MAP4-MAP7D1 partitioning on tyrosinated-detyrosinated microtubules coordinates lysosome positioning in nutrient signalling

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,863 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and tubulin post-translational modifications (PTMs) together shape a dynamic intracellular landscape for motor-driven transport, yet how the “MAP-PTM crosstalk” regulates organelle positioning remains unclear. Here, we show that MAP4 and MAP7D1 selectively partition onto distinct microtubule subsets demarcated by tyrosination and detyrosination, respectively, creating specialized tracks for kinesin motors. MAP4’s preferential binding depends on its projection domain, while expanded microtubule lattice states mediate MAP7D1’s enrichment on detyrosinated microtubules. Remarkably, rigor kinesin-1 (KIF5B-R) predominantly localizes to detyrosinated, MAP7D1-coated tracks, whereas rigor kinesin-3 (KIF1A) prefers tyrosinated, MAP4-decorated microtubules. We further find that the local density of MAP4 and MAP7D1 on microtubules fine-tunes lysosomal movement and directional transport. Moreover, MAP density is modulated to coordinate lysosomal reorganization in response to nutrient availability. During starvation MAP7D1 density on microtubules increases while MAP4 density decreases, localizing lysosomes to the perinuclear region. Conversely, with nutrient stimulation, MAPD1 density declines, allowing lysosomes to migrate towards the cell periphery. Altering the cellular levels of MAP4 and MAP7D1, either up or down, hinders lysosomal motility, trapping them near the nucleus and impairing their responsiveness to nutrient stimulation. Together, our findings reveal two distinct MAP–PTM circuits, a MAP4–tyrosination–kinesin-3 axis and a MAP7D1– detyrosination–kinesin-1 axis, that govern lysosome positioning for nutrient signaling, highlighting the combinatorial logic of MAP and tubulin codes in shaping microtubule function. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00