Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol

Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913" }, "headline": "Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol", "datePublished": "2022-08-08T17:01:32", "dateModified": "2024-07-05T16:09:50", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Faiza Iqbal" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "N Siva" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Leslie Edward S Lewis" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Apurv Barche" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Jayashree Purkayastha" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Baby S Nayak" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background: The microbiota in the intestine is made up of trillions of living bacteria that coexist with the host. Administration of antibiotics during neonatal infection causes depletion of gut flora resulting in gut dysbiosis. Over the last few decades, probiotics have been created and promoted as microbiota management agents to enrich gut flora. Probiotics decrease the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria in the gut of preterm neonates, reducing the frequency of nosocomial infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICUs). Methods: The systematic review will include randomized control trials (RCTs) of premier neonates with sepsis. Studies will be retrieved from global databases like Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO host, MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Ovid, Web of Science, ProQuest Medical Library, Microsoft academic, and DOAJ by utilizing database-specific keywords. Screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included research will be carried out separately by two review writers. Findings will be reported in accordance with the PRISMS-P 2020 guidelines. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review will help to translate the evidence-based information needed to encourage the implementation of potential research output in the field of neonatal intensive care, guide best clinical practise, assist policy making and implementation to prevent gut dysbiosis in neonates with sepsis by summarising and communicating the evidence on the topic. PROSPERO registration number: This systematic review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) on 10th March 2022. The registration number is CRD42022315980." } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913", "name": "Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review..." } } ] } Home Browse Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Iqbal F, Siva N, Kolibylu Raghupathy M et al. Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Study Protocol Revised Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] Faiza Iqbal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-1796 1 , N Siva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-7904 2 , Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy 3 , [...] Leslie Edward S Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-6821 1 , Apurv Barche 1 , Jayashree Purkayastha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-1756 1 , Baby S Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-9860 2 Faiza Iqbal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-1796 1 , N Siva https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4320-7904 2 , [...] Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy 3 , Leslie Edward S Lewis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-6821 1 , Apurv Barche 1 , Jayashree Purkayastha https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-1756 1 , Baby S Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9659-9860 2 PUBLISHED 05 Jul 2024 Author details Author details 1 Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Child Health Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Faiza Iqbal Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing N Siva Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Leslie Edward S Lewis Roles: Investigation, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Apurv Barche Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Jayashree Purkayastha Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Baby S Nayak Roles: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Background: The microbiota in the intestine is made up of trillions of living bacteria that coexist with the host. Administration of antibiotics during neonatal infection causes depletion of gut flora resulting in gut dysbiosis. Over the last few decades, probiotics have been created and promoted as microbiota management agents to enrich gut flora. Probiotics decrease the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria in the gut of preterm neonates, reducing the frequency of nosocomial infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICUs). Methods: The systematic review will include randomized control trials (RCTs) of premier neonates with sepsis. Studies will be retrieved from global databases like Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus via EBSCO host, MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Ovid, Web of Science, ProQuest Medical Library, Microsoft academic, and DOAJ by utilizing database-specific keywords. Screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included research will be carried out separately by two review writers. Findings will be reported in accordance with the PRISMS-P 2020 guidelines. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review will help to translate the evidence-based information needed to encourage the implementation of potential research output in the field of neonatal intensive care, guide best clinical practise, assist policy making and implementation to prevent gut dysbiosis in neonates with sepsis by summarising and communicating the evidence on the topic. PROSPERO registration number: This systematic review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) on 10 th March 2022. The registration number is CRD42022315980. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Probiotics, Preterm, Neonatal Sepsis, Gut health, Mortality, Morbidity, Growth Corresponding Author(s) Jayashree Purkayastha ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Jayashree Purkayastha Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Iqbal F et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Iqbal F, Siva N, Kolibylu Raghupathy M et al. Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.3 ) First published: 08 Aug 2022, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.1 ) Latest published: 05 Jul 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.3 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 This version of the manuscript includes updates and revisions based on detailed feedback to enhance clarity, accuracy, and comprehensiveness. Key changes include incorporating recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) in the introduction to provide context and rationale for the research. The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions. The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript, and up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted following Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). These revisions aim to improve the manuscript's overall readability, precision, and adherence to current scientific standards and terminology. Â This version of the manuscript includes updates and revisions based on detailed feedback to enhance clarity, accuracy, and comprehensiveness. Key changes include incorporating recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) in the introduction to provide context and rationale for the research. The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions. The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript, and up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted following Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). These revisions aim to improve the manuscript's overall readability, precision, and adherence to current scientific standards and terminology. Â See the authors' detailed response to the review by Cecile Leah T Bayaga See the authors' detailed response to the review by Sabina Fijan READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD), there are 1.3 million yearly incident cases of neonates sepsis and associated infections (about 937 instances per 100,000 live births) and 203,000 sepsis-related neonatal deaths. 1 A preterm infants’ immature intestine predisposes it to infection and inflammation, as it has immature immunity, barrier function, and peristalsis resulting in gut dysbiosis. 2 Co-morbidities like c-section deliveries, antenatal and post-natal antibiotic exposure, parenteral nutrition and prolonged stays in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), lead to a rapid decrease in taxonomic richness and diversity of good commensal gut bacteria contributing to the loss of colonization resistance. 3 , 4 The gut is the centre of microbial activity; it is essential to address neonatal microbiota dysbiosis as many of the events like period of gestation, method of delivery, dietary patterns, weaning and antibiotic administration play an important role in framing gut microbiota and may have an impact on long term health outcomes. 5 , 6 The host and gut microbiota have unique and cryptic interlinkage; the formation of an individual’s gut microbiota starts right from birth and is shaped by various factors. Starting from birth, the gut microbiota plays three critical roles: protective, metabolic, and trophic. 5 Gut microbiota carries out their effects by modulating immunologic, endocrine, and neurological pathways. 7 The gut also serves as a significant source of noninflammatory immune stimulators in healthy people throughout their lives. However, these beneficial health-promoting factors of the gut microbiota are not infallible and can be altered due to dysbiosis or neonatal infection. Numerous studies have shown that antibiotic consumption causes dysbiosis and disturbance of the gut microbiome in infants, children and adults. 8 , 9 Probiotics have been shown to improve the gut health of preterm infants. 9 – 11 Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host”. 12 This definition is a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and aligns with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) 13 and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria. 14 A shift in the composite microbiota system has increased disease risk. 6 The use of probiotics facilitates the restoration of the gut microbial profile. It may protect high-risk neonates by preventing the movement of microbes and microbial metabolites across the mucosa, elimination of pathogenic organisms, modifying host reactions to microbial supplements and enhancing nutrition by upregulation of immune response. 15 , 16 A relative reduction in the Bifidobacteriaceae counts and an increase in Enterobacteriaceae and Clostridiaceae may be a good criterion to define dysbiosis in the initial months of life. 11 , 17 It can also explain gut colonization between birth, which can serve as the basis for introducing nutritional strategies targeted at the microbiota. These nutritional interventions, based mainly on probiotics, may be used for favourably altering the gut microbiome and preventing neonatal sepsis. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome invites the expansion of the pathobiont population, leading to sepsis in neonates. 18 Probiotic supplementation aims to rebuild the gut bacteria, preventing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), infection and other problems. The initial days of life are crucial for an adequate microbiome that facilitates gut maturation and neonatal health. Therefore, strategies focused primarily on establishing microbiota and consuming probiotic supplements that can help balance the gut microbiota composition, improve well-being, and lower disease risk in neonates. Thomas et al. (2023) 19 conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis suggesting that probiotics may significantly reduce sepsis and mortality rates in VLBW neonates, emphasizing their importance in resource-limited settings. This review included 29 RCTs with 4,906 neonates and 24 probiotics, but only 11 studies had a low risk of bias. Probiotics were compared with placebos, not with each other. The combination of B. longum, B. bifidum, B. infantis, and L. acidophilus may reduce mortality (RR 0.26; 95% CrI 0.07 to 0.72), sepsis (RR 0.47; 95% CrI 0.25 to 0.83), and NEC (RR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.10 to 0.78), though evidence is uncertain. B. lactis alone may also reduce mortality (RR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05 to 0.66) and NEC (RR 0.09; 95% CrI 0.01 to 0.32), but evidence is low-certainty. 19 Kulkarni et al., in their systematic review, highlighted both the benefits and potential risks of probiotic use, stressing the need for rigorous trials to confirm safety and efficacy. 20 Despite these comprehensive reviews, gaps remain in the evidence regarding the optimal strains, dosages, and treatment durations of probiotics, as well as their long-term effects on neonatal health. This systematic review protocol aims to address these gaps by synthesizing current evidence on the probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis. Description of the intervention? Probiotics supplements help revive the disrupted gut microbiota and prevent gut inflammation and other intestinal diseases. 21 Probiotics decrease the overgrowth of pathogenic bacteria in the gut of preterm neonates, reducing the frequency of nosocomial infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). 22 According to systematic evaluations of randomized controlled trials (RCT), probiotics have substantial potential to lower mortality and morbidity in premature neonates. A systematic assessment of RCT narrated the benefits of probiotics in low- and middle-income countries. 11 The supplements may restore the composition of the gut microbiome and introduce beneficial functions to gut microbial communities. According to recent randomized controlled research, early probiotic use may have the capacity to alter the gut microbiota during antibiotic treatment recovery. 23 Probiotics are becoming more well acknowledged as a valuable tool for promoting health and preventing adverse health outcomes in premature neonates. 24 , 25 They may protect high-risk neonates by increasing the barrier for migration of bacteria and their products across the mucosa, by elimination of potential pathogens, by modifying host response to microbial products, and enhancing nutrition by upregulation of the immune response. 26 This study aims to evaluate the effect of probiotics on the gut health and growth of preterm infants in neonates with sepsis. We hypothesized that the administration of specific probiotics could improve the gut microbiota of preterm neonates by lowering the risk of morbidity and mortality with sepsis. How might the intervention work? Over the last few decades, probiotics have been created and promoted as microbiota management agents to enrich gut microbiota. Early life is a crucial time for the gut of neonates to be gradually colonised with different species of bacteria that collectively promote initial gut maturation. Bacterial diversity in preterm neonates is low and comparatively different from term neonates. 21 Probiotic supplements may help to restore the gut microbiome composition and introduce beneficial functions to gut microbial communities, resulting in the improvement or prevention of inflammation of the gut and other phenotypes of systemic or intestinal diseases. 27 Probiotic supplement in preterm has been proven to decrease pathogen overgrowth and promote the maturation of the intestinal mucosa by facilitating the growth and proliferation of probiotic bacteria in the intestinal tract. 28 Antibiotic exposure was observed to significantly alter gut microbiota, with a considerable reduction in Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus , according to Zhong et al ., 2021. 23 The administration of probiotics concurrently with antibiotics was more advantageous to the gut microbiota than waiting until after antibiotic therapy to use probiotics, especially in terms of increasing Bifidobacterium abundance. 23 Pneumonia and sepsis accounted for 46% of all admission diagnoses and were attributed to 29% of the overall death rate, compared to 26% globally. 29 The mode of delivery influences the gut microbial pattern. Several high-quality studies suggest that bacterial diversity differs among babies based on the mode of delivery. Neonates born by vaginal delivery swallow the vaginal bacteria on their way down the birth canal, which results in the primary source for initial seeding of microbiota to the neonatal gut . Over the initial year of life, there is an abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and a decrease of Enterococcus spp. and Klebsiella spp. 30 Microbiota of caesarean section neonates show distinctly different gut microbiota than vaginally delivered infants and are more likely to have skin, breastmilk, oral and environmental bacteria. 31 Why it is important to do this review Infections spread rapidly in preterm infants, resulting in severe disease and death; therefore, infection prevention directly reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality. In a systematic review conducted by Balasubramanian et al . among preterm infants in India, metanalysis showed a significantly lower risk in blood culture positive Late-Onset Sepsis (LOS) after 48 hours of birth in the probiotic group (p < 0.001). 25 A double-blinded, placebo-randomized controlled trial was conducted using Bacillus clausii to prevent LOS in 244 preterm infants. Of that, 120 were extremely preterm neonates, of which 59 received a placebo and 61 received probiotics. On other hand, 124 babies were stratified as preterm, 61 neonates received a placebo and 61 received probiotics. The study concluded that prophylactic administration of B. clausii to preterm neonates did not result in a significant difference in LOS incidence compared with placebo. 32 The gut microbiome is a complex and dynamic population of hundreds of bacteria responsible for transporting nutrition, controlling intestinal epithelial maturation, and building an innate immune defence in neonates. An RCT was conducted by Panigrahi et al. to prevent sepsis among rural Indian neonates. Researchers used Limosilactobacillus plantarum plus fructooligosaccharide as a probiotic on 4,556 neonates of birthweight < 2000 grams, gestational age ≥ 35 weeks with no sign of sepsis and morbidity and were recruited and monitored for 60 days; a significant decrease in neonatal sepsis (culture-positive sepsis, culture-negative sepsis) and lower respiratory tract infections were observed. The study’s findings suggested that neonatal sepsis in developing countries could be effectively prevented using a symbiotic containing L. plantarum ATCC-202195. 33 The findings of this systematic review would definitively answer whether early administration of specific probiotics could improve the gut microbiota of preterm neonates by lowering the risk of infant morbidity and mortality in neonates with sepsis, and assist healthcare providers and policymakers in developing a probiotic supplement guideline for sepsis neonates. Methods Ethical considerations As this is a systematic review protocol, ethical approval is not required as we will not be directly involving human participants. Review questions How effective is probiotics in lowering the risk of morbidity and mortality among preterm neonates with sepsis? Specific objectives To determine the impact of probiotics on lowering the risk of morbidity and mortality among preterm neonates with sepsis. Design We will systematically review existing randomized and non-randomized control trial studies and execute a meta-analysis when acceptable data is available. This protocol follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015. 44 The Participants, Interventions, Comparators and Outcomes elements used for the systematic review are listed in Table 1 . Table 1. Eligibility criteria. NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; NRCT’s: Non- randomized controlled trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria PICO component Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Population (P) Preterm neonates (Gestational age <36 weeks) with sepsis. Term neonates and preterm neonates without sepsis. Intervention (I) All types of probiotic supplements administered to preterm with sepsis. Administered prebiotics and synbiotic supplements to preterm with sepsis. Comparison (C) Placebo or standardized NICU treatment. Prebiotics and synbiotic supplements. Outcome (O) Primary outcome: Morbidity, and mortality Secondary outcome: Length of NICU Stay Time (T) Articles published from January 2010 to December 2022 with full text in English language. Study design (S) RCTs, NRCT’s. Observational studies, Qualitative studies, reviews, editorials, conference abstracts, study protocols, reports, and letters. Search strategy A comprehensive search would be conducted in global databases like Cochrane CENTRAL , CINAHL Plus via EBSCO host, MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE , SCOPUS , Ovid , Web of Science and ProQuest Medical Library by utilizing the stated search keywords: “Premature neonates”, “Preterm birth”, “Very low birth weight”, “Low birth weight”, Preterm, “Preterm infants”, “extremely low birth weight”, “Neonates”, “Neonatal infection”, Infection*, “Late-onset sepsis”, “Early-onset sepsis”, Sepsis, “Neonatal period”, “intestinal infection”, “Nosocomial infection”, septicaemia, Bacteraemia, “septic shock”, probiotic*, “Probiotic supplement”, Lactobacilli, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, “Lactic acid bacteria”, Bacillus OR “Probiotic therapy”, “Randomized Controlled Trial”, and “Non- randomized controlled trial” ( Extended data 42 ). Search for other resources Additional references will be found in the reference lists of all primary research and review papers. To get necessary supplementary information, we will reach out to relevant field experts and researchers from the included papers. For data management, records will be exported to EndNote X7. Selection of studies Two review authors (FI, SN) shall execute independent searches of the study titles and abstracts of the indicated study sources. We shall exclude the articles which do not meet the inclusion criteria. If there is a disagreement among those reviewers, it will be resolved through conversation, and the complete text will be examined. Two reviewers will independently assess the included abstracts as “include” or “exclude” after obtaining the whole manuscript. If required, we will work with a supervisory review author (LEL) to address any disagreements. We will keep track of why the articles were refused. We will look for and eliminate duplicates and compile numerous reports from the same research. Data extraction and management Data will be extracted by examining general features such as gestational age, research participants, setting, identifiers, type of pathogen isolated, LOS, early-onset sepsis (EOS), type of probiotic, study selection criteria, and results. To organize the list of intervention parameters to assist intervention replication and research comparability, we will use the TIDier checklist (Template for Intervention Description and Replication). 34 Additionally, we will extract data of specific characteristics such as type of probiotic used, dosage, antibiotic exposure, gestational age and type of delivery. Two review authors will independently use the data extraction templates to abstract the data from included articles in the review. The included studies will have the following data collected: research title and authors, sample size, study setting, intervention features, assessment procedures, outcomes, findings, conclusions, and year of publication. If there is a disagreement, we will discuss it until we reach an agreement, or we will handle it with the assistance of a third reviewer (MKR). Assessment of quality of the studies We will assess the quality of included randomized controlled trials using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0 ). The RoB 2.0 tool considers the following factors: a) The randomization method, b) deviation from the planned intervention, c) outcome measurement, d) missing outcomes, and e) selective reporting. Two authors will independently evaluate each paper. RCT risk will be assessed and classified into three categories: low risk, high risk, and some concerns. 35 To assess the quality of the included non-randomized controlled trials, we will use the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist . If there is any disagreement, we will solve it by contacting a methodology expert (BSN). Dealing with missing data We will contact the primary authors whenever possible to obtain the missing data. The most important empirical data, including screening, randomization, intention-to-treat, as-treated, and per-protocol groups, will be investigated thoroughly. The article will be excluded from the review if the authors do not respond within two weeks after communicating through email. If this is not possible, we will consider the missing data a major bias, and the article will be removed from consideration. Data synthesis Two independent reviewers (FI and SN) will extract the data from each study and enter it into a Microsoft Excel file Version 16.61. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) standards will be used to provide evidence regarding the effect of probiotics on the gut health of preterm neonates with sepsis ( Extended data 43 ). 36 If there is sufficient homogeneity in study design and study subjects among the selected studies, meta-analyses will be conducted. 37 As a result, continuous and dichotomous outcomes will be integrated for meta-analysis purposes. Statistical analyses will be conducted with the help of the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan 5 ). Sensitivity analysis Sensitivity analysis will be performed to investigate the robustness of the results by examining the effects of including and excluding studies with a high risk of bias and studies with missing data. The results’ robustness will be evaluated using a variety of impact size measures, such as risk ratio and odds ratio, and various statistical models, such as fixed effects and random-effects models. Discussion The microbiota in the intestine is made up of trillions of living bacteria that coexist with the host. Depleting gut microbiota in neonates, especially in vulnerable preterm neonates, may elevate the risk of neonatal infections resulting in administration of antibiotics. 38 Antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells, 39 but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Probiotic supplementation has become increasingly popular in the fight against gut microbiota depletion. 17 , 23 , 24 The impact of probiotics on neonatal health has been extensively studied, and several randomized controlled trials have demonstrated significant benefits. A randomized control trial was conducted by Zhong et al. to assess the impact of probiotic supplements on 90 neonates with gestational age ≥ 37 weeks. They concluded that antibiotics cause a decrease in the microbial richness and variety of the gut microbiota in neonates and the attenuation of several bacteria, especially Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus. 23 A significant reduction in newborn sepsis has been reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of various probiotic strains and combinations given to preterm infants of different gestational ages and birth weights. Panigrahi et al ., in their randomized control trial, examined the effect of probiotics in neonatal sepsis and showed a significant reduction in neonatal sepsis cases when supplemented with Limosilactobacillus plantarum. 40 Costeloe et al. evaluated the effect of Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG-001 on the development of sepsis or NEC in very low birth weight neonates. At two weeks postnatal age, he observed B. breve colonisation in 1186 (94%) survivors. There were 85% in the probiotic group and 37% in the placebo group. 41 Strengths and limitations of the study This systematic review will include randomized controlled trials and all types of non-randomized control trials. Meta-analysis will be carried out with the results of RCTs, and narrative description will be used to analyse non-randomized control trials regarding the effect of probiotics among preterm neonates with sepsis. This review includes only the use of probiotics in preterm infants, excluding the studies that assessed the effect of prebiotics and synbiotics among preterm neonates. Only studies published in English will be included; thus, eligible studies published in other languages will be excluded. Data availability Underlying data No underlying data are associated with this article Extended data Figshare: supplementary_file1.docx. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839604 . 42 This project contains the following extended data: • Supplementary_File1.docx (Appendix 1- Search Strategy; Appendix 2 – Search Terms) Figshare: Supplementary file 2. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839964 . 43 This project contains the following extended data: • Supplementary_file2.pdf (PRISMA flow chart of Systematic review) Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). Reporting guidelines Figshare: PRISMA-P checklist for ‘Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol’, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241 . 44 Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). References 1. Fleischmann C, Reichert F, Cassini A, et al. : Global incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. 2021 Aug 1; 106 (8): 745–752. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Henderickx JGE, Zwittink RD, van Lingen RA , et al. : The Preterm Gut Microbiota: An Inconspicuous Challenge in Nutritional Neonatal Care. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019 [cited 2022 Feb 16]; 9 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 3. Azad MB, Konya T, Persaud RR, et al. : Impact of maternal intrapartum antibiotics, method of birth and breastfeeding on gut microbiota during the first year of life: a prospective cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016 May; 123 (6): 983–993. Publisher Full Text 4. Basu S: Neonatal sepsis: the gut connection. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2015 Feb; 34 (2): 215–222. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 5. Yang I, Corwin EJ, Brennan PA, et al. : The Infant Microbiome: Implications for Infant Health and Neurocognitive Development. Nurs. Res. 2016; 65 (1): 76–88. Publisher Full Text 6. Young VB: The role of the microbiome in human health and disease: an introduction for clinicians. BMJ. 2017 Mar 15; 356 : j831. Publisher Full Text 7. Suganya K, Koo BS: Gut-Brain Axis: Role of Gut Microbiota on Neurological Disorders and How Probiotics/Prebiotics Beneficially Modulate Microbial and Immune Pathways to Improve Brain Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 Oct 13; 21 (20): E7551. 8. Weersma RK, Zhernakova A, Fu J: Interaction between drugs and the gut microbiome. Gut. 2020 Aug 1; 69 (8): 1510–1519. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 9. Wong E, Lui K, Day AS, Leach ST: Manipulating the neonatal gut microbiome: current understanding and future perspectives. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Aug 25. fetalneonatal-2021-321922. 10. Totsu S, Terahara M, Kusuda S: Probiotics and the development of very low birthweight infants: follow-up study of a randomised trial. BMJ Paediatr. Open. 2018 Apr 1; 2 (1): e000256. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Deshpande G, Jape G, Rao S, et al. : Benefits of probiotics in preterm neonates in low-income and medium-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 7; 7 (12): e017638. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. : Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014; 11 : 506–514. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 13. Hotel AC, Cordoba A: Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. Prevention. 2001 Oct 1; 5 (1): 1–0. 14. Araya M, Morelli L, Reid G, et al. : Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. Joint FAO/WHO Working Group Report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. 2002 Apr 30; pp. 1–1. 15. Rodríguez JM, Murphy K, Stanton C, et al. : The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015; 26 : 26050. 16. Plaza-Diaz J, Ruiz-Ojeda FJ, Gil-Campos M, et al. : Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics. Adv. Nutr. 2019 Jan; 10 (Suppl 1): S49–S66. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 17. Rao S, Esvaran M, Chen L, et al. : Probiotic supplementation in neonates with congenital gastrointestinal surgical conditions: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pediatr. Res. 2022 Jan 3; 1–10. Publisher Full Text 18. Sanidad KZ, Zeng MY: LOS in The Dysbiotic Gut. Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Jan 8; 27 (1): 11–13. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 19. Thomas D, Sharma A, Sankar MJ: Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low-and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front. Nutr. 2023 Jun 14; 10 : 1133293. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 20. Kulkarni T, Majarikar S, Deshmukh M, et al. : Probiotic sepsis in preterm neonates—a systematic review. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2022 Jun; 181 (6): 2249–2262. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 21. Chi C, Buys N, Li C, et al. : Effects of prebiotics on sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality, feeding intolerance, time to full enteral feeding, length of hospital stay, and stool frequency in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019 May; 73 (5): 657–670. Publisher Full Text 22. Zhang GQ, Hu HJ, Liu CY, et al. : Probiotics for Preventing Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Neonates. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar 3; 95 (8): e2581. Publisher Full Text 23. Zhong H, Wang XG, Wang J, et al. : Impact of probiotics supplement on the gut microbiota in neonates with antibiotic exposure: an open-label single-center randomized parallel controlled study. World J. Pediatr. 2021 Aug 1; 17 (4): 385–393. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 24. Navarro-Tapia E, Sebastiani G, Sailer S, et al. : Probiotic Supplementation during the Perinatal and Infant Period: Effects on gut Dysbiosis and Disease. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 27; 12 (8): 2243. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 25. Balasubramanian H, Ananthan A, Rao S, et al. : Probiotics for Preterm Infants in India – Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Indian J. Pediatr. 2020 Oct 1; 87 (10): 817–825. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 26. Belkaid Y, Hand T: Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014 Mar 27; 157 (1): 121–141. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 27. Hemarajata P, Versalovic J: Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan; 6 (1): 39–51. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 28. Seghesio E, De Geyter C, Vandenplas Y: Probiotics in the Prevention and Treatment of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2021 May; 24 (3): 245–255. Publisher Full Text 29. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, et al. : WHO Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet Lond Engl. 2005 Apr 26; 365 (9465): 1147–1152. Publisher Full Text 30. Bäckhed F, Roswall J, Peng Y, et al. : Dynamics and Stabilization of the Human Gut Microbiome during the First Year of Life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015 May 13; 17 (5): 690–703. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 31. Korpela K: Impact of Delivery Mode on Infant Gut Microbiota. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2021 Aug 30; 1–9. 32. Tewari VV, Dubey SK, Gupta G: Bacillus clausii for Prevention of Late-onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2015 Oct; 61 (5): 377–385. Publisher Full Text 33. Panigrahi P, Parida S, Nanda NC, et al. : A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature. 2017 Aug 24; 548 (7668): 407–412. Publisher Full Text 34. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. : Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014 Mar 7; 348 : g1687. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 35. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. : RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28; 366 : l4898. Publisher Full Text 36. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. : The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29; 372 : n71. Publisher Full Text 37. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. : What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008 May 3; 336 (7651): 995–998. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 38. Madan JC, Salari RC, Saxena D, et al. : Gut microbial colonisation in premature neonates predicts neonatal sepsis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Nov; 97 (6): F456–F462. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 39. Patel P, Wermuth HR, Calhoun C, et al. : Antibiotics.StatPearls [Internet].2023 Jan. 40. Panigrahi P, Parida S, Nanda NC, et al. : A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature. 2017 Aug 24; 548 (7668): 407–412. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 41. Costeloe K, Bowler U, Brocklehurst P, et al. : A randomised controlled trial of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in preterm babies to prevent sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis and death: the Probiotics in Preterm infantS (PiPS) trial. Health Technol. Assess. (Winch. Eng.). 2016 Aug; 20 (66): 1–194. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 42. Iqbal F, Siva N, Raghupathy MK, et al. : supplementary_file1.docx. figshare.2022 [cited2022Jun2]. Publisher Full Text 43. Iqbal F, Siva N, Raghupathy MK, et al. : Supplementary file 2. figshare.2022 [cited2022Jun2]. Publisher Full Text 44. Iqbal F, Siva N, Kolibylu Raghupathy M, et al. : PRISMA-P Checklist.docx. figshare.2022 [cited2022Jun2]. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 08 Aug 2022 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Child Health Nursing, Manipal College of Nursing, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Department of Physiotherapy, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Faiza Iqbal Roles: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing N Siva Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Manasa Kolibylu Raghupathy Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Leslie Edward S Lewis Roles: Investigation, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Apurv Barche Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Jayashree Purkayastha Roles: Writing – Review & Editing Baby S Nayak Roles: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (3) version 3 Revised Published: 05 Jul 2024, 11:913 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.3 version 2 Revised Published: 20 Oct 2023, 11:913 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.2 version 1 Published: 08 Aug 2022, 11:913 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.1 Copyright © 2024 Iqbal F et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Iqbal F, Siva N, Kolibylu Raghupathy M et al. Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122226.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 05 Jul 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Wang Y. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168360.r306773 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3#referee-response-306773 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 06 Aug 2024 Yao Wang , The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168360.r306773 Sepsis is a severe condition that threatens fetal health. Applying probiotics is a feasible and potential approach to prevent this disease. Therefore, this study is meaningful with significant clinical implications. The methods and study design are clear and reasonable. Importantly, ... Continue reading READ ALL Sepsis is a severe condition that threatens fetal health. Applying probiotics is a feasible and potential approach to prevent this disease. Therefore, this study is meaningful with significant clinical implications. The methods and study design are clear and reasonable. Importantly, the authors will extract specific data such as the type of probiotic used, dosage, antibiotic exposure, gestational age, and type of delivery. One suggestion is that the details of probiotics should be clearly documented at the species or strain level if the data allows. Moreover, the prescribed model, including the starting point of administration during pregnancy and the duration of probiotic use, should also be included. All these contents are crucial to help clinicians to understand and make decisions. An example study is Bekalu et al., AJOG FMF 2023. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148. I am overall content if the authors could further improve above comments. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes References 1. Alemu BK, Azeze GG, Wu L, Lau SL, et al.: Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM . 2023; 5 (11): 101148 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Microbiome, Maternal-fetal health, Exercise Intervention, RCT, I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Wang Y. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168360.r306773 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3#referee-response-306773 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 20 Oct 2023 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Fijan S. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r278782 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-278782 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 13 Jun 2024 Sabina Fijan , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r278782 Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol: Review report This manuscript, submitted to the journal f1000Research, is a crucial topic and describes the protocol to conduct a systematic review of the probiotic ... Continue reading READ ALL Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol: Review report This manuscript, submitted to the journal f1000Research, is a crucial topic and describes the protocol to conduct a systematic review of the probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis. General comments Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri ), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri ), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum ), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis ), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus ), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius ). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/ . Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus , Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains , and many others. Minor corrections Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Binda S, Hill C, Johansen E, Obis D, et al.: Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as. Front Microbiol . 2020; 11 : 1662 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization. FAO/WHO . 2001. 3. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. FAO/WHO . 2002. 4. Grice EA, Segre JA: The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet . 2012; 13 : 151-70 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 5. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S: Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2020; 70 (11): 5753-5798 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 6. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, et al.: Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2014; 11 (8): 506-14 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 7. Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, Wang JQ, et al.: Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther . 2022; 7 (1): 135 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 8. Kulkarni T, Majarikar S, Deshmukh M, Ananthan A, et al.: Probiotic sepsis in preterm neonates-a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr . 2022; 181 (6): 2249-2262 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 9. Lawson P, Citron D, Tyrrell K, Finegold S: Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938. Anaerobe . 2016; 40 : 95-99 Publisher Full Text 10. McFarland LV, Srinivasan R, Setty RP, Ganapathy S, et al.: Specific Probiotics for the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JPGN Rep . 2021; 2 (3): e079 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Ogunrinola GA, Oyewale JO, Oshamika OO, Olasehinde GI: The Human Microbiome and Its Impacts on Health. Int J Microbiol . 2020; 2020 : 8045646 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Oren A, Garrity GM: Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2021; 71 (10). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 13. Scholz CFP, Kilian M: The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria, and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2016; 66 (11): 4422-4432 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 14. Tan W, Zhou Z, Li W, Lu H, et al.: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for Cow's Milk Allergy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics . 2021; 9 . Publisher Full Text 15. Thomas D, Sharma A, Sankar M: Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023; 10 . Publisher Full Text 16. Walsh CJ, Guinane CM, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD: Beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota. FEBS Lett . 2014; 588 (22): 4120-30 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 17. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, et al.: A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2020; 70 (4): 2782-2858 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18. Patel P,Wermuth: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing . 2023. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: probiotics, beneficial microbes, fermented foods, health benefits I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Fijan S. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r278782 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-278782 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 05 Jul 2024 Author Response Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published ... Continue reading Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Authors Reply: Recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) has referenced in the introduction to provide context and rationale for conducting similar research. Comment #2: Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Authors Reply: The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions from 2001 and 2002. Comment #3: The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. Authors Reply: The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript. Comment #4: When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Authors Reply: Up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted, following the guidelines by Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). Comment #5: Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/. Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Authors Reply: Modified accordingly Comment #6: Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains, and many others. Authors Reply: Modified accordingly in manuscript Minor corrections Comment #7: Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected to "Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria." Comment #8: Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Authors Reply: For the assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used in our study, we have utilized the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), not the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The methodology section has been updated to reflect this, ensuring clarity on the quality assessment process used in our research. Comment #9: Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected. Comment #10: Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Authors Reply: Connective sentences has been added for clarity, and when referring to the conductors of clinical trials, the term 'they' has been used.. We hope these revisions will adequately address your concerns and improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript. Please let us know if any further modifications are required. Thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Authors Reply: Recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) has referenced in the introduction to provide context and rationale for conducting similar research. Comment #2: Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Authors Reply: The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions from 2001 and 2002. Comment #3: The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. Authors Reply: The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript. Comment #4: When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Authors Reply: Up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted, following the guidelines by Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). Comment #5: Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/. Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Authors Reply: Modified accordingly Comment #6: Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains, and many others. Authors Reply: Modified accordingly in manuscript Minor corrections Comment #7: Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected to "Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria." Comment #8: Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Authors Reply: For the assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used in our study, we have utilized the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), not the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The methodology section has been updated to reflect this, ensuring clarity on the quality assessment process used in our research. Comment #9: Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected. Comment #10: Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Authors Reply: Connective sentences has been added for clarity, and when referring to the conductors of clinical trials, the term 'they' has been used.. We hope these revisions will adequately address your concerns and improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript. Please let us know if any further modifications are required. Thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. Competing Interests: No Competing Interests Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 05 Jul 2024 Author Response Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published ... Continue reading Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Authors Reply: Recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) has referenced in the introduction to provide context and rationale for conducting similar research. Comment #2: Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Authors Reply: The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions from 2001 and 2002. Comment #3: The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. Authors Reply: The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript. Comment #4: When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Authors Reply: Up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted, following the guidelines by Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). Comment #5: Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/. Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Authors Reply: Modified accordingly Comment #6: Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains, and many others. Authors Reply: Modified accordingly in manuscript Minor corrections Comment #7: Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected to "Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria." Comment #8: Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Authors Reply: For the assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used in our study, we have utilized the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), not the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The methodology section has been updated to reflect this, ensuring clarity on the quality assessment process used in our research. Comment #9: Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected. Comment #10: Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Authors Reply: Connective sentences has been added for clarity, and when referring to the conductors of clinical trials, the term 'they' has been used.. We hope these revisions will adequately address your concerns and improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript. Please let us know if any further modifications are required. Thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Authors Reply: Recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) has referenced in the introduction to provide context and rationale for conducting similar research. Comment #2: Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Authors Reply: The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions from 2001 and 2002. Comment #3: The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. Authors Reply: The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript. Comment #4: When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Authors Reply: Up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted, following the guidelines by Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). Comment #5: Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/. Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Authors Reply: Modified accordingly Comment #6: Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains, and many others. Authors Reply: Modified accordingly in manuscript Minor corrections Comment #7: Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected to "Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria." Comment #8: Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Authors Reply: For the assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used in our study, we have utilized the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), not the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The methodology section has been updated to reflect this, ensuring clarity on the quality assessment process used in our research. Comment #9: Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected. Comment #10: Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Authors Reply: Connective sentences has been added for clarity, and when referring to the conductors of clinical trials, the term 'they' has been used.. We hope these revisions will adequately address your concerns and improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript. Please let us know if any further modifications are required. Thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. Competing Interests: No Competing Interests Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Bayaga CLT. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r217414 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-217414 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Oct 2023 Cecile Leah T Bayaga , Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Home Economics, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r217414 The article has improved comparing it from version 1. However, I could not follow through the general purpose of the article, matching it with my idea of what a systemic review article should be. As I have mentioned in my ... Continue reading READ ALL The article has improved comparing it from version 1. However, I could not follow through the general purpose of the article, matching it with my idea of what a systemic review article should be. As I have mentioned in my earlier review, the paper would benefit by comparing the current status of the paper with a checklist on STROBE. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: My area of expertise is on clinical nutrition specifically chemical and microbiological composition of human milk. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Bayaga CLT. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r217414 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-217414 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 16 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We ... Continue reading Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered your previous feedback and have made efforts to improve the clarity and focus of the protocol. Regarding your suggestion to compare the protocol with a checklist on STROBE, we appreciate the recommendation for a structured evaluation. However, it's important to note that STROBE is primarily designed for reporting observational studies, and our protocol is focused on the systematic review protocol. Hence, we have utilized the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist, which is tailored to assess the quality and completeness of systematic review protocols. We have written the protocol based on the PRISMA-P checklist to ensure that it adheres to recognized standards for systematic review protocol, which is provided in Extended data under reporting guidelines.You can find the checklist at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241. Once again, we appreciate your valuable feedback, and if you have any further comments or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered your previous feedback and have made efforts to improve the clarity and focus of the protocol. Regarding your suggestion to compare the protocol with a checklist on STROBE, we appreciate the recommendation for a structured evaluation. However, it's important to note that STROBE is primarily designed for reporting observational studies, and our protocol is focused on the systematic review protocol. Hence, we have utilized the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist, which is tailored to assess the quality and completeness of systematic review protocols. We have written the protocol based on the PRISMA-P checklist to ensure that it adheres to recognized standards for systematic review protocol, which is provided in Extended data under reporting guidelines.You can find the checklist at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241. Once again, we appreciate your valuable feedback, and if you have any further comments or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Competing Interests: No competing interest Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 16 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We ... Continue reading Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered your previous feedback and have made efforts to improve the clarity and focus of the protocol. Regarding your suggestion to compare the protocol with a checklist on STROBE, we appreciate the recommendation for a structured evaluation. However, it's important to note that STROBE is primarily designed for reporting observational studies, and our protocol is focused on the systematic review protocol. Hence, we have utilized the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist, which is tailored to assess the quality and completeness of systematic review protocols. We have written the protocol based on the PRISMA-P checklist to ensure that it adheres to recognized standards for systematic review protocol, which is provided in Extended data under reporting guidelines.You can find the checklist at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241. Once again, we appreciate your valuable feedback, and if you have any further comments or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered your previous feedback and have made efforts to improve the clarity and focus of the protocol. Regarding your suggestion to compare the protocol with a checklist on STROBE, we appreciate the recommendation for a structured evaluation. However, it's important to note that STROBE is primarily designed for reporting observational studies, and our protocol is focused on the systematic review protocol. Hence, we have utilized the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist, which is tailored to assess the quality and completeness of systematic review protocols. We have written the protocol based on the PRISMA-P checklist to ensure that it adheres to recognized standards for systematic review protocol, which is provided in Extended data under reporting guidelines.You can find the checklist at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241. Once again, we appreciate your valuable feedback, and if you have any further comments or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Competing Interests: No competing interest Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 Aug 2022 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Bayaga CLT. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134189.r198892 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v1#referee-response-198892 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 14 Sep 2023 Cecile Leah T Bayaga , Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Home Economics, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines Not Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134189.r198892 General Observation From my perspective, the paper is unfished. There are no results of the systematic review. The tense used is in the future; hence it will still be implemented. Specific Observation Abstract Following ... Continue reading READ ALL General Observation From my perspective, the paper is unfished. There are no results of the systematic review. The tense used is in the future; hence it will still be implemented. Specific Observation Abstract Following the PRISMA guidelines , the abstract lacks the following details: Explicitly stated objective Inclusion/Exclusion criteria Methods on how bias was lessened Methods on how data were synthesized No major results and discussion No mention of funding agency Introduction First, majority of the systematic reviews published do not have subsections under this portion. Having sub sections probably is beneficial when the author writes the Introduction. However, reading is made smooth if there were no sub sections. Second, the specific objective which was supposed to be in this section was found in the Methods section. Last, the stated objective of the study does not jive with the stated hypothesis. The premise “growth of preterm infants” was included in the objective but absent in the hypothesis. Methods There is a need to refine the methods to indicate it has been implemented, make the connection seamless, and revise the statements to make them clearer. Discussion There was no discussion as there were no results presented. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: My area of expertise is on clinical nutrition specifically chemical and microbiological composition of human milk. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Bayaga CLT. Reviewer Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134189.r198892 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v1#referee-response-198892 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 16 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears unfinished due to the absence of results and the use of future tense. It's essential to clarify that a systematic review protocol is a prelude to the actual systematic review. Protocols are written before the systematic review and data extraction phases commence, and they serve as a comprehensive plan that outlines the steps and procedures that will be followed during the review process. The use of future tense in the protocol is intentional and necessary because, protocols are typically written before starting the search and data extraction process. At this stage, the review team has not yet gathered and analyzed the data, so it would be premature to present any results. Instead, the protocol serves as a blueprint for the systematic review, detailing the research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and analysis plan. Rest assured that once the systematic review is completed, we will publish the results in a separate paper or report, where we will present and discuss our findings based on the data collected and analyzed during the review process. This follow-up publication will provide a comprehensive overview of the results and their implications. We hope this clarifies the purpose and scope of our systematic review protocol. We value your input and appreciate your understanding of the process. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears unfinished due to the absence of results and the use of future tense. It's essential to clarify that a systematic review protocol is a prelude to the actual systematic review. Protocols are written before the systematic review and data extraction phases commence, and they serve as a comprehensive plan that outlines the steps and procedures that will be followed during the review process. The use of future tense in the protocol is intentional and necessary because, protocols are typically written before starting the search and data extraction process. At this stage, the review team has not yet gathered and analyzed the data, so it would be premature to present any results. Instead, the protocol serves as a blueprint for the systematic review, detailing the research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and analysis plan. Rest assured that once the systematic review is completed, we will publish the results in a separate paper or report, where we will present and discuss our findings based on the data collected and analyzed during the review process. This follow-up publication will provide a comprehensive overview of the results and their implications. We hope this clarifies the purpose and scope of our systematic review protocol. We value your input and appreciate your understanding of the process. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Competing Interests: No competing interests Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal , Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India 16 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears unfinished due to the absence of results and the use of future tense. It's essential to clarify that a systematic review protocol is a prelude to the actual systematic review. Protocols are written before the systematic review and data extraction phases commence, and they serve as a comprehensive plan that outlines the steps and procedures that will be followed during the review process. The use of future tense in the protocol is intentional and necessary because, protocols are typically written before starting the search and data extraction process. At this stage, the review team has not yet gathered and analyzed the data, so it would be premature to present any results. Instead, the protocol serves as a blueprint for the systematic review, detailing the research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and analysis plan. Rest assured that once the systematic review is completed, we will publish the results in a separate paper or report, where we will present and discuss our findings based on the data collected and analyzed during the review process. This follow-up publication will provide a comprehensive overview of the results and their implications. We hope this clarifies the purpose and scope of our systematic review protocol. We value your input and appreciate your understanding of the process. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears unfinished due to the absence of results and the use of future tense. It's essential to clarify that a systematic review protocol is a prelude to the actual systematic review. Protocols are written before the systematic review and data extraction phases commence, and they serve as a comprehensive plan that outlines the steps and procedures that will be followed during the review process. The use of future tense in the protocol is intentional and necessary because, protocols are typically written before starting the search and data extraction process. At this stage, the review team has not yet gathered and analyzed the data, so it would be premature to present any results. Instead, the protocol serves as a blueprint for the systematic review, detailing the research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and analysis plan. Rest assured that once the systematic review is completed, we will publish the results in a separate paper or report, where we will present and discuss our findings based on the data collected and analyzed during the review process. This follow-up publication will provide a comprehensive overview of the results and their implications. We hope this clarifies the purpose and scope of our systematic review protocol. We value your input and appreciate your understanding of the process. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal Competing Interests: No competing interests Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 08 Aug 2022 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 3 (revision) 05 Jul 24 read Version 2 (revision) 20 Oct 23 read read Version 1 08 Aug 22 read Cecile Leah T Bayaga , University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines Sabina Fijan , University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia Yao Wang , The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Wang Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 06 Aug 2024 | for Version 3 Yao Wang , The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong 0 Views copyright © 2024 Wang Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Sepsis is a severe condition that threatens fetal health. Applying probiotics is a feasible and potential approach to prevent this disease. Therefore, this study is meaningful with significant clinical implications. The methods and study design are clear and reasonable. Importantly, the authors will extract specific data such as the type of probiotic used, dosage, antibiotic exposure, gestational age, and type of delivery. One suggestion is that the details of probiotics should be clearly documented at the species or strain level if the data allows. Moreover, the prescribed model, including the starting point of administration during pregnancy and the duration of probiotic use, should also be included. All these contents are crucial to help clinicians to understand and make decisions. An example study is Bekalu et al., AJOG FMF 2023. 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101148. I am overall content if the authors could further improve above comments. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes References 1. Alemu BK, Azeze GG, Wu L, Lau SL, et al.: Effects of maternal probiotic supplementation on breast milk microbiome and infant gut microbiome and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM . 2023; 5 (11): 101148 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Microbiome, Maternal-fetal health, Exercise Intervention, RCT, I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Wang Y. Peer Review Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.168360.r306773) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3#referee-response-306773 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Fijan S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 13 Jun 2024 | for Version 2 Sabina Fijan , Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia 0 Views copyright © 2024 Fijan S. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol: Review report This manuscript, submitted to the journal f1000Research, is a crucial topic and describes the protocol to conduct a systematic review of the probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis. General comments Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri ), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri ), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum ), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis ), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus ), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius ). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/ . Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus , Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains , and many others. Minor corrections Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Binda S, Hill C, Johansen E, Obis D, et al.: Criteria to Qualify Microorganisms as. Front Microbiol . 2020; 11 : 1662 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 2. Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization. FAO/WHO . 2001. 3. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food. FAO/WHO . 2002. 4. Grice EA, Segre JA: The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet . 2012; 13 : 151-70 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 5. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S: Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2020; 70 (11): 5753-5798 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 6. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, et al.: Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2014; 11 (8): 506-14 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 7. Hou K, Wu ZX, Chen XY, Wang JQ, et al.: Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther . 2022; 7 (1): 135 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 8. Kulkarni T, Majarikar S, Deshmukh M, Ananthan A, et al.: Probiotic sepsis in preterm neonates-a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr . 2022; 181 (6): 2249-2262 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 9. Lawson P, Citron D, Tyrrell K, Finegold S: Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938. Anaerobe . 2016; 40 : 95-99 Publisher Full Text 10. McFarland LV, Srinivasan R, Setty RP, Ganapathy S, et al.: Specific Probiotics for the Treatment of Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JPGN Rep . 2021; 2 (3): e079 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 11. Ogunrinola GA, Oyewale JO, Oshamika OO, Olasehinde GI: The Human Microbiome and Its Impacts on Health. Int J Microbiol . 2020; 2020 : 8045646 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 12. Oren A, Garrity GM: Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2021; 71 (10). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 13. Scholz CFP, Kilian M: The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria, and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2016; 66 (11): 4422-4432 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 14. Tan W, Zhou Z, Li W, Lu H, et al.: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG for Cow's Milk Allergy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Pediatrics . 2021; 9 . Publisher Full Text 15. Thomas D, Sharma A, Sankar M: Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023; 10 . Publisher Full Text 16. Walsh CJ, Guinane CM, O'Toole PW, Cotter PD: Beneficial modulation of the gut microbiota. FEBS Lett . 2014; 588 (22): 4120-30 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 17. Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, et al.: A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol . 2020; 70 (4): 2782-2858 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 18. Patel P,Wermuth: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing . 2023. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise probiotics, beneficial microbes, fermented foods, health benefits I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 05 Jul 2024 Faiza Iqbal, Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Thank you for your detailed review and constructive feedback. We have addressed each of your comments as follows: Comment #1 : Recent systematic reviews on this subject have been published and should be referenced with the rationale for conducting similar research (Kulkarni et al., 2022; Thomas et al., 2023). Authors Reply: Recent systematic reviews by Kulkarni et al. (2022) and Thomas et al. (2023) has referenced in the introduction to provide context and rationale for conducting similar research. Comment #2: Probiotics are by definition: “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” (Hill et al., 2014). This definition is published as a consensus statement by the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics and should be referenced when citing the correct definition. This definition is in line with the definition accepted by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (FAO/WHO) published in 2001 (FAO/WHO, 2001) and the guidelines to assist with this definition published in 2002 (FAO/WHO, 2002). Authors Reply: The definition of probiotics has been updated to include the consensus statement by Hill et al. (2014) and references to the FAO/WHO definitions from 2001 and 2002. Comment #3: The human microbiota comprises of bacteria, archaea, viruses, fungi and other eukaryotes that coexist in and on various sites of the human body (Hou et al., 2022), while the microbiome is the collection of all genetic information of this microbiota (Grice & Segre, 2012; Ogunrinola et al., 2020). The term ‘flora’ is outdated and should be replaced by the taxonomically correct term ‘microbiota. Authors Reply: The term 'flora' has been replaced with 'microbiota' throughout the manuscript. Comment #4: When comparing the modulation of gut microbiota, the abundance or ratio of certain phyla is usually compared (Walsh et al., 2014). However, it is necessary to use up-to-date nomenclature (Oren & Garrity, 2021). Firmicutes are now Bacillota, Proteobacteria are now Pseudomonadota, Actinobacteria are now Actinomycetota, Bacteroidetes are now Bacteroidota etc. Authors Reply: Up-to-date nomenclature for bacterial phyla and genera has been adopted, following the guidelines by Oren & Garrity (2021) and Zheng et al. (2020). Comment #5: Up-to-date terminology should be used for lactobacilli (Zheng et al., 2020). This genus Lactobacillus has been divided and now consists of 25 genera. It is necessary to include the new nomenclature of many species that contain probiotic strains, for example: Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Limosilactobacillus reuteri (previously Lactobacillus reuteri), Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (previously Lactobacillus plantarum), Levilactobacillus brevis (previously Lactobacillus brevis), Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus (previously Lactobacillus rhamnosus), Ligilactobacillus salivarius (previously Lactobacillus salivarius). The new nomenclature can be found at the website: http://lactotax.embl.de/wuyts/lactotax/. Other genera that also include probiotic strains such as Bacillus, Clostridium, Propionibacterium have also undergone taxonomic reclassification (Gupta et al., 2020; Lawson et al., 2016; Scholz & Kilian, 2016). Authors Reply: Modified accordingly Comment #6: Another important factor is the meaning of probiotics. Only certain strains are probiotic microbes. The strains that are labeled as a probiotic must have at least on quality double blind randomised controlled clinical study that exhibits a statistically significant difference in the group that was supplemented with probiotics compared to the placebo group (Binda et al., 2020). And in many instances the health benefits are strain-specific, therefore strain information must be included. For example, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (previously known as Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) is a well-known probiotic with several proven health benefits (McFarland et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2021). However, this does not mean that all strains of the species Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus are probiotics, let alone all lactobacilli. The same applies for Limosilactobacillus reuteri strains, Lactiplantibacillus strains, and many others. Authors Reply: Modified accordingly in manuscript Minor corrections Comment #7: Introduction, paragraph 3: please correct the sentence to ‘probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth pathogenic gut bacteria'. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected to "Probiotics can enhance your immune system while preventing the growth of pathogenic gut bacteria." Comment #8: Assessment of quality of the studies: please add the foreseen Joanna Briggs Institute Critical appraisal tool checklist for randomised controlled trials. Authors Reply: For the assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) used in our study, we have utilized the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0), not the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool. The methodology section has been updated to reflect this, ensuring clarity on the quality assessment process used in our research. Comment #9: Discussion: paragraph 1: please use accurate phrases. antibiotics are pharmacological agents that destroy the bacteria cells (Patel P et al., 2023), but not viruses that are also possible gut pathogens. Authors Reply: The sentence has been corrected. Comment #10: Discussion: paragraph 1: some connective sentences should be included, not just the presentation of results of randomised controlled trials. When referring to the conductors of clinical trials please use the term ‘they’. Authors Reply: Connective sentences has been added for clarity, and when referring to the conductors of clinical trials, the term 'they' has been used.. We hope these revisions will adequately address your concerns and improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript. Please let us know if any further modifications are required. Thank you for your valuable feedback and guidance. View more View less Competing Interests No Competing Interests reply Respond Report a concern Fijan S. Peer Review Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r278782) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-278782 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2023 Bayaga C. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Oct 2023 | for Version 2 Cecile Leah T Bayaga , Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Home Economics, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines 0 Views copyright © 2023 Bayaga C. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions The article has improved comparing it from version 1. However, I could not follow through the general purpose of the article, matching it with my idea of what a systemic review article should be. As I have mentioned in my earlier review, the paper would benefit by comparing the current status of the paper with a checklist on STROBE. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise My area of expertise is on clinical nutrition specifically chemical and microbiological composition of human milk. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal, Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Dear Dr.Cecile Leah T Bayaga, Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered your previous feedback and have made efforts to improve the clarity and focus of the protocol. Regarding your suggestion to compare the protocol with a checklist on STROBE, we appreciate the recommendation for a structured evaluation. However, it's important to note that STROBE is primarily designed for reporting observational studies, and our protocol is focused on the systematic review protocol. Hence, we have utilized the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) checklist, which is tailored to assess the quality and completeness of systematic review protocols. We have written the protocol based on the PRISMA-P checklist to ensure that it adheres to recognized standards for systematic review protocol, which is provided in Extended data under reporting guidelines.You can find the checklist at this link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19839241. Once again, we appreciate your valuable feedback, and if you have any further comments or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal View more View less Competing Interests No competing interest reply Respond Report a concern Bayaga CLT. Peer Review Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.157165.r217414) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v2#referee-response-217414 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2023 Bayaga C. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 14 Sep 2023 | for Version 1 Cecile Leah T Bayaga , Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Home Economics, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines 0 Views copyright © 2023 Bayaga C. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Not Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions General Observation From my perspective, the paper is unfished. There are no results of the systematic review. The tense used is in the future; hence it will still be implemented. Specific Observation Abstract Following the PRISMA guidelines , the abstract lacks the following details: Explicitly stated objective Inclusion/Exclusion criteria Methods on how bias was lessened Methods on how data were synthesized No major results and discussion No mention of funding agency Introduction First, majority of the systematic reviews published do not have subsections under this portion. Having sub sections probably is beneficial when the author writes the Introduction. However, reading is made smooth if there were no sub sections. Second, the specific objective which was supposed to be in this section was found in the Methods section. Last, the stated objective of the study does not jive with the stated hypothesis. The premise “growth of preterm infants” was included in the objective but absent in the hypothesis. Methods There is a need to refine the methods to indicate it has been implemented, make the connection seamless, and revise the statements to make them clearer. Discussion There was no discussion as there were no results presented. Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? No Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? No Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review? No Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise My area of expertise is on clinical nutrition specifically chemical and microbiological composition of human milk. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 16 Nov 2023 Faiza Iqbal, Department of Paediatrics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India Dear Reviewer, Thank you for taking the time to review our systematic review protocol. We appreciate your feedback and would like to address your observation that the paper appears unfinished due to the absence of results and the use of future tense. It's essential to clarify that a systematic review protocol is a prelude to the actual systematic review. Protocols are written before the systematic review and data extraction phases commence, and they serve as a comprehensive plan that outlines the steps and procedures that will be followed during the review process. The use of future tense in the protocol is intentional and necessary because, protocols are typically written before starting the search and data extraction process. At this stage, the review team has not yet gathered and analyzed the data, so it would be premature to present any results. Instead, the protocol serves as a blueprint for the systematic review, detailing the research questions, eligibility criteria, search strategy, data extraction methods, and analysis plan. Rest assured that once the systematic review is completed, we will publish the results in a separate paper or report, where we will present and discuss our findings based on the data collected and analyzed during the review process. This follow-up publication will provide a comprehensive overview of the results and their implications. We hope this clarifies the purpose and scope of our systematic review protocol. We value your input and appreciate your understanding of the process. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please feel free to share them. Sincerely, Faiza Iqbal View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests reply Respond Report a concern Bayaga CLT. Peer Review Report For: Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol [version 3; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations] . F1000Research 2024, 11 :913 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.134189.r198892) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v1#referee-response-198892 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Iqbal F et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913", templates : { twitter : "Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic.... Iqbal F et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/11-913/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/122226/168360") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "168360"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "278784": 0, "278785": 0, "147211": 0, "147214": 0, "172558": 0, "182798": 0, "172559": 0, "182799": 0, "224269": 0, "147212": 0, "224268": 0, "147213": 0, "182802": 0, "182803": 0, "172560": 0, "182800": 0, "182801": 0, "182806": 0, "182807": 0, "182804": 0, "156949": 0, "182805": 0, "219167": 0, "219166": 0, "219165": 0, "219164": 0, "219171": 0, "219170": 0, "219169": 0, "219168": 0, "219173": 0, "219172": 0, "150842": 0, "150843": 0, "148284": 0, "148285": 0, "217414": 23, "159306": 0, "159304": 0, "306767": 0, "159305": 0, "306772": 0, "306773": 8, "306774": 0, "306775": 0, "306768": 0, "306769": 0, "306770": 0, "306771": 0, "306776": 0, "273769": 0, "273770": 0, "273780": 0, "273781": 0, "168051": 0, "273776": 0, "273777": 0, "273778": 0, "273779": 0, "155258": 0, "155259": 0, "155257": 0, "188827": 0, "152482": 0, "188835": 0, "152483": 0, "188838": 0, "188839": 0, "188836": 0, "188837": 0, "156069": 0, "188842": 0, "188843": 0, "188840": 0, "188841": 0, "241860": 0, "241867": 0, "241866": 0, "241865": 0, "299982": 0, "241864": 0, "299983": 0, "195278": 0, "195279": 0, "241868": 0, "195282": 0, "195283": 0, "195280": 0, "195281": 0, "195286": 0, "195287": 0, "195284": 0, "195285": 0, "300764": 0, "300765": 0, "300766": 0, "300767": 0, "300761": 0, "300762": 0, "178908": 0, "300763": 0, "178914": 0, "149474": 0, "198883": 0, "178915": 0, "149475": 0, "300768": 0, "178918": 0, "198887": 0, "300769": 0, "178919": 0, "198886": 0, "300770": 0, "178916": 0, "149476": 0, "198885": 0, "178917": 0, "198884": 0, "178922": 0, "198891": 0, "178923": 0, "198890": 0, "178920": 0, "198889": 0, "178921": 0, "198888": 0, "198892": 28, "149233": 0, "278780": 0, "160762": 0, "278781": 0, "160763": 0, "278782": 25, "160760": 0, "278783": 0, "160761": 0, "278778": 0, "160764": 0, "278779": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "4d4a2463-da1f-4bf9-9d72-a8e5ada9f1cc"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });