Measuring critical thermal maximum in aquatic ectotherms: a practical guide

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Critical thermal limits, commonly quantified as CTmax (maximum) or CTmin (minimum), are core metrics in the thermal biology of aquatic ectotherms. CTmax, in particular, has recently surged in popularity due to its various applications, including understanding and predicting the responses of animals to climate warming. Despite its growing popularity, there is a limited literature aimed at establishing best practices for designing, running, and reporting CTmax experiments. This lack of standardisation and insufficiently detailed reporting in the literature creates challenges when designing CTmax studies or comparing results across studies. Here, we provide a comprehensive, practical guide for designing and conducting experiments to measure critical thermal limits, with an emphasis on CTmax. Our recommendations cover 12 topic areas including apparatus design, masking (blinding), warming rates, endpoints, replication, and reporting. We include diagrams and photos for designing and building critical thermal limit arenas for field or lab applications. We also provide a reporting checklist as a reference for researchers when carrying out experiments and preparing manuscripts. Future studies incorporating critical thermal limits would benefit from transparent reporting of warming/cooling rates (raw data, supplementary graphs) and photo/video evidence showing arena designs and critical thermal limit endpoints. We also provide directions for empirical research that will help further inform the measurement of critical thermal limits, including on biotic factors like stress and digestion, warming/cooling rates, the effects of body mass on heat transfer, and the physiological mechanisms underlying thermal tolerance.
Full text 2,681 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Critical thermal limits, commonly quantified as CTmax (maximum) or CTmin (minimum), are core metrics in the thermal biology of aquatic ectotherms. CTmax, in particular, has recently surged in popularity due to its various applications, including understanding and predicting the responses of animals to climate warming. Despite its growing popularity, there is a limited literature aimed at establishing best practices for designing, running, and reporting CTmax experiments. This lack of standardisation and insufficiently detailed reporting in the literature creates challenges when designing CTmax studies or comparing results across studies. Here, we provide a comprehensive, practical guide for designing and conducting experiments to measure critical thermal limits, with an emphasis on CTmax. Our recommendations cover 12 topic areas including apparatus design, masking (blinding), warming rates, endpoints, replication, and reporting. We include diagrams and photos for designing and building critical thermal limit arenas for field or lab applications. We also provide a reporting checklist as a reference for researchers when carrying out experiments and preparing manuscripts. Future studies incorporating critical thermal limits would benefit from transparent reporting of warming/cooling rates (raw data, supplementary graphs) and photo/video evidence showing arena designs and critical thermal limit endpoints. We also provide directions for empirical research that will help further inform the measurement of critical thermal limits, including on biotic factors like stress and digestion, warming/cooling rates, the effects of body mass on heat transfer, and the physiological mechanisms underlying thermal tolerance. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X28S69 Subjects Life Sciences, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology, Zoology

Keywords

climate change, heat stress, heat shock, Heat Wave, experimental design, global warming, fish Dates Published: 2025-02-03 14:06 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: Data and analysis code are publicly archived on figshare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28319774.v1 Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00