Improving our understanding of adaptive evolution by addressing multi-generational non-genetic responses

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,254 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 5 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 5 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Populations that face environmental change reducing their mean fitness can recover by adaptive genetic evolution over multiple generations, but their immediate responses may also involve non-genetic mechanisms, though the latter can be difficult to demonstrate. When the dynamics of such non-genetic changes in mean phenotype and fitness span multiple generations, their effects at the population level can be difficult to distinguish from those of natural selection on genetic variants. While the existence of non-genetic inheritance is no longer controversial, we argue that its potential contribution to observed patterns in evolutionary studies remains overlooked, especially for processes leading to phenotypic change that unfolds over multiple generations, which we call multigenerational non-genetic responses (MUNGER). We highlight three major forms of MUNGER that, if not properly accounted for, could confound inference about genetic changes: delayed impact of stress, transgenerational plasticity, and priming. We summarize how each may impact the dynamics of phenotypic change across generations in concrete experimental contexts (e.g., experimental evolution, common gardens, ecotoxicological experiments). We propose that analysing the dynamic properties of MUNGER, their relative contributions to overall phenotypic responses, and how they interact with genetic changes, should help build a more comprehensive understanding of evolutionary responses to changing environments. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2V04W Life Sciences Epigenetics, plasticity, Transgeneretional effects, fitness, Stability, Reversibility, transient dynamics, stressors Published: 2025-01-07 07:15 Last Updated: 2026-02-05 18:53 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00