Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 73,389 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair Chih-Wen Chu , Satheeja Velayudhan , Jakob H. Schauser , Sapna Krishnakumar , Stephanie Yang , Keiji Itoh , Dominique Alfandari , Ala Trusina , Sergei Y. Sokol doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.20.654909 Chih-Wen Chu 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Satheeja Velayudhan 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Jakob H. Schauser 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sapna Krishnakumar 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Stephanie Yang 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Keiji Itoh 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Dominique Alfandari 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Ala Trusina 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Sergei Y. Sokol 1 Department of Cell , Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: sergei.sokol{at}mssm.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Preview PDF SUMMARY Planar cell polarity (PCP) is a phenomenon of coordinated cell orientation in many epithelia and is required for early morphogenetic events, such as vertebrate gastrulation or neural tube closure that place embryonic tissues in their proper locations. Known PCP complexes segregate to opposite edges of each cell due to regulatory feedback interactions, however, whether and how PCP is connected to the tension-sensing machinery has been elusive. Here we observed dynamic polarization of Afadin- and α-Actinin-interacting protein (ADIP) in the epithelia adjacent to the involuting marginal zone and the folding neural plate of Xenopus embryos, suggesting that it is controlled by mechanical cues. Supporting this hypothesis, ADIP puncta relocated in response to the pulling forces of neighboring ectoderm cells undergoing apical constriction. Moreover, ADIP puncta rapidly polarized in embryos subjected to stretching and during embryonic wound healing. ADIP formed a mechanosensitive complex with the PCP protein Diversin that was distinct from known core PCP complexes and required for wound repair. We propose that mechanically controlled planar polarization of the ADIP-Diversin complex guides cell behaviors in normal morphogenesis and during wound healing. Highlights: ADIP is a mechanosensing protein that is planar polarized together with Diversin in epithelia during morphogenesis and wound repair Epithelial wound healing redistributes ADIP-containing complexes towards the wound. ADIP and Diversin are interdependent and form a complex regulating morphogenesis and wound healing Positive regulatory feedback between mechanical forces and PCP signaling drives morphogenesis Introduction Collective tissue movements during embryonic development such as neural tube closure in vertebrates are regulated by mechanical and molecular stimuli. Cells sense mechanical environmental cues through cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion complexes linked to actomyosin bundles. Forces transmitted through these cytoskeletal networks are converted into biochemical signals that modulate gene expression and protein dynamics 1 , 2 . Despite numerous examples of physical forces affecting the localization and signaling of many proteins 3 – 5 , the process of mechanotransduction, from force generation to force sensing and transmission between cells, remains poorly understood at the molecular level. Stretching of mechanosensitive proteins, such as F-actin 6 , α-catenin 7 , and vinculin 8 , 9 , results in the appearance of new protein binding sites. For example, stretched actin filaments recruit actin-binding proteins such as α-Actinin and Myosin II 10 – 12 . Actomyosin contractile forces are transmitted from cell to cell via adherens junctions 13 , 14 , but how the response to force is amplified and coordinated within the tissue over large distances is largely unknown. One molecular pathway that may regulate long-range force transmission during morphogenesis is planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling. PCP is a biological phenomenon that refers to coordinated polarity of cells in the plane of the tissue, whereas PCP signaling refers to the molecular mechanisms underlying planar polarity axis formation and the control of collective cell behaviors. The ‘core PCP’ proteins form signaling complexes segregating to opposite ends of the cell due to regulatory feedbacks, leading to signal amplification 15 – 18 . In vertebrate ectoderm derivatives, including the skin and the neural plate, core PCP complexes polarize to the anterior edge of cells 19 – 21 and are genetically required for morphogenesis such as neural tube closure 22 , 23 . In addition to core PCP proteins, PCP can be organized by other molecules such as Fat and Dachsous 18 , 24 , 25 , Par3 and Myosin II during germ band extension 26 , or Fat2 and Lar phosphatase in the fly follicular cell collective migration 27 . Consistent with a role of mechanical signals in the establishment of PCP, global patterning signals and tissue deformation have been associated with PCP regulation 28 – 33 . Also, the segregation of core PCP complexes in Ciona and Xenopus depends on Myosin II activity 20 , 34 , and the core PCP axis can be altered by ectopic pulling forces 29 , 31 , 35 . While the published work implicates mechanical forces in PCP establishment, the remaining challenge is to understand how PCP signaling senses mechanical forces and converts them into biochemical signals underlying collective cell behaviors. We previously identified ADIP (Afadin- and α-Actinin-interacting protein), also known as SSX2IP or Msd1 36 – 38 , as physically associated with a mechanosensitive LIM domain protein 39 . Since ADIP also interacts with two other mechanosensitive proteins, Afadin and α-Actinin 12 , 37 , 40 , we suspected that ADIP may be similarly involved in force sensing. Here we demonstrate that ADIP polarizes in response to tensile forces in an α-Actinin-dependent manner, in the folding neural plate, during wound healing and blastopore closure. Importantly, we show that the core PCP protein Diversin is the interacting partner of ADIP needed to establish tension-induced PCP. Our findings support an essential role of the ADIP-Diversin complex in sensing mechanical cues during wound healing and embryonic morphogenesis. Results To investigate the involvement of ADIP in mechanosensing, we asked how ADIP is distributed in Xenopus embryonic ectoderm. In gastrula ectoderm, GFP-tagged ADIP is localized to nonpolarized puncta ( Fig. 1A - 1C , see Fig. S1 for quantification). Intriguingly, we observed planar polarization of ADIP puncta in the epidermis surrounding the closing neural plate ( Fig. 1D - 1G ) and in the cells abutting the blastopore lip during gastrulation ( Fig. 1H - 1N ). These locations are adjacent to the areas undergoing apical constriction and likely experience tensile stresses 22 , 41 , 42 . ADIP puncta were predominantly enriched near the cell corners and junctions proximal to the constricting cells, and this polarized distribution was observed in three to six rows of cells adjacent to the constricted cells. Of note, the puncta were consistently polarized towards the neural plate border at different locations along the neural plate ( Fig. 1E - 1F’ ). Importantly, this ADIP polarity was sensitive to Myosin II inhibition by constitutively active myosin phosphatase Mypt1 43 , 44 ( Fig. S2A-S2D ). We thus hypothesized that ADIP localization is controlled by mechanical forces. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 1. ADIP is polarized in superficial cell layers during morphogenetic events (A) Scheme of RNA injections. myr-BFP marks the cell boundary. RNAs were targeted to the neural plate and the blastopore of four-cell Xenopus embryos as described in the Methods. (B-B’) Localization of GFP-ADIP in ectodermal cells at the boxed region in (A) at stage 12. (C) Rose plot showing ADIP orientation in ectoderm. Chi-square test indicates random distribution. Also see Figure S1. (D-F’) Top view of stage 16 anterior neural plate expressing GFP-ADIP and myr-BFP. The neural plate is highlighted by intense staining of F-actin (blue). Anterior (E, E’) and lateral (F, F’) cells at the respective boxed regions in (D) show ADIP enrichment at the cell corners (arrows) closest to the neural plate border (dashed lines). Also see Figure S2. (G) Rose plot showing ADIP orientation with respect to the anterior neural plate border (0°). Chi-square test indicates non-random ADIP distribution ( p <0.05). (H) Vegetal view of Xenopus gastrula at stage 10.5 depicting the blastopore lips (red arrows). (I, I’, L, L’) Superficial cells from the boxed regions in (H) show ADIP enrichment (arrows) toward the blastopore lip boundary (dashed lines). Scale bars, 20 μm. (J, M) Segmentation of cells in (I, I’) and (L, L’), respectively, showing ADIP polarization (red arrowheads). (K, N) Rose plots showing ADIP orientation with respect to the blastopore lip (0°) in (I, I’) and (L, L’) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Chi-square test indicates non-random ADIP distribution. To evaluate force-sensing properties of ADIP, we asked whether it can relocalize in response to external mechanical cues. To produce a local pulling force, ectodermal cells were injected with mRNA encoding Shroom3, an apical constriction inducer 45 , 46 . While GFP-ADIP puncta were randomly distributed in control embryonic ectoderm ( Fig. 2A - 2C ), they accumulated near the cell borders adjacent to the mosaic patches of neighboring Shroom3-expressing cells ( Fig. 2D - 2F ). Live imaging revealed the appearance of ADIP puncta near the apical surface and their movement toward these cell borders ( Fig. S3A and Video S1 ), suggesting directional transport of ADIP puncta. Similar results have been obtained in experiments using Plekhg5, another apical constriction inducer 47 ( Fig. S3B-S3G ), indicating that this response is not specific to Shroom3 but rather is triggered by apical constriction per se . Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 2. ADIP polarization in response to anisotropic mechanical forces (A, D) Scheme of injection. The clone of cells injected with Shroom3 RNA or control are marked with mem-Cherry, the clone of cells expressing GFP-ADIP is marked by myr-BFP (B-B’’, E-E’’) Distribution of GFP-ADIP (green) in cells adjacent to mem-Cherry-expressing cells (cyan) at stage 12.5. Note the polarization of GFP-ADIP (arrows in E-E”) toward the adjacent mem-Cherry cells expressing Shroom3 (cyan). (C, F) Rose plots showing ADIP orientation with respect to adjacent mem-Cherry-expressing cells (0°) in (B-B”) and (E-E”) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Chi-square test indicates random (B-B”) and non-random (E-E”) distribution, respectively. Bar, 20 µm. Also see Figure S3. To further confirm that ADIP can polarize in response to tensile forces along the tissue plane, embryos expressing GFP-ADIP were subjected to unidirectional stretching along the animal-vegetal axis using a hydrostatic pressure-driven aspiration device 29 ( Fig. 3A ). ADIP puncta were randomly distributed in the control unmanipulated embryos ( Fig. 3B - 3D ) but became polarized along the force vector in response to a 25-min stretch ( Fig. 3E - 3G ). Like ADIP polarization around the neural plate, the stretch-induced puncta polarization was sensitive to Mypt1 ( Fig. S4A-S4H ), consistent with the requirement of Myosin II for ADIP polarization. Together, our observations strongly indicate that ADIP localization reflects the existing mechanical cues along the tissue plane. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 3. ADIP redistribution in response to aspiration-induced stretching (A) Experimental setup of unidirectional tissue stretching. Negative pressure was applied to gastrula embryos to aspirate ectoderm into the capillary. (B-B’, E-E’) GFP-ADIP distribution in an unstretched (B-B’) or stretched embryo (E-E’). Note the polarization of GFP-ADIP (yellow arrows) that aligns with the stretch axis (white arrow) (E-E’). Scale bar, 20 μm. (C, F) Segmentation of cells in (B-B’) and (E-E’) respectively showing ADIP polarity (red arrowheads). (D, G) Rose plots showing ADIP orientation with respect to the animal pole or aspiration axis (0°) in (B-B’) and (E-E’) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Chi-square test indicates random distribution in (B-B’) and non-random distribution in (E-E’) respectively. Also see Figure S4. An alternative model that is easily amenable to experimental manipulation is embryonic wound healing that depends on the pulling force of the contractile actomyosin ring surrounding the wound 48 – 52 . Consistent with our previous conclusions, we observed robust polarization of ADIP puncta within 20-40 min after inflicting a wound by surgically removing a piece of gastrula ectoderm at stage 11 ( Fig. 4A - 4F , Fig. S5A-S5B”’, and Video S2). Although the wound repair can involve both superficial and deep cell layers of Xenopus ectoderm 52 , 53 , we observed ADIP polarization even in case of exclusively superficial wounds. Importantly, ADIP was polarized in 5-9 rows of cells surrounding the closing wound, with the degree of polarization (angular alignment, i.e. ‘orientation’, and magnitude) decreased in the cells that are further away from the wound edge ( Fig. S5C-S5F ). Moreover, time-lapse imaging revealed directional movements of ADIP puncta ( Fig. 4G , Video S2, arrows ) or appearance of ADIP puncta near the cell corners proximal to the wound ( Video S2, asterisks ). We observed gradual increase of ADIP puncta at the cell corners, whereas the numbers of apical cortical puncta and those near the bicellular junctions gradually decreased ( Fig. 4H ). These data suggest that ADIP polarization is likely achieved via directional transport of ADIP puncta toward the cell corner closest to the wound. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 4. ADIP is polarized in epithelial cells around the wound (A-A’, D-D’) Localization of GFP-ADIP in unwounded (A-A’) and 30 min post-wounded (D-D’) gastrula ectoderm respectively, with myr-BFP marking the cell boundaries. Wound (w) edge is indicated by dashed lines. Also see Figure S5A. (B-B’, E-E’) Segmentation of cells in (A-A’) and (D-D’) respectively showing ADIP polarity (red arrowheads). (C, F) Rose plots showing ADIP orientation with respect to the animal pole or wound edge (0°) in (A-A’) and (D-D’) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Chi-square test indicates random distribution in (A-A’) and non-random distribution in (D-D’) respectively. Also see Figure S5B-F, S6, S7. (G) Stills of time-lapse images showing GFP-ADIP at 5, 13 and 30 min post-wounding (pw) with myr-BFP marking the cell boundaries. Note ADIP movement toward the wound (w) over time (arrows). Also see Video S2. (H) Quantification of the distribution of ADIP puncta near the bicellular junction, tricellular junction, or apical cytoplasm over time. Colored lines are the rolling averages of the original data points shown in grey. To test which region of ADIP is required for its polarization, ADIP deletion mutants lacking the amino acid sequences corresponding to the α-Actinin-or Afadin-binding region 37 ( Fig. S6A ) were expressed in the wounded ectoderm. We found that the mutant lacking Afadin-binding site remained partly polarized, whereas the mutant lacking the α-Actinin-binding domain failed to polarize toward the wound ( Fig. S6B-S6G ). The latter finding indicates that α-Actinin is involved in ADIP polarization. We next assessed the distribution of F-actin and the Myosin II heavy chain that can be traced by the SF9 intrabody 54 – 56 and detected their polarization towards the wound edge ( Fig. S7A-S7D) . These findings suggest that ADIP polarization is associated with actomyosin contractility near the cell vertices. To understand the significance of ADIP in wound healing, we assessed the effect of ADIP knockdown on wound closure. We generated ADIP-specific monoclonal antibodies and confirmed the depletion of endogenous ADIP (65 kDa) in embryos injected with morpholino (MO) targeting ADIP (ADIPMO) 39 ( Fig. 5A ). Whereas the epithelial wounds were nearly closed within 15 min in control embryos, the rate of wound closure in ADIP morphants was significantly reduced, especially in the first 5 min after wounding ( Fig. 5B and 5C ). This effect can be rescued by co-expressing GFP-ADIP RNA ( Fig. 5D ), confirming specificity. In search for molecular markers affected by ADIP depletion, we found that F-actin staining was significantly reduced both at bicellular junctions and at the wound edge in ADIP depleted cells as compared to control cells ( Fig. 5E - 5G , Fig.S8A-S8C) . Moreover, junctional E-cadherin was decreased in the depleted tissue ( Fig. S8D-S8H ), suggesting that ADIP acts in the assembly or maintenance of adherens junctions that play a critical role during wound closure 50 . Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 5. ADIP is required for epithelial wound healing (A) Immunoblot showing the depletion of endogenous ADIP (65 kDa band) in ADIPMO-injected embryo lysates. α-tubulin (α-tub) is the loading control. (B-D) ADIP depletion delayed wound healing in stage 14 ectoderm. (B) Stills of time-lapse images showing the epithelial wound in CoMO or ADIPMO-injected stage 14 embryos at indicated time point after wounding. (C) Quantification of the wound size relative to that at 1 min post-wounding (relative wound size) over time. Data are from two clutches of embryos. Two-tailed Student’s t -test of the relative wound size at 5 mins: ****: p <0.0001. (D) Quantification of the relative wound size at 5 min post-wounding showing rescue of the ADIPMO defect by GFP-ADIP. Data are from three clutches of embryos, and p values are obtained using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. ****: p <0.0001, ***: p <0.001. (E-H) ADIP depletion reduced F-actin enrichment at the wound edge. Also see Figure S8. (E-F’) Epithelial wounds (w) 5 min post-wounding on embryos injected with indicated MOs were immunostained to visualize HA (green) and F-actin (magenta). HA-myr-BFP is the lineage tracer marking the cell boundaries, dashed lines mark the wound edge. (G) Segmentation of cells and quantification of F-actin intensity at the wound edge (WE, magenta) in (F-F’) and at non-wound edge junctions (NE, black). Data are from three embryos, 5 min post-wounding. Total cell numbers are in parentheses. Two-tailed Student’s t test: ****: p <0.0001. The planar polarized distribution of ADIP is very similar to that of core PCP complexes in many epithelia, raising the question of whether ADIP functions in PCP signaling. We therefore assessed the effects of ADIP depletion on the polarization of the core PCP protein Vangl2 in the neural plate ( Fig. S9A ). In control embryos, Vangl2 accumulated at the anterior edges of neuroepithelial cells at stage 15 as reported previously 20 ( Fig. S9B and S9B’ , arrows). This enrichment was lost in embryos depleted of ADIP ( Fig. S9C and S9C’, asterisks). Immunoblotting confirmed that Vangl2 protein level remained unaffected ( Fig. S9D ), suggesting that ADIP regulates Vangl2 protein distribution. We next hypothesized that the distribution of Vangl2 may be altered in the wounded gastrula ectoderm, but no detectable Vangl2 polarization was apparent (Fig. S9E and S9E’) . While our results indicate that ADIP functionally interacts with Vangl2, lack of Vangl2 polarization during wound healing prompted us to look for alternative markers that become polarized near the wound edge. We assessed the distribution of Diversin/Ankrd6, a homolog of Drosophila PCP protein Diego 57 , 58 , because it was previously reported to polarize in the Xenopus neural plate 59 . Like ADIP, Diversin was enriched at the cell corners proximal to the wound edge in gastrula ectoderm ( Fig. 6A - 6C ). Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 6. ADIP interacts with Diversin to establish PCP during wound healing (A-B) Localization of Diversin in stage 11 ectoderm unwounded (A) or 30 min post-wounding (B). Arrows indicate enrichment of Diversin at junctions facing the wound (w) edge (dashed line). (C) Rose plot showing the orientation of Diversin relative to the wound (0°). Data are from 3 embryos. Chi-square test indicates non-random distribution compared to the null hypothesis (dashed line). (D-H) ADIP was associated with Diversin. (D-D”, F-F”) Colocalization of ADIP with Diversin in stage 11 ectoderm, unwounded (D-D”) or 30 min post-wounding (F-F”). Arrows indicate puncta where ADIP and Diversin signals overlap. Dashed lines mark the wound (w) edge. (E, G) Scatter plots showing the colocalization of ADIP and Diversin puncta in (D-D”) and (F-F”) images, respectively. Colocalization of ADIP and Diversin puncta was analyzed using the ComDet plugin in ImageJ and the scatter plots were generated using Microsoft Excel. (E) 74.66% of Diversin puncta colocalized with ADIP, while 15.86% of ADIP puncta and 9.46% of Diversin puncta did not colocalize. (G) At the cell corners facing the wound, 83.12% of Diversin puncta colocalized with ADIP with a strong correlation ( R² □=□0.9398). (H) Western blot showing immunoprecipitation of HARFP-Diversin (HARFP-Div, asterisks) from embryonic lysates co-expressing TurboID-ADIP and HARFP-Div. Diversin is specifically biotinylated in the presence of TurboID-ADIP (arrow). Biotinylated TurboID-ADIP is also detected in the precipitates (double asterisks). (I-L) ADIP is required for Diversin polarization in response to aspiration-induced stretching. (I-I’, K-K’) RFP-Diversin distribution in stretched embryo with (K-K’) or without (I-I’) ADIPMO (40 ng) injection. Note the polarization of Diversin (yellow arrows) that aligns with the stretch axis (white arrow) in control embryos (I-I’). Scale bar = 20 μm. (J, L) Rescaled rose plots showing the orientation of Diversin polarization relative to the stretch axis (0°) in (I-I’) and (K-K’) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Welch’s t-test between population polarities in J and L: p <0.0001. Given the similar distribution of ADIP and Diversin in the epithelium surrounding the wound, we asked whether the two proteins form a complex. Supporting this possibility, the ADIP and DIversin puncta colocalized in the intact gastrula ectoderm ( Fig. 6D - 6E ), and the protein complex polarized towards the epidermal wound ( Fig. 6F - 6G ). The interaction between ADIP and Diversin was further supported in a proximity-labeling assay, as Diversin was specifically biotinylated by the ADIP construct fused with TurboID 60 ( Fig. 6H ). Importantly, the Diversin deletion mutant lacking the ankyrin repeats (Div-ΔANK) 61 did not colocalize with ADIP ( Fig. S10A-S10D ) and failed to polarize in response to wounding ( Fig. S10E-S10H). This finding suggests that Diversin responds to mechanical cues by associating with ADIP. This is further supported by the lack of Diversin polarization in the ectoderm of ADIP-depleted embryos after unidirectional stretching ( Fig. 6I - 6L ). We next asked whether Diversin is required for ADIP polarization because both proteins were implicated in neural tube closure 39 , 59 . We also found that wound healing was delayed in embryos depleted Diversin with previously characterized MO 62 ( Fig. 7A - 7B ). Compared to control embryos, ADIP became less polarized in Diversin-deficient embryos subjected to unidirectional stretching ( Fig. 7C - 7F ), indicating that Diversin is required for ADIP polarization. These observations are consistent with ADIP acting together with Diversin in a pathway that is critical for both wound healing and normal morphogenesis. Download figure Open in new tab Fig. 7. Diversin is required for wound healing and ADIP polarization (A-B) Diversin requirement for wound healing in stage 11.5 ectoderm. (A) Stills from time-lapse imaging showing epithelial wound closure in CoMO and Diversin MO (DivMO, 60 ng)-injected embryos at the indicated time points post-wounding. Bar, 50 µm. (B) Quantification of the relative wound size over time. Data are from three clutches of embryos. Two-tailed Student’s t -test of the relative wound size at 1 min: **: p = 0.0014. (C-F) Diversin is required for ADIP polarization in response to aspiration-induced stretching. (C-D′) GFP-ADIP distribution in stretched embryo with (D-D’) or without (C-C’) DivMO (40 ng) injection. Note the polarization of ADIP (yellow arrows) that aligns with the stretch axis (white arrow) in control embryos (C-C’). Scale bar = 20 μm. (E-F) Rescaled rose plots showing the orientation of ADIP polarization relative to the aspiration axis (0°) in (C-C’) and (D-D’) respectively. Data are from 3 embryos. Welch’s t-test between population polarities in E and F: p <0.0001. (G) Working model. The ADIP-Diversin (Div) complex (magenta) is redistributed to the proximal end of the cell (blue arrows) in response to the pulling force (F) from neighboring cells. This relocalization leads to the establishment of PCP and subsequent cell-cell signaling in the tissue plane. Discussion In this study we report that ADIP redistributes in response to tensile forces in Xenopus embryonic epithelia, leading to the formation of the polarized complex with the PCP protein Diversin. Since both ADIP and Diversin function in morphogenesis and wound healing in Xenopus embryos, the enrichment of their complex to one side of the cell may trigger a unique pathway instructing collective cell behaviors yet different from the existing PCP signaling pathways ( Fig. 7G ) . We propose that this protein complex mediates the transmission of tensile forces to biochemical signaling that underlies many morphogenetic processes including gastrulation and neurulation. During epithelial morphogenesis, cells sense mechanical forces at cell vertices, tension hotspots where the balance between cell adhesion and cortical contractility is fine-tuned to facilitate cell shape changes while maintaining tissue integrity 63 – 65 . Here we demonstrate that ADIP redistributes to the proximity of cell vertices in response to tensile force in a Myosin II-dependent manner, and the underlying mechanism may be related to the mechanosensitive properties of ADIP binding partners. Our finding that ADIP polarization requires its α-Actinin-binding domain suggests that ADIP is recruited to the cortex by α-Actinin, a mechanosensitive protein that responds to F-actin deformation 12 . Moreover, we observe that deletion of the Afadin-binding domain partially affects ADIP polarization, consistent with the mechanosensitive role of Afadin at tricellular junctions 40 , 66 . As we did not detect Afadin polarization during wound healing, it remains unclear how Afadin regulates ADIP distribution. PCP is a hallmark of many epithelial tissues undergoing morphogenesis, and wound healing has significant similarity to morphogenetic processes 48 , 67 . Moreover, mouse embryonic skin repair is delayed in the absence of core PCP protein function 68 , although, to our knowledge, PCP has not been previously described in the wounded epithelium. The localization of the ADIP-Diversin complex appears to be controlled differently from the previously described anterior Vangl2-Prickle complex 20 . Consistent with this view, the dynamic polarization of Diversin and ADIP takes place in response to wounding at the time when the Vangl2 polarity in the embryo is not yet established 20 , 29 . The ADIP-Diversin complex polarization occurs via a unique mechanism that is rapidly activated in response to force. This property makes the ADIP-Diversin polarity module distinct from other polarity modules. We propose that the ADIP-Diversin complex defines a novel mechanosensitive planar polarity system that plays a critical role in wound healing and morphogenesis, adding to the existing PCP signaling modes 18 , 24 , 69 . To explain the ability of ADIP puncta to move long distances in the cells, we speculate that an additional mechanosensitive trafficking mechanism delivers ADIP in the proximity of the cell vertices. Such directional transport could take place along F-actin filaments or microtubules. At present, there is no evidence for F-actin involvement in ADIP transport. Supporting the potential involvement of microtubules, ADIP mediates microtubule anchorage and can be delivered by microtubule motors Dynein and Kinesin-14 36 , 70 , 71 . Moreover, extrinsic mechanical cues have been shown to promote microtubule alignment along the force axis 29 . A hypothesis consistent with the current findings is that the initial recruitment of ADIP by α-Actinin promotes local microtubule anchoring, leading to further accumulation of ADIP through active transport along the microtubules. While the polarized ADIP-Diversin puncta are likely non-centrosomal due to their high number, the association of ADIP and Diversin with the centrosome 36 , 61 , 70 , 72 , 73 may be relevant for their signaling function. For example, the ADIP complex may anchor noncentrosomal microtubules at the polarized cortex to promote PCP-related vesicular trafficking 59 , 74 , 75 . Our finding of F-actin reduction in ADIP morphants suggests that ADIP not only acts as a force sensor but contributes to subsequent force generation by modulating junctional F-actin assembly. Supporting this hypothesis, we observed polarized distribution of F-actin and Myosin heavy chain toward the closing wound similar to the polarization of ADIP. Future studies will evaluate whether ADIP regulates F-actin through its binding partners Afadin and α-Actinin or through stabilizing junctional E-cadherin. Our data thus suggest a positive feedback loop between mechanical forces produced during morphogenesis and the establishment of polarized ADIP-Diversin signaling complexes that might lead to new rounds of force generation. Resource availability Lead contact Requests for further information, resources, and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Sergei Y. Sokol ( sergei.sokol{at}mssm.edu ). Materials availability Reagents generated for this study are available upon reasonable request from the lead contact. Data and code availability All of the original data and any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper are available from the lead contact upon request. Author contributions C.C. and S.V. designed, executed, and analyzed experiments, prepared the figures, and contributed to writing of the manuscript. J.H.S. and A.T. performed image analysis and quantification, statistical analysis, and contributed to writing of the manuscript. S.K. carried out the experiments with stretching embryos and their imaging. S.Y. contributed to wound healing studies of Diversin. D.A. generated ADIP-specific hybridomas and selected monoclonal antibodies to ADIP. K.I. prepared ADIP antigens for immunization and tested the antibody to ADIP by immunoblotting. S.Y.S. conceived the study, designed experiments, acquired funding, supervised and coordinated the project, and wrote the manuscript. All authors agreed to the final version of the manuscript. Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests. Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process During the preparation of this work, the authors did not use AI-assisted technologies. Supplemental Information Document S1 . Figures S1–S10. Video S1. ADIP polarization in response to apical constriction of neighboring cells, related to Figure 2 . Time-lapse images of ectodermal cells at stage 12 showing directional movement of RFP-ADIP (red) toward the apically constricting Shroom3-expressing cells (cyan). Images were taken every 2 mins. Video S2. ADIP polarization in response to wounding, related to Figure 3 . Time-lapse images of gastrula ectoderm at stage 11 showing directional movement of GFP-ADIP (arrows) toward the wound (w). Asterisks mark ADIP puncta appearance near the tricellular junctions. Images were taken every 1 min. Methods Plasmid constructs The plasmids encoding pCS105-HA-RFP-Diversin, pCS105-HA-RFP-Diversin-ΔAnk 58 , 61 , Mypt1-T696A (the constitutively active mutant of myosin phosphatase) 43 , pCS2-Plekhg5, a gift of Chenbei Chang 47 , pCS2-SF9-mNG 54 , pCS2-myc-mShroom3, pCS2-myr-tagBFP-HA and pCS2-memCherry have been previously described 59 , 76 . The Xenopus ADIP constructs, pXT7-EGFP-ADIP and pCS105-HA-RFP-ADIP were also described 39 . FlagTurboID-ADIP has been generated by subcloning of ADIP cDNA insert into the FlagTurboID plasmid (a gift of Kenichi Takemaru, Addgene plasmid 124646) 60 . GFP-Afadin was constructed by subcloning Xenopus Afadin cDNA, a gift of Naoto Ueno 77 , in-frame with GFP into pCS2. Xenopus ADIP deletion mutants ADIP-ΔAB (actinin-binding domain, aa 124-214) and ADIP-ΔAFB (afadin-binding domain, aa 334-417) were constructed by PCR at the positions corresponding to these domains in human/mouse ADIP 37 . These were subcloned in-frame into pCS105-HA-RFP-ADIP and pXT7-GFP-ADIP with specific primers. Detailed cloning procedures are available upon request. All constructs have been verified by sequencing. ADIP ortholog sequences were aligned using the MEGA software, viewed using Jalview 78 . Xenopus embryo culture, morpholinos, RNA synthesis and microinjections Wild-type Xenopus laevis were purchased from Xenopus 1 (Michigan) and maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. In vitro fertilization and embryo culture were carried out as previously described 59 , and embryonic staging was determined according to 79 . Capped mRNAs were synthesized using the mMessage mMachine SP6 or T7 Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). For microinjections, embryos were transferred to 3% Ficoll 400 (Sigma) in 0.5× Marc’s modified Ringer’s (MMR) solution (50 mM NaCl, 1 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl 2 , 0.5 mM MgCl 2 and 2.5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) 80 . Control MO (5′-GCTTCAGCTAGTGACACATGCAT-3′) 39 , ADIP/SSX2IP MO (5’-TAACTCCTCGACTCCTTCTGGACAG-3’) 39 , and Diversin MO (5’-GGC CAC ATC CTG CTG GCT CAT GAA T-3’) 62 were described previously. To investigate protein distribution, a ventral-animal blastomere was co-injected with 100 pg of mRNAs encoding ADIP or Diversin, along with 50 pg of myrBFP. For studies on apical constriction-induced PCP, the right ventral-animal blastomere was injected with 100 pg of ADIP and 50 pg of myrBFP RNA, while the left ventral-animal blastomere was injected with 20 pg of myc-Shroom3 or Plekhg5 RNA together with 20 pg of memCherry mRNAs at the 4-cell stage. For knockdown experiments in the neural plate, a dorsal-animal blastomere was injected with 20 ng of control or ADIP morpholinos (MOs) with 50 pg of myrBFP RNA as lineage tracer. For knockdown experiments of wound closure, two ventral-animal blastomeres were injected with 40-60 ng of ADIP MOs with 100 pg of myrBFP RNA or 40 ng of Diversin MO. Embryos injected with RNA or MOs were cultured in 0.1x MMR until they reached the early gastrula or neurula stage. Each experimental group comprised a minimum of 10-20 embryos, and the experiments were repeated at least three times to ensure reproducibility. The wound healing and the aspiration assay A small wound was created on the embryonic ectoderm at stage 11.5 or 14 with the dissection forceps, and wounded embryos were healed for 1-30 min in 0.7x MMR solution. The wound closure rate was monitored using a light microscope, with images captured every 5 min as previously described 53 , 81 . The hydraulic aspiration assay was as described by Chien et al. 29 with modifications. The micromanipulator holding a syringe with 0.1x MMR buffer was connected to a capillary filled with and submerged into 0.1x MMR solution. Stage 10.5-11 embryos were devitellinized and positioned with the animal hemisphere towards the capillary. Negative pressure was applied by lowering the position of the capillary to gradually draw the liquid and the embryo into the capillary, where they were subjected to suction for 25 min. Embryos exhibiting a persistent bulge post-suction were immediately fixed in MEMFA (100 mM MOPS, pH 7.4, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO 4 , 3.7% formaldehyde) for 30 min, as described 82 . ADIP antibody generation Xenopus ADIP-specific immunogens have been produced in E. coli using glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-peptide fusions by subcloning ADIP protein fragments (amino acids 1-297, 253-384 and 295-554) into pGEX plasmids 61 . Recombinant proteins were expressed in E. coli, purified by affinity chromatography and used to immunize Balb/c mice. Specific hybridomas were obtained after fusing splenocytes of immunized mice with the myeloma line SP-20. The hybridomas were screened by immunofluorescence on HEK-293T cells expressing full length Xenopus ADIP fused to RFP. Positive hybridomas were further tested by capillary immunoblotting by comparing lysates of control and RFP-ADIP-transfected HEK293T cells as previously described 83 . Positive clones were expanded and frozen. Further testing resulted in the selection of the 5C3 antibody that recognized a single band of 65 kDa ADIP protein and was reactive with overexpressed ADIP constructs. Immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting and proximity labeling Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting have been carried out as previously described 84 . For proximity biotinylation, four-cell embryos were injected into the animal pole with 200 pg of Flag-TurboID-ADIP and 400 pg of HA-RFP-Diversin RNAs, followed by injection of 20 nl of a 0.8 mM biotin (Millipore Sigma) solution into the blastocoel. Embryos were lysed at stage 10.5, and protein biotinylation was assessed in embryo lysates precipitated with mouse anti-HA (12A5). Immunoblotting was carried out with goat anti-biotin-HRP (Cell Signaling), anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma), mouse anti-HA (12A5), mouse anti-αTubulin (12G10, DSHB), and mouse anti-ADIP antibodies (5C3, this study). Chemiluminescence signals were measured using ChemiDoc (BioRad). Immunostaining and embryo imaging For phalloidin staining, embryos were fixed in MEMFA for 1 hour at RT. Embryos were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and stained with Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS with 1% BSA overnight at 4°C. For HA and Vangl2 staining, embryos were fixed in 2% TCA solution for 30 min at room temperature, permeabilized in 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 minutes, and stained with mouse monoclonal anti-HA (12A5), mouse anti-E-cadherin (5D3, DSHB), and rabbit anti-Vangl2 antibody 85 . Secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Imaging was performed using a BC43 spinning disk confocal microscope (Fusion Ver 2 image processing software, Andor, Oxford Instruments) using 20x objective lens. Experiments were repeated at least three times, with each experimental group comprising a minimum of five embryos. Z-stack images were projected into a single image using the maximum projection function in ImageJ for subsequent analysis and quantification. Quantification of polarity complexes and statistical analysis Epithelial sheet images were segmented using the Cellpose algorithm 86 . Cell borders were identified by classifying a pixel as a border-pixel if its 8 nearest or 16 next-nearest neighbors belonged to a mask with a different cell ID. For protein aggregate analysis, pixel intensity was log-transformed, normalized, and converted into a binary mask using a 20% threshold. Protein clusters were identified using OpenCV (opencv-python 4.10.0.84, Connected components algorithm), excluding clusters smaller than 2 pixels. To quantify cell polarization (see also Fig. S1 ), each protein cluster (or pixel in case of pixel-based analysis) was assigned a unit vector pointing from cell center towards its center of mass. The cell polarization vector was calculated by averaging unit vectors weighted by either cluster size or the intensity of the pixel. The magnitude of polarity was calculated as the length of the non-weighted average of unit vectors. To quantify polarity orientation relative to the direction of pull, the “force vector”, defined as the shortest path from each cell center to the junction with the cell exerting the pulling force was calculated, and the angular difference between the cell’s polarization vector and the force vector was computed. Cells within the perturbed region or with incomplete boundaries were filtered out. The angular differences were binned into 12 bins and a chi-square test was used to assess the statistical significance of non-uniform angle distribution under the null hypothesis that cell polarizations orient randomly 87 . Samples showing p < 0.05 were considered polarized. In ADIP-cluster analysis the null hypothesis was uniform distribution of the angles. In pixel-based analysis, the polarity quantification may be sensitive to elongated cell shape due to higher numbers of points/unit vectors. To account for this bias, a null model distribution was obtained computationally by randomly reshuffling the pixels and calculating the resulting orientation of polarity, and the corresponding rose plots were rescaled to be visually consistent with others plots. Each bin count was rescaled as , where N observed is the observed number of counts in the bin, N null the counts in the bin under the null model, and N uniform the expected counts without cell shape distortion (assumed to be uniform, N total /12 for 12 bins). For isotropic cell geometry, N rescaled = N observed Population polarity represents the degree of alignment of cell’s polarities across the population. The magnitude of population polarity was calculated similarly to the magnitude of cell polarity above (also Fig. S1), with the only difference of unit vectors representing the polarity orientation in individual cells. To assess whether population polarities differed significantly between samples, Welch’s t-test was applied to bootstrapped (with replacement) distributions of the population polarity. To estimate the changes in ADIP localization over time, the aggregates overlapping with the bicellular junctions or within 1.8 µm of the tricellular junctions were counted towards bicellular, f_bi, or tricellular, f_tri, fraction, respectively. The fraction of cytoplasmic aggregates f_cyto = 1 – f_bi – f_tri. Cell borders were imported into ImageJ as 1-pixel wide lines to measure the intensity of F-actin and E-cadherin at bicellular junctions and wound edge. Colocalization of ADIP and Diversin puncta was analyzed using the ComDet plugin in ImageJ and the scatter plots were generated using Microsoft Excel. Acknowledgments We thank Chenbei Chang, Naoto Ueno, Ann Miller, Ken Takemaru for plasmids; Ken Irvine and Vladimir Gelfand for comments on the manuscript, Raymond Keller and Lance Davidson for suggestions regarding the aspiration assay. We are grateful to members of the Sokol laboratory for valuable discussions. This research was supported by the NIH grants R35GM122492 to S.Y.S., R24OD021485 to D.A. and the NNF grant NNF23OC0086722 to A.T. Funder Information Declared National Institutes of Health, https://ror.org/01cwqze88 , R35GM122492 , R24OD021485 Novo Nordisk Foundation , NNF23OC0086722 Footnotes ↵ $ Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, ↵ # Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark References 1. ↵ Sun , Z. , Guo , S.S. , and Fassler , R . ( 2016 ). Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction . J Cell Biol 215 , 445 – 456 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201609037 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 2. ↵ Yap , A.S. , Duszyc , K. , and Viasnoff , V . ( 2018 ). Mechanosensing and Mechanotransduction at Cell-Cell Junctions . Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10 . doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028761 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 3. ↵ Heisenberg , C.P. , and Bellaiche , Y . ( 2013 ). Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning . Cell 153 , 948 – 962 . S0092-8674(13)00573-4 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 4. Martino , F. , Perestrelo , A.R. , Vinarsky , V. , Pagliari , S. , and Forte , G . ( 2018 ). Cellular Mechanotransduction: From Tension to Function . Front Physiol 9 , 824 . doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00824 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Lecuit , T. , Lenne , P.F. , and Munro , E . ( 2011 ). Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis . Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 27 , 157 – 184 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104027 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Smith , M.A. , Blankman , E. , Gardel , M.L. , Luettjohann , L. , Waterman , C.M. , and Beckerle , M.C . ( 2010 ). A zyxin-mediated mechanism for actin stress fiber maintenance and repair . Dev Cell 19 , 365 – 376 . doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.08.008 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 7. ↵ Yonemura , S. , Wada , Y. , Watanabe , T. , Nagafuchi , A. , and Shibata , M . ( 2010 ). alpha-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development . Nat Cell Biol 12 , 533 – 542 . ncb2055 [pii] doi: 10.1038/ncb2055 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 8. ↵ Heer , N.C. , and Martin , A.C . ( 2017 ). Tension, contraction and tissue morphogenesis . Development 144 , 4249 – 4260 . doi: 10.1242/dev.151282 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 9. ↵ le Duc , Q. , Shi , Q. , Blonk , I. , Sonnenberg , A. , Wang , N. , Leckband , D. , and de Rooij , J. ( 2010 ). Vinculin potentiates E-cadherin mechanosensing and is recruited to actin-anchored sites within adherens junctions in a myosin II-dependent manner . J Cell Biol 189 , 1107 – 1115 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201001149 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 10. ↵ Uyeda , T.Q. , Iwadate , Y. , Umeki , N. , Nagasaki , A. , and Yumura , S . ( 2011 ). Stretching actin filaments within cells enhances their affinity for the myosin II motor domain . PLoS One 6 , e26200 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026200 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. Luo , T. , Mohan , K. , Iglesias , P.A. , and Robinson , D.N . ( 2013 ). Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanosensing . Nat Mater 12 , 1064 – 1071 . doi: 10.1038/nmat3772 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 12. ↵ Le , S. , Hu , X. , Yao , M. , Chen , H. , Yu , M. , Xu , X. , Nakazawa , N. , Margadant , F.M. , Sheetz , M.P. , and Yan , J . ( 2017 ). Mechanotransmission and Mechanosensing of Human alpha-Actinin 1 . Cell Rep 21 , 2714 – 2723 . doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.040 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Angulo-Urarte , A. , van der Wal , T. , and Huveneers , S. ( 2020 ). Cell-cell junctions as sensors and transducers of mechanical forces . Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1862 , 183316 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183316 . OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Lecuit , T. , and Yap , A.S . ( 2015 ). E-cadherin junctions as active mechanical integrators in tissue dynamics . Nat Cell Biol 17 , 533 – 539 . doi: 10.1038/ncb3136 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 15. ↵ Gray , R.S. , Roszko , I. , and Solnica-Krezel , L . ( 2011 ). Planar cell polarity: coordinating morphogenetic cell behaviors with embryonic polarity . Dev Cell 21 , 120 – 133 . doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.06.011 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 16. Sokol , S.Y . ( 2015 ). Spatial and temporal aspects of Wnt signaling and planar cell polarity during vertebrate embryonic development . Semin Cell Dev Biol 42 , 78 – 85 . doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.05.002 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 17. Butler , M.T. , and Wallingford , J.B . ( 2017 ). Planar cell polarity in development and disease . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18 , 375 – 388 . doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.11 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 18. ↵ Goodrich , L.V. , and Strutt , D . ( 2011 ). Principles of planar polarity in animal development . Development 138 , 1877 – 1892 . doi: 10.1242/dev.054080 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 19. ↵ Ciruna , B. , Jenny , A. , Lee , D. , Mlodzik , M. , and Schier , A.F . ( 2006 ). Planar cell polarity signalling couples cell division and morphogenesis during neurulation . Nature 439 , 220 – 224 . doi: 10.1038/nature04375 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 20. ↵ Ossipova , O. , Kim , K. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2015 ). Planar polarization of Vangl2 in the vertebrate neural plate is controlled by Wnt and Myosin II signaling . Biol Open 4 , 722 – 730 . doi: 10.1242/bio.201511676 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 21. ↵ Devenport , D. , and Fuchs , E . ( 2008 ). Planar polarization in embryonic epidermis orchestrates global asymmetric morphogenesis of hair follicles . Nature cell biology 10 , 1257 – 1268 . doi: 10.1038/ncb1784 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 22. ↵ Nikolopoulou , E. , Galea , G.L. , Rolo , A. , Greene , N.D. , and Copp , A.J . ( 2017 ). Neural tube closure: cellular, molecular and biomechanical mechanisms . Development 144 , 552 – 566 . doi: 10.1242/dev.145904 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 23. ↵ Juriloff , D.M. , and Harris , M.J . ( 2012 ). A consideration of the evidence that genetic defects in planar cell polarity contribute to the etiology of human neural tube defects. Birth defects research. Part A , Clinical and molecular teratology 94 , 824 – 840 . doi: 10.1002/bdra.23079 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Fulford , A.D. , and McNeill , H . ( 2020 ). Fat/Dachsous family cadherins in cell and tissue organisation . Curr Opin Cell Biol 62 , 96 – 103 . doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2019.10.006 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 25. ↵ Matis , M. , and Axelrod , J.D . ( 2013 ). Regulation of PCP by the Fat signaling pathway . Genes Dev 27 , 2207 – 2220 . doi: 10.1101/gad.228098.113 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 26. ↵ Zallen , J.A. , and Wieschaus , E . ( 2004 ). Patterned gene expression directs bipolar planar polarity in Drosophila . Dev Cell 6 , 343 – 355 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 27. ↵ Barlan , K. , Cetera , M. , and Horne-Badovinac , S . ( 2017 ). Fat2 and Lar Define a Basally Localized Planar Signaling System Controlling Collective Cell Migration . Dev Cell 40 , 467 – 477 e465. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.02.003 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ↵ Aigouy , B. , Farhadifar , R. , Staple , D.B. , Sagner , A. , Roper , J.C. , Julicher , F. , and Eaton , S . ( 2010 ). Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila . Cell 142 , 773 – 786 . S0092-8674(10)00890-1 [pii] doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 29. ↵ Chien , Y.H. , Keller , R. , Kintner , C. , and Shook , D.R . ( 2015 ). Mechanical strain determines the axis of planar polarity in ciliated epithelia . Curr Biol 25 , 2774 – 2784 . doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.09.015 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. Sagner , A. , Merkel , M. , Aigouy , B. , Gaebel , J. , Brankatschk , M. , Julicher , F. , and Eaton , S . ( 2012 ). Establishment of global patterns of planar polarity during growth of the Drosophila wing epithelium . Curr Biol 22 , 1296 – 1301 . doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.066 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Aw , W.Y. , Heck , B.W. , Joyce , B. , and Devenport , D . ( 2016 ). Transient Tissue-Scale Deformation Coordinates Alignment of Planar Cell Polarity Junctions in the Mammalian Skin . Curr Biol 26 , 2090 – 2100 . doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.030 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. Tan , S.E. , and Strutt , D . ( 2025 ). Tissue shear as a cue for aligning planar polarity in the developing Drosophila wing . Nat Commun 16 , 1451 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56744-7 . OpenUrl CrossRef 33. ↵ Trinidad , L. , Fletcher , A.G. , and Strutt , D . ( 2025 ). The Fat-Dachsous planar polarity pathway competes with hinge contraction to orient polarized cell behaviors during Drosophila wing morphogenesis . Curr Biol 35 , 422 – 430 e423. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.058 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 34. ↵ Newman-Smith , E. , Kourakis , M.J. , Reeves , W. , Veeman , M. , and Smith , W.C . ( 2015 ). Reciprocal and dynamic polarization of planar cell polarity core components and myosin . Elife 4 , e05361 . doi: 10.7554/eLife.05361 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Hirano , S. , Mii , Y. , Charras , G. , and Michiue , T . ( 2022 ). Alignment of the cell long axis by unidirectional tension acts cooperatively with Wnt signalling to establish planar cell polarity . Development 149 . doi: 10.1242/dev.200515 . OpenUrl CrossRef 36. ↵ Hori , A. , Ikebe , C. , Tada , M. , and Toda , T . ( 2014 ). Msd1/SSX2IP-dependent microtubule anchorage ensures spindle orientation and primary cilia formation . EMBO Rep 15 , 175 – 184 . doi: 10.1002/embr.201337929 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 37. ↵ Asada , M. , Irie , K. , Morimoto , K. , Yamada , A. , Ikeda , W. , Takeuchi , M. , and Takai , Y . ( 2003 ). ADIP, a novel Afadin- and alpha-actinin-binding protein localized at cell-cell adherens junctions . J Biol Chem 278 , 4103 – 4111 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209832200 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 38. ↵ de Bruijn , D.R. , dos Santos , N.R. , Kater-Baats , E. , Thijssen , J. , van den Berk , L. , Stap , J. , Balemans , M. , Schepens , M. , Merkx , G. , and van Kessel , A.G. ( 2002 ). The cancer-related protein SSX2 interacts with the human homologue of a Ras-like GTPase interactor, RAB3IP, and a novel nuclear protein, SSX2IP . Genes Chromosomes Cancer 34 , 285 – 298 . doi: 10.1002/gcc.10073 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 39. ↵ Reis , A.H. , Xiang , B. , Ossipova , O. , Itoh , K. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2021 ). Identification of the centrosomal maturation factor SSX2IP as a Wtip-binding partner by targeted proximity biotinylation . PLoS One 16 , e0259068 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259068 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 40. ↵ Yu , H.H. , and Zallen , J.A . ( 2020 ). Abl and Canoe/Afadin mediate mechanotransduction at tricellular junctions . Science 370 . doi: 10.1126/science.aba5528 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 41. ↵ Hardin , J. , and Keller , R . ( 1988 ). The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis . Development 103 , 211 – 230 . doi: 10.1242/dev.103.1.211 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 42. ↵ Sawyer , J.M. , Harrell , J.R. , Shemer , G. , Sullivan-Brown , J. , Roh-Johnson , M. , and Goldstein , B . ( 2010 ). Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis . Dev Biol 341 , 5 – 19 . doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.009 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 43. ↵ Weiser , D.C. , Row , R.H. , and Kimelman , D . ( 2009 ). Rho-regulated myosin phosphatase establishes the level of protrusive activity required for cell movements during zebrafish gastrulation . Development 136 , 2375 – 2384 . dev.034892 [pii] doi: 10.1242/dev.034892 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 44. ↵ Kimura , K. , Ito , M. , Amano , M. , Chihara , K. , Fukata , Y. , Nakafuku , M. , Yamamori , B. , Feng , J. , Nakano , T. , Okawa , K. , et al. ( 1996 ). Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) . Science 273 , 245 – 248 . OpenUrl Abstract 45. ↵ Hildebrand , J.D. , and Soriano , P . ( 1999 ). Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice . Cell 99 , 485 – 497 . doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81537-8 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 46. ↵ Haigo , S.L. , Hildebrand , J.D. , Harland , R.M. , and Wallingford , J.B . ( 2003 ). Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure . Curr Biol 13 , 2125 – 2137 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 47. ↵ Popov , I.K. , Ray , H.J. , Skoglund , P. , Keller , R. , and Chang , C . ( 2018 ). The RhoGEF protein Plekhg5 regulates apical constriction of bottle cells during gastrulation . Development 145 . doi: 10.1242/dev.168922 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 48. ↵ Martin , P. , and Lewis , J . ( 1992 ). Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing . Nature 360 , 179 – 183 . doi: 10.1038/360179a0 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 49. Clark , A.G. , Miller , A.L. , Vaughan , E. , Yu , H.Y. , Penkert , R. , and Bement , W.M . ( 2009 ). Integration of single and multicellular wound responses . Curr Biol 19 , 1389 – 1395 . doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.044 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 50. ↵ Rothenberg , K.E. , and Fernandez-Gonzalez , R . ( 2019 ). Forceful closure: cytoskeletal networks in embryonic wound repair . Mol Biol Cell 30 , 1353 – 1358 . doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-04-0248 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. Bement , W.M. , Mandato , C.A. , and Kirsch , M.N . ( 1999 ). Wound-induced assembly and closure of an actomyosin purse string in Xenopus oocytes . Curr Biol 9 , 579 – 587 . doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80261-9 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 52. ↵ Davidson , L.A. , Ezin , A.M. , and Keller , R . ( 2002 ). Embryonic wound healing by apical contraction and ingression in Xenopus laevis . Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 53 , 163 – 176 . doi: 10.1002/cm.10070 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 53. ↵ Li , J. , Zhang , S. , Soto , X. , Woolner , S. , and Amaya , E . ( 2013 ). ERK and phosphoinositide 3-kinase temporally coordinate different modes of actin-based motility during embryonic wound healing . J Cell Sci 126 , 5005 – 5017 . doi: 10.1242/jcs.133421 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 54. ↵ Arnold , T.R. , Shawky , J.H. , Stephenson , R.E. , Dinshaw , K.M. , Higashi , T. , Huq , F. , Davidson , L.A. , and Miller , A.L . ( 2019 ). Anillin regulates epithelial cell mechanics by structuring the medial-apical actomyosin network . Elife 8 . doi: 10.7554/eLife.39065 . OpenUrl CrossRef 55. Nizak , C. , Martin-Lluesma , S. , Moutel , S. , Roux , A. , Kreis , T.E. , Goud , B. , and Perez , F . ( 2003 ). Recombinant antibodies against subcellular fractions used to track endogenous Golgi protein dynamics in vivo . Traffic 4 , 739 – 753 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 56. ↵ Vielemeyer , O. , Nizak , C. , Jimenez , A.J. , Echard , A. , Goud , B. , Camonis , J. , Rain , J.C. , and Perez , F . ( 2010 ). Characterization of single chain antibody targets through yeast two hybrid . BMC Biotechnol 10 , 59 . doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-10-59 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Feiguin , F. , Hannus , M. , Mlodzik , M. , and Eaton , S . ( 2001 ). The ankyrin repeat protein Diego mediates Frizzled-dependent planar polarization . Dev Cell 1 , 93 – 101 . doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(01)00010-7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 58. ↵ Schwarz-Romond , T. , Asbrand , C. , Bakkers , J. , Kuhl , M. , Schaeffer , H.J. , Huelsken , J. , Behrens , J. , Hammerschmidt , M. , and Birchmeier , W . ( 2002 ). The ankyrin repeat protein Diversin recruits Casein kinase Iepsilon to the beta-catenin degradation complex and acts in both canonical Wnt and Wnt/JNK signaling . Genes Dev 16 , 2073 – 2084 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 59. ↵ Ossipova , O. , Kim , K. , Lake , B.B. , Itoh , K. , Ioannou , A. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2014 ). Role of Rab11 in planar cell polarity and apical constriction during vertebrate neural tube closure . Nat Commun 5 , 3734 . ncomms4734 [pii] doi: 10.1038/ncomms4734 . OpenUrl CrossRef 60. ↵ Branon , T.C. , Bosch , J.A. , Sanchez , A.D. , Udeshi , N.D. , Svinkina , T. , Carr , S.A. , Feldman , J.L. , Perrimon , N. , and Ting , A.Y . ( 2018 ). Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID . Nat Biotechnol 36 , 880 – 887 . doi: 10.1038/nbt.4201 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 61. ↵ Itoh , K. , Jenny , A. , Mlodzik , M. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2009 ). Centrosomal localization of Diversin and its relevance to Wnt signaling . J Cell Sci 122 , 3791 – 3798 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 62. ↵ Yasunaga , T. , Itoh , K. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2011 ). Regulation of basal body and ciliary functions by Diversin . Mech Dev 128 , 376 – 386 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 63. ↵ Bosveld , F. , Wang , Z. , and Bellaiche , Y . ( 2018 ). Tricellular junctions: a hot corner of epithelial biology . Curr Opin Cell Biol 54 , 80 – 88 . doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.05.002 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 64. Sugimura , K. , Lenne , P.-F. , and Graner , F . ( 2016 ). Measuring forces and stresses in situ in living tissues . Development 143 , 186 – 196 . doi: 10.1242/dev.119776 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 65. ↵ Higashi , T. , and Miller , A.L . ( 2017 ). Tricellular junctions: how to build junctions at the TRICkiest points of epithelial cells . Mol Biol Cell 28 , 2023 – 2034 . doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-10-0697 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 66. ↵ Choi , W. , Acharya , B.R. , Peyret , G. , Fardin , M.A. , Mege , R.M. , Ladoux , B. , Yap , A.S. , Fanning , A.S. , and Peifer , M . ( 2016 ). Remodeling the zonula adherens in response to tension and the role of afadin in this response . J Cell Biol 213 , 243 – 260 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201506115 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 67. ↵ Wood , W. , Jacinto , A. , Grose , R. , Woolner , S. , Gale , J. , Wilson , C. , and Martin , P . ( 2002 ). Wound healing recapitulates morphogenesis in Drosophila embryos . Nat Cell Biol 4 , 907 – 912 . doi: 10.1038/ncb875 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 68. ↵ Caddy , J. , Wilanowski , T. , Darido , C. , Dworkin , S. , Ting , S.B. , Zhao , Q. , Rank , G. , Auden , A. , Srivastava , S. , Papenfuss , T.A. , et al. ( 2010 ). Epidermal wound repair is regulated by the planar cell polarity signaling pathway . Dev Cell 19 , 138 – 147 . doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.008 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 69. ↵ Devenport , D . ( 2014 ). The cell biology of planar cell polarity . The Journal of cell biology 207 , 171 – 179 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201408039 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 70. ↵ Barenz , F. , Inoue , D. , Yokoyama , H. , Tegha-Dunghu , J. , Freiss , S. , Draeger , S. , Mayilo , D. , Cado , I. , Merker , S. , Klinger , M. , et al. ( 2013 ). The centriolar satellite protein SSX2IP promotes centrosome maturation . J Cell Biol 202 , 81 – 95 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201302122 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 71. ↵ Yukawa , M. , Ikebe , C. , and Toda , T . ( 2015 ). The Msd1-Wdr8-Pkl1 complex anchors microtubule minus ends to fission yeast spindle pole bodies . J Cell Biol 209 , 549 – 562 . doi: 10.1083/jcb.201412111 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 72. ↵ Toya , M. , Sato , M. , Haselmann , U. , Asakawa , K. , Brunner , D. , Antony , C. , and Toda , T . ( 2007 ). Gamma-tubulin complex-mediated anchoring of spindle microtubules to spindle-pole bodies requires Msd1 in fission yeast . Nat Cell Biol 9 , 646 – 653 . doi: 10.1038/ncb1593 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 73. ↵ Wallingford , J.B. , and Mitchell , B . ( 2011 ). Strange as it may seem: the many links between Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, and cilia . Genes Dev 25 , 201 – 213 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 74. ↵ Matis , M. , Russler-Germain , D.A. , Hu , Q. , Tomlin , C.J. , and Axelrod , J.D . ( 2014 ). Microtubules provide directional information for core PCP function . Elife 3 , e02893 . doi: 10.7554/eLife.02893 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 75. ↵ Akhmanova , A. , and Kapitein , L.C . ( 2022 ). Mechanisms of microtubule organization in differentiated animal cells . Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 23 , 541 – 558 . doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00473-y . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 76. ↵ Matsuda , M. , Rozman , J. , Ostvar , S. , Kasza , K.E. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2023 ). Mechanical control of neural plate folding by apical domain alteration . Nat Commun 14 , 8475 . doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43973-x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 77. ↵ Morita , H. , Nandadasa , S. , Yamamoto , T.S. , Terasaka-Iioka , C. , Wylie , C. , and Ueno , N . ( 2010 ). Nectin-2 and N-cadherin interact through extracellular domains and induce apical accumulation of F-actin in apical constriction of Xenopus neural tube morphogenesis . Development 137 , 1315 – 1325 . doi: 10.1242/dev.043190 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 78. ↵ Waterhouse , A.M. , Procter , J.B. , Martin , D.M. , Clamp , M. , and Barton , G.J. ( 2009 ). Jalview Version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench . Bioinformatics 25 , 1189 – 1191 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 79. ↵ Nieuwkoop , P.D. , and Faber , J. ( 1994 ). Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) : a systematical and chronological survey of the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis (Garland Pub.) . 80. ↵ Peng , H.B . ( 1991 ). Xenopus laevis: Practical uses in cell and molecular biology. Solutions and protocols . Methods Cell Biol 36 , 657 – 662 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 81. ↵ Shindo , A. , Audrey , A. , Takagishi , M. , Takahashi , M. , Wallingford , J.B. , and Kinoshita , M . ( 2018 ). Septin-dependent remodeling of cortical microtubule drives cell reshaping during epithelial wound healing . J Cell Sci 131 . doi: 10.1242/jcs.212647 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 82. ↵ Harland , R.M . ( 1991 ). In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos . Methods Cell Biol 36 , 685 – 695 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 83. ↵ Horr , B. , Kurtz , R. , Pandey , A. , Hoffstrom , B.G. , Schock , E. , LaBonne , C. , and Alfandari , D. ( 2023 ). Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies to Xenopus proteins . Development 150 . doi: 10.1242/dev.201309 . OpenUrl CrossRef 84. ↵ Itoh , K. , Ossipova , O. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2021 ). Pinhead antagonizes Admp to promote notochord formation . iScience 24 , 102520 . doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102520 . OpenUrl CrossRef 85. ↵ Ossipova , O. , Chuykin , I. , Chu , C.W. , and Sokol , S.Y . ( 2015 ). Vangl2 cooperates with Rab11 and Myosin V to regulate apical constriction during vertebrate gastrulation . Development 142 , 99 – 107 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 86. ↵ Stringer , C. , Wang , T. , Michaelos , M. , and Pachitariu , M . ( 2021 ). Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation . Nat Methods 18 , 100 – 106 . doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 87. ↵ Batschelet , E . ( 1981 ). Circular Statistics in Biology . London : Academic Press . View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted May 21, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair Chih-Wen Chu , Satheeja Velayudhan , Jakob H. Schauser , Sapna Krishnakumar , Stephanie Yang , Keiji Itoh , Dominique Alfandari , Ala Trusina , Sergei Y. Sokol bioRxiv 2025.05.20.654909; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.20.654909 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Mechanical cues organize planar cell polarity during vertebrate morphogenesis and embryonic wound repair Chih-Wen Chu , Satheeja Velayudhan , Jakob H. Schauser , Sapna Krishnakumar , Stephanie Yang , Keiji Itoh , Dominique Alfandari , Ala Trusina , Sergei Y. Sokol bioRxiv 2025.05.20.654909; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.05.20.654909 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Developmental Biology Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7640) Biochemistry (17706) Bioengineering (13902) Bioinformatics (41978) Biophysics (21465) Cancer Biology (18611) Cell Biology (25528) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13387) Ecology (19920) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24332) Genetics (15615) Genomics (22519) Immunology (17747) Microbiology (40424) Molecular Biology (17194) Neuroscience (88662) Paleontology (667) Pathology (2839) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4827) Physiology (7650) Plant Biology (15160) Scientific Communication and Education (2046) Synthetic Biology (4302) Systems Biology (9826) Zoology (2271)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00