Abstract
This study investigates the pollution factors present in the water of the Al-Shatrah Stream, focusing on identifying the health risks associated with these factors. To achieve this objective, the researcher employed the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) as a tool for classifying and examining the impact of spatial and seasonal variations on pollution levels. The study analyzed nine indicators, including physical and chemical parameters such as temperature, turbidity, pH, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, chlorides, sulfates, and alkalinity. Additionally, a bacteriological analysis was conducted to assess the presence of fecal coliform bacteria at three sites along the stream during the months of February and July. The researcher employed statistical analysis to calculate the arithmetic mean and standard deviation of the measured values, both temporally and spatially. Variations between sites were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the least significant difference test was applied at a significance level of 0.05 for all indicators. The findings from the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) analysis are concerning, as they indicate that the water quality of the Al-Shatrah Stream is subpar and unsuitable for human consumption. The CWQI equation, a widely accepted and reliable method for assessing water quality, has classified the sampled sites along the stream as having poor water quality.
Full text
6,613 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Evaluating the water quality of al-Shatrah stream using the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) in Dhi Qar Governorate | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 19 May 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Evaluating the water quality of al-Shatrah stream using the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) in Dhi Qar Governorate Author : Ali Abdul Wahhab Majeed 0000-0002-6430-3479 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174763648.82786739/v1 89 views 56 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This study investigates the pollution factors present in the water of the Al-Shatrah Stream, focusing on identifying the health risks associated with these factors. To achieve this objective, the researcher employed the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) as a tool for classifying and examining the impact of spatial and seasonal variations on pollution levels. The study analyzed nine indicators, including physical and chemical parameters such as temperature, turbidity, pH, total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, chlorides, sulfates, and alkalinity. Additionally, a bacteriological analysis was conducted to assess the presence of fecal coliform bacteria at three sites along the stream during the months of February and July. The researcher employed statistical analysis to calculate the arithmetic mean and standard deviation of the measured values, both temporally and spatially. Variations between sites were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the least significant difference test was applied at a significance level of 0.05 for all indicators. The findings from the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) analysis are concerning, as they indicate that the water quality of the Al-Shatrah Stream is subpar and unsuitable for human consumption. The CWQI equation, a widely accepted and reliable method for assessing water quality, has classified the sampled sites along the stream as having poor water quality. Supplementary Material File (evaluating the water quality of al-shatrah stream using the canadian water quality index.docx) Download 81.68 KB File (pictures and figures.docx) Download 690.03 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 19 May 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Keywords (water quality water characteristics water pollution) water quality indicator Authors Affiliations Ali Abdul Wahhab Majeed 0000-0002-6430-3479 [email protected] Al Iraqia University View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 89 views 56 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation Ali Abdul Wahhab Majeed. Evaluating the water quality of al-Shatrah stream using the Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) in Dhi Qar Governorate. Authorea . 19 May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174763648.82786739/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.174763648.82786739/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'a026b679c93852ad',t:'MTc3OTkwMjY2Mg=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.