Nodule microbiome functions shape the performance of a wild perennial legume

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,875 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Nitrogen fixing legume nodules are typically viewed as the product of a bilateral mutualism between host plants and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, yet nodules also harbor diverse non-rhizobial endophytes whose functional significance remains poorly understood, especially in wild legumes and uncultivated soil. Here, using the wild Mediterranean shrub Calicotome villosa, we performed a soil inoculation experiment to test whether plant performance is linked to the functional composition of the nodule microbiome. Soil inocula from different natural sites produced strong differences in nodulation success, plant biomass, leaf nitrogen concentration, nitrogen fixation rate, and nodule allocation under otherwise uniform conditions. Although Bradyrhizobium dominated all nodules, species composition varied among inoculation sources, and non-rhizobial endophytes reached substantial abundance in some treatments. Functional profiles of the nodule microbiome were significantly associated with plant phenotype, with the strongest coupling observed for traits related to nodule investment. Targeted and genome-wide analyses identified trait-associated genes in both symbionts and endophytes, including genes involved in nitrogen cycling, ammonium transport, denitrification, pyrimidine degradation, sulfur assimilation, and type VI secretion systems. Several of these functions were not part of the canonical symbiosis machinery, yet were strongly associated with plant nitrogen status, biomass accumulation, or nodule mass fraction. Together, our results show that legume performance is better predicted by the collective functional composition of the nodule microbiome than by the primary symbiont alone. These findings support a broader view of nodules as multipartite microbial communities. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00