A Large Language Model For Clinical Outcomes Adjudication from Telephone Follow-up Interviews: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
This paper reports a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial, evaluating a large language model for adjudicating clinical outcomes using telephone follow-up interviews. The study leverages the released code and experimental setup to reproduce the model-based outcome adjudication, and the key finding is that the model can be used to automate outcome adjudication from follow-up interview text. A major limitation is that the analysis is tied to the specific trial’s telephone follow-up data and outcome definitions rather than broader real-world adjudication contexts. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,482 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:59:48.016658+00:00