Correlations between laparoscopic and hysteroscopic findings in 497 women with otherwise unexplained infertility
other
public-domain-us
Abstract
Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were undertaken simultaneously in 497 women presenting with otherwise unexplained infertility. Of them, 285 complained of primary infertility and 212 of secondary infertility. Laparoscopic evidence of pelvic inflammatory disease in the absence of endometriosis was noted in 103 patients with primary and in 108 women with secondary infertility. Lesions were noted on hysteroscopy in both groups as well as in 34% of women with normal laparoscopic examinations. No specific dependency could be demonstrated between any laparoscopically detected lesion and hysteroscopically detected lesion. A significant dependency was demonstrated only between a history of secondary infertility and uterine adhesions (chi 2 = 12.03, 1 df, p less than 0.01). While the combined endoscopic findings did not demonstrate any dependency, the findings of this study demonstrate the importance of hysteroscopy in assessing all patients with infertility, especially those with secondary infertility.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-19T06:14:56.452680+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:50.790931+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine