Comparison of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Abdominal Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Benign Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
This retrospective cohort study compared total laparoscopic hysterectomy with abdominal total hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease, finding that the laparoscopic approach resulted in less blood loss and shorter hospital stays without increased complications.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective cohort study compared clinical outcomes between total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal total hysterectomy in 102 patients with benign gynecological disease. The analysis revealed that the laparoscopic approach resulted in significantly less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and lighter excised uterine weights despite longer operation times. There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of perioperative complications between the two surgical groups. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for hysterectomy, though the paper's main focus is a general comparison of surgical approaches for benign disease rather than specifically endometriosis or adenomyosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,758 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-06T09:34:12.023084+00:00