Endometrioma v1

preprint OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

This systematic review aims to identify the optimal surgical intervention for ovarian endometriomas by comparing cystectomy, ablation, and sclerotherapy based on fertility outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-09 · read from full text

This protocols.io paper describes a planned systematic review (per PRISMA 2020) to identify and extract evidence from PubMed and Europe PMC (English full research articles, 2000–2023) on surgical interventions for endometrioma—specifically laparoscopic cystectomy, CO2 laser vaporization, plasma energy ablation, and sclerotherapy—and how these relate to infertility parameters, including ovarian reserve and pregnancy outcomes. It will include studies reporting correlations with infertility measures and will exclude reviews, conference abstracts, and articles focused on conservative treatment, while also considering studies involving combined treatment to reduce bias. Data extraction will be performed in duplicate using predefined criteria, and results are intended to be tabulated with demographics and key findings, with a critical appraisal of included studies. The paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on endometrioma surgical interventions and related effects on ovarian reserve and fertility in women with endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background:Endometriosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outsidethe uterus. Beyond medical treatment, surgical intervention is also a viableconsideration. However, current guidelines do not clearly indicate whetherlaparoscopic cystectomy, ablative methods (CO2 laser vaporization, plasmaenergy), or sclerotherapy is the preferred option. Methods: We conductedsearches in two databases (PubMed, Europe PMC) to retrieve articles containingthe keywords ‘surgical intervention for Endometrioma, ovarian reserve,pregnancy rates, fertility’, published between January 1, 2000, and December31, 2023. We will include articles presenting information on surgical interventionfor endometrioma and its correlation with infertility parameters. Articlesdescribing conservative treatment will be excluded. Data will be extracted by twoauthors using predefined criteria.
Full text 22,181 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · 15 sections · click to expand

Keywords

endometriosis, endometrioma, anti-mullerian hormone, laparoscopic cystectomy, CO2 laser vaporization, plasma energy ablation, sclerotherapy, GnRH agonist treatment, assisted reproduction treatment, surgical intervention for endometrioma, endometrioma, endometriosi, endometrioma background, endometrial tissue, presence of endometrial tissue, infertility parameter, uterus, laparoscopic cystectomy, ovarian reserve, correlation with infertility parameter, fertility, information on surgical intervention, pregnancy rate, surgical intervention

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. Beyond medical treatment, surgical intervention is also a viable consideration. However, current guidelines do not clearly indicate whether laparoscopic cystectomy, ablative methods CO2 laser vaporization, plasma energy), or sclerotherapy is the preferred option. Methods: We conducted searches in two databases PubMed, Europe PMC) to retrieve articles containing the keywords ‘surgical intervention for Endometrioma, ovarian reserve, pregnancy rates, fertilityʼ, published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023. We will include articles presenting information on surgical intervention for endometrioma and its correlation with infertility parameters. Articles describing conservative treatment will be excluded. Data will be extracted by two authors using predefined criteria. Image Attribution One figure with flow diagram including studies' selection. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 2/11 Guidelines According to PRISMA 2020 checklist. TITLE The report is identified as a systematic review.

Abstract

This research is written according to PRISMA 2020 checklist for Abstracts. Title: The report is identified as a systematic review.

Background

An explicit statement of the main objective the review addresses is provided.

Methods

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the review are specified. The information sources (e.g. databases, registers) used to identify studies and the date when each was last searched are specified. The

Methods

used to assess risk of bias in the included studies are specified.

Introduction

The rationale for the review is described in the context of existing knowledge. An explicit statement of the

Objective

the review addresses is provided. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 3/11

Materials

The conduct of this systematic review will adhere to the guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA Statement. Data sources and Search Strategy Search will be conducted across two databases—PubMed and Europe PMC—to collect articles containing the keywords ‘surgical intervention for endometrioma, ovarian reserve, pregnancy rates, fertilityʼ published between January 1, 2000, and October 30, 2023. Eligibility Criteria for Articles of Inclusion The articles will be limited to those written in English and only full research articles will be included. Abstracts presented in scientific meetings will be excluded as well as review articles. Only articles presenting information about surgical intervention for endometrioma and their correlation with infertility parameters will be included. Any articles describing conservative treatment for endometrioma will be also excluded. To avoid bias, articles that refer to the combined treatment of endometrioma will be also considered. Data Extraction Specific data will be extracted from each publication in duplicate, including publication date, authorship, studied population, methodologies employed, criteria for inclusion or exclusion I/E, sample type, and primary outcome measures. Safety warnings None to declare. Ethics statement Not applicable. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 4/11

Introduction

1 Introduction Endometriosis, growing outside the uterus, takes various forms, including peritoneal lesions, ovarian cysts (endometrioma), deep-seated variants, and extrapelvic involvement. The retrograde menstruation hypothesis suggested backward movement of endometrial tissue through fallopian tubes, settling in the pelvis, causing inflammation and adhesions. Current research explores genetic and epigenetic origins, focusing on intracellular aromatase activity. This updated perspective investigates genetics, gene expression, and cellular activity, particularly aromatase. Its manifestation includes not only pain, but disrupts also everyday life, having negative impact to infertility. Despite affecting 610% of women in their reproductive years, 50% of those seeking fertility treatment hide endometriosis lesions. Statistics suggest that approximately 1744% of women diagnosed with endometriosis will experience an endometrioma, the most prevalent form of endometriosis manifestation. These lesions, colloquially known as "chocolate cysts," owe their name to the dark brown fluid they contain. Beyond their appearance, endometriomas signal a more severe state of the disease in individuals with endometriosis. Research on endometrioma's effect on ovarian reserve, specifically concerning serum anti-Müllerian hormone AMH) levels, has conflicting findings. Some studies indicate a decrease in AMH levels among women with endometriomas, while others find no significant differences compared to control groups. To reach a conclusive understanding, more extensive and prolonged investigations are essential. Surgical interventions, notably excision of the cyst's capsule (cystectomy), show a potential to improve post-operative pregnancy rates compared to drainage and ablative methods. Yet, the delicate ovarian tissue and follicles face possible harm from surgical excision. Fears of ovarian protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 5/11 failure after cystectomy have led healthcare providers to embrace ablative approaches. In this approach, rather than entirely removing it, the "pseudo-capsule" undergoes ablation using energy sources with limited thermal dispersion. A new approach, the 'one step' or 'three step' laser vaporization, employing CO2 laser technology, Looks as a promising option by minimizing energy usage and consequently decreasing potential damage. It offers hope in preserving fertility while effectively managing endometrioma. Another alternative is sclerotherapy, aiming to eliminate the pseudocapsule of an endometrioma by introducing alcoholic substances into it. This

Method

is regarded as a cost-effective and safe way to protect healthy ovarian tissue. The procedure involves injecting a sclerosing substance directly into the cyst, followed by rinsing or retaining it. Hydrosoluble dehydrating antiseptic fluids can alter the proteins in microorganism envelopes and dissolve the lipids of their capsules. Ethanol is often chosen for its superior track record in managing renal and hepatic cysts.

Material and methods

2 The conduct of this systematic review will adhere to the guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA Statement. Data sources and Search Strategy Search will be conducted across two databases—PubMed and Europe PMC—to collect articles containing the keywords ‘surgical intervention for endometrioma, ovarian reserve, pregnancy rates, fertilityʼ published between January 1, 2000, and October 30, 2023. Eligibility Criteria for Articles of Inclusion The articles will be limited to those written in English and only full research articles will be included. Abstracts presented in scientific meetings will be excluded as well as review articles. Only articles presenting information about surgical intervention for endometrioma and their correlation with infertility parameters will be included. Any articles describing conservative treatment for endometrioma will be also excluded. To protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 6/11 avoid bias, articles that refer to the combined treatment of endometrioma will be also considered. Data Extraction Specific data will be extracted from each publication in duplicate, including publication date, authorship, studied population, methodologies employed, criteria for inclusion or exclusion I/E, sample type, and primary outcome measures.

Results

3 Results will be presented in a standardized fashion and the publication and author data, demographics, metrics, and key findings of the included studies will be tabulated to optimize readability.

Discussion

4 A critical appraisal of the included studies will be undertaken.

Conclusion

5 In this section, we will recapitulate the key findings of our research. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 7/11 Protocol references 1. Kheil MH, Sharara FI, Ayoubi JM, Rahman S, Moawad G. Endometrioma and assisted reproductive technology: a review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Feb;39228390. 2. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;38213124456. 3. Saunders PTK, Horne AW. Endometriosis: Etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. 2021 Dec 27;18411280724. 4. Meggyesy M, Friese M, Gottschalk J, Kehler U. Case Report of Cerebellar Endometriosis. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;8143726. 5. Hoyle AT, Puckett Y. Endometrioma. In: StatPearls Internet]. Treasure Island FL StatPearls Publishing; 2024 [cited 2024 May 11. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559230/ 6. Younis JS, Nelson SM. What is the recommended management of a young woman with an intact endometrioma desiring future fertility? Front Endocrinol Internet]. 2022 Nov 10 [cited 2024 May 11;13. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2022.1005597/full 7. Dunselman G a. J, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, DʼHooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2014 Mar;29340012. 8. Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, et al. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus ‘one-stepʼ laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2018 Dec 1;3312220511. 9. Candiani M, Ottolina J, Salmeri N, DʼAlessandro S, Tandoi I, Bartiromo L, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for ovarian endometriosis as a mean of improving fertility: Cystectomy vs. CO2 fiber laser ablation what do we know so far? Front Surg. 2023;101147877. 10.Ronsini C, Iavarone I, Braca E, Vastarella MG, De Franciscis P, Torella M. The Efficiency of Sclerotherapy for the Management of Endometrioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Fertility Outcomes. Medicina Mex. 2023 Sep 11;5991643. 11. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;20222hoac009. 12.Kwon SK, Kim SH, Yun SC, Kim DY, Chae HD, Kim CH, et al. Decline of serum antimüllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma and other benign cysts: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2014 Feb;101243541. 13. Kovačević VM, Anđelić LM, Mitrović Jovanović A. Changes in serum antimüllerian hormone levels in patients 6 and 12 months after endometrioma stripping surgery. Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;1106117380. 14.Bhat RG, Dhulked S, Ramachandran A, Bhaktha R, Vasudeva A, Kumar P, et al. Laparoscopic cystectomy of endometrioma: Good surgical technique does not adversely affect ovarian reserve. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;721259. 15. Hosseinimousa S, Safdarian L, Aleyasin A, Aghahosseini M, Talebian M. Can Laparoscopic Cystectomy Improve Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometrioma? A Prospective Clinical Trial Study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug 21;16320610. 16.Tsolakidis D, Pados G, Vavilis D, Athanatos D, Tsalikis T, Giannakou A, et al. The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage management in patients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jun;941717. 17. Zhang CH, Wu L, Li PQ. Clinical study of the impact on ovarian reserve by different hemostasis methods in laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;55450711. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 8/11 18.Liang Y, Yang X, Lan Y, Lei L, Li Y, Wang S. Effect of Endometrioma cystectomy on cytokines of follicular fluid and IVF outcomes. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Oct 21;1298. 19. Celik HG, Dogan E, Okyay E, Ulukus C, Saatli B, Uysal S, et al. Effect of laparoscopic excision of endometriomas on ovarian reserve: serial changes in the serum antimüllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97614728. 20.Hwu YM, Wu FSY, Li SH, Sun FJ, Lin MH, Lee RKK. The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE. 2011 Jun 9;980. 21.Harada M, Takahashi N, Hirata T, Koga K, Fujii T, Osuga Y. Laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma does not exert a qualitative effect on ovarian function: insights from in vitro fertilization and single embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 May;3256859. 22.Anh ND, Ha NTT, Tri NM, Huynh DK, Dat DT, Thuong PTH, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up Of Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels After Laparoscopic Endometrioma Cystectomy. Int J Med Sci. 2022;1946518. 23.Shaltout MF, Elsheikhah A, Maged AM, Elsherbini MM, Zaki SS, Dahab S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a new technique for laparoscopic management of ovarian endometriosis preventing recurrence and keeping ovarian reserve. J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jul 20;12166. 24.Esinler I, Bozdag G, Aybar F, Bayar U, Yarali H. Outcome of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after laparoscopic cystectomy for endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jun;85617305. 25.Tang Y, Chen SL, Chen X, He YX, Ye DS, Guo W, et al. Ovarian damage after laparoscopic endometrioma excision might be related to the size of cyst. Fertil Steril. 2013 Aug;10024649. 26.Kitajima M, Matsumoto K, Murakami N, Harada A, Kitajima Y, Masuzaki H, et al. Ovarian reserve after three‐step laparoscopic surgery for endometriomas utilizing dienogest: A pilot study. Reprod Med Biol. 2020 Sep 13;19442531. 27.Urman B, Alper E, Yakin K, Oktem O, Aksoy S, Alatas C, et al. Removal of unilateral endometriomas is associated with immediate and sustained reduction in ovarian reserve. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Aug;2722126. 28.Fakehi M, Davari Tanha F, Asgari Z, Mohazzab A, Ghaemi M. Risk Factors for Anti Mullerian Hormone Decline after Laparoscopic Excision of Endometrioma: A Prospective Study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug 21;16316771. 29.Bourdon M, Raad J, Dahan Y, Marcellin L, Maignien C, Even M, et al. Endometriosis and ART A prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation. PLoS ONE. 2018 Aug 20;138e0202399. 30.Uncu G, Kasapoglu I, Ozerkan K, Seyhan A, Oral Yilmaztepe A, Ata B. Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2013 Aug;28821405. 31.Muzii L, Achilli C, Lecce F, Bianchi A, Franceschetti S, Marchetti C, et al. Second surgery for recurrent endometriomas is more harmful to healthy ovarian tissue and ovarian reserve than first surgery. Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103373843. 32. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Auber M, Marpeau L, Puscasiu L. Antimullerian Hormone Level and Endometrioma Ablation Using Plasma Energy. JSLS. 2014;183e2014.00002. 33.Lockyer EK, Schreurs A, Lier M, Dekker J, Melgers I, Mijatovic V. Treatment of ovarian endometriomas using plasma energy in endometriosis surgery: effect on pelvic pain, return to work, pregnancy and cyst recurrence. Facts Views Vis ObGyn. 2019 Mar;1114955. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 9/11 34.Roman H, Quibel S, Auber M, Muszynski H, Huet E, Marpeau L, et al. Recurrences and fertility after endometrioma ablation in women with and without colorectal endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2015 Mar;30355868. 35.Saito N, Yamashita Y, Okuda K, Kokunai K, Terai Y, Ohmichi M. Comparison of the impact of laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy and vaporization on postoperative serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Feb;111239. 36. Var T, Batioglu S, Tonguc E, Kahyaoglu I. The effect of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus coagulation in bilateral endometriomas on ovarian reserve as determined by antral follicle count and ovarian volume: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun;957224750. 37.Alborzi S, Momtahan M, Parsanezhad ME, Dehbashi S, Zolghadri J, Alborzi S. A prospective, randomized study comparing laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus fenestration and coagulation in patients with endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82616337. 38.Roman H, Auber M, Mokdad C, Martin C, Diguet A, Marpeau L, et al. Ovarian endometrioma ablation using plasma energy versus cystectomy: a step toward better preservation of the ovarian parenchyma in women wishing to conceive. Fertil Steril. 2011 Dec;9661396400. 39.Chen J, Huang D, Zhang J, Shi L, Li J, Zhang S. The effect of laparoscopic excisional and ablative surgery on ovarian reserve in patients with endometriomas. Medicine Baltimore). 2021 Feb 19;1007e24362. 40.Rius M, Gracia M, Ros C, Martínez-Zamora MÁ, deGuirior C, Quintas L, et al. Impact of endometrioma surgery on ovarian reserve: a prospective, randomized, pilot study comparing stripping with CO2 laser vaporization in patients with bilateral endometriomas. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun 11;4860300060520927627. 41. Muzii L, Achilli C, Bergamini V, Candiani M, Garavaglia E, Lazzeri L, et al. Comparison between the stripping technique and the combined excisional/ablative technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a multicentre RCT. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2016 Feb;31233944. 42. Miquel L, Preaubert L, Gnisci A, Resseguier N, Pivano A, Perrin J, et al. Endometrioma ethanol sclerotherapy could increase IVF live birth rate in women with moderate-severe endometriosis. PloS One. 2020;159e0239846. 43.Hsieh CL, Shiau CS, Lo LM, Hsieh TT, Chang MY. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided aspiration and sclerotherapy with 95% ethanol for treatment of recurrent ovarian endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;916270913. 44.André GM, Vilarino FL, Christofolini DM, Bianco B, Barbosa CP. Aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy to treat recurrent ovarian endometriomas prior to in vitro fertilization - a pilot study. Einstein Sao Paulo Braz. 2011 Dec;944948. 45.Aflatoonian A, Rahmani E, Rahsepar M. Assessing the efficacy of aspiration and ethanol injection in recurrent endometrioma before IVF cycle: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Mar;113179 84. 46.Crestani A, Merlot B, Dennis T, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Roman H. Impact of Laparoscopic Sclerotherapy for Ovarian Endometriomas on Ovarian Reserve. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023 Jan;301328. 47. Ghasemi Tehrani H, Tavakoli R, Hashemi M, Haghighat S. Ethanol Sclerotherapy versus Laparoscopic Surgery in Management of Ovarian Endometrioma; a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022;101e55. 48.Lee KH, Kim CH, Lee YJ, Kim SH, Chae HD, Kang BM. Surgical resection or aspiration with ethanol sclerotherapy of endometrioma before in vitro fertilization in infertilie women with endometrioma. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 Jul;574297303. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 10/11 49.Alborzi S, Askary E, Keramati P, Moradi Alamdarloo S, Poordast T, Ashraf MA, et al. Assisted reproductive technique outcomes in patients with endometrioma undergoing sclerotherapy vs laparoscopic cystectomy: Prospective cross-sectional study. Reprod Med Biol. 2021 Jul;20331320. 50.Yamamoto S, Umeki M, Maeda T, Yamaguchi M, Hamano T. Poor pregnancy outcome following assisted reproductive technology among women operated on for bilateral endometriomas. Reprod Med Biol. 2010 Mar;91439. protocols.io | https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.kqdg3227pv25/v1 October 16, 2024 11/11

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometriomainfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK