A new molecular seed assay to predictUstilago nudafield infection levels

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,494 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Seed health tests are performed to prevent sowing untreated seeds with problematic pathogen levels. The detection of internal seedborne pathogens like Ustilago nuda, causing loose smut in barley (Hordeum vulgare), is challenging because symptoms only appear when teliospores replace barley inflorescences and smutted ears develop. Currently, U. nuda seed infection levels are determined from the visual inspections of extracted embryos or fields of plants used for seed production, both of which are laborious and can be unreliable. To improve U. nuda detection, we developed a multiplex qPCR method targeting U. nuda and H. vulgare DNA. Naturally infected seed lots were tested using this qPCR method and the visual analysis of embryos. We grew the same seed lots in the field over two seasons and used the observed smutted ears as the reference infection level. The qPCR results, U. nuda DNA normalized to H. vulgare DNA, better correlated with observed field infections than the number of infected embryos. Our qPCR method more accurately distinguished seed lots with infections above and below the field tolerance threshold. It offers a reliable alternative to the visual analysis of extracted embryos. The integration of our qPCR method with field observations can enhance U. nuda management and reduce unnecessary prophylactic seed treatments, thereby bolstering integrated pest management strategies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00