Operations Near the Edge of cognitive decline: Behavioral and Neural Correlates of cognitive load in Mild cognitive impairment

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,742 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Motivation Early detection of cognitive strain is essential for identifying Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and its progression to more severe neurodegenerative diseases. This study investigates cognitive strain in MCI by examining both behavioral and neural correlates during a real-world task.

Methods

Twenty-four older adults (M=69, 14 male, 10 female), including 11 with MCI and 13 healthy controls (MMSE >22/30), performed a spatial navigation task under varying memory load. We recorded brain activity using electroencephalography (EEG) and a mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm to capture error-related potentials (ErrPs), which reflect cognitive load and processing errors.

Results

Both groups showed a decline in working memory performance as cognitive load increased (β = -41.39, SE = 10.73, t(90) = -3.86, p < .001). MCI participants, however, exhibited more efficient use of non-intrinsic (allocentric) reference frames under high cognitive load (β = 2.47, SE = 0.95, t(82) = 2.61, p = .009). MCI individuals also displayed larger ErrPs in central brain regions, indicating greater neural resource allocation. Additionally, MCI participants showed a decrease in parietal-to-frontal theta dominance under high load (β = -0.68, SE = 0.32, t(90) = -2.12, p = .037), and reduced fronto-parietal connectivity.

Discussion

These findings suggest that MCI participants experience greater cognitive strain, evidenced by increased neural resource allocation and strategy-shifting under load. This heightened strain may serve as an early marker of MCI progression, offering potential for early detection of pathological changes. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes ↵* first authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00