Pictorial Essay of Gallium-68-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) in Oncological Malignancies: Clinical Experience at Ocean Road Cancer Institute

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 117,224 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Pictorial Essay of Gallium-68-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) in Oncological Malignancies: Clinical Experience at Ocean Road Cancer Institute | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Pictorial Essay of Gallium-68-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) in Oncological Malignancies: Clinical Experience at Ocean Road Cancer Institute Bright Awadh Sangiwa, Alita Mrema, Faraji Sabaya, Baraka Fundo, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract The type II transmembrane protease known as fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is not present in quiescent fibroblasts but is extensively expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAPI expression has been linked to a bad prognosis and increased treatment resistance. FAPI has demonstrated variable expressions in different tumors; high expression has been observed in desmoplastic tumors, these tumors (such as breast, colon and pancreatic carcinoma) have high concentrations of CAF’s and mesenchymal tumors (such as sarcoma) which express FAP in both CAF’s and tumor cells. FAP demonstrates poor expression in tumors with no significant desmoplastic reaction, such as lymphoma, myeloma, melanoma, RCC, seminoma, and multiple myeloma. Our pictorial review aims to demonstrate FAPI expression of the 68 Ga-FAPI PET performed at our institute. Oncology 68Ga-FAPI PET-CT oncology cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF’s) Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Introduction Cancer remains one of the world's major causes of death, with 20 million new cases and 9 million cancer-related deaths in 2022 [1]. Anatomical and molecular imaging in malignancies is essential to every stage of their treatment. Stroma refers to the supportive, non-parenchymal tissue or fluid within a biological structure, like an organ, tissue, or cell. Its key characteristic includes providing amatrix for other cells and tissues within an organ or structure (supportive framework), it is non-parenchymal as opposed to parenchyma, which performs the specialized functions of the organ or tissue, and has variable composition depending on the specific organ or tissue, including connective tissues, blood vessels, and nerves [2]. Over 90% of the mass in tumors is made up of stroma, which interacts with tumor cells to influence their behavior and plays a critical role in tumor growth and progression [2,3]. A transmembrane glycoprotein, the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is scarce in healthy tissue but highly expressed in stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) [4]. CAFs alter the extracellular matrix and release cytokines and chemokines, which promote tumor development, migration, metastasis, resistance to treatment, and immunosuppression [5]. The studies have also reported that increased FAP expression in tumors is associated with poor prognosis and contributes to resistance to treatment. Current research has been directed towards targeting tumor microenvironment (TME) in tumor stroma that aims at the diagnosis and therapy of different cancers [6]. Quinoline- and non-quinoline-based radioligands are among the FAP-targeting radioligands. The quinoline FAPI 4 has undergone various modifications to produce a class of quinoline-based PET tracers, such as FAPI-02, FAPI-42, FAPI-46, and FAPI-74, which have significant washout after 24 hours and rapid in vivo tumoral uptake (beginning 10 minutes after injection) [7]. The non-quinoline FAPI-2286 has a limited washout (10%) at 48 hours after injection and is based on a seven-amino-acid cyclic peptide with an affinity for FAP in the nanomolar range. It also has a DOTA-chelator for labeling with both therapeutic and diagnostic radioisotopes. [8]. Due in large part to the hepatobiliary excretion of 18 F-labelled FAPI, FAPI labeling with 68 Ga has shown an excellent tracer profile in the clinical environment (high tumor uptake, low background uptake) as compared to 18 F [9]. Patient preparation for FAPI PET imaging does not require caloric fasting, adaptation of anti-diabetic drugs, or avoiding intense exercise during the previous 24 hours before the procedure. Unlike FDG PET imaging, the patient only requires good hydration to aid clearance of the urinary excreted tracer [9]. FAPI has demonstrated variable expressions in different tumors; high expression has been observed in desmoplastic tumors, these tumors (such as breast, colon and pancreatic carcinoma) have high concentrations of CAF’s and mesenchymal tumors (such as sarcoma) which express FAP in both CAF’s and tumor cells. FAP is poorly expressed in tumors with no significant desmoplastic reaction (lymphoma, myeloma, melanoma, RCC, seminoma, multiple myeloma) [10]. Our study aims to provide a pictorial review of FAP expression in different cancers done at our institution. Clinical Applications Up to date, FAPI PET has demonstrated detection of a wide range of malignancies; up to 28 malignancies have been reported so far, including breast, head-and-neck, and GI cancers [11]. When it comes to detecting GI cancers, liver metastases, and other metastatic locations, FAPI PET imaging has an advantage over traditional FDG PET because of its low background [12]. Based on existing evidence, both diagnostic imaging and prospective therapeutic applications are made possible by FAPI labelled radioisotopes; ongoing research will further hone its function in patient management and potential radioligand therapies. Method FAPI is a new radiopharmaceutical in clinical settings; for this, anethics committee approval was obtained. The labelling of FAPI 4 was done exclusively with the 68 Ga radioisotope. PET request forms were reviewed and approved by a nuclear medicine physician for scans. All patients in this review were histologically confirmed cancer patients, and consents for performing 68 Ga-FAPI PET were obtained. 68 Ga PET-CT images were acquired between 10-30 min after the intravenous administration of about 3 mCi to 5 mCi of 68 Ga-FAPI, based on the weight of the patient (0.05–0.06 mCi/kg of body weight). A 3D PET/CT scan was performed from vertex to mid-thigh/feet on a SIEMENS BIOGRAPH mCT-64 slice PET/CT scanner. Multiplanar reformations were then performed on a dedicated workstation. Images and patients’ data were extracted from institutional medical archives PACS. Results Our case series was composed of studies with significant FAPI uptake which indicates malignant disease. These cases have demonstrated the use of FAPI PET in different malignancies in centres with no access to FDG. DISCUSSION In molecular imaging for various cancers, FAPI PET has been described as a potential diagnostic method that performs as well as or better than FDG PET in terms of diagnosis and staging. FAPI PET is backed up with its characteristic low background activity and ability to be expressed not only in the tumor microenvironment but also in cancer cells of certain histopathology, such as mucinous adenocarcinoma and others [ 10 , 11 ]. Most of the existing evidence is delivered from small sample sizes with limited histopathological confirmation; this necessitates additional investigation provided by carefully planned, multicenter, prospective studies with histological validation. Recently, there is an increased wave of clinical application of FAPI PET in tumors that have limitations with FDG PET and demographical areas where FDG production is limited and gallium-based radiopharmaceuticals are being deployed as PET tracers. Clinical data and anatomical imaging correlation are very essential for accurate interpretation of FAPI PET scans; additionally, in order to further guarantee appropriate interpretation in clinical practice, quantitative markers like SUV still require validation. [ 9 ]. Our pictorial overview aims to demonstrate FAPI expressions in the different malignancies as described in recent literature. These scans were performed at our institution as an alternative to FDG PET due to the absence of FDG production at the time when PET-CT scans were requested. Normal Biodistribution The normal biodistribution of 68 Ga-FAPI PET shows a high concentration of activity in the kidneys, urinary bladder (due to excretion) and uterus (see Fig. 1 ). Lower uptake will be noticed in the salivary glands, pancreas, Waldeyer’s ring, breasts, striated muscles, thyroid, prostate, ovaries, testes, adrenal glands, heart, and blood pool. FAP can express a high concentration in the gallbladder, cystic duct, and bile duct with F-18 radiopharmaceutical. Breast Cancer Breast cancer accounts for 11.6% of all cancer cases worldwide, making it the second most prevalent form of cancer in women, and 6.9% of all cancer deaths globally, making it the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. [ 1 ]. Both anatomical and molecular imaging modalities have been deployed in the imaging of breast cancer patients. As regards molecular imaging, FDG PET has been shown to be useful in staging locally advanced disease, inflammatory breast cancer, detecting recurrence, and restaging [ 13 ]. FDG PET provides information on extra axillary nodes and distant metastases (chest, abdomen and bone) which refines the prognostic stratification and influences management. Breast cancer is among desmoplastic tumors, which usually express high cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF’s) present in the stroma [ 14 ]. FAPI PET has shown promising performance in breast cancer for detection of primary tumors and metastatic lesions (Figs. 1 and 2 ), showing FAPI avidity that is comparably higher than or equal to that observed in traditional F-FDG PET [ 15 ]. The study by Ji Bin et al. [ 16 ] on the comparison of 18 F-FDG PET and 18 F-FAPI PET in the systemic staging of 38 patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer (stage IIb -IIIc), found that there was an overall detection rate in upstaging of 47.4% vs. 34.2%, unexpected extra nodal disease of 97.6% vs. 52.4% (P < 0.001) and distant metastases of 98.1% vs. 67.3% (P < 0.001), for FAPI PET and FDG PET, respectively. Our breast cancer cases for restaging (Fig. 2 ) and for recurrence (Fig. 3 ) demonstrated 68 Ga-FAPI PET in breast tumors and distant metastases. Soft Tissue Sarcoma Sarcomas are a class of tumors with over 150 subtypes that develop from soft tissue and bone connective tissue. These tumors are rare and express heterogeneity, and subtypes include low-grade, intermediate, or unpredicted tumors. The median overall survival period for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma is 12–18 months, which is a bad prognosis [ 17 ]. Numerous clinical studies have lately shown that FAPI uptake is high in a variety of solid tumors, including sarcomas [ 18 ]. Histogenesis-specific FAPI expression in sub-entities of several sarcomas has been reported; however, FAPI uptake has shown high intensity in intratumoral assessment [ 19 , 20 ]. FAPI PET imaging has shown good performance for accurate diagnosis and its potential as an imaging modality in advanced-stage disease; this plays a significant role in the selection of patients for ongoing FAPI radioligand therapy trials [ 21 ]. Our illustrated case (Fig. 4 ) shows intense FAPI uptake in the primary tumor and metastatic nodal disease; this case demonstrates high avidity of FAPI in sarcoma and potential FAPI radioligand therapy in advanced cases. Laryngeal Cancer Any region of the larynx, but particularly the glottis, can develop laryngeal carcinoma, a common respiratory malignancy [ 22 ]. The most common histotype is squamous cell carcinoma, and the risk of recurrence and/or death is high. Convectional imaging (CT, MRI) as well as molecular imaging with FDG PET have been used for accurate staging. FDG PET has been shown to be favorable for local tumor characterization, regional nodal disease, and distant metastasis at initial staging as well as treatment response assessment [ 23 , 24 ]. Current studies have reported a higher detection rate of FAPI PET imaging compared to FDG PET imaging in head and neck malignancies in both primary and nodal disease; this advantage is significantly contributed to by the minimal background activity observed in FAPI PET imaging [ 25 ]. Xia R et al. studied patients who had pathologically confirmed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma with both FAPI PET and FDG PET imaging. In terms of tumor identification, staging, and delineation, FAPI PET imaging was reported to perform better than FDG PET imaging (100% FAPI vs. 85.7% FDG) [ 26 ]. 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT (Fig. 5 ) shows strong tracer uptake in the primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Thymoma Thymomas, which make up between 0.2% and 1.5% of all malignant neoplasms, are the most common kind of mediastinal epithelial tumors. They make up 20% of all adult mediastinal neoplasms and are frequently the cause of anterior mediastinal masses [ 27 ]. Because of their variability and the danger of making predictions about their prognosis based on particular cell types, thymoma categorization has largely been a contentious issue. In 2021, the WHO classified thymomas into several subtypes (Type A, AB, B1, B2-formerly thymoma, B3-formerly atypical thymoma and thymic carcinoma ) , their classification was based on their microscopic appearance, primarily focusing on the types of cells present and their relative proportions [ 28 ]. The study by Xiuling S. et al [ 29 ], looked at the evaluation of thymic epithelial tumors using 68 Ga-FAPI PET and 18 F-FDG PET. Findings showed that 68 Ga-FAPI PET was superior to 18 F-FDG PET in differentiating thymomas from thymic carcinomas (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.90, P = 0.02), higher specificity in detecting nodal metastasis (67% vs 93%, P < 0.001) and higher sensitivity in detecting distant metastases (49% vs 97%, P < 0.001). FAPI avidity also correlated with both SUVmax and tumor-mediastinal ratio (both r = 0.843, P < 0.001). Figure 6 is our case demonstrating FAPI avidity of the superior anterior mass (primary disease) and metastatic disease (skeletal with soft tissue components and abdominal soft tissue mass). Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP) A tumor that causes metastatic disease and is found using a standardized diagnostic workup in the hunt for the concealed primary is characterized as a carcinoma of unknown primary [ 30 ]. Although CUP makes up 5% of all cancers, its poor prognosis with a median survival of 6 to 9 months makes it a greater cause of cancer-related deaths. There are 15% squamous cell carcinomas, 5% undifferentiated neoplasms, and 50% well-differentiated to moderately-differentiated adenocarcinomas and 30% poorly-differentiated or undifferentiated adenocarcinomas in the histology [ 31 ]. CUP diagnostics involves a vigorous search for the hidden primary cancer, with CT, MRI, and FDG PET currently being the preferred imaging modalities. FAPI PET imaging has recently shown excellent performance in the detection of disease in oncology; a systematic review by Justine M. et al. [ 32 ] looked at the role of FAPI in CUP, both in head and neck malignancy as well as general CUP. The study found that both SUVmax and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) on FAPI PET for primary disease were high for general CUP, at 9.6 and 6.7, respectively. When comparing FAPI PET to FDG PET, SUVmax and TBR for metastatic lymph nodes were 9.2 vs. 7.9 (p = 0.03) and 9.1 vs. 4.9 (p < 0.01), respectively. These results indicated increased sensitivity in identifying primary tumors and metastatic lesions, which could lead to better diagnostic precision, especially when current imaging modalities are inadequate. Our case of CUP (Fig. 7 ) showed FAPI-avid disease involving the liver, head and uncinate process of the pancreas, and third part of the duodenum. Cancer of Cervix Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide and the most common malignancy detected in women. Many cases occur in the low- to middle-income nations (131.1 per 100,000 women in 2020) and mortality (90% of global deaths in 2020); this phenomenon is caused by low coverage of extensive screening services and lack of adequate and timely treatment with curative intent [ 33 , 34 ]. When it comes to cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, both radiological and molecular imaging have been crucial, ultrasound and MRI for primary staging, and CT and/or FDG PET for assessing extra pelvic spread in advanced local and metastatic disease [ 35 ]. Current literature has reported the application of FAPI in gynecological carcinomas, including a systematic literature review and meta-analysis by Anita F. et al. [ 36 ] that compares FAPI PET and FDG PET in these cancers, as well as interest in cervical tumors. For primary disease detection, both tracers demonstrated a detection rate of 96 to 100%; however, the nodal detection rate was higher with FAPI PET compared to FDG PET, while there was no statistically significant difference for non-peritoneal metastases. Our case (Fig. 8 ) demonstrates metastatic lesions (pulmonary and nodal) in a cervical cancer patient. Colorectal Cancer The second most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most prevalent cancer is colorectal cancer (CRC) [ 1 ]. The overall 5-year survival percentage for early-stage disease, which is frequently treated with the goal of curing it, ranges from 80% to 90%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for advanced disease, when systemic therapy is the primary treatment, is only 13% [ 37 ]. CRC staging is essential for choosing a successful treatment strategy that will enhance patient outcomes. FDG PET is currently the preferred molecular imaging technique for tumor staging; nevertheless, due to physiological FDG uptake in the colon and in tumor histology types such as mucinous, its diagnostic accuracy in colorectal cancer is frequently limited. There have been numerous studies that compare FAPI PET and FDG PET side by side; a study by Komek et al [ 38 ], reported the specificity and overall accuracy of FAPI PET/CT were superior to those of FDG PET. The study by Erol et al. [ 39 ] showed FDG PET exhibited high uptake in tubular and tubulovillous adenomas, whereas FAPI PET showed no abnormal uptake, suggesting that FAPI PET may aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors. Regarding tracer uptake in primary CRC, this remains inconsistent across the existing literature, possibly contributed to by histopathological subtypes. This is demonstrated in the study by Lin et al [ 40 ] which compared FAPI PET to FDG PET. The findings showed higher FAPI SUVmax in signet-ring and mucinous carcinomas but lower FAPI uptake in poorly differentiated carcinomas. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94–1.00) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.23–1.00), respectively, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis by Jiqi Ouyang [ 43 ]. In contrast, the results for 18 F-FDG PET/CT were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60–0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.52–0.95). While both imaging modalities exhibited nearly equal diagnostic efficacy in colorectal cancer, 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT performed better for certain tumors, especially in gastric, liver, biliary tract, and pancreatic malignancies. [ 41 ]. Our cases demonstrate FAPI uptake in both primary and metastatic disease in rectal (Fig. 9 ) and colon cancer (Fig. 10 ). Bladder Cancer Bladder cancer (BCa) is among the most aggressive and potentially life-threatening diseases. According to Globocan 2022, bladder cancer has moved from the 10th to the 9th as one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, with increasing incidence and mortality. It is reported to be the 6th most common cancer among men. Urothelial carcinoma makes up 90% of bladder cancer, with the remaining 10% consisting of less prevalent histologies such lymphomas, adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell carcinoma [ 42 ]. Bladder cancer can be classified as carcinoma in situ, invasive BCa, muscle-invasive BCa (MIBC), or non-muscle-invasive BCa (NMIBC) based on its variable morphology that changes with tumor growth and progression [ 43 ]. Radiological workup strategies have included ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for initial diagnosis (conjunction with cystoscopy and biopsy), tumor invasion, and assessment of distant disease [ 44 ]. In addition, molecular imaging with FDG PET has shown a limited role in primary tumor assessment due to urogenital excretion of the tracer causing masking of tumors in the urinary tract [ 45 ], A meta-analysis study by Wang N et al. [ 46 ] found that FDG PET was not superior to CT and MRI in detecting local BC; FDG PET showed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI: 71.0–87.0%) and 84.0% (95% CI: 69.0–93.0%), respectively. Current literature indicates that small cohort studies have compared FAPI PET to traditional FDG PET in BCa; FAPI PET, however, shows promise as a diagnostic radioligand for identifying distant disease and primary tumors in individuals with bladder cancer [ 47 ]. Figure 11 demonstrates tracer uptake suggestive of distant metastases (skeletal and pulmonary) in a BCa on 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT. Neuroendocrine tumor A rare and diverse class of cancers, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) typically develop in the lungs and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract [ 48 ]. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), more often type 2, are overexpressed on the cell membrane of these malignancies [ 48 ]. Recently, there has been increased early detection of NETs, which has given room for better and improved management, leading to longer survival in these patients. Molecular imaging has been a key imaging modality in the management of NETs, where FDG PET is used for poorly differentiated NETs and SSTRI PET is used for well-differentiated tumors, while a dual imaging method is used to study tumor behaviour and for assessment prior to radioligand therapy [ 49 ]. There is an association between dual imaging with prognosis and overall survival in patients with NETs, typically divided into three groups: patients with only FDG PET positive lesions, patients with positive lesions on both FDG and SSTRI PET, and those with SSTRI negative/FDG positive (significant discordant is observed in multiple lesions), the last category of patients tends to have poor prognosis and overall survival [ 50 ]. Studies have assessed the role of FAPI PET as a prognostic marker compared to traditional FDG PET, and a study by Kerstin M. et al. [ 51 ] assessed the outcome prediction in patients with high-grade NETs. The study found that there was no significant difference in the quantitative analysis of both tracers; tumor heterogeneity with discordant FDG-positive/FAPI negative lesions in substantial fraction of patients (45%), also median PFS of patients with FDG positive /FAPI negative lesions was significantly shorter (4 months) than that of patients without FDG-positive/FAPI-negative metastases (9 months). These findings could help guide treatment decisions or identify lesions for additional stereotactic approaches. Our case (Fig. 12 ) was a patient with NET who had a previous negative SSTRI PET; 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT was done to assess tumor heterogeneity for restaging. Limitations This study is limited by lack of histopathological confirmation of FAPI avid lesions. Conclusion This study aims to provide our clinical experience of this new tracer and its applicability in different cancers What is already known on this topic Role of 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT in different cancers Comparison of FAPI PET to traditional FDG PET in detection of tumors and metastatic disease. What this study adds First case series to report clinical experience of role of 68 Ga-FAPI PET-CT in different tumors in the region; the study will communicate the experiences and challenges which will accelerate the use of FAPI PET/CT modality in our settings. Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interest Authors’ contributions Bright Awadh Sangiwa was responsible for study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. Alita Mrema, Faraji Sabaya, Baraka Fundo, Swahibu Ramadhani and Brown Mwangosi were responsible for data collecton, analysis and manuscript editing. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript. Acknowledgment The authors would like to thank all the referring oncologists inside and outside our institute who were involved in the management of cases presented in our review for allowing FAPI PET scans in the investigation of their patients. Special thanks to all nuclear medicine colleagues for their participation in each step to the accomplishment of these scans. Declarations The authors certify that they have obtained ethical approval. A waiver of informed consent was granted as a retrospective pictorial study that imposes no risk to the subjects. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interest References Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2024 May;74(3):229-63. Grisendi G, Bussolari R, Veronesi E, Piccinno S, Burns JS, De Santis G, Loschi P, Pignatti M, Di Benedetto F, Ballarin R, Di Gregorio C. Understanding tumor-stroma interplays for targeted therapies by armed mesenchymal stromal progenitors: the Mesenkillers. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2011 May 28;1(6):787. Szot C, Saha S, Zhang XM, Zhu Z, Hilton MB, Morris K, Seaman S, Dunleavey JM, Hsu KS, Yu GJ, Morris H. Tumor stroma–targeted antibody-drug conjugate triggers localized anticancer drug release. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2018 Jul 2;128(7):2927-43. Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. PROTEOMICS–Clinical Applications. 2014 Jun;8(5-6):454-63. Caligiuri G, Tuveson DA. Activated fibroblasts in cancer: Perspectives and challenges. Cancer cell. 2023 Mar 13;41(3):434-49. Li M., Younis MH., Zhang Y., Cai W., Lan X. Clinical summary of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals: cancer and beyond. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2022 Jul;49(8):2844-68. Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Jäger D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2018 Sep 1;59(9):1415-22. Zboralski D, Hoehne A, Bredenbeck A, Schumann A, Nguyen M, Schneider E, Ungewiss J, Paschke M, Haase C, von Hacht JL, Kwan T. Preclinical evaluation of FAP-2286 for fibroblast activation protein-targeted radionuclide imaging and therapy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2022 Sep;49(11):3651-67. Hope TA, Calais J, Goenka AH, Haberkorn U, Konijnenberg M, McConathy J, Oprea-Lager DE, Trimnal L, Zan E, Herrmann K, Deroose CM. SNMMI procedure standard/EANM practice guideline for fibroblast activation protein (FAP) PET. Mona CE, Benz MR, Hikmat F, Grogan TR, Lueckerath K, Razmaria A, Riahi R, Slavik R, Girgis MD, Carlucci G, Kelly KA. Correlation of 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution with FAP expression by immunohistochemistry in patients with solid cancers: interim analysis of a prospective translational exploratory study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2022 Jul 1;63(7):1021-6. Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, Röhrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Jun 1;60(6):801-5. Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, Marschalek MM, Loktev A, Lehnert W, Debus J, Jäger D, Flechsig P, Altmann A, Mier W. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Mar 1;60(3):386-92. Groheux D, Cochet A, Humbert O, Alberini JL, Hindié E, Mankoff D. 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging of breast cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2016 Feb 1;57(Supplement 1):17S-26S. Kratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, Röhrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Jun 1;60(6):801-5. Taralli S, Lorusso M, Perrone E, Perotti G, Zagaria L, Calcagni ML. PET/CT with fibroblast activation protein inhibitors in breast cancer: diagnostic and theranostic application—a literature review. Cancers. 2023 Jan 31;15(3):908. Bin J, Wenjia L, Wan W, Kaiyin M, Bowen Y, Qichang W, Junzhi L, Shi G. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FAPI PET/CT in systemic staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Academic Radiology. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):50-7. Casali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JV, Boye K. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):20-33. Ballal S, Yadav MP, Moon ES, Kramer VS, Roesch F, Kumari S, Tripathi M, ArunRaj ST, Sarswat S, Bal C. Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of [68Ga] Ga-DOTA. SA. FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [18F] F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2021 Jun;48(6):1915-31. Dohi O, Ohtani H, Hatori M, Sato E, Hosaka M, Nagura H, Itoi E, Kokubun S. Histogenesis‐specific expression of fibroblast activation protein and dipeptidylpeptidase‐IV in human bone and soft tissue tumours. Histopathology. 2009 Oct;55(4):432-40. Lanzafame H, Mavroeidi IA, Pabst KM, Desaulniers M, Ingenwerth M, Hirmas N, Kessler L, Nader M, Bartel T, Leyser S, Barbato F. 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT improves detection of intermediate and low-grade sarcomas and identifies candidates for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2024 Jun 1;65(6):880-7. A study of 177 Lu-FAP-2286 in advanced solid tumors (LuMIERE). ClinicalTrials.gov website. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04939610. Updated February 6, 2024. Accessed April 9, 2024. Steuer CE, El‐Deiry M, Parks JR, Higgins KA, Saba NF. An update on larynx cancer. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2017 Jan;67(1):31-50. Yongkui L, Jian L, Jingui L. 18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with primary head and neck cancer before treatment: a meta-analysis. Surgical Oncology. 2013 Jun 1;22(2):e11-6. Sun R, Tang X, Yang Y, Zhang C. 18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis. Oral oncology. 2015 Apr 1;51(4):314-20. Jiang Y, Wen B, Li C, Tian Y, Xiao Z, Xu K, Xing D, Yu Z, Huang J, Jia J, He Y. The performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023 Jun;50(7):2114-26. Xia R, Wang X, Cheng J, Li X, Sun J, Zeng Q, Hu D, You J, Xiong Y, Chen X. Head-to-head comparison of [18F] FAPI-42 and [18F] FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2025 Mar 8:1-3. Suster S, Moran CA. Thymoma classification: current status and future trends. American journal of clinical pathology. 2006 Apr 1;125(4):542-54. Tsao MS, Nicholson AG, Maleszewski JJ, Marx A, Travis WD. Reprint of “Introduction to 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors”. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):337-40. Shen X, Zhou X, Yao Y, Meng X, Song Y, Yang Z, Li N. Superiority of [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT to [18F] FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of thymic epithelial tumours. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023 Sep;50(11):3414-24. Krämer A, Bochtler T, Pauli C, Baciarello G, Delorme S, Hemminki K, Mileshkin L, Moch H, Oien K, Olivier T, Patrikidou A. Cancer of unknown primary: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up☆. Annals of Oncology. 2023 Mar 1;34(3):228-46. Pavlidis N, Briasoulis E, Hainsworth J, Greco FA. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. European journal of cancer. 2003 Sep 1;39(14):1990-2005. Maes J, Cleeren F, Goffin K, Dekervel J, Nafteux P, Topal B, Geboes K, Stroobants S, Deroose C. Role of FAPI PET/CT in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): A systematic review. European Journal of Radiology. 2025 Jul 23:112330. Dzinamarira T, Moyo E, Dzobo M, Mbunge E, Murewanhema G. Cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: an urgent call for improving accessibility and use of preventive services. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023 Apr 1;33(4):592-7. Wu J, Jin Q, Zhang Y, Ji Y, Li J, Liu X, Duan H, Feng Z, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Lyu Z. Global burden of cervical cancer: current estimates, temporal trend, and future projections based on the GLOBOCAN 2022. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2025 Jan 23. Cibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, Centeno C, Chargari C, Felix A, Fischerová D, Jahnn-Kuch D, Joly F, Kohler C, Lax S. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer–Update 2023. Virchows Archiv. 2023 Jun;482(6):935-66. Florit, A., de Koster, E.J., Sassano, S., Alic, L., Pisano, G., van Velden, F.H., Annunziata, S., Primac, I., Ruggiero, M.R., Müller, C. and Sala, E., 2025. Head-to-head comparison of fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) radiopharmaceuticals and [ 18 F] FDG in gynaecological malignancies: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, pp.1-15. Biller LH, Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. Jama. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):669-85. Kömek H, Can C, Kaplan I, Gündoğan C, Kepenek F, Karaoglan H, Demirkıran A, Ebinc S, Güzel Y, Gündeş E. Comparison of [68 Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F] FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2022 Sep;49(11):3898-909. Fenercioğlu ÖE, Beyhan E, Şahin R, Baloğlu MC, Arslan E, Çermik TF, Ergül N. The potential role of 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for screening malignancy in suspected colonic lesions. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 2023 Oct 1;44(10):896-9. Lin X, Li Y, Wang S, Zhang Y, Chen X, Wei M, Zhu H, Wu A, Yang Z, Wang X. Diagnostic value of [68Ga] Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [18F] F-FDG PET/CT. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023 Jan 9;12:1087792. Ouyang J, Ding P, Zhang R, Lu Y. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary digestive system cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023 Jun 26;13:1202505. Hilton S, Jones LP. Recent advances in imaging cancer of the kidney and urinary tract. Surgical Oncology Clinics. 2014 Oct 1;23(4):863-910. Lal P. The molecular-morphologic correlates of bladder cancer. Diagnostic Histopathology. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):299-307. Gontero P, Comperat E, Escrig JD, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, van Rhijn BW, Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Shariat SF. EAU guidelines. InEdn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. Vasireddi A, Nguyen NC. PET/CT limitations and pitfalls in urogenital cancers. InSeminars in Nuclear Medicine 2021 Nov 1 (Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 611-620). WB Saunders. Wang N, Jiang P, Lu Y. Is fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography useful for detecting bladder lesions? A meta-analysis of the literature. Urologia internationalis. 2014 Aug 8;92(2):143-9. Novruzov E, Dendl K, Ndlovu H, Choyke PL, Dabir M, Beu M, Novruzov F, Mehdi E, Guliyev F, Koerber SA, Lawal I. Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT in patients with bladder cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 2022 Aug;24(4):651-8. Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):991-1002. Sanli Y, Garg I, Kandathil A, Kendi T, Zanetti MJ, Kuyumcu S, Subramaniam RM. Neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis and management: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018 Aug;211(2):267-77. Chan DL, Pavlakis N, Schembri GP, Bernard EJ, Hsiao E, Hayes A, Barnes T, Diakos C, Khasraw M, Samra J, Eslick E. Dual somatostatin receptor/FDG PET/CT imaging in metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: proposal for a novel grading scheme with prognostic significance. Theranostics. 2017 Mar 1;7(5):1149. Michalski K, Kosmala A, Hartrampf PE, Heinrich M, Serfling SE, Schlötelburg W, Buck AK, Meining A, Werner RA, Weich A. [18F] FDG and [68Ga] Ga-FAPI-04–Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2024 Dec 1;65(12):1899-903. Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8230719","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":552295975,"identity":"764512eb-df48-4067-a30c-1c64a4332f7a","order_by":0,"name":"Bright Awadh Sangiwa","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-3561","institution":"Ocean Road Cancer Institute","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Bright","middleName":"Awadh","lastName":"Sangiwa","suffix":""},{"id":552296101,"identity":"41d8bbce-9c4c-43b4-b56c-a3369ef6f068","order_by":1,"name":"Alita Mrema","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ocean Road Cancer Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alita","middleName":"","lastName":"Mrema","suffix":""},{"id":552296102,"identity":"23dc1363-feb5-4d5f-bbe5-973854816e0c","order_by":2,"name":"Faraji Sabaya","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ocean Road Cancer Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Faraji","middleName":"","lastName":"Sabaya","suffix":""},{"id":552296103,"identity":"36ef6dc2-2132-410a-bce0-3a271bb77a1e","order_by":3,"name":"Baraka Fundo","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ocean Road Cancer Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Baraka","middleName":"","lastName":"Fundo","suffix":""},{"id":552296104,"identity":"c73fbb1c-7767-4058-8ba0-d27c34aa7537","order_by":4,"name":"Brown Mwangosi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ocean Road Cancer Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Brown","middleName":"","lastName":"Mwangosi","suffix":""},{"id":552296105,"identity":"752136d8-3c24-4156-97b3-0235baab9945","order_by":5,"name":"Swahibu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Ramadhani","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"","middleName":"","lastName":"Swahibu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-11-28 13:16:37","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":true,"humanSubjectCaseReport":true,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":97368613,"identity":"4cbc2503-e50f-46b2-bfdc-e69ec8dc72db","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:33","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":3912992,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Mainmanuscriptrevised.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/5d92a80961b4606087d0c923.docx"},{"id":97268736,"identity":"5f506db9-30c1-41cf-8a41-31caf60859c5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":342,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs8230719.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/05b6c9b27504902ccfc29d0f.json"},{"id":97367833,"identity":"dfce4bd6-4e8a-41da-b4db-58536bde4890","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:20:52","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":132986,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs82307190enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/10ac20133baa25c93e0ff139.xml"},{"id":97367130,"identity":"b0dbe4ce-01c5-454e-b445-bdd560a8b4c1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:16:43","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":32298,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/8dcbb54f626969120183f73c.png"},{"id":97268743,"identity":"5675e436-b2be-457b-b197-6e36331b213b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":294521,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/e4d9ee79071fd5a092419018.png"},{"id":97368466,"identity":"51a30795-0387-4830-9aa8-38ebaec8bde0","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:19","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":335323,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage11.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/93a403262b9758ce13ea8916.png"},{"id":97268748,"identity":"86041598-c65f-47db-9ce7-8c18353727d1","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":204550,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage12.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/df4e4f4d9a36f97f5269022b.png"},{"id":97369299,"identity":"1178ee0f-25c2-4a6d-a529-aae729f1667b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:24:12","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":379627,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/97adaecd86279e823e16515c.png"},{"id":97368689,"identity":"9d89cb26-3ad8-4242-8e9f-7ec04fca4487","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:47","extension":"jpeg","order_by":8,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":632570,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/0436f49f4e06b0abd0f9ab47.jpeg"},{"id":97268761,"identity":"42f9ba7a-0630-4019-a9fa-bf56df0d2767","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":362214,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/f653a0824a744d53aacbaf26.png"},{"id":97268755,"identity":"b40712fc-586b-47fe-8c51-3f54896ee323","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":170125,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/2b83553e7248c549dc347c58.png"},{"id":97367874,"identity":"1abda62c-0c91-4a3e-b1b7-9914a33b3822","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:20:57","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":347503,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/ab407409746813380b0ab4a9.png"},{"id":97268750,"identity":"9bcccf10-d2b8-4e0a-9249-f1f4976bbe4d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"jpeg","order_by":12,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":413617,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/18fc17397842b611611416a5.jpeg"},{"id":97368214,"identity":"c9b558ea-ae39-402f-8d14-c8f48a89790d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:21:50","extension":"png","order_by":13,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":429522,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/bc2d56c4d4a1b2da48d1da5c.png"},{"id":97268762,"identity":"621e89b6-f678-4fc8-8271-d332f3fde2df","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":14,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":241712,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/61343d1242afda94d6d9bb7b.png"},{"id":97268774,"identity":"41de6dba-91f5-4c16-b5d6-3557effabba2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:33","extension":"png","order_by":15,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":29273,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/9b28b724d41e3f938521c043.png"},{"id":97368612,"identity":"a9cf79d0-1ff1-462a-93c5-86089b276935","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:33","extension":"png","order_by":16,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":33524,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/7b0aaf80709ad25f98237f8c.png"},{"id":97368092,"identity":"bee6813f-5fb7-4731-a31e-c93fd2e2f14d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:21:33","extension":"png","order_by":17,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":27329,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage11.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/cf34f1955033ec2f806a432d.png"},{"id":97368686,"identity":"f977b747-4aa9-4a45-938c-de70f3d9d76d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:47","extension":"png","order_by":18,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":18810,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage12.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/2a87fd1137e696c85203589d.png"},{"id":97268770,"identity":"ae00d8c2-35c0-4079-8031-d0805373ecfb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":19,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":53936,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/6ade195c234ecc042b687356.png"},{"id":97268771,"identity":"71ef38fb-a02d-4f06-94b5-444ebb1df0ec","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":20,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":156970,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/4ea77ee25a54c5127592d967.png"},{"id":97268767,"identity":"2ff7e349-5c1c-4c7d-9c9d-236905be371c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":21,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":36698,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/53a7028219aa05986175a9e1.png"},{"id":97268766,"identity":"39f869f9-5c32-4fa8-a8ae-440215fb0995","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":22,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":23023,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/7274ed0a76fcd65876b1084b.png"},{"id":97368649,"identity":"bbe161f0-5821-4ca6-9917-119a8d7afdcf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:41","extension":"png","order_by":23,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":39328,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/048c6c3f7c7dbb9732895224.png"},{"id":97368048,"identity":"7e68ebca-e097-4fa8-a072-dbe96906cc8a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:21:25","extension":"png","order_by":24,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":134541,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/d2d8e1e4048cc33876a79d96.png"},{"id":97268769,"identity":"968c20f0-55f0-4afa-944f-a7403ba10feb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":25,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":42447,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/b176a21e5098f2d9f8cd1f63.png"},{"id":97367337,"identity":"7f87ad82-6199-4cae-96aa-307d78062131","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:18:13","extension":"png","order_by":26,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":25303,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/6c7ddfc43d6feb5b0565f3c5.png"},{"id":97367960,"identity":"049df3b5-58ed-45ce-94bf-539a4d790b05","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:21:07","extension":"xml","order_by":27,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":131767,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"rs82307190structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/5c9f755bfdd252c269e0155d.xml"},{"id":97268773,"identity":"b743e7b4-4f87-42cd-8862-d9e5f6386b0e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"html","order_by":28,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":139105,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/128b1049d1496040dc645023.html"},{"id":97268735,"identity":"b536dec3-a09e-4684-94ef-d551b6002b84","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":90643,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET images, male patient on the left and female patient on the right. Both images demonstrate normal physiological concentration of FAPI activity, with noticeable uptake in the uterus on the right image.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/5fdcd99a59156884e7bf0d99.png"},{"id":97268739,"identity":"493cd51d-e398-4be1-be49-b74b0a9ea3d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":171906,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient known to have right breast cancer had MRM, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Six months post-treatment follow-up, she was clinically well with no complaints; a CT scan showed no new lesion. The patient was then referred for a PET-CT scan to assess active disease and distant metastasis. \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT showed no tracer uptake in the right breast region, the site of the known primary tumor; however, there was evidence of locoregional mediastinal nodes and pulmonary metastases, which showed variable FAPI avidity inconsistent with known treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/533f3e178eb20d6cff37b057.png"},{"id":97368622,"identity":"2b9a85ad-fd7f-4acf-a35b-e446d1bbb1a7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:37","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":365245,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient known to have right breast cancer (IDC, triple negative, cT4N1Mo, pT4N1Mo). She had MRM, CRT, and chemotherapy; post-treatment FDG-PET showed no significant FDG-avid lesions to suggest malignancy. After 3 months, the patient presented with significant clinical symptoms. On imaging workup, diagnostic CT scans were performed (first row images). A chest CT showed subpleural infiltrates (right upper lobe), bilateral ground glass opacities, and bilateral pleural effusion. Total Spine CT Survey: degenerative changes and Abdominal CT: no abnormal findings. A \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT scan (second and third row images) was then performed and demonstrated disease progression with tracer uptake in the left breast (contralateral breast), nodal (left supraclavicular, left axillary, mediastinal, bilateral hilar), multiple hepatic lesions in both lobes, and multiple mixed skeletal lesions. The PET-CT scan revealed no FAPI avidity for lung changes, which would indicate metastatic disease. Biopsies of the left breast lesion, left axillary node, and hepatic lesions were performed by the IR team; histopathology revealed malignant disease.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/ebbde786f7a6f8a0be066547.png"},{"id":97368352,"identity":"af6f9c00-3d2f-417f-950d-3c690021df1b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:22:04","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":221091,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient with a history of right lower limb swelling, with rapid progression associated with pain. Initial excision of the swelling was performed; histopathology revealed alveolar soft tissue sarcoma. 3 weeks post-surgery, there was clinical evidence of disease progression with two new swellings on the same side and a palpable left supraclavicular node. A CT scan of the pelvis revealed a left inguinal mass with regional lymphadenopathy, and a CT scan of the chest and abdomen revealed suspicious nodes, hepatomegaly, and no evidence of pulmonary metastasis. After tumor board discussion, surgeons deemed the tumor to be resectable. PET-CT was requested for staging in light of clinical and CT findings to further assess the burden of disease before further management. \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT images revealed intense tracer uptake in the region of the known primary tumor and lymph node metastasis (locoregional and distant)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/8c9603183cdc381c6e3ba1dc.png"},{"id":97268737,"identity":"c1e31906-bc72-4c08-aea9-26a5013acb24","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":118719,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient known to have locally advanced laryngeal cancer treated with radical radiotherapy had a history of dyspnea after treatment, and a tracheostomy was inserted. On follow-up, six months post-treatment, computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck showed bilateral vocal cord thickening (right\u0026gt; left) suggestive of residual disease.\u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT showed intense tracer uptake in the residual primary laryngeal tumor and metastatic right cervical lymph node.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/2429dc3af4f76b91a12ebd0a.png"},{"id":97268742,"identity":"7c6c6143-d2d1-40e3-8cef-690104b0c617","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":234521,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient diagnosed with metastatic atypical thymoma of superior anterior mediastinal mass; wide local excision of the mediastinal mass was performed, spinal cord decompression surgery was performed, and she has received six cycles of palliative chemotherapy. There was clinical disease progressing with a wound of the soft tissue mass on the buttocks for which wide local debridement was done, PET was requested to assess disease status and \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT revealed tracer uptake in the primary residual mediastinal mass and indicated metastatic disease in the skeleton accompanied by soft tissue components. Additionally, a round abdominal soft tissue lesion was observed adjacent to the inferior border of the left kidney, which exhibited circumferential minimal tracer uptake.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"6.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/b523fc950a65dfeb7f28f17f.png"},{"id":97268746,"identity":"dc7ed5c6-c5cc-46c3-bf86-5c8531198817","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":260943,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient presented with a history of loss of weight (10kgs in 8 months) and severe abdominal pain. MRI (abdomen): showed hepatic lesions, pancreatic mass, duodenal mass, and abdominal ascites. Blood tests: elevated CA-125. The origin is unknown; a PET scan was recommended to search for the primary tumor and assess its behaviour. \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT showed intense tracer uptake in the liver, head \u0026amp; uncinate process of the pancreas, and third part of the duodenum. The rest of the scan showed no abnormal areas of tracer uptake.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"7.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/a9899864900e9f5d8d00b842.png"},{"id":97368018,"identity":"4fc0c5d8-9f75-419a-a321-486a17b1b9c8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:21:16","extension":"png","order_by":8,"title":"Figure 8","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":226707,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient known to have metastatic cervical cancer (lungs and spine), was referred for post-treatment PET, 68Ga-FAPI. PET-CT showed intense tracer uptake in the primary cervical tumor and distant metastasis (nodal, pulmonary), there were lytic skeletal changes on CT; however, they were non-active, most likely due to known treatment.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"8.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/8071444ebdbf2e913e0ccba5.png"},{"id":97367300,"identity":"59ddaaab-a266-4715-921a-30d8c87e024a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:18:05","extension":"png","order_by":9,"title":"Figure 9","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":146505,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient who was newly diagnosed with rectal cancer (moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma). CT (Abdomen-pelvic) showed circumferential rectal wall thickening, subcentimeter inguinal lymph nodes, and a solitary lung nodule. Staging \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-PET CT showed intense tracer uptake in the primary rectal tumor and metastatic osteosclerotic lesions (bilateral ilia, 9\u003csup\u003eth\u003c/sup\u003e right rib and 3\u003csup\u003erd\u003c/sup\u003e left rib). The lung nodules and inguinal nodes reported on CT were non-avid (not shown in this figure).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"9.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/51a7c453230386812f93c057.png"},{"id":97369260,"identity":"2bd6b718-64b8-4694-a50c-3cbe0db8964c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:24:02","extension":"png","order_by":10,"title":"Figure 10","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":249835,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient who was newly diagnosed with sigmoid adenocarcinoma following colonoscopy. Staging 68Ga-FAPI PET-CT demonstrated intense tracer uptake in the primary sigmoid colon tumor corresponding to circumferential irregular wall thickening on CT (top row images) and nodal metastases (bottom row images) involving the right mesorectal, bilateral internal iliac, left common iliac, and para-aortic (highest lymph node at the level of L3). The remainder of the scan was unremarkable\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"10.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/1ffa03b127ce101cc5f2993b.png"},{"id":97268758,"identity":"1d85e81b-b2e9-410e-ba30-8de13300a1bd","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-02 14:48:32","extension":"png","order_by":11,"title":"Figure 11","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":189373,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient with a history of urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) underwent radiotherapy and chemotherapy. \u0026nbsp;During the one-year follow-up after treatment, a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis revealed post-treatment changes in the bladder wall and bilateral inguinal lymphadenopathy, while a separate CT scan of the chest showed a soft tissue mass and a lung nodule in the right lower lobe (RLL). \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT demonstrated intense tracer uptake of the lung findings reported on previous CT; additionally, there was also intense tracer uptake in the manubrium and sternum associated with lytic CT changes. Mild tracer uptake was observed in the bladder wall.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"11.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/1e3819ba579420e023e0f792.png"},{"id":97367279,"identity":"99b394a1-7a71-42c2-99e7-4f69c42a02eb","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-03 16:17:56","extension":"png","order_by":12,"title":"Figure 12","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":100159,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAdult patient known to have a mediastinal neuroendocrine tumor was treated with chemotherapy and reported significant chest symptoms. Post-treatment imaging workup for assessment of mediastinal mass was performed. CeCT (chest) showed anterior mediastinal mass. \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-DOTNOC PET on the right-sided column showed no SSTR expression; however, \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI on the right side demonstrated intense tracer uptake suggestive of high-grade neuroendocrine tumoral behavior.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"12.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/f5cd8d5ddba908b1bd55ae36.png"},{"id":97664885,"identity":"e1a19566-676b-4743-b3df-438ecc03ed8a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-08 09:15:20","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":3368890,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8230719/v1/02586c4f-6095-42f4-8c8f-86a01d00f79a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003ePictorial Essay of Gallium-68-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) in Oncological Malignancies: Clinical Experience at Ocean Road Cancer Institute\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eCancer remains one of the world's major causes of death, with 20 million new cases and 9 million cancer-related deaths in 2022 [1]. Anatomical and molecular imaging in malignancies is essential to every stage of their treatment. Stroma refers to the supportive, non-parenchymal tissue or fluid within a biological structure, like an organ, tissue, or cell. Its key characteristic includes providing amatrix for other cells and tissues within an organ or structure (supportive framework), it is non-parenchymal as opposed to parenchyma, which performs the specialized functions of the organ or tissue, and has variable composition depending on the specific organ or tissue, including connective tissues, blood vessels, and nerves [2]. Over 90% of the mass in tumors is made up of stroma, which interacts with tumor cells to influence their behavior and plays a critical role in tumor growth and progression [2,3]. A transmembrane glycoprotein, the fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is scarce in healthy tissue but highly expressed in stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) [4]. CAFs alter the extracellular matrix and release cytokines and chemokines, which promote tumor development, migration, metastasis, resistance to treatment, and immunosuppression [5]. The studies have also reported that increased FAP expression in tumors is associated with poor prognosis and contributes to resistance to treatment. Current research has been directed towards targeting tumor microenvironment (TME) in tumor stroma that aims at the diagnosis and therapy of different cancers [6].\u0026nbsp;Quinoline- and non-quinoline-based radioligands are among the FAP-targeting radioligands. The quinoline FAPI 4 has undergone various modifications to produce a class of quinoline-based PET tracers, such as FAPI-02, FAPI-42, FAPI-46, and FAPI-74, which have significant washout after 24 hours and rapid in vivo tumoral uptake (beginning 10 minutes after injection)\u0026nbsp;[7].\u0026nbsp;The non-quinoline FAPI-2286 has a limited washout (10%) at 48 hours after injection and is based on a seven-amino-acid cyclic peptide with an affinity for FAP in the nanomolar range. It also has a DOTA-chelator for labeling with both therapeutic and diagnostic radioisotopes. [8]. Due in large part to the hepatobiliary excretion of \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-labelled FAPI, FAPI labeling with \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa has shown an excellent tracer profile in the clinical environment (high tumor uptake, low background uptake) as compared to \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF [9]. Patient preparation for FAPI PET imaging does not require caloric fasting, adaptation of anti-diabetic drugs, or avoiding intense exercise during the previous 24 hours before the procedure. Unlike FDG PET imaging, the patient only requires good hydration to aid clearance of the urinary excreted tracer [9].\u0026nbsp;FAPI has demonstrated variable expressions in different tumors; high expression has been observed in desmoplastic tumors, these tumors (such as breast, colon and pancreatic carcinoma)\u0026nbsp;have high concentrations of CAF’s and mesenchymal tumors (such as sarcoma) which express FAP in both CAF’s and tumor cells. FAP is poorly expressed in tumors with no significant desmoplastic reaction (lymphoma, myeloma, melanoma, RCC, seminoma, multiple myeloma) [10]. Our study aims to provide a pictorial review of FAP expression in different cancers done at our institution.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical Applications\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUp to date, FAPI PET has demonstrated detection of a wide range of malignancies; up to 28 malignancies have been reported so far, including breast, head-and-neck, and GI cancers [11]. When it comes to detecting GI cancers, liver metastases, and other metastatic locations, FAPI PET imaging has an advantage over traditional FDG PET because of its low background [12]. Based on existing evidence, both diagnostic imaging and prospective therapeutic applications are made possible by FAPI labelled radioisotopes; ongoing research will further hone its function in patient management and potential radioligand therapies.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Method","content":"\u003cp\u003eFAPI is a new radiopharmaceutical in clinical settings; for this, anethics committee approval was obtained. The labelling of FAPI 4 was done exclusively with the \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa radioisotope. PET request forms were reviewed and approved by a nuclear medicine physician for scans. All patients in this review were histologically confirmed cancer patients, and consents for performing \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET were obtained. \u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa PET-CT images were acquired between 10-30 min after the intravenous administration of about 3 mCi to 5 mCi of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI, based on the weight of the patient (0.05–0.06 mCi/kg of body weight). A 3D PET/CT scan was performed from vertex to mid-thigh/feet on a SIEMENS BIOGRAPH mCT-64 slice PET/CT scanner. Multiplanar reformations were then performed on a dedicated workstation. Images and patients’ data were extracted from institutional medical archives PACS.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur case series was composed of studies with significant FAPI uptake which indicates malignant disease. These cases have demonstrated the use of FAPI PET in different malignancies in centres with no access to FDG.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn molecular imaging for various cancers, FAPI PET has been described as a potential diagnostic method that performs as well as or better than FDG PET in terms of diagnosis and staging. FAPI PET is backed up with its characteristic low background activity and ability to be expressed not only in the tumor microenvironment but also in cancer cells of certain histopathology, such as mucinous adenocarcinoma and others [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Most of the existing evidence is delivered from small sample sizes with limited histopathological confirmation; this necessitates additional investigation provided by carefully planned, multicenter, prospective studies with histological validation. Recently, there is an increased wave of clinical application of FAPI PET in tumors that have limitations with FDG PET and demographical areas where FDG production is limited and gallium-based radiopharmaceuticals are being deployed as PET tracers. Clinical data and anatomical imaging correlation are very essential for accurate interpretation of FAPI PET scans; additionally, in order to further guarantee appropriate interpretation in clinical practice, quantitative markers like SUV still require validation. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Our pictorial overview aims to demonstrate FAPI expressions in the different malignancies as described in recent literature. These scans were performed at our institution as an alternative to FDG PET due to the absence of FDG production at the time when PET-CT scans were requested.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eNormal Biodistribution\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe normal biodistribution of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET shows a high concentration of activity in the kidneys, urinary bladder (due to excretion) and uterus (see Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Lower uptake will be noticed in the salivary glands, pancreas, Waldeyer\u0026rsquo;s ring, breasts, striated muscles, thyroid, prostate, ovaries, testes, adrenal glands, heart, and blood pool. FAP can express a high concentration in the gallbladder, cystic duct, and bile duct with F-18 radiopharmaceutical.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eBreast Cancer\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBreast cancer accounts for 11.6% of all cancer cases worldwide, making it the second most prevalent form of cancer in women, and 6.9% of all cancer deaths globally, making it the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. Both anatomical and molecular imaging modalities have been deployed in the imaging of breast cancer patients. As regards molecular imaging, FDG PET has been shown to be useful in staging locally advanced disease, inflammatory breast cancer, detecting recurrence, and restaging [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. FDG PET provides information on extra axillary nodes and distant metastases (chest, abdomen and bone) which refines the prognostic stratification and influences management. Breast cancer is among desmoplastic tumors, which usually express high cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF\u0026rsquo;s) present in the stroma [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. FAPI PET has shown promising performance in breast cancer for detection of primary tumors and metastatic lesions (Figs.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e and \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e), showing FAPI avidity that is comparably higher than or equal to that observed in traditional F-FDG PET [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. The study by Ji Bin et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e] on the comparison of \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-FDG PET and \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-FAPI PET in the systemic staging of 38 patients who were newly diagnosed with breast cancer (stage IIb -IIIc), found that there was an overall detection rate in upstaging of 47.4% vs. 34.2%, unexpected extra nodal disease of 97.6% vs. 52.4% (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and distant metastases of 98.1% vs. 67.3% (P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001), for FAPI PET and FDG PET, respectively. Our breast cancer cases for restaging (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e) and for recurrence (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrated \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET in breast tumors and distant metastases.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eSoft Tissue Sarcoma\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eSarcomas are a class of tumors with over 150 subtypes that develop from soft tissue and bone connective tissue. These tumors are rare and express heterogeneity, and subtypes include low-grade, intermediate, or unpredicted tumors. The median overall survival period for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma is 12\u0026ndash;18 months, which is a bad prognosis [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Numerous clinical studies have lately shown that FAPI uptake is high in a variety of solid tumors, including sarcomas [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. Histogenesis-specific FAPI expression in sub-entities of several sarcomas has been reported; however, FAPI uptake has shown high intensity in intratumoral assessment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]. FAPI PET imaging has shown good performance for accurate diagnosis and its potential as an imaging modality in advanced-stage disease; this plays a significant role in the selection of patients for ongoing FAPI radioligand therapy trials [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Our illustrated case (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e) shows intense FAPI uptake in the primary tumor and metastatic nodal disease; this case demonstrates high avidity of FAPI in sarcoma and potential FAPI radioligand therapy in advanced cases.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eLaryngeal Cancer\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAny region of the larynx, but particularly the glottis, can develop laryngeal carcinoma, a common respiratory malignancy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. The most common histotype is squamous cell carcinoma, and the risk of recurrence and/or death is high. Convectional imaging (CT, MRI) as well as molecular imaging with FDG PET have been used for accurate staging. FDG PET has been shown to be favorable for local tumor characterization, regional nodal disease, and distant metastasis at initial staging as well as treatment response assessment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Current studies have reported a higher detection rate of FAPI PET imaging compared to FDG PET imaging in head and neck malignancies in both primary and nodal disease; this advantage is significantly contributed to by the minimal background activity observed in FAPI PET imaging [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Xia R et al. studied patients who had pathologically confirmed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma with both FAPI PET and FDG PET imaging. In terms of tumor identification, staging, and delineation, FAPI PET imaging was reported to perform better than FDG PET imaging (100% FAPI vs. 85.7% FDG) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e) shows strong tracer uptake in the primary laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eThymoma\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThymomas, which make up between 0.2% and 1.5% of all malignant neoplasms, are the most common kind of mediastinal epithelial tumors. They make up 20% of all adult mediastinal neoplasms and are frequently the cause of anterior mediastinal masses [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. Because of their variability and the danger of making predictions about their prognosis based on particular cell types, thymoma categorization has largely been a contentious issue. In 2021, the WHO classified thymomas into several subtypes (Type A, AB, B1, B2-formerly thymoma, B3-formerly atypical thymoma and thymic carcinoma\u003cb\u003e)\u003c/b\u003e, their classification was based on their microscopic appearance, primarily focusing on the types of cells present and their relative proportions [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. The study by Xiuling S. et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e], looked at the evaluation of thymic epithelial tumors using \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET and \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-FDG PET. Findings showed that \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET was superior to \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-FDG PET in differentiating thymomas from thymic carcinomas (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.90, P\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.02), higher specificity in detecting nodal metastasis (67% vs 93%, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001) and higher sensitivity in detecting distant metastases (49% vs 97%, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). FAPI avidity also correlated with both SUVmax and tumor-mediastinal ratio (both r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.843, P\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e is our case demonstrating FAPI avidity of the superior anterior mass (primary disease) and metastatic disease (skeletal with soft tissue components and abdominal soft tissue mass).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCarcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP)\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA tumor that causes metastatic disease and is found using a standardized diagnostic workup in the hunt for the concealed primary is characterized as a carcinoma of unknown primary [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. Although CUP makes up 5% of all cancers, its poor prognosis with a median survival of 6 to 9 months makes it a greater cause of cancer-related deaths. There are 15% squamous cell carcinomas, 5% undifferentiated neoplasms, and 50% well-differentiated to moderately-differentiated adenocarcinomas and 30% poorly-differentiated or undifferentiated adenocarcinomas in the histology [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. CUP diagnostics involves a vigorous search for the hidden primary cancer, with CT, MRI, and FDG PET currently being the preferred imaging modalities. FAPI PET imaging has recently shown excellent performance in the detection of disease in oncology; a systematic review by Justine M. et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e] looked at the role of FAPI in CUP, both in head and neck malignancy as well as general CUP. The study found that both SUVmax and the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) on FAPI PET for primary disease were high for general CUP, at 9.6 and 6.7, respectively. When comparing FAPI PET to FDG PET, SUVmax and TBR for metastatic lymph nodes were 9.2 vs. 7.9 (p\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.03) and 9.1 vs. 4.9 (p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01), respectively. These results indicated increased sensitivity in identifying primary tumors and metastatic lesions, which could lead to better diagnostic precision, especially when current imaging modalities are inadequate. Our case of CUP (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e) showed FAPI-avid disease involving the liver, head and uncinate process of the pancreas, and third part of the duodenum.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eCancer of Cervix\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eCervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide and the most common malignancy detected in women. Many cases occur in the low- to middle-income nations (131.1 per 100,000 women in 2020) and mortality (90% of global deaths in 2020); this phenomenon is caused by low coverage of extensive screening services and lack of adequate and timely treatment with curative intent [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. When it comes to cervical cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, both radiological and molecular imaging have been crucial, ultrasound and MRI for primary staging, and CT and/or FDG PET for assessing extra pelvic spread in advanced local and metastatic disease [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. Current literature has reported the application of FAPI in gynecological carcinomas, including a systematic literature review and meta-analysis by Anita F. et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e] that compares FAPI PET and FDG PET in these cancers, as well as interest in cervical tumors. For primary disease detection, both tracers demonstrated a detection rate of 96 to 100%; however, the nodal detection rate was higher with FAPI PET compared to FDG PET, while there was no statistically significant difference for non-peritoneal metastases. Our case (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig8\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e) demonstrates metastatic lesions (pulmonary and nodal) in a cervical cancer patient.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eColorectal Cancer\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe second most common cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most prevalent cancer is colorectal cancer (CRC) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. The overall 5-year survival percentage for early-stage disease, which is frequently treated with the goal of curing it, ranges from 80% to 90%, whereas the 5-year survival rate for advanced disease, when systemic therapy is the primary treatment, is only 13% [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. CRC staging is essential for choosing a successful treatment strategy that will enhance patient outcomes. FDG PET is currently the preferred molecular imaging technique for tumor staging; nevertheless, due to physiological FDG uptake in the colon and in tumor histology types such as mucinous, its diagnostic accuracy in colorectal cancer is frequently limited. There have been numerous studies that compare FAPI PET and FDG PET side by side; a study by Komek et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e], reported the specificity and overall accuracy of FAPI PET/CT were superior to those of FDG PET. The study by Erol et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e] showed FDG PET exhibited high uptake in tubular and tubulovillous adenomas, whereas FAPI PET showed no abnormal uptake, suggesting that FAPI PET may aid in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors. Regarding tracer uptake in primary CRC, this remains inconsistent across the existing literature, possibly contributed to by histopathological subtypes. This is demonstrated in the study by Lin et al [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e] which compared FAPI PET to FDG PET. The findings showed higher FAPI SUVmax in signet-ring and mucinous carcinomas but lower FAPI uptake in poorly differentiated carcinomas. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET/CT were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94\u0026ndash;1.00) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.23\u0026ndash;1.00), respectively, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis by Jiqi Ouyang [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. In contrast, the results for \u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF-FDG PET/CT were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.60\u0026ndash;0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.52\u0026ndash;0.95). While both imaging modalities exhibited nearly equal diagnostic efficacy in colorectal cancer, \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET/CT performed better for certain tumors, especially in gastric, liver, biliary tract, and pancreatic malignancies. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. Our cases demonstrate FAPI uptake in both primary and metastatic disease in rectal (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig9\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e) and colon cancer (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig10\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eBladder Cancer\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eBladder cancer (BCa) is among the most aggressive and potentially life-threatening diseases. According to Globocan 2022, bladder cancer has moved from the 10th to the 9th as one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers worldwide, with increasing incidence and mortality. It is reported to be the 6th most common cancer among men. Urothelial carcinoma makes up 90% of bladder cancer, with the remaining 10% consisting of less prevalent histologies such lymphomas, adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell carcinoma [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. Bladder cancer can be classified as carcinoma in situ, invasive BCa, muscle-invasive BCa (MIBC), or non-muscle-invasive BCa (NMIBC) based on its variable morphology that changes with tumor growth and progression [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. Radiological workup strategies have included ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for initial diagnosis (conjunction with cystoscopy and biopsy), tumor invasion, and assessment of distant disease [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, molecular imaging with FDG PET has shown a limited role in primary tumor assessment due to urogenital excretion of the tracer causing masking of tumors in the urinary tract [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e], A meta-analysis study by Wang N et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e] found that FDG PET was not superior to CT and MRI in detecting local BC; FDG PET showed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI: 71.0\u0026ndash;87.0%) and 84.0% (95% CI: 69.0\u0026ndash;93.0%), respectively. Current literature indicates that small cohort studies have compared FAPI PET to traditional FDG PET in BCa; FAPI PET, however, shows promise as a diagnostic radioligand for identifying distant disease and primary tumors in individuals with bladder cancer [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e47\u003c/span\u003e]. Figure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig11\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e demonstrates tracer uptake suggestive of distant metastases (skeletal and pulmonary) in a BCa on \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eNeuroendocrine tumor\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA rare and diverse class of cancers, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) typically develop in the lungs and gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tract [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), more often type 2, are overexpressed on the cell membrane of these malignancies [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e48\u003c/span\u003e]. Recently, there has been increased early detection of NETs, which has given room for better and improved management, leading to longer survival in these patients. Molecular imaging has been a key imaging modality in the management of NETs, where FDG PET is used for poorly differentiated NETs and SSTRI PET is used for well-differentiated tumors, while a dual imaging method is used to study tumor behaviour and for assessment prior to radioligand therapy [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e49\u003c/span\u003e]. There is an association between dual imaging with prognosis and overall survival in patients with NETs, typically divided into three groups: patients with only FDG PET positive lesions, patients with positive lesions on both FDG and SSTRI PET, and those with SSTRI negative/FDG positive (significant discordant is observed in multiple lesions), the last category of patients tends to have poor prognosis and overall survival [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e50\u003c/span\u003e]. Studies have assessed the role of FAPI PET as a prognostic marker compared to traditional FDG PET, and a study by Kerstin M. et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e51\u003c/span\u003e] assessed the outcome prediction in patients with high-grade NETs. The study found that there was no significant difference in the quantitative analysis of both tracers; tumor heterogeneity with discordant FDG-positive/FAPI negative lesions in substantial fraction of patients (45%), also median PFS of patients with FDG positive /FAPI negative lesions was significantly shorter (4 months) than that of patients without FDG-positive/FAPI-negative metastases (9 months). These findings could help guide treatment decisions or identify lesions for additional stereotactic approaches. Our case (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig12\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e) was a patient with NET who had a previous negative SSTRI PET; \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003e Ga-FAPI PET-CT was done to assess tumor heterogeneity for restaging.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eLimitations\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study is limited by lack of histopathological confirmation of FAPI avid lesions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study aims to provide our clinical experience of this new tracer and its applicability in different cancers\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWhat is already known on this topic\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eRole of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT in different cancers\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eComparison of FAPI PET to traditional FDG PET in detection of tumors and metastatic disease.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003eWhat this study adds\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eFirst case series to report clinical experience of role of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET-CT in different tumors in the region; the study will communicate the experiences and challenges which will accelerate the use of FAPI PET/CT modality in our settings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interest\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors’ contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBright Awadh Sangiwa was responsible for study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing. Alita Mrema, Faraji Sabaya, Baraka Fundo, Swahibu Ramadhani and Brown Mwangosi were responsible for data collecton, analysis and manuscript editing. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgment\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors would like to thank all the referring oncologists inside and outside our institute who were involved in the management of cases presented in our review for allowing FAPI PET scans in the investigation of their patients. Special thanks to all nuclear medicine colleagues for their participation in each step to the accomplishment of these scans.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDeclarations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors certify that they have obtained ethical approval. A waiver of informed consent was granted as a retrospective pictorial study that imposes no risk to the subjects.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFinancial support and sponsorship\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNil.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no competing interest\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2024 May;74(3):229-63.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGrisendi G, Bussolari R, Veronesi E, Piccinno S, Burns JS, De Santis G, Loschi P, Pignatti M, Di Benedetto F, Ballarin R, Di Gregorio C. Understanding tumor-stroma interplays for targeted therapies by armed mesenchymal stromal progenitors: the Mesenkillers. American Journal of Cancer Research. 2011 May 28;1(6):787.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSzot C, Saha S, Zhang XM, Zhu Z, Hilton MB, Morris K, Seaman S, Dunleavey JM, Hsu KS, Yu GJ, Morris H. Tumor stroma\u0026ndash;targeted antibody-drug conjugate triggers localized anticancer drug release. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2018 Jul 2;128(7):2927-43.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. PROTEOMICS\u0026ndash;Clinical Applications. 2014 Jun;8(5-6):454-63.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCaligiuri G, Tuveson DA. Activated fibroblasts in cancer: Perspectives and challenges. Cancer cell. 2023 Mar 13;41(3):434-49.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLi M., Younis MH., Zhang Y., Cai W., Lan X. Clinical summary of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor-based radiopharmaceuticals: cancer and beyond. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2022 Jul;49(8):2844-68.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, J\u0026auml;ger D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2018 Sep 1;59(9):1415-22.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eZboralski D, Hoehne A, Bredenbeck A, Schumann A, Nguyen M, Schneider E, Ungewiss J, Paschke M, Haase C, von Hacht JL, Kwan T. Preclinical evaluation of FAP-2286 for fibroblast activation protein-targeted radionuclide imaging and therapy. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2022 Sep;49(11):3651-67.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHope TA, Calais J, Goenka AH, Haberkorn U, Konijnenberg M, McConathy J, Oprea-Lager DE, Trimnal L, Zan E, Herrmann K, Deroose CM. SNMMI procedure standard/EANM practice guideline for fibroblast activation protein (FAP) PET.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMona CE, Benz MR, Hikmat F, Grogan TR, Lueckerath K, Razmaria A, Riahi R, Slavik R, Girgis MD, Carlucci G, Kelly KA. Correlation of 68Ga-FAPi-46 PET biodistribution with FAP expression by immunohistochemistry in patients with solid cancers: interim analysis of a prospective translational exploratory study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2022 Jul 1;63(7):1021-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, R\u0026ouml;hrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Jun 1;60(6):801-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGiesel FL, Kratochwil C, Lindner T, Marschalek MM, Loktev A, Lehnert W, Debus J, J\u0026auml;ger D, Flechsig P, Altmann A, Mier W. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: biodistribution and preliminary dosimetry estimate of 2 DOTA-containing FAP-targeting agents in patients with various cancers. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Mar 1;60(3):386-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGroheux D, Cochet A, Humbert O, Alberini JL, Hindi\u0026eacute; E, Mankoff D. 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging of breast cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2016 Feb 1;57(Supplement 1):17S-26S.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKratochwil C, Flechsig P, Lindner T, Abderrahim L, Altmann A, Mier W, Adeberg S, Rathke H, R\u0026ouml;hrich M, Winter H, Plinkert PK. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: tracer uptake in 28 different kinds of cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Jun 1;60(6):801-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTaralli S, Lorusso M, Perrone E, Perotti G, Zagaria L, Calcagni ML. PET/CT with fibroblast activation protein inhibitors in breast cancer: diagnostic and theranostic application\u0026mdash;a literature review. Cancers. 2023 Jan 31;15(3):908.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBin J, Wenjia L, Wan W, Kaiyin M, Bowen Y, Qichang W, Junzhi L, Shi G. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FAPI PET/CT in systemic staging of newly diagnosed breast cancer. Academic Radiology. 2025 Jan 1;32(1):50-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCasali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JV, Boye K. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO\u0026ndash;EURACAN\u0026ndash;GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology. 2022 Jan 1;33(1):20-33.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBallal S, Yadav MP, Moon ES, Kramer VS, Roesch F, Kumari S, Tripathi M, ArunRaj ST, Sarswat S, Bal C. Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and dosimetry of [68Ga] Ga-DOTA. SA. FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [18F] F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2021 Jun;48(6):1915-31.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDohi O, Ohtani H, Hatori M, Sato E, Hosaka M, Nagura H, Itoi E, Kokubun S. Histogenesis‐specific expression of fibroblast activation protein and dipeptidylpeptidase‐IV in human bone and soft tissue tumours. Histopathology. 2009 Oct;55(4):432-40.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLanzafame H, Mavroeidi IA, Pabst KM, Desaulniers M, Ingenwerth M, Hirmas N, Kessler L, Nader M, Bartel T, Leyser S, Barbato F. 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT improves detection of intermediate and low-grade sarcomas and identifies candidates for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2024 Jun 1;65(6):880-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eA study of \u0026nbsp;\u003csup\u003e177\u003c/sup\u003eLu-FAP-2286 in advanced solid tumors (LuMIERE). ClinicalTrials.gov website. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04939610. Updated February 6, 2024. Accessed April 9, 2024.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSteuer CE, El‐Deiry M, Parks JR, Higgins KA, Saba NF. An update on larynx cancer. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2017 Jan;67(1):31-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eYongkui L, Jian L, Jingui L. 18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with primary head and neck cancer before treatment: a meta-analysis. Surgical Oncology. 2013 Jun 1;22(2):e11-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSun R, Tang X, Yang Y, Zhang C. 18FDG-PET/CT for the detection of regional nodal metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer: A meta-analysis. Oral oncology. 2015 Apr 1;51(4):314-20.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eJiang Y, Wen B, Li C, Tian Y, Xiao Z, Xu K, Xing D, Yu Z, Huang J, Jia J, He Y. The performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023 Jun;50(7):2114-26.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eXia R, Wang X, Cheng J, Li X, Sun J, Zeng Q, Hu D, You J, Xiong Y, Chen X. Head-to-head comparison of [18F] FAPI-42 and [18F] FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2025 Mar 8:1-3.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSuster S, Moran CA. Thymoma classification: current status and future trends. American journal of clinical pathology. 2006 Apr 1;125(4):542-54.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eTsao MS, Nicholson AG, Maleszewski JJ, Marx A, Travis WD. Reprint of \u0026ldquo;Introduction to 2021 WHO classification of thoracic tumors\u0026rdquo;. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):337-40.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eShen X, Zhou X, Yao Y, Meng X, Song Y, Yang Z, Li N. Superiority of [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT to [18F] FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of thymic epithelial tumours. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2023 Sep;50(11):3414-24.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eKr\u0026auml;mer A, Bochtler T, Pauli C, Baciarello G, Delorme S, Hemminki K, Mileshkin L, Moch H, Oien K, Olivier T, Patrikidou A. Cancer of unknown primary: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up☆. Annals of Oncology. 2023 Mar 1;34(3):228-46.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePavlidis N, Briasoulis E, Hainsworth J, Greco FA. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary. European journal of cancer. 2003 Sep 1;39(14):1990-2005.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMaes J, Cleeren F, Goffin K, Dekervel J, Nafteux P, Topal B, Geboes K, Stroobants S, Deroose C. Role of FAPI PET/CT in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): A systematic review. European Journal of Radiology. 2025 Jul 23:112330.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eDzinamarira T, Moyo E, Dzobo M, Mbunge E, Murewanhema G. Cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: an urgent call for improving accessibility and use of preventive services. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023 Apr 1;33(4):592-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWu J, Jin Q, Zhang Y, Ji Y, Li J, Liu X, Duan H, Feng Z, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Lyu Z. Global burden of cervical cancer: current estimates, temporal trend, and future projections based on the GLOBOCAN 2022. Journal of the National Cancer Center. 2025 Jan 23.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eCibula D, Raspollini MR, Planchamp F, Centeno C, Chargari C, Felix A, Fischerov\u0026aacute; D, Jahnn-Kuch D, Joly F, Kohler C, Lax S. ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer\u0026ndash;Update 2023. Virchows Archiv. 2023 Jun;482(6):935-66.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFlorit, A., de Koster, E.J., Sassano, S., Alic, L., Pisano, G., van Velden, F.H., Annunziata, S., Primac, I., Ruggiero, M.R., M\u0026uuml;ller, C. and Sala, E., 2025. Head-to-head comparison of fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPI) radiopharmaceuticals and [\u003csup\u003e18\u003c/sup\u003eF] FDG in gynaecological malignancies: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, pp.1-15.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eBiller LH, Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. Jama. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):669-85.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eK\u0026ouml;mek H, Can C, Kaplan I, G\u0026uuml;ndoğan C, Kepenek F, Karaoglan H, Demirkıran A, Ebinc S, G\u0026uuml;zel Y, G\u0026uuml;ndeş E. Comparison of \u003csup\u003e[68\u003c/sup\u003e Ga] Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F] FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2022 Sep;49(11):3898-909.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eFenercioğlu \u0026Ouml;E, Beyhan E, Şahin R, Baloğlu MC, Arslan E, \u0026Ccedil;ermik TF, Erg\u0026uuml;l N. The potential role of \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI-04 PET/CT for screening malignancy in suspected colonic lesions. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 2023 Oct 1;44(10):896-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLin X, Li Y, Wang S, Zhang Y, Chen X, Wei M, Zhu H, Wu A, Yang Z, Wang X. Diagnostic value of [68Ga] Ga-FAPI-04 in patients with colorectal cancer in comparison with [18F] F-FDG PET/CT. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023 Jan 9;12:1087792.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOuyang J, Ding P, Zhang R, Lu Y. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary digestive system cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023 Jun 26;13:1202505.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eHilton S, Jones LP. Recent advances in imaging cancer of the kidney and urinary tract. Surgical Oncology Clinics. 2014 Oct 1;23(4):863-910.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eLal P. The molecular-morphologic correlates of bladder cancer. Diagnostic Histopathology. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):299-307.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGontero P, Comperat E, Escrig JD, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, van Rhijn BW, Roupr\u0026ecirc;t M, Seisen T, Shariat SF. EAU guidelines. InEdn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eVasireddi A, Nguyen NC. PET/CT limitations and pitfalls in urogenital cancers. InSeminars in Nuclear Medicine 2021 Nov 1 (Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 611-620). WB Saunders.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eWang N, Jiang P, Lu Y. Is fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography useful for detecting bladder lesions? A meta-analysis of the literature. Urologia internationalis. 2014 Aug 8;92(2):143-9.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eNovruzov E, Dendl K, Ndlovu H, Choyke PL, Dabir M, Beu M, Novruzov F, Mehdi E, Guliyev F, Koerber SA, Lawal I. Head-to-head intra-individual comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT in patients with bladder cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 2022 Aug;24(4):651-8.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eOronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017 Dec 1;19(12):991-1002.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eSanli Y, Garg I, Kandathil A, Kendi T, Zanetti MJ, Kuyumcu S, Subramaniam RM. Neuroendocrine tumor diagnosis and management: 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2018 Aug;211(2):267-77.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eChan DL, Pavlakis N, Schembri GP, Bernard EJ, Hsiao E, Hayes A, Barnes T, Diakos C, Khasraw M, Samra J, Eslick E. Dual somatostatin receptor/FDG PET/CT imaging in metastatic neuroendocrine tumours: proposal for a novel grading scheme with prognostic significance. Theranostics. 2017 Mar 1;7(5):1149.\u003c/li\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eMichalski K, Kosmala A, Hartrampf PE, Heinrich M, Serfling SE, Schl\u0026ouml;telburg W, Buck AK, Meining A, Werner RA, Weich A. [18F] FDG and [68Ga] Ga-FAPI-04\u0026ndash;Directed Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Patients with High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2024 Dec 1;65(12):1899-903.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"68Ga-FAPI, PET-CT, oncology, cancer associated fibroblasts (CAF’s)","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThe type II transmembrane protease known as fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is not present in quiescent fibroblasts but is extensively expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAPI expression has been linked to a bad prognosis and increased treatment resistance. FAPI has demonstrated variable expressions in different tumors; high expression has been observed in desmoplastic tumors, these tumors (such as breast, colon and pancreatic carcinoma) have high concentrations of CAF\u0026rsquo;s and mesenchymal tumors (such as sarcoma) which express FAP in both CAF\u0026rsquo;s and tumor cells. FAP demonstrates poor expression in tumors with no significant desmoplastic reaction, such as lymphoma, myeloma, melanoma, RCC, seminoma, and multiple myeloma. Our pictorial review aims to demonstrate FAPI expression of the \u003csup\u003e68\u003c/sup\u003eGa-FAPI PET performed at our institute.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Pictorial Essay of Gallium-68-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) in Oncological Malignancies: Clinical Experience at Ocean Road Cancer Institute","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-02 14:48:27","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8230719/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"0779d0e1-502e-4922-86f0-67fee6171025","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 2nd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":58777963,"name":"Oncology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-02T14:48:27+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-02 14:48:27","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8230719","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8230719","identity":"rs-8230719","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00