Reproductive technology--the price of progress

Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

Over one million US women use infertility services annually with less than 50% success, leading to the development of assisted reproductive techniques for those unable to accept childlessness.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Each year more than a million American women use infertility services, but fewer than 50 percent of them go on to deliver a live baby1. Standard treatments for infertility include induction of ovulation, artificial insemination, and surgery for tubal disease or endometriosis. Little is known about why success with standard treatment for infertility is so limited; in many cases there may be reproductive deficiencies that are undetectable with current methods. Many couples are unable to reconcile themselves to the prospect of childlessness, and for them the scope of treatment has been altered dramatically by new techniques of assisted reproduction. . . .

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Infertility, Female Pregnancy, Multiple Reproductive Techniques Adult Canada Cost-Benefit Analysis Costs and Cost Analysis Female Hospital Charges Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Male Pregnancy Reproductive Techniques United States

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

References (11)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:14.651011+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-19T06:34:38.229974+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK