What do fishermen think? Local perspectives on human–crocodile co-existence in Lake Nasser

Abstract The increasing impact of humans on natural habitats leads to an increase in human–wildlife conflict (HWC), specifically when there is competition for shared resources. In freshwater systems such as Lake Nasser, Egypt, co-occurrence of local fishermen communities with Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) poses critical challenges for both livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. Understanding local perception of crocodiles by local fishermen is therefore essential for developing effective and socially accepted management responses. We used a structured questionnaire to assess how fishermen perceive and respond to crocodiles across three attitudinal domains: (1) perceived threats, (2) perceived economic benefits, and (3) conservation or co-existence values. Forty-two fishermen were interviewed across multiple khors (side arms of the lake). The responses showed a multifaceted picture: while many local fishermen associated crocodiles with gear damage, reduced catches, and livelihood risks, support for crocodile protection and recognition of their ecological role were also widespread. Interest in crocodile-based livelihood opportunities, such as harvesting or collecting the hatchlings, was generally low, suggesting social, cultural, or legal barriers to such approaches. Fishing experience influenced perceptions, with fishermen encountering crocodiles more frequently reporting decreased catches and greater concern. Cluster analysis further revealed three different respondent groups with different attitudes: conflict-oriented, moderate, and coexistence-oriented. Support for crocodile protection was the strongest predictor of belonging to the pro-co-existence group. Our findings underscore the complexity of human– crocodile co-occurrence in Lake Nasser and, on a wider scale, add to the existing cautions against simplistic mitigations of local HWC. Effective conservation and livelihood interventions will require participatory, context-sensitive approaches that integrate the different perceptions and attitudes of local people. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.