Multimolecular proofreading overcomes the activity-fidelity trade-off

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,653 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
SUMMARY Accurate signal processing is essential for proper cell functions, and can be achieved through kinetic proofreading, where an enzyme undergoes sequential state transitions and irreversible deactivation to enable high fidelity. However, synthetically constructing a biological proofreading system has been hindered by the difficulty in engineering single molecular state transitions. Here, we designed a protein circuit that combines diffusion and endocytosis to enable kinetic proofreading at the multimolecular level, without the conservation of total enzymes implicitly assumed in classic kinetic proofreading. Simulations revealed a previously overlooked yet experimentally crucial trade-off between circuit activity and fidelity, and theoretical analysis confirmed it to be fundamental in all kinetic proofreading systems. By integrating self-activation and mutual inhibition mechanisms, the circuit overcomes this activity-fidelity trade-off within biologically plausible parameter regimes. Our results extend proofreading schemes from single enzymes to a multimolecular context, and represent a practical and generalizable strategy for constructing high-fidelity synthetic biological circuits. HIGHLIGHTS We design a multimolecular and multicellular proofreading circuit A previously overlooked yet practically relevant trade-off arises between circuit activity and fidelity The activity-fidelity trade-off is fundamental in all kinetic proofreading circuits Self-activation and mutual inhibition mechanisms collectively overcome the activity-fidelity trade-off Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00