma. A)
Glandular pattern with polyvesicular structures. B) Detail of an endometrioid
glandular component. C) Solid area of YST. D) SALL-4 immunostain diffusely positive
in YST component. Fig. 1
Yolk-sac tumor associated with endometrioid carcinoma. A)
Glandular pattern with polyvesicular structures. B) Detail of an endometrioid
glandular component. C) Solid area of YST. D) SALL-4 immunostain diffusely positive
in YST component.
A planned laparoscopic procedure was done in February 2016 for
staging purposes and also to obtain additional tissue for pathological evaluation.
This procedure showed hemorrhagic ascites in association with extensive peritoneal
disease.
The pathologic examination confirmed metastatic disease with
morphologic features consistent with those of the initial pathologic findings.
Immunohistochemical study showed positive staining for cytokeratin 7 (CK7)
(epithelial component), cytokeratin 20 (CK20) (foci in YST component), PAX 8 (diffuse
in epithelial component and focal in YST), SALL4 (YST component), GATA3, progesterone
receptor (PR) (epithelial component), and estrogen receptor (ER) (epithelial
component) and was negative for calretinin, Wilms tumor-1, CerbB2, and AFP.
After the new diagnosis, in March 2016, patient received four cycles
of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) at the conventional doses with a partial
response by image and markers. In August 2016, she initiated three salvage regimens
in a sequence with no response in each of those regimens (etoposide, ifosfamide, and
cisplatin; oxaliplatin and gemcitabine; and oral cyclophosphamide). She had
progressive disease in the liver with hepatic failure and death few days
later.
Role
No funding to declare.
Conflict
No conflict of interest to disclose.
Conclusion
Mixed YST–epithelial carcinoma is a rare entity and must be
recognized as an aggressive tumor. Because of its prognosis, complete surgical
staging and aggressive systemic therapy must be considered in an attempt to improve
disease outcome. Future studies that include more patients will help to delineate the
optimal systemic approach in the first-line and salvage settings.
Discussion
YST in the postmenopausal population, either pure or associated with
ovarian epithelial tumors, is a rarity and associated with a distinct biologic
behavior, characterized by poor prognosis even with early-stage disease
( Boussios et al., 2015 ;
Roth et al.,
2011 ).
YST can be pure or mixed with other germ cells or epithelial
components. As was seen in our case, most postmenopausal women with YSTs present with
a coexisting epithelial component; In this case, with or without an epithelial
component, arise from a different molecular pathway than do germ cell-tumors in
younger patients ( Roth et al.,
2011 ). Prognosis also correlates with stage of disease and the
presence of elevated tumor markers ( Boussios
et al., 2015 ). Boussios et al. reported that most patients died
within 8 months of diagnosis; only a few cases, particularly those
with mixed YSTs, were disease-free for more than 2 years from the
initial diagnosis ( Boussios et al.,
2015 ).The first case of YST coexisting with an epithelial carcinoma
reported in a postmenopausal woman, similar to our patient, suggested that the
epithelial component originated from a endometriotic cyst ( Shaaban et al., 2014 ).This is in accordance with the
hypothesis that endometriosis may be a risk factor for this tumor ( Koi et al., 2014 ). Interestingly, both
YST and endometrioid carcinoma components show typical features; both were separate
entities ( McNamee et al.,
2016 ). McNamee et al. reported a series of 18 cases of YST of the
female genital tract in women older than 40 years old and showed
that most of these tumors were associated with a somatic epithelial neoplasm
( McNamee et al., 2016 ).
Due to the overlap of morphology and immunophenotype between YST and the epithelial
neoplasm, they suggested the term “somatically derived YST’ for these neoplasms
( McNamee et al.,
2016 ).
The histopathogenesis of this rare entity is still unknown
( Rutgers et al., 1987 ).
Pathologic differential diagnoses include clear cell carcinoma, serous carcinoma,
müllerian mixed tumor, and the intestinal variant of YST ( Roth et al., 2011 ). Accurate diagnosis is based on
morphologic features and immunohistochemical profile.
CK7 and EMA are important stains for differentiating ovarian YST
from endometrioid adenocarcinoma ( McNamee et
al., 2016 ) Usually, CK7 and EMA are negative in YST and positive in
endometrioid adenocarcinoma, while AFP is positive in YST but negative in
endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, in other series most part of the
immunohistochemical findings showed positive for EMA and CK7 in the YST component
( McNamee et al.,
2016 ).
Newer markers for YST, including glypican-3 and SALL-like protein 4
(SALL4), may be useful in the identification of the YST component ( Roth et al., 2011 ). Glypican-3, an
oncofetal protein expressed in fetal liver and malignant tumors of hepatocytic
lineage, is more sensitive than AFP but not as specific ( Nogales et al., 1996 ). SALL4 is a specific and
sensitive marker for germ cell tumors ( Nogales et al., 1996 ). Our patient's tumor sample was positive for
SALL4, but glypican-3 was not tested.
Plasma AFP roughly correlates with the YST component ( Roth et al., 2011 ). In postmenopausal
women with an ovarian mass and an elevated serum AFP level, this rare neoplasm should
be included in the differential diagnosis ( Roth et al., 2011 ). Of note, advanced stage and elevated tumor
markers have been shown to be independent poor prognostic indicators ( Boussios et al., 2015 ).
Although YST associated with endometrioid adenocarcinoma is
extremely rare, the recognition of this histologic subtype is important not only in
differential diagnosis but also prognosis ( Koi et al., 2014 ). This tumor is greatly different from pure YST
in terms of the response to chemotherapy or the postoperative clinical course
( Roth et al., 2011 ). As
previously postulated, YST arising from epithelial tumors by transformation may be
less sensitive to chemotherapy than de novo YST because of the
mixed epithelial component ( Roth et al.,
2011 ). Because of its rarity, no systemic treatment guidelines are
available, BEP chemotherapy is a potential choice for first-line treatment and may be
effective not only in the germ cell but also in the epithelial component because of
the platinum component ( Boussios et al.,
2015 ). In contrast to the current data, our patient achieved a
long-term response with carboplatin and paclitaxel, both agents active against the
germ cell and epithelial components; at the time of progression, a second response
was obtained with platinum re-challenge and bevacizumab. The role of antiangiogenic
agents in this setting is unknown but worthy of further study. A BEP regimen was also
administered as third-line therapy when the pathologic features were reviewed, and a
partial response of short duration occurred.
Introduction
Ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCTs) make up approximately 2% to 5% of
all ovarian malignancies ( Boussios et al.,
2015 ). Yolk sac tumor (YST) is one of the most common subtypes of
OGCTs and may present as a pure histologic type or mixed with other germ cell
components ( Boussios et al.,
2015 ; Roth et al.,
2011 ). YST rarely coexists with epithelial carcinoma, and this
entity is rare in postmenopausal women ( Koi
et al., 2014 ). We describe a 61-year-old woman with YST coexisting
with epithelial carcinoma and report on the efficacy of systemic therapies.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.