Counterfactual Generation Through Multi-objective Constrained Optimisation
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Abstract Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques are often adopted to provide transparent feedback to decision-makers evaluating the results of trained machine learning (ML) models. One of these techniques covers the generation of counterfactuals -- slightly modified instances based on a given input that can change its predicted outcome. These counterfactuals enable decision-makers to know what actions they could do to modify an outcome and improve the trust and transparency of a trained ML model. This research aims to develop and apply a novel constrained multi-objective optimisation design (MOOD) to generate counterfactuals in classification and regression problems. The MOOD is composed of three steps: the definition of a constrained multi-objective problem (MOP); the multi-objective optimisation (MOO) using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA); and the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) with a domination filter and the TOPSIS ranking technique. This MOOD generated large numbers of valid counterfactuals and selected and ranked only the most relevant to the decision-maker. Furthermore, the results show that the proposed MOOD outperformed other architectures available for production use in at least one of the objectives measured for all datasets analysed in both regression and classification problems.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00