SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential and rural-urban disease burden disparities across Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi, March 2020 — May 2021

Purpose To quantify and compare SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential across Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi and selected counties with populations in the 50th, 75th, and 100th percentile. Methods To determine the time-varying reproduction number R t of SARS-CoV-2, we applied the R package EpiEstim to the time series of daily incidence of confirmed cases. Median R t percentage change when policies changed was determined. Linear regression was performed between log 10 -transformed cumulative incidence and log 10 -transformed population size at four time points. Results Stay-at-home orders, face mask mandates, and vaccinations were associated with the most significant reductions in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the three southern states. R t across the three states decreased significantly by 20% following stay-at-home orders. We observed varying degrees of reductions in R t across states following other policies. Rural Alabama counties experienced higher per capita cumulative cases relative to urban ones as of June 17 and October 17, 2020. Meanwhile, Louisiana and Mississippi saw the disproportionate impact of SARS-CoV-2 in rural counties compared to urban ones throughout the study period. Conclusion State and county policies had an impact on local pandemic trajectories. The rural-urban disparities in case burden call for evidence-based approaches in tailoring health promotion interventions and vaccination campaigns to rural residents.