Nociplastic Pain: Facts, Controversies and Future Tasks

In: European Journal of Pain · 2025 · vol. 30(1) , pp. e70175 · doi:10.1002/ejp.70175 · PMID:41294344 · W4416695912
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This paper clarifies the definition and controversies surrounding nociplastic pain, emphasizing it is distinct from central sensitization or chronic primary pain and proposing future research directions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-05, 2026-05-18

This paper summarises a 2025 European Pain Federation (EFIC) conference session on nociplastic pain — the third mechanistic pain descriptor alongside nociceptive and neuropathic pain, defined as pain arising from altered nociception. The authors argue nociplastic pain should not be conflated with chronic primary pain, central sensitization, or pain of unknown origin, and they flag controversies including the suitability of the term itself, terminology mismatches with other specialties, fibromyalgia's status as a prototype condition, and whether nociplasticity is better treated as a continuous component than a discrete category requiring exclusion of the other two mechanisms. Future tasks named include field-testing and refining the diagnostic criteria, developing mechanism-stratified treatment guidelines, and building umbrella concepts that unify somatic, psychosocial and pain-medicine perspectives. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper notes the nociplastic pain concept has been introduced into gynaecology, though its main focus is the conceptual framework across pain medicine generally.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nociplastic pain, a third mechanistic pain descriptor in addition to nociceptive and neuropathic pain is defined as 'pain that arises from altered nociception' not fully explained by nociceptive or neuropathic pain mechanisms. METHODS: We summarise and extend some discussions of a main session on nociplastic pain at the conference of the European Pain Federation EFIC in Lyon at the 26th April, 2025. RESULTS: We recommend not to mix up concepts and terms: Nociplastic pain is not synonymous with chronic primary pain nor with central sensitization. Nociplastic pain is not a new term for pain of unknown origin. We identified these controversies: 'Nociplastic' might not be the best term. Other specialties (e.g., internal medicine) use different terms and concepts for clinical conditions termed as 'nociplastic pain conditions' by pain medicine. Fibromyalgia syndrome is not always the prototype of a pure nociplastic pain condition. 'Nociplasticity' can be a continuous (and not a separate) component of pain; hence the requirement to 'exclude' nociceptive and neuropathic pain to diagnose nociplastic pain has been questioned. CONCLUSIONS: Future tasks include additional field testing and eventual modification of the criteria for nociplastic pain; development of pharmacological and psychological treatment guidelines, based on the three pain types; unravelling pathophysiological mechanisms driving altered nociception in pain conditions with substantial nociplastic components; development of umbrella concepts unifying the different views of somatic medicine, psychosocial medicine and pain medicine. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The concept of nociplastic pain has gained growing importance in pain medicine and has been introduced into other specialties such as gynaecology and rheumatology. Clinicians should always strive to identify the major pain mechanisms to guide treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

References (31)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK