Abstract
Objective: To examine the incidence rate and risk of non -fatal irAEs, including gynecological, hematological,
dermatological, ophthalmological, otologic, and dental problems following the COVID-19 vaccination.
Methods
We conducted a population- based cohort study from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)
database in Seoul, South Korea . The non -fatal irAEs included gynecol ogical, hematological, dermatological,
ophthalmological, ear, and periodontal problems as reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Center. The
cumulative incidence rate per 10,000 population, Odds ratio, and Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% Confidence Interval
(CI) were measured to assess the non-fatal irAEs after COVID-19 vaccination.
Results
The cIR of non-fatal irAEs for three months was significantly higher in vaccinated subjects than in non-
vaccinated subjects, except for endometriosis. The vaccination significantly increased the risks of all the non-fatal
irAEs except for visual impairment. The risk of inner ear disease showed the highest HRs (HR [95% CI] = 2.368
[2.153-2.604]) among the non- fatal irAEs following COVID -19 vaccination. Among the vaccinated subjects,
heterologous vaccination was associated with the increased risk of most of the non-fatal irAEs.
Conclusions
The three -month risks of incidental non -fatal irAEs are substantially higher in the COVID- 19
vaccinated subjects than in non -vaccinated controls. Our findings suggested that vaccinated subjects with
predisposition are potentially vulnerable to the occurrence of diverse irAEs although the COVID-19 vaccines may
not be fatal.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
3
Introduction
Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), as a global challenge for health and socioeconomic issues, demonstrated
a subsequent rise in morbidity and mortality in the early stages of the pandemic compared to other viral infections.1
With the rapid development of vaccines in response to the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a
contribution in the reduction of the severity and fatality rates. Subsequently, severa l types of vaccines after
approval of the AZD1222 vaccine have been released to prevent COVID-19 infection.2-5 However, a wide range
of adverse events (AEs), not previously reported in conventional vaccines, have been observed post-vaccination.6-
8
As every country has done, South Korea initiated the COVID-19 vaccination program at care facilities
and subsequently expanded its coverage to encompass the entire nation's population. About 80% of the population
in South Korea was vaccinated within a year, which contributed to a significant decrease in COVID-19 infection.9
Meanwhile, there is increasing evidence that many vaccinated populations could experience several unexpected
complications, such as immune-related AEs (irAEs).6-8 10 11 Many post-vaccination AEs are believed to originate
from an immune response characterized by an inflammatory cytokine storm that causes irreversible damage to the
cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory systems. 12 13 Much of the current literature on the side effects
occurring after the COVID -19 vaccination focused on serious AEs such as cardiovascular complications.
Consequently, the non-fatal irAEs have yet to be comprehensively elucidated.11 14-20 Therefore, this study aims to
assess the non -fatal irAEs after COVID -19 vaccination from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)
database in Seoul, South Korea.
Methods
Data source
This from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database on 1, January 2021 enrolled randomly
extracted 50% of individuals residing in Seoul, South Korea. We randomly selected 50% of the residents living
in Seoul as of January 1, 2021, and obtained their diagnostic records from 2020 to 2021. The International
Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), was adopted by the NHIS to classify disease diagnoses. The
data included the primary diagnosis, secondary diagnosis, and dates of hospital visits. This population -based
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
4
cohort study was conducted by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
(STROBE) guidelines.21
Study population
A total of 4 348 412 individuals living in Seoul, constituting 50% of the population, were included and investigated
as of January 1, 2021. Individuals aged under 20 years were excluded, leaving 4 203 887 individuals for analysis.
In this study, only individuals who had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine were included in the vaccinated
group. In this cohort study, the index date, which is the date on which individuals started participating in the study,
was set differently for the vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups. For the vaccinated group, the index date was set
as the date of the second vaccine dose administered before September 30, 2021. On the other hand, for the non -
vaccinated group, the index date was set as October 1, 2021. The history of COVID- 19 vaccination was
investigated as of January 1, 2021. On January 1, 2021, the vaccinated group included 3 839 014 individuals,
whereas the non -vaccinated group included 364,873 individuals. Individuals who received a dose of vaccine
before January 1, 2021, and did not receive a second dose between January 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021,
were excluded. The vaccinated group included 2 154 389 individuals, whereas the non-vaccinated group included
350,953 individuals.
The non-fatal irAEs included gynecological (endometriosis, and menstrual disorders [polymenorrhagia,
menorrhagia, abnormal cycle length, oligomenorrhea, and amenorrhea]), hematological (bruises confined to
nontender and yellow- colored on especially extremities), dermatological (herpes zoster, alopecia, and warts),
ophthalmological (visual impairment, and glaucoma), otological (tinnitus, inner ear, middle ear, and outer ear
disease), and dental problems (periodontal disease) as reported by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Center.
To investigate the causal relationship between vaccine administration and irAEs, the diagnostic records for a year
before the index date were traced. Individuals with any target disease as a primary or secondary diagnosis during
this period were excluded from the study. The occurrence of the target disease was defined as receiving a primary
diagnosis of the disease from the day after the index date.
Outcome measurements
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
5
The primary outcome measure was cumulative incidence rates (cIRs) of irAEs per 10,000 population between the
vaccinated and non-vaccinated subjects. The cIRs of the irAEs were measured at one week, two weeks, one month,
and three months. The secondary outcome measures were the odd ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) of irAEs.
Furthermore, subgroup analyses were also conducted based on gender, the number of COVID-19 vaccine doses,
the vaccine type (mRNA vaccine, cDNA vaccine, and heterologous vaccination), health insurance level, presence
of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD).
Age, gender, insurance level, Charlson’s comorbidity index (CCI), presence of DM, HTN,
hyperlipidemia, and COPD, and prior COVID -19 infection history were extracted using their ICD -19 codes,
which were suggested by Sundararajan et al.
22 The presence of comorbid diseases (i.e. DM, HTN, hyperlipidemia,
and COPD), items in CCI, and the prior COVID -19 infection history was determined as a primary or secondary
diagnosis 2 or more times within 1 year before the index date. The NHI premium was used as a proxy measure of
income because it is proportional to monthly income, including earnings and capital gains. The income quantiles
of the enrolled individuals were categorized into three groups (low-, middle- and high-income groups in medical
aid enrollees and the 0–33, 34–66, and 67–100 centiles of NHI enrollees).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS Enterprise Guide (version 8.3., SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A
normal distribution was confirmed with the Kolmogorov –Smirnov test. Baseline patient characteristics and
comorbidities were reported as means ± standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency (percentage, %)
for categorical variables. Student’s t- test was performed for continuous variables, and the chi -square test or
immune-mediated adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination were assessed using Student’s t-test for
continuous variables, and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. The cIR was calculated
per 10,000 populations. To identify the association between COVID-19 vaccination and irAEs, a multiple logistic
regression model was used for ORs, corresponding to 95% CIs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to
estimate the HRs and 95% CIs. Two -sided P values of 0.05 or less were considered to indicate statistical
significance
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
6
Results
The participants' characteristics
In total, 1 748 136 subjects were included in this study. Among them, 289 579 (16.57 %) had not received the
Covid-19 vaccine (i.e. non-vaccinated subjects), whereas 1 458 557 (83.43 %) were vaccinated against COVID-
19 (i.e. vaccinated subjects) (Figure 1). The baseline characteristics of the vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups
are shown in Table 1.
The cIRs per 10,000 of the non-fatal irAEs following the COVID-19 vaccination
Among the non-fatal irAEs in this study, the cIRs at three months following COVID-19 vaccination were higher
in vaccinated subjects than in non-vaccinated subjects, except for endometriosis. The highest cIR of the non-fatal
irAEs in vaccinated subjects was observed in other ear diseases (cIR, 51.78%; 95% CI, 50.61-52.94) followed by
inner ear diseases (cIR, 47.10%; 95% CI, 45.99 -48.21), herpes zoster (cIR, 45.08%; 95% CI, 43.99 -46.17),
menstrual disorders (cIR, 44.43%; 95% CI, 43.35 -45.51), and glaucoma (cIR, 39.42%; 95% CI, 38.40 -40.43).
Among the non-fatal irAEs, 50% exhibited a significant difference in cIRs one-week post-vaccination. Menstrual
disorders and visual impairments were noted from one -month, whereas alopecia, warts, and periodontal disease
were observed from two weeks onwards (Table 2).
When stratified by gender, the cIRs of irAEs showed a similar pattern to that of the overall population.
At three months post-vaccination, menstrual disorders presented the highest cIRs in females (cIR, 87.54%; 95%
CI, 85.41-89.66) followed by inner ear diseases in females (cIR, 62.82%; 95% CI, 61.02-64.62), other ear diseases
in females (cIR, 55.27%; 95% CI, 53.58-56.96), and herpes zoster in females (cIR, 53.13%; 95% CI, 51.48-54.79).
When stratified by vaccine type, heterologous vaccination increased the cIR of menstrual disorders to 78.96%
(95% CI, 73.45 -84.48). The detailed cIRs stratified by gender or vaccine type were presented in Supplement
tables S1 and S2.
The risks of non-fatal irAEs following the COVID-19 vaccination
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
7
In the Cox proportional hazard model in this study, COVID -19 vaccination signific antly increased the risks of
non-fatal AEs except for visual impairments (HR, 3.935; 95% CI, 0.943-16.410), with the highest level of alopecia
(HR, 2.397; 95% CI, 1.896-3.029) followed by inner ear diseases (HR, 2.368; 95% CI, 2.153-2.604), and herpes
zoster (HR, 2.337; 95% CI, 2.122-2.573) (Figure 2a). In the multivariate logistic model in this study, the COVID-
19 vaccination was associated with a significant increase in the risk of most non-fatal irAEs, indicating potential
influence in the early time point (one-week after COVID-19 vaccination). At three months post-vaccination, the
COVID-19 vaccination significantly increased the risk of endometriosis (OR, 1.631; 95% CI, 1.313- 2.025).
Furthermore, visual impairment at three months (OR, 3.956; 95% CI, 0.949- 16.496), tinnitus at one-week (OR,
1.840; 95% CI, 0.981-3.451), and two weeks (OR, 1.513; 95% CI, 1.000-2.287), and periodontal diseases at one-
week (OR, 0.965; 95% CI, 0.366 -2.546), two weeks (OR, 1.771; 95% CI, 0.760 -4.126), and one -month (OR,
1.662; 95% CI, 0.955 -3.041) showed no statistical differences of ORs between two groups (Figure 2b) . The
detailed data for risks of non -fatal irAEs following the COVID- 19 vaccination were described in Supplement
Tables S3 and S4.
The risks of non-fatal irAEs according to the COVID-19 vaccine type
Both the multivariate logistic regression model and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to assess the
risk factors according to the COVID -19 vaccine type (Figure 3) . In the Cox proportional hazard model,
heterologous vaccination was more increased the risks of gynecological problems including endometriosis (HR,
2.784; 95% CI, 2.083-3.722]) and menstrual disorders (HR, 2.837; 95% CI, 2.583-3.117]), hematological problem
including bruise (HR, 1.891; 95% CI, 1.208-2.962), dermatological problems including herpes zoster (HR, 2.894;
95% CI, 2.153 -2.604) and alopecia (HR, 3.413; 95% CI, 2.520 -4.623), ophthalmological problem including
glaucoma (HR, 1.828; 95% CI, 1.596- 2.093), and periodontal diseases (HR, 3.560; 95 % CI, 2.179 -5.818)
compared to other types of vaccination (Figure 3a). In the multivariate logistic regression model, most trends of
risks were shown a similar pattern to that of Cox proportional hazard models. According to time points, alopecia
and periodontal diseases were associated with the highest risk outcomes following heterologous vaccinations
compared to other vaccination methods. However, vaccination using cDNA only was observed to notably increase
risks of bruise at one-week (OR [95% CI] = 5.767 [2.010-16.543]), two weeks (HR, 6.260; 95% CI, 2.280-14.621),
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
8
and one-month (HR, 4.996; 95% CI, 2.659-9.388]) (Figure 3b). The detailed data was presented in Supplement
tables S5 and S6.
Discussion
The concerns for post-sequelae and vaccine-related complications have been raised as one of the global important
issues.
1 9 The main focus of the COVID-19 vaccine-related complications were serious AEs such as cardiovascular,
and neurological problems that can give rise to fatal conditions. 6 7 To the best of ou r knowledge, the research
regarding non-fatal irAEs following COVID-19 vaccination did not conduct a large population-based cohort study
at the nationwide level.10 Here, we investigated the 14 non-fatal irAEs following COVID-19 vaccination in Seoul,
South Korea. By comparing the 1 458 557 vaccinated subjects and 289 579 non-vaccinated subjects, we found
that 13 non-fatal irAEs except for endometriosis showed a significant increase in cumulative incidence following
COVID-19 vaccination with notable significant higher rates of menstrual disorders, herpes zoster, glaucoma, inner
ear diseases, middle ear diseases, and other ear disease than in non -vaccinated subjects. Furthermore, bruise is
associated with COVID-19 vaccination in the early phase showing the highest ORs at one -week and two weeks.
For three months follow-up, alopecia showed the highest level of HRs following COVID-19 vaccination.
The type of vaccination has been associated with immune response given cellular mechanisms.13 23 Lee
et al. showed that heterologous vaccination leads to enriched B cells and CD4 + T cell responses with higher
activation of interferon pathways, suggesting the potential increase of ir AEs.24 In this study for non-fatal irAEs,
heterologous vaccination showed the highest risks of eight irAEs including endometriosis, menstrual disorders,
bruise, herpes zoster, alopecia, glaucoma, and periodontal diseases compared to other types of vaccination. Thus,
Peripheral blood and skin lesions may exhibit heightened immune responses following heterologous vaccination.
The spike protein is considered a primary target for the development of vaccines against COVID -19
because the infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (S ARS-CoV-2) is initiated by the
binding of spike protein to the ACE2 receptor on the host cell surface.
23 25 Yonker et al. suggested that the
circulating spike protein were detected in peripheral blood of patients who developed post -mRNA vaccine
myocarditis.25 Several studies, supporting Yonker et al., provide potential insight into the possibility that mRNA-
LNP can act as a potential underlying cause for diverse irAEs. 25-28 The main difference between cDNA -based
vaccines and mRNA -based vaccines against SARS -CoV-2 was mediators of immune responses, which were
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
9
respectively spike protein and lipid-nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA.23 The current hypothesis between COVID-
19 vaccination and ear diseases as AEs is that the ear disease is activated by intensification of a spike protein-
specific IgG and potential systematic immune response suggesting the immunologic important factors. 29
Surprisingly, in this study, most ear problems including tinnitus, inner ear disease, and middle ear diseases showed
the highest HRs in vaccination using cDNA only compared to other types of vaccination. The findings of this
study are not only consistent with existing hypotheses indicating the important role of spike protein in SARS -
CoV-2.
For gynecological and hematological issues, previous studies have suggested that the COVID- 19
vaccination increased bleeding from the changes in the irregular menstrual cycle. 30 Population-based studies
reported that unexpected vaginal bleeding and menstrual bleeding changes as emerging phenomenon. 27 28
Likewise, our study also showed that increased cIRs and risks of menstrual disorders (including menorrhagia,
metrorrhagia, and hypermenorrhea), and bruises (vaccine -specific manifestation, i.e. non- tender yellow-colored
bruises on especially extremities) , which significantly rose on heterologous vaccinations. One of the important
points for this result was the trend of the diminishing risk of bruises after vaccination. Considering previous studies,
these manifestations were caused by hormonal changes resulting from spike proteins and disruption of coagulation
pathway in endometrium.
27 28 Thus, both clinicians and vaccinated subjects need to be cautious of bruise
occurrence within one-month post-vaccination. In addition, vaccination using cDNA only significantly increased
the risks of bruises very significantly at the early phase compared to other types so special caution may be needed
in the vaccinated subjects using cDNA vaccine up to at least two weeks post -vaccination. While there were no
significant differences in cIR of endometriosis at three months between vaccinated and non -vaccinated subjects,
this study revealed an increased risk of endometriosis associated with COVID-19 vaccination at the three months
post-vaccination. These results suggest that the cIR of endometriosis may see a significant rise beyond three
months, indicating the need for extended long-term follow-up studies.
Strengths and Limitations
Our study has several strengths and potential limitations for non-fatal AEs following COVID-19 vaccination. First,
many non-fatal irAEs have been reported as case reports or case series so it is the first study to investigate non -
fatal irAEs following COVI D-19 vaccination.14 15 20 29 31 For diverse manifestations including post -vaccination
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
10
glaucoma, ear diseases, and alopecia, these irAEs shared potential pathophysiological mechanisms as expression
of spike proteins, which dysregulate immunity, lead to molecular mimicry phenomena, and activate the pro-
inflammatory cytokines.
13 15 With the suggested mechanisms in the literature, our studies are consistent with this
hypothesis because the types of vaccinations have higher HRs in heterologous or cDNA vaccination compared to
mRNA-only vaccination. Second, the current studies have been demonstrated that the COVID-19 vaccine effect
on T cell mediated immune response in multiple sclerosis, which lead to autoimmunity. 19 Our findings for the
spectrum of non -fatal irAEs strengthens their studies sharing the similar pathophysiological mechani sms and
hypothesis such as role of spike proteins and autoimmune diseases triggered by vaccines. Last, the non-fatal irAEs
after COVID-19 vaccination are relatively common and can be affected by various factors such as vaccination
methods.19 Furthermore, our findings also suggest that different types of vaccinations exhibit distinct activation
patterns at various sites, which will need to be studied in future. Even in case, the warts on cheek was developed
with positive for spike IgG and negative for nucleocapsid IgG after mRNA-based vaccination, suggesting that the
mRNA-LNP triggers autoimmune response.18 Therefore, the COVID-19 vaccines may not be fatal, but vaccinated
people with predisposition may more susceptible for occurrence of AEs. Furthermore, our study indicate that it is
essential to consider potential side effects that persist beyond three months. As the toxicity of COVID- 19
diminishes and a significant portion of the worldwide population acquires natural immunity, it is important to
designate as vaccine recipients those for whom the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential side effects for
ongoing vaccination.
Conclusions
The three-month risks of incidental non-fatal irAEs are substantially higher in the COVID-19 vaccinated subjects
than i n non -vaccinated controls. Our findings suggested that vaccinated subjects with predisposition are
potentially vulnerable to the occurrence of diverse irAEs although the COVID -19 vaccines may not be fatal.
Consequently, clinicians should maintain closed observation of a range of non-fatal irAEs after vaccination, given
that these manifestations might emerge post-vaccination.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
11
Summary boxes
What is already known on this topic
Although the COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to have favorable safety and efficacy, they have
also been associated with adverse events (AEs) stemming from immune-related responses.
Much of the current literature on COVID -19 vaccination focused on serious AEs but the various non-
fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have yet to be comprehensively elucidated.
What this study adds
In a population -based cohort study of 1,748,136 participants in Seoul, South Korea, the three -month
cumulative incidence rates of non -fatal irAEs were significantly higher in vaccinated subjects than in
non-vaccinated subjects. The vaccination significantly increased the risks of non-fatal irAEs following
COVID-19 vaccination.
The findings of this study suggest that clinicians should maintain closed observation of a range of non-
fatal irAEs after vaccination, given that these manifestations might emerge post-vaccination.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
This population -based study suggested that vaccinated subjects with predisposition are potentially
vulnerable to the occurrence of diverse irAEs although the COVID-19 vaccines may not be fatal.
Ethical Statement
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institute (IRB No.: EUMC 2022- 07-
003), which waived the requirement for informed consent because data analyses were performed retrospectively
using anonymized data derived from the South Korean NHIS database.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
12
Acknowledgment
None
Footnotes
Contributors:
EMC conceptualized the study. JHS, M-HK, and EMC designed the study. JHS, HJK, M-HK, and
EMC analyzed and interpreted the data. M -HK acquired the data. JHS, HJK, and EMC drafted the manuscript.
JHS, HJK, M-HK, MGC, and EMC critically reviewed the work. MGC verified the data in the study. All authors
had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-
profit sectors.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
13
References
1. Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, et al . Extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID -19. Nat Med
2020;26:1017-32. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0968-3.
2. Feikin DR, Higdon MM, Abu -Raddad LJ, et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS -
CoV-2 infection and COVID -19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta -regression. Lancet
2022;399:924-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00152-0.
3. Voysey M, Clemens SAC, Madhi SA, et al . Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV -19 vaccine
(AZD1222) against SARS -CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil,
South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 2021;397:99-111. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32661-1.
4. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.
N Engl J Med 2021;384:403-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389.
5. Thomas SJ, Moreira ED, Jr., Kitchin N, et al. Safe ty and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid- 19
Vaccine through 6 Months. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1761-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2110345.
6. Patone M, Handunnetthi L, Saatci D, et al. Neurological complications after first dose of COVID- 19
vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Med 2021;27:2144-53. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01556-7.
7. Wang W, Wang CY, Wang SI, et al. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in COVID-19 survivors among
non-vaccinated population: A retrospective cohort study from the TriNetX US collaborative networks.
EClinicalMedicine 2022;53:101619. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101619
8. Cho JY, Kim KH, Lee N, et al. COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis: a Korean nationwide study.
Eur Heart J 2023;44:2234-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad339.
9. Jung J. Preparing for the Coronavirus Disease (COVID -19) Vaccination: Evidence, Plans, and
Implications. J Korean Med Sci 2021;36:e59. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e59.
10. Lee DS, Kim JW, Lee KL, et al. Adverse events following COVID -19 vaccination in South Korea
between February 28 and August 21, 2021: A nationwide observational study. Int J Infect Dis
2022;118:173-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.007.
11. Sharifian-Dorche M, Bahmanyar M, Sharifian -Dorche A, et al. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic
thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis post COVID- 19 vaccination; a systematic
review. J Neurol Sci 2021;428:117607. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117607.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
14
12. Ewer KJ, Barrett JR, Belij -Rammerstorfer S, et al. T cell and antibody responses induced by a single
dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Nat Med 2021;27:270-78.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01194-5.
13. Li C, Lee A, Grigoryan L, et al . Mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity to the Pfizer -BioNTech
BNT162b2 vaccine. Nat Immunol 2022;23:543-55. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01163-9.
14. Singh RB, Parmar UPS, Kahale F , et al . Vaccine- Associated Uveitis after COVID -19 Vaccination:
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Database Analysis. Ophthalmology 2023;130:179-86. doi:
10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.027.
15. Wichova H, Miller ME, Derebery MJ. Otologic Manifestations Afte r COVID -19 Vaccination: The
House Ear Clinic Experience. Otol Neurotol 2021;42:e1213-e18. doi: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003275.
16. Fazlollahi A, Zahmatyar M, Noori M, et al . Cardiac complications following mRNA COVID -19
vaccines: A systematic review of case reports and case series. Rev Med Virol 2022;32:e2318. doi:
10.1002/rmv.2318.
17. Genco L, Cantelli M, Noto M, et al. Alopecia Areata after COVID-19 Vaccines. Skin Appendage Disord
2023;9:141-43. doi: 10.1159/000528719.
18. Cazzato G, Romita P, Foti C, et al. Development of Flat Warts on the Cheeks after BioNTech -Pfizer
BNT162b2 Vaccine: Is There a Correlation? Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040532.
19. Toljan K, Amin M, Kunchok A, et al . New diagnosis of multiple sclerosis in the setting of mRNA
COVID-19 vaccine exposure. J Neuroimmunol 2022;362:577785. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577785.
20. Gallo G, Mastorino L, Tonella L, et al. Alopecia areata after COVID-19 vaccination. Clin Exp Vaccine
Res 2022;11:129-32. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2022.11.1.129.
21. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in
Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet
2007;370:1453-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61602-x.
22. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, et al. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index
predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012.
23. Seyed Hosseini E, Riahi Kashani N, Nikzad H, et al. The novel coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19):
Mechanism of action, detection and recent therapeutic strategies. Virology 2020;551:1-9. doi:
10.1016/j.virol.2020.08.011.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
15
24. Lee HK, Go J, Sung H, et al. Heterologous ChAdOx1-BNT162b2 vaccination in Korean cohort induces
robust immune and antibody responses that includes Omicron. iScience 2022;25:104473. doi:
10.1016/j.isci.2022.104473.
25. Yonker LM, Swank Z, Bartsch YC, et al. Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post-COVID-19 mRNA
Vaccine Myocarditis. Circulation 2023;147:867-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061025
26. Ndeupen S, Qin Z, Jacobsen S, et al. The mRNA-LNP platform's lipid nanoparticle component used in
preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory. iScience 2021;24:103479. doi:
10.1016/j.isci.2021.103479.
27. Blix K, Laake I, Juvet L, et al . Unexpected vaginal bleeding and COVID- 19 vaccination in
nonmenstruating women. Sci Adv 2023;9:eadg1391. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1391.
28. Lee KMN, Junkins EJ, Luo C, et al . Investigating trends in those who experience menstrual bleeding
changes after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Sci Adv 2022;8:eabm7201. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm7201.
29. Ciorba A, Corazzi V, Bianchini C, et al. Autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED): A diagnostic challenge.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2018;32:2058738418808680. doi: 10.1177/2058738418808680.
30. Farland LV, Khan SM, Shilen A, et al. COVID-19 vaccination and changes in the menstrual cycle among
vaccinated persons. Fertil Steril 2023;119:392-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.023.
31. Su YW, Yeh SJ, Chen MJ. New -onset Glaucoma Following Moderna COVID- 19 Vaccination. J Curr
Glaucoma Pract 2023;17:106-09. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1408.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
16
Figure legends
Figure 1. Flowchart of this study
Figure 2. The risk for non -fatal autoimmune-related adverse events (irAEs) by COVID-19 vaccination. a.
Cox proportional hazard model, which is presented as a forest plot (hazard ratio [red circle] with 95% confidence
interval [bar]). If clinical significance, it is marked as red-bar. b. Multivariate logistic regression model along with
time point, which presented as forest plot (odd ratio [red circle] with 95% confidence interval [bar]).
Figure 3. The risk f or non -fatal autoimmune -related adverse events (irAEs) of vaccinated subjects
according to vaccine type. a. Cox proportional hazard model, which is presented as a forest plot (hazard ratio
[red circle] with 95% confidence interval [bar]). If clinical signi ficance, it is marked as red- bar. b. Multivariate
logistic regression model along with time point was presented as the odd ratio of a heatmap. If clinical significance,
it is marked as *.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
17
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients stratified by COVID-19 vaccination in South Korea.
Total
(n=1,748,133)
Vaccination
P No (n=289,576) Yes (n=1,458,557)
Gender, n (%)
Male
Female
861,301 (49.27%)
886,832 (50.73%)
143,128 (49.43%)
146,448 (50.57%)
718,173 (49.24%)
740,384 (50.76%)
.064
Age, mean (SD), years
20 – 29 years, n (%)
30 – 39 years, n (%)
40 – 49 years, n (%)
50 – 59 years, n (%)
60 – 69 years, n (%)
70 – 79 years, n (%)
≥ 80 years, n (%)
53.32 (16.87)
21,3267 (12.20%)
191,879 (10.98%)
231,285 (13.23%)
430,101 (24.60%)
398,344 (22.79%)
190,087 (10.87%)
93,170 (5.33%)
45.00 (16.89)
54,748 (18.91%)
72,852 (25.16%)
63,163 (21.81%)
42,637 (14.72%)
28,757 (9.93%)
13,351 (4.61%)
14,068 (4.86%)
54.97 (16.37)
158,519 (10.87%)
119,027 (8.16%)
168,122 (11.53%)
387,464 (26.56%)
369,587 (25.34%)
176,736 (12.12%)
79,102 (5.42%)
<.001*
<.001
Insurance level, n (%)
Low
Moderate
High
449,717 (25.73%)
492,107 (28.15%)
806,309 (46.12%)
85,471 (29.52%)
91,292 (31.53%)
112,813 (38.96%)
364,246 (24.97%)
400,815 (27.48%)
693,496 (47.55%)
<.001
CCI, n (%)
0
1
≥ 2
1,226,052 (70.13%)
274,493 (15.70%)
247,588 (14.16%)
249,643 (86.21%)
18,841 (6.51%)
21,092 (7.28%)
976,409 (66.94%)
255,652 (17.53%)
226,496 (15.53%)
<.001
Comorbidity, n (%)
DM
Hyperlipidemia
HTN
COPD
249,273 (14.26%)
507,183 (29.01%)
459,210 (26.27%)
59,009 (3.38%)
16,143 (5.57%)
29,640 (10.24%)
27,778 (9.59%)
5,414 (1.87%)
233,130 (15.98%)
477,543 (32.74%)
431,432 (29.58%)
53,595 (3.67%)
<.001
<.001
<.001
<.001
Prior COVID-19 infection, n (%) 13,719 (0.78%) 2,970 (1.03%) 10,749 (0.74%) <.001
1st vaccination product, n (%)
AZD1222
BNT162b2
mRNA-1273
JNJ-78436735
609,023 (41.76%)
826,953 (56.70%)
22,573 (1.55%)
8 (0.00%)
609,023 (41.76%)
826,953 (56.70%)
22,573 (1.55%)
8 (0.00%)
2nd vaccination product, n (%)
AZD1222
BNT162b2
mRNA-1273
JNJ-78436735
510,261 (34.98%)
925,692 (63.47%)
22,596 (1.55%)
8 (0.00%)
510,261 (34.98%)
925,692 (63.47%)
22,596 (1.55%)
8 (0.00%)
1st – 2nd vaccination product, n (%)
AZD1222 – AZD1222
AZD1222 – BNT162b2
AZD1222 – mRNA-1273
AZD1222 – JNJ-78436735
BNT162b2 – AZD1222
BNT162b2 – BNT162b2
BNT162b2 – mRNA-1273
BNT162b2 – JNJ-78436735
mRNA-1273 – BNT162b2
mRNA-1273 – mRNA-1273
JNJ-78436735 – AZD1222
JNJ-78436735 – BNT162b2
510,253 (34.98%)
98,762 (6.77%)
2 (0.00%)
6 (0.00%)
3 (0.00%)
826,925 (56.69%)
23 (0.00%)
2 (0.00%)
2 (0.00%)
22,571 (1.55%)
5 (0.00%)
3 (0.00%)
510,253 (34.98%)
98,762 (6.77%)
2 (0.00%)
6 (0.00%)
3 (0.00%)
826,925 (56.69%)
23 (0.00%)
2 (0.00%)
2 (0.00%)
22,571 (1.55%)
5 (0.00%)
3 (0.00%)
1st – 2nd vaccination type, n (%)
No vaccination
Only mRNA vaccine
Only cDNA vaccine
Heterologous vaccination
289,576 (16.56%)
849,526 (48.60%)
510,253 (29.19%)
98,778 (5.65%)
289,576 (100%)
849,526 (58.24%)
510,253 (34.98%)
98,778 (6.77%)
Vaccination interval,
mean (SD), months 50.88 (23.19&) 50.88 (23.19&)
*All values expressed as mean ± standard deviation. n, number; CCI, Charson’s comorbidity index; DM, Diabetic mellitus; HTN,
Hypertension; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases; AZD- 1222, AstraZeneca ChAdOx1- S recombinant vaccine; BNT162b2,
Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty; mRNA-1273, Moderna Spikevax; JNJ-78436735, Janssen/Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 Vaccine.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
18
Table 2 Cumulative incidence rate (cIR) of non-fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) following COVID-19 vaccination.
Disease Vaccination Total
number
One week Two weeks One month Three months
event IR 95% CI P event cIR 95% CI P event cIR 95% CI P event cIR 95% CI P
Endometriosis No 289576 4 0.14 0.00-0.27 .389 13 0.45 0.20-0.69 .877 35 1.21 0.81-1.61 .704 99 3.42 2.75-4.09 0.15
Yes 1458557 34 0.23 0.15-0.31 63 0.43 0.33-0.54 165 1.13 0.96-1.30 584 4 3.68-4.33
Menstrual disorder No 289576 82 2.83 2.22-3.44 .638 161 5.56 4.70-6.42 .096 346 11.95 10.69-13.21 .002 1025 35.4 33.23-37.56 <0.001
Yes 1458557 442 3.03 2.75-3.31 935 6.41 6.00-6.82 2081 14.27 13.65-14.88 6481 44.43 43.35-45.51
Bruise No 289576 4 0.14 0.00-0.27 <.001 6 0.21 0.04-0.37 <.001 11 0.38 0.16-0.60 <.001 48 1.66 1.19-2.13 <0.001
Yes 1458557 107 0.73 0.59-0.87 181 1.24 1.06-1.42 287 1.97 1.74-2.20 559 3.83 3.51-4.15
Herpes zoster No 289576 31 1.07 0.69-1.45 <.001 66 2.28 1.73-2.83 <.001 162 5.59 4.73-6.46 <.001 454 15.68 14.24-17.12 <0.001
Yes 1458557 472 3.24 2.94-3.53 1055 7.23 6.80-7.67 2270 15.56 14.92-16.20 6575 45.08 43.99-46.17
Alopecia No 289576 6 0.21 0.04-0.37 .101 10 0.35 0.13-0.56 .003 23 0.79 0.47-1.12 <.001 80 2.76 2.16-3.37 <0.001
Yes 1458557 61 0.42 0.31-0.52 122 0.84 0.69-0.98 266 1.82 1.60-2.04 766 5.25 4.88-5.62
Warts No 289576 20 0.69 0.39-0.99 .279 30 1.04 0.67-1.41 <.001 78 2.69 2.10-3.29 <.001 197 6.8 5.85-7.75 <0.001
Yes 1458557 135 0.93 0.77-1.08 303 2.08 1.84-2.31 658 4.51 4.17-4.86 1811 12.42 11.84-12.99
Visual impairment No 289576 0 0 0.00-0.00 1 0 0 0.00-0.00 .372 0 0 0.00-0.00 .024 2 0.07 0.00-0.16 0.008
Yes 1458557 5 0.03 0.00-0.06 9 0.06 0.02-0.10 23 0.16 0.09-0.22 50 0.34 0.25-0.44
Glaucoma No 289576 43 1.48 1.04-1.93 <.001 80 2.76 2.16-3.37 <.001 199 6.87 5.92-7.83 <.001 534 18.44 16.88-20.00 <0.001
Yes 1458557 430 2.95 2.67-3.23 901 6.18 5.77-6.58 1892 12.97 12.39-13.56 5749 39.42 38.40-40.43
Tinnitus No 289576 11 0.38 0.16-0.60 .013 26 0.9 0.55-1.24 .003 54 1.86 1.37-2.36 <.001 171 5.91 5.02-6.79 <0.001
Yes 1458557 119 0.82 0.67-0.96 237 1.62 1.42-1.83 534 3.66 3.35-3.97 1789 12.27 11.70-12.83
Inner ear disease No 289576 43 1.48 1.04-1.93 <.001 71 2.45 1.88-3.02 <.001 152 5.25 4.41-6.08 <.001 466 16.09 14.63-17.55 <0.001
Yes 1458557 553 3.79 3.48-4.11 1094 7.5 7.06-7.94 2381 16.32 15.67-16.98 6870 47.1 45.99-48.21
Middle ear disease No 289576 14 0.48 0.23-0.74 <.001 42 1.45 1.01-1.89 <.001 93 3.21 2.56-3.86 <.001 290 10.01 8.86-11.17 <0.001
Yes 1458557 218 1.49 1.30-1.69 468 3.21 2.92-3.50 1058 7.25 6.82-7.69 3343 22.92 22.14-23.70
Other ear disease No 289576 43 1.48 1.04-1.93 <.001 86 2.97 2.34-3.60 <.001 202 6.98 6.01-7.94 <.001 607 20.96 19.30-22.63 <0.001
Yes 1458557 550 3.77 3.46-4.09 1112 7.62 7.18-8.07 2441 16.74 16.07-17.40 7552 51.78 50.61-52.94
Periodontal disease No 289576 5 0.17 0.02-0.32 1 6 0.21 0.04-0.37 .044 14 0.48 0.23-0.74 .001 31 1.07 0.69-1.45 <0.001
Yes 1458557 30 0.21 0.13-0.28 70 0.48 0.37-0.59 160 1.1 0.93-1.27 488 3.35 3.05-3.64
Cumulative incidence rates were calculated as a rate per 10,000 individuals. IR, incidence rate; CI, confidence interval; cIR, cumulative incidence.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
perpetuity.
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
The copyright holder for thisthis version posted November 22, 2023. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.15.23298566doi: medRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.