Engaging European Local Communities in Biodiversity Genomics Research: A Five-Step Framework for Scientists

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 2,595 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Societally relevant applications of genomic science to understanding biodiversity depend on sustained and equitable engagement with Local Communities that supports ethical practice, builds a richer knowledge base, and guides sustainable conservation decisions. Pairing genomic sequencing data with long-held local ecological knowledge offers unique opportunities to gain insights into species biology within lived landscapes. However, meaningful participation of Local Communities and integration of community-held knowledge in genomics-informed research practices remains limited, likely hindered by inadequate engagement training and a lack of researcher incentives. Establishing an engagement framework is therefore essential to align collaboration norms, embed a two-way dialogue, and safeguard fair benefit-sharing between scientists and community representatives. Here, we outline participatory principles throughout the biodiversity genomics project lifecycle from a European perspective, from early sampling design to data interpretation, dissemination, and subsequent policy dialogue. Based on this we develop an engagement framework, adoption of which will strengthen data interpretability, elevate scientific and social legitimacy, while empowering communities to co-design management strategies grounded in both contemporary genomics and generational lived experience. By synthesising engagement drivers, pinpointing obstacles, and distilling lessons from a practical example, we present a five-step framework adaptable to varied cultural and ecological settings. We call on researchers, funders, and community leaders to take up and refine this framework, ensuring local voices shape and benefit from the accumulating genomic knowledge that will direct future conservation actions. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2VH3P Life Sciences biodiversity conservation, community engagement, equitable research, knowledge co-creation, local ecological knowledge, participatory genomics, stakeholder communities Published: 2025-12-29 10:28 Last Updated: 2025-12-29 10:28 CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Data and Code Availability Statement: Not applicable Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00