Outcome after Laparoscopic Ureteral Resection and Ureteroneocystostomy in Women with Ureteral Endometriosis

article OA: bronze CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08

Laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy resolved hydronephrosis, improved pelvic pain, and enhanced renal function in women with ureteral endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

The paper studied outcomes in nine women with ureteral endometriosis who underwent laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy between 2008 and 2012, with follow-up assessing hydronephrosis, pelvic pain via VAS scores, and renal function using radioisotope measurements before and after surgery. Six months postoperatively, there was no recurrence of hydronephrosis, and pelvic pain VAS levels improved. In three cases assessed with renal radioisotopes, all showed improved renal function. The main limitation is the very small sample size and the short follow-up timeframe reported (six months for key outcomes). This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically ureteral endometriosis treated with laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy, reporting postoperative hydronephrosis, pain, and renal function outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the prognosis of women with ureteral endometriosis after laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy.Study Design: From 2008 through 2012, we followed nine cases of ureteral endometriosis after laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy. We evaluated for any presence of hydronephrosis, improvement of pelvic pain (VAS levels), and renal function with radioisotopes before and after surgery.Results: We found no recurrence of hydronephrosis six months postoperatively. The VAS levels of pelvic pain also improved six months postoperatively. Three cases were examined with renal radioisotopes and all three cases were found to have improved function.Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy improved the renal function of women with ureteral endometriosis.
Full text 1,749 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Objective

We investigated the prognosis of women with ureteral endometriosis after laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy. Study Design: From 2008 through 2012, we followed nine cases of ureteral endometriosis after laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy. We evaluated for any presence of hydronephrosis, improvement of pelvic pain (VAS levels), and renal function with radioisotopes before and after surgery.

Results

We found no recurrence of hydronephrosis six months postoperatively. The VAS levels of pelvic pain also improved six months postoperatively. Three cases were examined with renal radioisotopes and all three cases were found to have improved function.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy improved the renal function of women with ureteral endometriosis. Study Design: From 2008 through 2012, we followed nine cases of ureteral endometriosis after laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy. We evaluated for any presence of hydronephrosis, improvement of pelvic pain (VAS levels), and renal function with radioisotopes before and after surgery.

Results

We found no recurrence of hydronephrosis six months postoperatively. The VAS levels of pelvic pain also improved six months postoperatively. Three cases were examined with renal radioisotopes and all three cases were found to have improved function.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic ureteral resection and ureteroneocystostomy improved the renal function of women with ureteral endometriosis. © 2015 日本産科婦人科内視鏡学会

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (32)

Source provenance

crossref
last seen: 2026-05-15T01:00:13.459884+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK