Second-Class Medicare for Dually Eligible People Violates Civil Rights, Worsens Disparities, and Harms Millions. A Case Study of Dually Eligible People with Medicare and Medicaid in New Orleans

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

"The COVID-19 pandemic is disproportionately affecting dually eligible individuals, racial and ethnic minority groups, and individuals with disabilities." — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, February 18, 2021 1. Government policy worsens racial healthcare disparities for low-income dually eligible people.The COVID-19 pandemic exposed racial healthcare disparities for dually eligible people with Medicare and Medicaid — “the elderly and disabled poor”. The Congressional Balanced Budget Act of 1997 worsens these disparities. 2. The Balanced Budget Act decreases access to health care for dually eligible people.Medicare beneficiaries worked, paid Medicare payroll taxes, and purchased equal Medicare benefits. Yet the Balanced Budget Act allows poor dually eligible Medicare patients to receive less Medicare benefits than wealthier Medicare patients (“Second-Class Medicare”). As a result, four studies show the Balanced Budget Act decreases access to health care for low-income dually eligible Medicare patients.3. The Balanced Budget Act created a Second-Class Medicare system for dually eligible people.The Balanced Budget Act made it illegal for millions of low-income dually eligible people in 42 states to receive more than 78% of their purchased Medicare benefits. The remaining 22% is uncollectible “Medicare bad debt” — a poverty penalty for poor dually eligible people. Wealthier people receive 100% of their Medicare benefit without paying a poverty penalty. The Balanced Budget Act created a two-tiered discriminatory Medicare system for dually eligible people.4. This violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act.Dually eligible people are disproportionately elderly people of color and mentally and physically disabled people. Disproportionately decreasing healthcare access for these groups violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act and results in racial healthcare disparities tragically exposed by COVID-19.5. Flipping a switch can decrease healthcare disparities for low-income dually eligible people.Penalizing elderly and disabled poor people for being poor is socially unjust and morally wrong. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services pledged to prevent discrimination and promised equal healthcare access for all Medicare patients. It should take only the flip of a legislative switch to reverse healthcare disparities created by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. 6. Conclusion.Racial healthcare disparities will continue as long as poor Medicare patients receive less Medicare benefits than wealthier Medicare patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00