Abstract
There has been a fast-paced research effort on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in facilitating organisms’ capacity to cope with rapid environmental change, highlighted by several recent reviews and special issues on this topic. What is important, along with this momentum, is to pause and reflect on both the promises and challenges of linking detailed molecular mechanisms to broad patterns of population responses. Such reflection involves considering how different epigenetic mechanisms operate, depend on genomic context and taxonomic variation in function, the stability and persistence of epigenetic marks, and approaches to measuring these phenomena in natural populations. Here, we discuss in further detail these complexities, and in so doing bring a critical perspective on both the promise and limitations of studies considering epigenetic mechanisms as a driver of climate change adaptation. We provide practical suggestions for future studies that consider how both fundamental biology and methodological issues guide the design of ecological epigenomic studies. Collectively, we advocate for an interdisciplinary approach, where insights from molecular biology and evolutionary ecology, and close interaction between theoretical models and empirical tests, are important for advancing this field.
Full text
2,149 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
There has been a fast-paced research effort on the role of epigenetic mechanisms in facilitating organisms’ capacity to cope with rapid environmental change, highlighted by several recent reviews and special issues on this topic. What is important, along with this momentum, is to pause and reflect on both the promises and challenges of linking detailed molecular mechanisms to broad patterns of population responses. Such reflection involves considering how different epigenetic mechanisms operate, depend on genomic context and taxonomic variation in function, the stability and persistence of epigenetic marks, and approaches to measuring these phenomena in natural populations. Here, we discuss in further detail these complexities, and in so doing bring a critical perspective on both the promise and limitations of studies considering epigenetic mechanisms as a driver of climate change adaptation. We provide practical suggestions for future studies that consider how both fundamental biology and methodological issues guide the design of ecological epigenomic studies. Collectively, we advocate for an interdisciplinary approach, where insights from molecular biology and evolutionary ecology, and close interaction between theoretical models and empirical tests, are important for advancing this field.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X28W9G
Animal Sciences, Biology, Environmental Studies, Genetics and Genomics, Life Sciences, Research Methods in Life Sciences
Published: 2026-04-22 15:38
Last Updated: 2026-04-22 15:38
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
epigenetics, DNA methylation, histone modification, climate change adaptation, plasticity
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.