Dmt
DMTs are discussed here using generic names as well as the trade name to reflect the
information conveyed by participants. Physician information provided to the study
used trade names, generic names, or both. We did not find any discrepancies between
the patient information and that of the neurologist with respect to any specific DMT
usage.
DMTs can be administered as injections, oral medications, or infusions.
Participant DMT treatment choice was often influenced by how the DMT is
administered.
See Table 4 for the
number of women on each DMT (or naïve to therapy) and PDDS at enrollment, pregnancy
status by cut-off date and the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART). A
total of 7 women used ART.
Number of women on each disease modifying therapy (or therapy naïve) and PDDS
at initial interview (Total = 44), status by cut-off date of April 30, 2020,
and the use of ART.
a Neurologist records and patient reports vary in using trade
and generic names. This also provides clarity if there is more than 1
trade name for a generic (e.g. interferon beta 1-a).
b Disability groups: No or mild – PDDS= 0,1; Moderate – PDDS=
2,3 (see literature 24 , 25 ).
c Number includes 1 woman who used assisted reproductive
technology (ART).
d Includes one woman lost to follow-up before cut-off date.
To truly reflect the information as collected, we decided to show results for DMT
naïve women first followed by those who have used DMTs prior to or during the period
when they were planning to conceive. DMTs are listed by the number of study
participants on each (see Table 4 ).
Six participants were DMT naïve at enrollment. Three were recently diagnosed and
wanted to conceive as soon as possible. Over time, one newly diagnosed woman
stopped trying to conceive because of MS severity and began her first DMT
(ocrelizumab). At cut-off, 2 woman are still trying to conceive and 3 were able
to conceive.
At study enrollment, 10 women were either on a washout or actively trying to
conceive. Washout periods suggested by their neurologists ranged from 2 months
to 12 months. At enrollment, one woman made the decision to remain on dimethyl
fumarate until conception, i.e., no washout. She is currently pregnant and only
discontinued dimethyl fumarate once the pregnancy was confirmed. As of the study
cut-off date, no concerns have been raised by prenatal testing. One woman had
planned a 3-month washout but her MS became aggressive. She stopped trying to
conceive and resumed the DMT. Seven women have had no or mild disability (PDDS=
0,1) despite having stopped the DMT. Four of the 7 women achieved pregnancy
including one early miscarriage before cut-off. One woman had moderate
disability (PDDS = 2) which has remained stable despite her being off DMT as she
is still trying to conceive.
Six women were on glatiramer acetate and all had no or mild disability (PDDS = 0
or 1). Three have achieved pregnancy (one had an early miscarriage and 2 are
still pregnant) by the cut-off date; 2 are still trying to conceive; and one has
stopped trying due to fertility issues. No washouts were recommended by
neurologists but 2 women decided on their own to take the DMT “sporadically”
while trying to conceive.
Five women were on ocrelizumab at or prior to enrollment. Initial PDDS for these
women were 0 (N = 2), 1 (N = 1), 2 (N = 1) and 3 (N = 1). Washout periods
varied. Washouts of 2 and 3 months were recommended to 2 women. One achieved
pregnancy but had an early miscarriage; and the other is pregnant at cut-off. No
information on the fetus is available at this time.
One woman became pregnant 6 weeks after her second dose of ocrelizumab. Another
woman is trying to conceive after her first dose. The final woman in this cohort
had a six-month washout followed by 2 months of intense trying to conceive
before having a second dose of ocrelizumab. At cut-off, she is pregnant, having
conceived 8 months after her last dose.
Five women were on alemtuzumab. Four had no or mild disability (PDDS 0,1) and one
had moderate disability (PDDS = 2). All had the required washout and 3 became
pregnant by cut-off. One woman is still trying to conceive. One woman was
diagnosed as “infertile” based on her inability to conceive but no etiology was
known. She and her partner decided to adopt rather than undergo in vitro
fertilization (IVF) as suggested by her specialist.
Three women, all with no disability (PDDS = 0), were on fingolimod. One had a
2-month washout and the other a 3-month washout, as suggested by their
neurologists. The third woman had stopped fingolimod and was about to start
ocrelizumab when she decided it was time to try to conceive. To date, she is off
any DMT. No woman had a rebound relapse after stopping fingolimod.
Two women were on natalizumab (one initially with no or mild disability (PDDS = 0
or 1) and one with moderate disability (PDDS = 2). They reduced the frequency of
natalizumab while trying to conceive (to 6 weeks from 4 week intervals). At
cut-off, one is still trying to conceive, and her disability has progressed from
mild (PDDS = 1) to moderate (PDDS = 2). The other woman did not take natalizumab
once pregnancy was confirmed despite her neurologist suggested a dose before
delivery. She resumed the DMT at 1-month postpartum.
Two women in this study, both with no or mild disability (PDDS = 0 or 1), were on
interferon beta 1-a. One woman decided on a 1-month washout (did not speak with
her neurologist), eventually became pregnant and stayed off DMT. The other woman
stayed on the DMT while trying to conceive on the advice of her neurologist. She
subsequently became pregnant and had an early miscarriage. She continued to
participate in CANPREG-MS and did not take any DMT during her second attempt to
conceive. She is now pregnant.
Two women with no or mild disability (PDDS = 0,1) were on oral cladribine. One
had a single course followed by an 11-month washout and she became pregnant at
cut-off. The other had a 6-month washout after her second course before trying
to conceive and is still trying.
One woman was on interferon beta 1-a (Avonex) and no washout was planned. She is
still on the DMT and trying to conceive.
One woman on teriflunomide did an accelerated (4 month) washout using activated charcoal
27
and is pregnant at the cut-off date.
One woman was on this (PDDS = 1) and is continuing her therapy while trying to
conceive. She has no plans for a washout or discontinuation if she
conceives.
Intro
Multiple sclerosis (MS) preferentially affects women with the clinical onset usually
occurring during the reproductive years. Historically, women with MS were advised
against pregnancy. The current situation with respect to disease modifying therapies (DMTs)
1
and revised diagnostic criteria
2
have led to diagnosis earlier in the disease course. Thus, it appears that
the number of women considering reproduction has increased in many geographic regions.
3
Family planning has now become a major topic of interest to the MS
community. 4 , 5
There is a recognized need for population-based MS-specific pregnancy
registries 6 , 7
and this is the goal of the “Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Pregnancy Study (CANPREG-MS)”.
8
Ideally women with MS should plan pregnancies 9 , 10 but the “road to conception”
can be daunting and has not been systematically prospectively studied in a “real
world” scenario. Most women planning a pregnancy seek information from various
sources including their neurologists, MS nurses, and social media. There are no
definitive guidelines for DMT safety during pregnancy. Product information, United
States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) postings, pharma pregnancy registries and
committee guidelines can be outdated, confusing and/or contradictory. 11 – 21 The current consensus in many
regions is that for most DMTs, continuation during conception and gestation is
permissible if the benefits to the mother outweigh the risks to the fetus. 9 , 10 Final decisions made by woman
may or may not concur with the advising source(s).
Here we present data on Canadian women with MS who were identified as “planning a
pregnancy” as part of CANPREG-MS.
8
The data are preliminary as the study is ongoing and sample size will
increase. Nevertheless, we feel that this sample of 44 women provides important real
world information on challenges faced by women with MS in making reproductive
decisions.
Methods
CANPREG-MS rationale and methodology have been detailed elsewhere.
8
Ethics approval was given by the University of British Columbia Clinical
Research Ethics Board and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute.
CANPREG-MS was designed to include women with MS who were either pregnant or planning
a pregnancy at the time of enrollment. This paper focuses on women planning to
conceive. Upon conception, the woman is transferred to the “pregnancy” arm of
CANPREG-MS.
Participants are followed longitudinally. Data is collected through telephone
interviews using standardized questionnaires. A secure web-based application REDCap
(Research Electronic Data Capture) designed exclusively to support data capture for
research studies was used to develop data entry forms.
22
Each woman’s self-reported information on MS history (MS course, DMT, etc.)
has been confirmed by her neurologist after she signed a “release of information” form.
8
Data presented here have a cut-off date of April 30, 2020. All results are truncated
for this date as given the size of the dataset, it is impossible to conduct analyses
without a firm cut-off.
Results
Forty-four women planning a pregnancy were consented and enrolled. The average age at
the initial interview was 31.91 years (SD = 2.96). Thirty-nine of the 44 women
(88.64%) had European ancestry. Thirty of the 44 women (68.18%) had post-secondary
education, 40/44 (90.91%) were employed and 42/44 (95.45%) were in a stable
relationship (see Table
1 ).
Demographics of women with MS with “planning pregnancy” status at initial
interview.
The average age of MS onset was 26.05 years (SD= 5.39). The average age of diagnosis
was 27.20 years (SD= 4.34) with 29/44 (65.91%) diagnosed within a year of clinical
onset. The majority experienced sensory or visual symptoms at onset. See Table 2 for clinical
characteristics of this cohort.
Clinical characteristics of women with MS with “planning pregnancy” status at
initial interview.
a 11 participants only had Initial Interview at the cut-off
date.
b 7 participants only started trying.
Reported comorbidities in these women are shown in Table 3 . Few, other than reproductive
conditions, affect the ability to conceive.
Comorbid diseases reported by the 44 participants.
Physician correspondence relevant to CANPREG-MS
8
tend not to give recent EDSS.
23
However, at each study interview, Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS)
validated for MS are scored. 2 , 24 , 25 As done by others, (e.g. see 24 , 26 ) PDDS scores were classified
into 3 distinctive disability groups as follows: no or mild (PDDS 0-1), moderate
(PDDS 2-3) and severe (PDDS 4 or higher).
Thirty-seven of the 44 (84.09%) had a consistent “no” or “mild” disability (PDDS= 0
or 1) from the initial interview until the last interview before the cut-off. Seven
entered the study with moderate disability (5 had a PDDS = 2; 2 had PDDS = 3). No
woman had a PDDS score ≥ 4 on enrollment.
Discussion
CANPREG-MS is the first prospective, real world study on women with MS who are
actively planning a pregnancy. Women use various sources for information about the
safety of DMT usage at conception. Even with the relatively small numbers presented
here, we found that 6 women discontinued their DMTs while trying to conceive against
the advice of their neurologists because of disease activity. Another 6 women
interrupted/stopped trying to conceive because of a major clinical relapse, a
MRI-detected inflammation or limited “windows of opportunity” between DMT
courses.
The data presented here are preliminary, but they show how complex the road to
conception can be for women with MS. Further potentially complicating the path to
pregnancy is the fact that there is no single authority or roadmap on what to do for
any woman with MS with respect to therapy and disease course if she wishes to
conceive. It is imperative to remind health care professionals (most often MS
neurologists or MS nurses) that one must always ask female patients about
reproductive plans at each visit (until pregnancy is no longer an option). This must
be done regardless of whether or not a therapy is changed. Assumptions about
reproductive plans based on facts presumably known to the health care professional
such as age, relationship status and MS disability cannot be made. Decisions can be
very surprising (e.g. a wish to be a surrogate, MS diagnosis not disclosed to
partners, etc.).
Given the small sample, it is not possible to draw definitive conclusions on
fertility. However, the percentage of our participants who used ARTs is similar to
reports for the general Canadian population. 28 , 29 It is important to consider
that counseling should be given about the possibility of an increased risk for MS
relapse after ART. 29 , 30
As with most research, CANPREG-MS has benefits and limitations. As previously stated,
this is a real world scenario with no restrictions on a woman’s age, disability, MS
duration, therapy, etc. There are however certain caveats to be recognized in
addition to the fact that the results are preliminary. Numbers will increase as
CANPREG-MS continues. All participants were actively trying to conceive; no
unplanned pregnancies were included. No participant had a PDDS of 4 or higher.
European ancestry predominated. Most women (42/44) were in a stable relationship and
were relatively highly educated. The Canadian healthcare system supposedly provides
equal access but this is not the case regarding DMTs. Access to MS neurologist and
nurses, especially in some remote communities, remains problematic in Canada.
31
Nevertheless, as the data are presented with sufficient demographics, the study
population is well defined and thus can be applied to the general comparable MS
populations internationally.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.