Generation, Characterization and Comparison of Ovine Induced Pluripotent and Embryonic‑Disc Stem Cells

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,803 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Pluripotent stem cells derived from livestock species represent valuable systems for studying early mammalian development and for establishing renewable, well-defined cell sources; however, direct comparative characterization of distinct pluripotent stem cell platforms in sheep remains limited. In this study, we established and evaluated two ovine pluripotent stem cell types: reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells (siPSCs) and embryonic disc-derived stem cells (sEDSCs). Both siPSCs and sEDSCs exhibited core features of pluripotency, including compact colony morphology, alkaline phosphatase activity, expression of key pluripotency-associated markers, and maintenance of a normal ovine karyotype. Flow cytometry and quantitative RT-PCR analyses revealed broadly overlapping yet distinguishable pluripotency marker expression profiles between the two cell types. Functional pluripotency was confirmed by embryoid body formation and in vitro differentiation into derivatives of all three germ layers. To further assess lineage-specific differentiation competence and compare functional outputs relevant to mesodermal differentiation, both pluripotent stem cell types were directed towards the adipogenic lineage. While siPSCs and sEDSCs were each capable of adipogenic differentiation, differences in differentiation efficiency and marker expression were observed. Together, these findings demonstrate that ovine siPSCs and sEDSCs share core pluripotency characteristics while retaining distinct molecular and functional properties, providing a robust comparative framework for studies of ovine pluripotency, lineage specification, and stem cell biology. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes The author list is now correctly Reordered

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00