Abstract
The size of individual single cell samples continues to grow with advancing technologies, as do the number of samples included in individual experiments and across organizations. This presents challenges for processing this data at scale, both in terms of computational throughput and the required size of the machines that must process this data. We present a single cell RNA processing method that is fully distributed, capable of processing arbitrarily large files, and numbers of files, without requiring per-file based compute sizing. Our method, cspray, includes data ingestion, preprocessing, highly variable gene annotation, PCA, and clustering. We also show that this processing at scale permits LLM based reference-free cluster annotation on low resolution clusters, which demonstrates these techniques can be used to build single cell data discovery platforms at scale.
Full text
978 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
The size of individual single cell samples continues to grow with advancing technologies, as do the number of samples included in individual experiments and across organizations. This presents challenges for processing this data at scale, both in terms of computational throughput and the required size of the machines that must process this data. We present a single cell RNA processing method that is fully distributed, capable of processing arbitrarily large files, and numbers of files, without requiring per-file based compute sizing. Our method, cspray, includes data ingestion, preprocessing, highly variable gene annotation, PCA, and clustering. We also show that this processing at scale permits LLM based reference-free cluster annotation on low resolution clusters, which demonstrates these techniques can be used to build single cell data discovery platforms at scale.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors are employed by, and hold stock in, Databricks.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.