An AI-enhanced NHS will rely on clinical guidelines, but what if the evidence is inequitable?

2026 · doi:10.1136/bmjph-2025-003922 · PMID:41561563 · PMC12815137
OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
Full text 598 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 3 sections · click to expand

Data

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Fn Group

Funding: This article was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grant number #130529. Patient consent for publication: Not applicable. Ethics approval: Not applicable. Provenance and peer review: Commissioned; internally peer reviewed. Patient and public involvement: This manuscript does not constitute original research and patient and public representatives were not included in its design or delivery.

Associated Data

Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-24T06:10:11.469335+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0