Impact of Climate Variation on Malaria Incidence Rates In Sub Saharan Africa

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background: Malaria remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, with Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo among the most affected (1). While climate variability, particularly rainfall, influences malaria transmission through mosquito breeding habitats, the extent of its impact varies by region (2, 3). This study investigates the correlation between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns from 2020 to 2022 in the three selected countries, alongside a descriptive epidemiological review of national control policies. Methodology: Malaria incidence data were collected from WHO reports for the years 2020 to 2022, while annual rainfall data were sourced online. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence. The coefficient of variation was also calculated for both variables to evaluate data stability. Microsoft Excel was used for graphical representation. A descriptive epidemiological review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of malaria control policies in each country. Results: Nigeria recorded a malaria incidence decline from 313.76 to 305, Mozambique from 234 to 223, and the Democratic Republic of Congo from 330 to an estimated 310. Correlation analysis showed a strong negative relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence in Nigeria (r = -0.7651) and Mozambique (r = -0.99), but a strong positive correlation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (r = 0.895). Nigeria demonstrated the most effective control measures, followed by Mozambique. Conclusion: The study highlights that rainfall’s influence on malaria incidence is moderated by the effectiveness of national control strategies. Strengthening region-specific interventions remains key to sustained malaria reduction in sub-Saharan Africa.
Full text 55,090 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Impact of Climate Variation on Malaria Incidence Rates In Sub Saharan Africa | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Impact of Climate Variation on Malaria Incidence Rates In Sub Saharan Africa Mudasiru Olamide Rokeeb This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Malaria remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, with Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo among the most affected ( 1 ). While climate variability, particularly rainfall, influences malaria transmission through mosquito breeding habitats, the extent of its impact varies by region ( 2 , 3 ). This study investigates the correlation between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns from 2020 to 2022 in the three selected countries, alongside a descriptive epidemiological review of national control policies. Methodology: Malaria incidence data were collected from WHO reports for the years 2020 to 2022, while annual rainfall data were sourced online. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence. The coefficient of variation was also calculated for both variables to evaluate data stability. Microsoft Excel was used for graphical representation. A descriptive epidemiological review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of malaria control policies in each country. Results: Nigeria recorded a malaria incidence decline from 313.76 to 305, Mozambique from 234 to 223, and the Democratic Republic of Congo from 330 to an estimated 310. Correlation analysis showed a strong negative relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence in Nigeria (r = -0.7651) and Mozambique (r = -0.99), but a strong positive correlation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (r = 0.895). Nigeria demonstrated the most effective control measures, followed by Mozambique. Conclusion: The study highlights that rainfall’s influence on malaria incidence is moderated by the effectiveness of national control strategies. Strengthening region-specific interventions remains key to sustained malaria reduction in sub-Saharan Africa. General Microbiology Malaria incidence rate Rainfall patterns Sub Saharan Africa Descriptive epidemiology Coefficient of Variation Correlation Coefficient Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Introduction Malaria remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa ( 1 ). It is a preventable and treatable disease caused by parasites transmitted through the bites of infected mosquitoes. Although effective control and prevention strategies exist, challenges such as drug and insecticide resistance, limited access to healthcare, and inadequate funding continue to hinder progress ( 4 ). This research aims to examine the correlation between malaria incidence rates and climate variations, specifically rainfall patterns, by focusing on three sub-Saharan African countries which include Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data from 2020 to 2022 were collected and analyzed. Rainfall was selected as a key variable due to evidence from previous studies indicating that stagnant water, resulting from heavy rainfall, serves as a breeding ground for malaria vectors, especially during the larval and pupal stages ( 2 , 5 ). Additionally, descriptive epidemiological analysis was conducted to assess the policies and control measures implemented in the selected countries to combat malaria. This approach provides insight into regional efforts and helps identify gaps and strengths in current intervention strategies. While numerous studies have explored the epidemiology of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, relatively few have specifically examined how climate variability, particularly rainfall patterns, directly influences its regional incidence over time. Existing literature often generalizes the impact of climatic factors without writing on the breeding habitats of malaria vectors. Additionally, previous research tends to overlook the analysis of national malaria control policies implemented across different sub-Saharan African countries, insights that could inform effective strategies for reducing malaria incidence in other regions. This literature review synthesizes existing studies on malaria epidemiology, the role of climatic factors (particularly rainfall), mosquito breeding habitats, and national control policies in sub-Saharan Africa. It identifies gaps in the literature and justifies the current study’s focus on Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Malaria Epidemiology in Sub-Saharan Africa Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for approximately 94 percent of global malaria cases, with Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo contributing 27 percent and 12 percent of the total burden respectively ( 1 ). High incidence rates in these countries reflect systemic challenges, including weak healthcare infrastructure and socio-political instability, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo ( 6 ). Mozambique, while less burdened than Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, still reports significant malaria prevalence, driven by its tropical climate and limited intervention coverage. These country-specific trends underscore the need for tailored epidemiological analyses to inform targeted control strategies. Climatic Influences on Malaria Transmission Climatic factors, particularly rainfall and temperature, play a critical role in malaria transmission by creating favorable conditions for Anopheles mosquito breeding and parasite development ( 2 , 3 ). Heavy rainfall leads to stagnant water pools which serve as breeding sites, increasing vector populations and transmission risk. However, few studies have disaggregated these effects for West and Central African countries like Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, where ecological and socio-economic contexts differ significantly. This gap highlights the need for country-specific analyses of rainfall and malaria relationships. Mosquito Breeding Habitats The ecology of *Anopheles* mosquitoes, particularly *Anopheles gambiae*, is closely tied to rainfall-driven breeding habitats ( 5 ). Temporary water bodies formed during rainy seasons are ideal for larval development, yet regional variations in habitat suitability remain underexplored. For instance, southern Nigeria’s high rainfall supports extensive breeding sites, while Mozambique’s coastal ecology presents unique challenges. Existing studies often generalize climatic impacts without focusing on how specific breeding habitats influence transmission dynamics, a limitation this study seeks to address through targeted correlation analyses. Malaria Control Policies Effective malaria control relies on interventions such as insecticide treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and artemisinin based combination therapies (ACTs) ( 7 ). Nigeria’s National Malaria Strategic Plan (2014 to 2020) has achieved significant ITN coverage, contributing to a stable decline in incidence ( 8 ). Mozambique has implemented seasonal malaria chemoprevention and IRS, though with less comprehensive coverage. In contrast, the Democratic Republic of Congo’s control efforts are hampered by logistical challenges and conflict, resulting in higher incidence and variability ( 6 ). Methodology In respect to the background of this research, statistical data were collected on three sub-Saharan African countries which include Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, focusing on malaria incidence rates from 2020 to 2022, as reported by the WHO ( 1 ). These countries were selected based on the fact that they have high malaria incidence rates in sub-Saharan Africa, according to the WHO. Also, 2020 to 2022 was selected so as to work with current data which can help solve the problem of malaria burden compared to the years before 2020. In this context, the malaria incidence rate is defined as the number of malaria cases per 1,000 population at risk, annually. To understand the correlation between climate variability and malaria incidence rates, the annual rainfall patterns of the selected sub-Saharan African countries were collected using search engines like Google. For Nigeria, the southern region was selected for analysis, as it experiences higher rainfall compared to the northern region. The malaria incidence rate for the Democratic Republic of Congo for the year 2022 has not yet been published by the WHO. However, the malaria incidence rate was predicted for the year 2022 based on previously available data, in order to avoid errors in calculations. After data collection, statistical analysis was conducted using appropriate formulas like the coefficient of variation formula (CV = Standard deviation / Mean × 100) to determine the coefficient of variation in malaria incidence rates from 2020 to 2022, as well as for the rainfall patterns. Additionally, correlation analysis was carried out to examine the relationship between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns from 2020 to 2022 using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Microsoft Excel was used to visually represent the graphical representation of the line charts of both malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns. Furthermore, a descriptive epidemiological study was carried out on the selected sub-Saharan African countries to understand the policies and control measures implemented in different regions to combat malaria. This analysis aimed to identify the country with the most effective policies and control strategies, which could then be recommended to countries showing a strong positive correlation between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns. The descriptive epidemiology also served as a control for the statistical calculations, helping to minimize potential errors. Results According to the World Malaria Report released by WHO in 2020 ( 1 ), Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 313.76 per 1,000 population, Mozambique had a rate of 234, while the Democratic Republic of Congo recorded a rate of 330. In 2021, Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 306, Mozambique recorded 229, while the Democratic Republic of Congo had a rate of 320. In 2022, Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 305, Mozambique recorded 223, while the predicted rate for the Democratic Republic of Congo, using trend analysis, was 310. The rainfall patterns for the selected sub-Saharan African countries from 2020 to 2022 are as follows: Nigeria recorded 1,800 mm, 1,850 mm, and 2,000 mm; Mozambique had 950 mm, 1,000 mm, and 1,100 mm; while the Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 1,545 mm, 1,534 mm, and 1,386.10 mm. Statistical analysis showed that Nigeria had a coefficient of variation of 1.27 percent for malaria incidence rate and 4.51 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of -0.7651 between malaria incidence and rainfall. Mozambique had a coefficient of variation of 1.97 percent for malaria incidence rate and 6.13 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of -0.99. The Democratic Republic of Congo had a coefficient of variation of 2.55 percent for malaria incidence rate and 4.87 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.895. Descriptive epidemiology indicates that Nigeria has the most effective policies and control measures for eradicating malaria among the three selected sub-Saharan African countries, followed by Mozambique and then the Democratic Republic of Congo. Discussion / Interpretation The analysis of malaria incidence rates, rainfall patterns, and their statistical interrelations from 2020 to 2022 in Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo provides critical insights into the epidemiology of malaria within these sub-Saharan African nations. The observed patterns highlight country-specific variations in malaria burden, environmental influences, and the effectiveness of national control strategies. Trends in Malaria Incidence From 2020 to 2022, all three countries experienced a gradual decline in malaria incidence, reflecting the positive impact of ongoing control efforts. Nigeria demonstrated a slight but consistent decrease in malaria incidence, from 313.76 per 1,000 population in 2020 to 305 in 2022. This suggests a stable malaria control landscape, underpinned by sustained interventions such as the use of insecticide treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and improved access to antimalarial treatments ( 7 , 8 ). The slow pace of reduction, however, indicates room for enhanced programmatic efficiency and coverage. Mozambique reported a more pronounced decline from 234 in 2020 to 223 in 2022. The steady downward trajectory reflects moderately effective control measures. While Mozambique does not exhibit the same policy robustness as Nigeria, its malaria control efforts appear adequately structured to drive consistent reductions in incidence. The Democratic Republic of Congo showed a decline from 330 in 2020 to an estimated 310 in 2022, with the slowest rate of improvement among the three. The persistently high incidence underscores systemic challenges, including weak healthcare infrastructure, socio-political instability, and insufficient policy implementation, all of which hinder sustained malaria control ( 6 ). These patterns suggest that while progress is evident, the extent and pace of malaria reduction are significantly influenced by the strength of national malaria control programs, healthcare system capacity, and socio-environmental conditions. Variability in Malaria Incidence and Rainfall Patterns The coefficient of variation (CV) was employed to assess the temporal stability of malaria incidence and rainfall across the study period; Nigeria exhibited the lowest variability in malaria incidence (CV = 1.27 percent), indicative of a highly stable epidemiological profile. The moderate variability in rainfall (CV = 4.51 percent) had minimal apparent influence on incidence rates, likely due to Nigeria’s effective intervention coverage buffering the effects of environmental fluctuations ( 8 ). Mozambique recorded a moderately low variability in malaria incidence (CV = 1.97 percent) and the highest variability in rainfall (CV = 6.13 percent). Despite the greater fluctuation in precipitation, malaria incidence continued to decline, suggesting that interventions remain effective even under varying climatic conditions. The Democratic Republic of Congo had the highest variability in malaria incidence (CV = 2.55 percent), reflecting inconsistent malaria control efforts. Rainfall variability (CV = 4.87 percent) was similar to that of Nigeria, yet the Democratic Republic of Congo’s epidemiological instability points to systemic weaknesses in intervention consistency and coverage ( 6 ). These findings affirm that while rainfall variability is present across all three countries, its influence on malaria transmission is modulated by the strength and consistency of national control measures. Relationship Between Malaria Incidence and Rainfall Patterns The correlation analysis reveals diverse relationships between malaria incidence and rainfall, underscoring the multifaceted role of environmental factors in malaria epidemiology ( 2 , 3 ). In Nigeria, the strong negative correlation (r = -0.7651) between rainfall and malaria incidence suggests that increased rainfall may disrupt mosquito breeding habitats through flooding or that intensified control activities during the rainy season mitigate transmission risk. Urbanization, infrastructure improvements, and other socioeconomic factors may also contribute to this inverse relationship ( 9 ). In Mozambique, the near perfect negative correlation (r = -0.99) indicates that higher rainfall is associated with decreased malaria incidence. This could reflect the dominance of environmental management strategies or the natural impact of rainfall on vector habitats, such as dilution or flushing of breeding sites ( 5 ). The consistency of this relationship suggests rainfall is a significant determinant of transmission dynamics in Mozambique. Conversely, the Democratic Republic of Congo displayed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.895), with declining rainfall corresponding to reduced malaria incidence. This aligns with conventional models of malaria transmission, where rainfall creates conducive breeding environments for mosquitoes ( 2 ). The Democratic Republic of Congo’s weaker intervention systems may leave the population more vulnerable to environmental determinants of transmission ( 6 ). While the analysis provides valuable insights, several limitations should be noted. The data cover only three years (2020 to 2022), limiting the ability to capture long term trends. The predicted malaria incidence for the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2022, based on previous data, introduces potential uncertainty, and actual data would strengthen the findings. Additionally, the correlation analyses assume linear relationships, but non-linear or lagged effects of rainfall on malaria transmission may exist. Other factors such as temperature, humidity, socioeconomic conditions, and intervention coverage were not included in the analysis but likely influence malaria dynamics. Future research should incorporate longer time series, additional environmental and social variables, and non-linear modeling to better understand malaria transmission drivers. Also, the study of adaptive features of malaria vectors to insecticide will help in understanding the eradication of malaria ( 10 ). Conclusion This study examined the relationship between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns in Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2020 to 2022. The findings revealed a general decline in malaria incidence across all three countries, with Nigeria and Mozambique showing more stable reductions compared to the Democratic Republic of Congo. Statistical analysis showed varying correlations between rainfall and malaria incidence, with negative correlations observed in Nigeria and Mozambique, and a strong positive correlation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. These results indicate that the impact of rainfall on malaria transmission is influenced by the effectiveness of national control measures and regional ecological conditions. Descriptive epidemiology highlighted Nigeria as having the most effective malaria control policies among the three countries, followed by Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The study emphasizes the importance of strengthening national control strategies and tailoring interventions to regional climatic and epidemiological contexts. Although limited by data availability and the short study period, the analysis provides valuable insights that can guide future research and policy development aimed at reducing malaria incidence in sub-Saharan Africa. Declarations Data Availability The references for the data collected are listed above in the reference section Authors Contribution Mudasiru Olamide Rokeeb - Data Analysis, Interpretation and Proofreading AMUSA AISHA ADEBOLA - Data Collection Oloyede Haleemah - Data Collection References World Health Organization (2020) World Malaria Report 2020. World Health Organization, Geneva Smith DL, McKenzie FE, Snow RW (2007) Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for elimination. Malar J 6:139 Gubler DJ (1996) The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases. Arch Virol Suppl 11:61–71 O’Meara WP, Smith DL, Milman J, McKenzie FE (2004) The global burden of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2000. Malar J 3:4 Takken W, Knols BGJ (1999) Ecology of Anopheles mosquitoes in relation to malaria transmission. Microbes Infect 1(15):1695–1703 Ntuku HM, Mafuta EM, Kayembe PK et al (2016) Malaria control in the Democratic Republic of Congo: achievements and challenges. Malar J 15:582 National Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP) (2014) National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014–2020. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria Okorosobo T, Nwokoro C, Azuike EC et al (2020) Impact of insecticide-treated nets on malaria prevalence in children under five years in Nigeria: a systematic review. Malar J 19(1):407 Keating J, Miller JM, Bennett A, Lindsay SW (2010) Urbanization and malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Malar J 9:276 Hemingway J, Ranson H, Magill A et al (2016) Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Lancet 387(10029):1785–1788 Tables Table 1 to 3 are available in the Supplementary Files section. Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files floatimage1.jpeg Table Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6497060","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":445820602,"identity":"4d5d6dd6-a534-4801-92a8-8c83c061d2a8","order_by":0,"name":"Mudasiru Olamide Rokeeb","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0352-3466","institution":"Ladoke Akintola University of Technology","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mudasiru","middleName":"Olamide","lastName":"Rokeeb","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-21 14:45:38","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":81167648,"identity":"bf63398e-f774-45af-b01e-dd7e8ed8ce96","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-23 04:36:01","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":284834,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the Result section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6497060/v1/1494ab3a41bc898ab418599c.jpeg"},{"id":81167652,"identity":"959e9a4f-da8a-4f31-a36b-35b847b59733","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-23 04:36:01","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":305483,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the Result section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6497060/v1/2867caa2ed1b736d4adb3950.jpeg"},{"id":81167649,"identity":"016865ac-6783-42b1-9fc5-c787c9ef3afc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-23 04:36:01","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":88076,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eUnnumbered image in the Result section.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6497060/v1/2a1d43229f2906bafc1fc9b8.jpeg"},{"id":81168848,"identity":"4d4a42a9-4cf2-4deb-af90-f67e59ae3050","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-23 04:52:06","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1054974,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6497060/v1/1f8d8216-0efc-417e-9840-9bf36365d6d5.pdf"},{"id":81167650,"identity":"a446533d-5f50-498d-a6e9-6f2f0a100f74","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-23 04:36:01","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":652466,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eTable\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6497060/v1/65f27c9eac13bb4a589a01ee.jpeg"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eImpact of Climate Variation on Malaria Incidence Rates In Sub Saharan Africa","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eMalaria remains a significant global public health challenge, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions, with a disproportionate burden in sub-Saharan Africa (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). It is a preventable and treatable disease caused by parasites transmitted through the bites of infected mosquitoes. Although effective control and prevention strategies exist, challenges such as drug and insecticide resistance, limited access to healthcare, and inadequate funding continue to hinder progress (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis research aims to examine the correlation between malaria incidence rates and climate variations, specifically rainfall patterns, by focusing on three sub-Saharan African countries which include Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data from 2020 to 2022 were collected and analyzed. Rainfall was selected as a key variable due to evidence from previous studies indicating that stagnant water, resulting from heavy rainfall, serves as a breeding ground for malaria vectors, especially during the larval and pupal stages (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditionally, descriptive epidemiological analysis was conducted to assess the policies and control measures implemented in the selected countries to combat malaria. This approach provides insight into regional efforts and helps identify gaps and strengths in current intervention strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile numerous studies have explored the epidemiology of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, relatively few have specifically examined how climate variability, particularly rainfall patterns, directly influences its regional incidence over time. Existing literature often generalizes the impact of climatic factors without writing on the breeding habitats of malaria vectors. Additionally, previous research tends to overlook the analysis of national malaria control policies implemented across different sub-Saharan African countries, insights that could inform effective strategies for reducing malaria incidence in other regions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis literature review synthesizes existing studies on malaria epidemiology, the role of climatic factors (particularly rainfall), mosquito breeding habitats, and national control policies in sub-Saharan Africa. It identifies gaps in the literature and justifies the current study\u0026rsquo;s focus on Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMalaria Epidemiology in Sub-Saharan Africa\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSub-Saharan Africa accounts for approximately 94 percent of global malaria cases, with Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo contributing 27 percent and 12 percent of the total burden respectively (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). High incidence rates in these countries reflect systemic challenges, including weak healthcare infrastructure and socio-political instability, particularly in the Democratic Republic of Congo (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e). Mozambique, while less burdened than Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, still reports significant malaria prevalence, driven by its tropical climate and limited intervention coverage. These country-specific trends underscore the need for tailored epidemiological analyses to inform targeted control strategies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eClimatic Influences on Malaria Transmission\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eClimatic factors, particularly rainfall and temperature, play a critical role in malaria transmission by creating favorable conditions for Anopheles mosquito breeding and parasite development (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). Heavy rainfall leads to stagnant water pools which serve as breeding sites, increasing vector populations and transmission risk. However, few studies have disaggregated these effects for West and Central African countries like Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of Congo, where ecological and socio-economic contexts differ significantly. This gap highlights the need for country-specific analyses of rainfall and malaria relationships.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMosquito Breeding Habitats\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe ecology of *Anopheles* mosquitoes, particularly *Anopheles gambiae*, is closely tied to rainfall-driven breeding habitats (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). Temporary water bodies formed during rainy seasons are ideal for larval development, yet regional variations in habitat suitability remain underexplored. For instance, southern Nigeria\u0026rsquo;s high rainfall supports extensive breeding sites, while Mozambique\u0026rsquo;s coastal ecology presents unique challenges. Existing studies often generalize climatic impacts without focusing on how specific breeding habitats influence transmission dynamics, a limitation this study seeks to address through targeted correlation analyses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eMalaria Control Policies\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEffective malaria control relies on interventions such as insecticide treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and artemisinin based combination therapies (ACTs) (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). Nigeria\u0026rsquo;s National Malaria Strategic Plan (2014 to 2020) has achieved significant ITN coverage, contributing to a stable decline in incidence (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). Mozambique has implemented seasonal malaria chemoprevention and IRS, though with less comprehensive coverage. In contrast, the Democratic Republic of Congo\u0026rsquo;s control efforts are hampered by logistical challenges and conflict, resulting in higher incidence and variability (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn respect to the background of this research, statistical data were collected on three\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003esub-Saharan African countries which include Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, focusing on malaria incidence rates from 2020 to 2022, as reported by the WHO (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). These countries were selected based on the fact that they have high malaria incidence rates in sub-Saharan Africa, according to the WHO. Also, 2020 to 2022 was selected so as to work with current data which can help solve the problem of malaria burden compared to the years before 2020.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this context, the malaria incidence rate is defined as the number of malaria cases per 1,000 population at risk, annually.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo understand the correlation between climate variability and malaria incidence rates, the annual rainfall patterns of the selected sub-Saharan African countries were collected using search engines like Google. For Nigeria, the southern region was selected for analysis, as it experiences higher rainfall compared to the northern region.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe malaria incidence rate for the Democratic Republic of Congo for the year 2022 has not yet been published by the WHO. However, the malaria incidence rate was predicted for the year 2022 based on previously available data, in order to avoid errors in calculations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter data collection, statistical analysis was conducted using appropriate formulas like the coefficient of variation formula (CV\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Standard deviation / Mean \u0026times; 100) to determine the coefficient of variation in malaria incidence rates from 2020 to 2022, as well as for the rainfall patterns. Additionally, correlation analysis was carried out to examine the relationship between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns from 2020 to 2022 using Pearson\u0026rsquo;s correlation coefficient (r).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMicrosoft Excel was used to visually represent the graphical representation of the line charts of both malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, a descriptive epidemiological study was carried out on the selected sub-Saharan African countries to understand the policies and control measures implemented in different regions to combat malaria. This analysis aimed to identify the country with the most effective policies and control strategies, which could then be recommended to countries showing a strong positive correlation between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns. The descriptive epidemiology also served as a control for the statistical calculations, helping to minimize potential errors.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eAccording to the World Malaria Report released by WHO in 2020 (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e), Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 313.76 per 1,000 population, Mozambique had a rate of 234, while the Democratic Republic of Congo recorded a rate of 330.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn 2021, Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 306, Mozambique recorded 229, while the Democratic Republic of Congo had a rate of 320.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn 2022, Nigeria had a malaria incidence rate of 305, Mozambique recorded 223, while the predicted rate for the Democratic Republic of Congo, using trend analysis, was 310.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe rainfall patterns for the selected sub-Saharan African countries from 2020 to 2022 are as follows: Nigeria recorded 1,800 mm, 1,850 mm, and 2,000 mm; Mozambique had 950 mm, 1,000 mm, and 1,100 mm; while the Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 1,545 mm, 1,534 mm, and 1,386.10 mm.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStatistical analysis showed that Nigeria had a coefficient of variation of 1.27 percent for malaria incidence rate and 4.51 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of -0.7651 between malaria incidence and rainfall. Mozambique had a coefficient of variation of 1.97 percent for malaria incidence rate and 6.13 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of -0.99. The Democratic Republic of Congo had a coefficient of variation of 2.55 percent for malaria incidence rate and 4.87 percent for rainfall patterns, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.895.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive epidemiology indicates that Nigeria has the most effective policies and control measures for eradicating malaria among the three selected sub-Saharan African countries, followed by Mozambique and then the Democratic Republic of Congo.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion / Interpretation","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe analysis of malaria incidence rates, rainfall patterns, and their statistical interrelations from 2020 to 2022 in Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo provides critical insights into the epidemiology of malaria within these sub-Saharan African nations. The observed patterns highlight country-specific variations in malaria burden, environmental influences, and the effectiveness of national control strategies.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eTrends in Malaria Incidence\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrom 2020 to 2022, all three countries experienced a gradual decline in malaria incidence, reflecting the positive impact of ongoing control efforts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNigeria demonstrated a slight but consistent decrease in malaria incidence, from 313.76 per 1,000 population in 2020 to 305 in 2022. This suggests a stable malaria control landscape, underpinned by sustained interventions such as the use of insecticide treated nets, indoor residual spraying, and improved access to antimalarial treatments (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e). The slow pace of reduction, however, indicates room for enhanced programmatic efficiency and coverage.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMozambique reported a more pronounced decline from 234 in 2020 to 223 in 2022. The steady downward trajectory reflects moderately effective control measures. While Mozambique does not exhibit the same policy robustness as Nigeria, its malaria control efforts appear adequately structured to drive consistent reductions in incidence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Democratic Republic of Congo showed a decline from 330 in 2020 to an estimated 310 in 2022, with the slowest rate of improvement among the three. The persistently high incidence underscores systemic challenges, including weak healthcare infrastructure, socio-political instability, and insufficient policy implementation, all of which hinder sustained malaria control (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese patterns suggest that while progress is evident, the extent and pace of malaria reduction are significantly influenced by the strength of national malaria control programs, healthcare system capacity, and socio-environmental conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eVariability in Malaria Incidence and Rainfall Patterns\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe coefficient of variation (CV) was employed to assess the temporal stability of malaria incidence and rainfall across the study period;\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eNigeria exhibited the lowest variability in malaria incidence (CV = 1.27 percent), indicative of a highly stable epidemiological profile. The moderate variability in rainfall (CV = 4.51 percent) had minimal apparent influence on incidence rates, likely due to Nigeria’s effective intervention coverage buffering the effects of environmental fluctuations (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMozambique recorded a moderately low variability in malaria incidence (CV = 1.97 percent) and the highest variability in rainfall (CV = 6.13 percent). Despite the greater fluctuation in precipitation, malaria incidence continued to decline, suggesting that interventions remain effective even under varying climatic conditions.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe Democratic Republic of Congo had the highest variability in malaria incidence (CV = 2.55 percent), reflecting inconsistent malaria control efforts. Rainfall variability (CV = 4.87 percent) was similar to that of Nigeria, yet the Democratic Republic of Congo’s epidemiological instability points to systemic weaknesses in intervention consistency and coverage (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese findings affirm that while rainfall variability is present across all three countries, its influence on malaria transmission is modulated by the strength and consistency of national control measures.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRelationship Between Malaria Incidence and Rainfall Patterns\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe correlation analysis reveals diverse relationships between malaria incidence and rainfall, underscoring the multifaceted role of environmental factors in malaria epidemiology (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Nigeria, the strong negative correlation (r = -0.7651) between rainfall and malaria incidence suggests that increased rainfall may disrupt mosquito breeding habitats through flooding or that intensified control activities during the rainy season mitigate transmission risk. Urbanization, infrastructure improvements, and other socioeconomic factors may also contribute to this inverse relationship (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn Mozambique, the near perfect negative correlation (r = -0.99) indicates that higher rainfall is associated with decreased malaria incidence. This could reflect the dominance of environmental management strategies or the natural impact of rainfall on vector habitats, such as dilution or flushing of breeding sites (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e). The consistency of this relationship suggests rainfall is a significant determinant of transmission dynamics in Mozambique.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eConversely, the Democratic Republic of Congo displayed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.895), with declining rainfall corresponding to reduced malaria incidence. This aligns with conventional models of malaria transmission, where rainfall creates conducive breeding environments for mosquitoes (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The Democratic Republic of Congo’s weaker intervention systems may leave the population more vulnerable to environmental determinants of transmission (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eWhile the analysis provides valuable insights, several limitations should be noted. The data cover only three years (2020 to 2022), limiting the ability to capture long term trends. The predicted malaria incidence for the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2022, based on previous data, introduces potential uncertainty, and actual data would strengthen the findings. Additionally, the correlation analyses assume linear relationships, but non-linear or lagged effects of rainfall on malaria transmission may exist. Other factors such as temperature, humidity, socioeconomic conditions, and intervention coverage were not included in the analysis but likely influence malaria dynamics. Future research should incorporate longer time series, additional environmental and social variables, and non-linear modeling to better understand malaria transmission drivers. Also, the study of adaptive features of malaria vectors to insecticide will help in understanding the eradication of malaria (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study examined the relationship between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns in Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2020 to 2022. The findings revealed a general decline in malaria incidence across all three countries, with Nigeria and Mozambique showing more stable reductions compared to the Democratic Republic of Congo. Statistical analysis showed varying correlations between rainfall and malaria incidence, with negative correlations observed in Nigeria and Mozambique, and a strong positive correlation in the Democratic Republic of Congo. These results indicate that the impact of rainfall on malaria transmission is influenced by the effectiveness of national control measures and regional ecological conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDescriptive epidemiology highlighted Nigeria as having the most effective malaria control policies among the three countries, followed by Mozambique and the Democratic Republic of Congo. The study emphasizes the importance of strengthening national control strategies and tailoring interventions to regional climatic and epidemiological contexts. Although limited by data availability and the short study period, the analysis provides valuable insights that can guide future research and policy development aimed at reducing malaria incidence in sub-Saharan Africa.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe references for the data collected are listed above in the reference section\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors Contribution\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMudasiru Olamide Rokeeb - Data Analysis, Interpretation and Proofreading\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAMUSA AISHA ADEBOLA - Data Collection\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOloyede Haleemah - Data Collection\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization (2020) World Malaria Report 2020. World Health Organization, Geneva\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmith DL, McKenzie FE, Snow RW (2007) Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for elimination. Malar J 6:139\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGubler DJ (1996) The global emergence/resurgence of arboviral diseases. Arch Virol Suppl 11:61\u0026ndash;71\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eO\u0026rsquo;Meara WP, Smith DL, Milman J, McKenzie FE (2004) The global burden of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 2000. Malar J 3:4\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTakken W, Knols BGJ (1999) Ecology of Anopheles mosquitoes in relation to malaria transmission. Microbes Infect 1(15):1695\u0026ndash;1703\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNtuku HM, Mafuta EM, Kayembe PK et al (2016) Malaria control in the Democratic Republic of Congo: achievements and challenges. Malar J 15:582\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNational Malaria Elimination Programme (NMEP) (2014) National Malaria Strategic Plan 2014\u0026ndash;2020. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOkorosobo T, Nwokoro C, Azuike EC et al (2020) Impact of insecticide-treated nets on malaria prevalence in children under five years in Nigeria: a systematic review. Malar J 19(1):407\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKeating J, Miller JM, Bennett A, Lindsay SW (2010) Urbanization and malaria in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Malar J 9:276\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHemingway J, Ranson H, Magill A et al (2016) Averting a malaria disaster: will insecticide resistance derail malaria control? Lancet 387(10029):1785\u0026ndash;1788\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1 to 3 are available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Ladoke Akintola University of Technology","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Malaria incidence rate, Rainfall patterns, Sub Saharan Africa, Descriptive epidemiology, Coefficient of Variation, Correlation Coefficient","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaria remains a major public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa, with Nigeria, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo among the most affected (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). While climate variability, particularly rainfall, influences malaria transmission through mosquito breeding habitats, the extent of its impact varies by region (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). This study investigates the correlation between malaria incidence rates and rainfall patterns from 2020 to 2022 in the three selected countries, alongside a descriptive epidemiological review of national control policies.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethodology:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eMalaria incidence data were collected from WHO reports for the years 2020 to 2022, while annual rainfall data were sourced online. Pearson\u0026rsquo;s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence. The coefficient of variation was also calculated for both variables to evaluate data stability. Microsoft Excel was used for graphical representation. A descriptive epidemiological review was conducted to assess the effectiveness of malaria control policies in each country.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eNigeria recorded a malaria incidence decline from 313.76 to 305, Mozambique from 234 to 223, and the Democratic Republic of Congo from 330 to an estimated 310. Correlation analysis showed a strong negative relationship between rainfall and malaria incidence in Nigeria (r = -0.7651) and Mozambique (r = -0.99), but a strong positive correlation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (r\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.895). Nigeria demonstrated the most effective control measures, followed by Mozambique.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion:\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study highlights that rainfall\u0026rsquo;s influence on malaria incidence is moderated by the effectiveness of national control strategies. Strengthening region-specific interventions remains key to sustained malaria reduction in sub-Saharan Africa.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Impact of Climate Variation on Malaria Incidence Rates In Sub Saharan Africa","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-23 04:35:56","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6497060/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"125f6e9b-2dd1-47aa-92a1-9404249e56e0","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 23rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":47456158,"name":"General Microbiology"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-04-23T04:35:56+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-23 04:35:56","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6497060","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6497060","identity":"rs-6497060","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00