Automatic deep learning-based segmentation and quantification of stented arterial cross-sections for morphometric analysis

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,801 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Arterial vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, are among the most serious global health threats. In preclinical studies, morphometric analysis of histological arterial cross-sections is considered the gold standard for assessing vascular remodeling and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. However, morphometric analysis is usually performed manually, which is time-consuming, subjective, and requires significant user interaction. This paper presents a fully automated, operator-independent framework for the precise morphometric analysis of stented arterial cross-sections, extending the previously developed qHisto (quantitative histology) framework for the quantification of various histological components. A neural network for the segmentation of arterial structures was trained and evaluated using 819 cross-sections. In addition, a quantitative analysis of vascular morphology, fibrin area, and lumen asymmetry was performed using 72 cross-sections from coated and uncoated balloons. The model achieved high segmentation accuracy with a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.892–0.996. Compared to manual evaluation, the system reduces analysis time by 90%, enabling efficient processing of large datasets. Furthermore, morphometric analysis with qHisto showed significant differences between coated and uncoated balloons, e.g. regarding lumen area (AUC = 0.86) and fibrin ratio (AUC = 0.94). Our developed framework enables fully automated, comprehensive and standardized analysis of histological arterial cross-sections. This helps to reduce time-consuming, repetitive manual assessments and thus facilitates research of disease mechanisms and treatment effects in preclinical studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00