Efficacité et tolérance du traitement des nodules d’endométriose de la paroi abdominale cryoablation per cutanée versus chirurgie : étude comparative

Julie Maillot
In: Médecine humaine et pathologie. 2016 · 2016 · W2782521257
article OA: green CC0
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 ⓘ

This comparative study found that percutaneous cryoablation for abdominal wall endometriosis offers comparable efficacy to surgical resection with significantly shorter procedure times, reduced hospitalization, and fewer complications or aesthetic sequelae.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25 · read from full text ⓘ

The provided text does not contain the abstract or body of the research paper titled "Efficacité et tolérance du traitement des nodules d’endométriose de la paroi abdominale cryoablation per cutanée versus chirurgie : étude comparative." Instead, it displays a security challenge page generated by Anubis, which is designed to protect the website from automated scraping by requiring a Proof-of-Work verification. Consequently, no data regarding the efficacy or tolerance of cryoablation versus surgery for abdominal wall endometriosis nodules is available in the input. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Purpose: to evaluate the tolerance, efficacy and outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation vs surgical resection of localized symptomatic abdominal wall endometriosis. Patients and Methods: after a retrospective review of a single institution database, a total of 7 patients (15 lesions ; mean age 36,1 years) were included in the cryoablation group while 13 patients (16 lesions ; mean age 31.9 years) were included in the surgical group. The main information recorded was age, antecedents, tumor and procedure characteristics, severe complications (≥ grade 3 according to the CTCAE classification). Results: the mean follow up was of 1.7 years (range 3-42 months) for the cryoablation group and 4.5 years (14-149 months) for the surgical group. The mean node size was 2,3cm and 2,5 cm respectively. Cryoablation was performed in a single session under general anesthesia for 4 patients (57%) and local anesthesia for 3 patients (43%). Surgery was performed under general anesthesia in all patients but one (92%). The mean procedure and hospitalization lengths were 41.5 minutes (24-66) and 0.8 day for the cryoablation group, respectively. For the surgical group, they were 73,5 minutes (35- 160), and 2.8 days (1-12 days). Postoperative superficial edema disappeared within 2 weeks for all patients treated by cryoablation. After cryoablation, the mean postoperative pain was 2 at 6 months (0-8) and MRI demonstrated a significant volume decrease and a partiel reduction on RECIST for all patients. No severe complications were reported in the cryoablation group whereas in the surgical group, 3 severe adverse effects occurred, 9 patients had esthetic sequelaes. Conclusions: percutaneous image-guided cryoablation appears to be safe and effective for local control of symptomatic wall endometriosis, with a shortened procedure and hospitalisation compared with surgery, no complication, no esthetic sequelae were observed.
Full text 1,068 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Making sure you're not a bot! Loading... You are seeing this because the administrator of this website has set up Anubis to protect the server against the scourge of AI companies aggressively scraping websites. This can and does cause downtime for the websites, which makes their resources inaccessible for everyone. Anubis is a compromise. Anubis uses a Proof-of-Work scheme in the vein of Hashcash, a proposed proof-of-work scheme for reducing email spam. The idea is that at individual scales the additional load is ignorable, but at mass scraper levels it adds up and makes scraping much more expensive. Ultimately, this is a placeholder solution so that more time can be spent on fingerprinting and identifying headless browsers (EG: via how they do font rendering) so that the challenge proof of work page doesn't need to be presented to users that are much more likely to be legitimate. Please note that Anubis requires the use of modern JavaScript features that plugins like JShelter will disable. Please disable JShelter or other such plugins for this domain.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK