[Endometrial imaging].

E Lemercier, Lemercier E, A. Genevois, Genevois A, Dacher JN, J N Dacher, Benozio M, M Benozio, G Descargues, Descargues G, L. Marpeau, Marpeau L
Journal de Radiologie · 2000 · vol. 81(12 Suppl) , pp. 1845–55 · PMID:11173754 · W4299128867
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

Endovaginal sonography, especially with sonohysterography, is valuable for diagnosing endometrial pathology, while MRI is preferred for adenomyosis and preoperative endometrial cancer staging.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The diagnostic value of endovaginal sonography in benign or malignant endometrial pathology is high, increased by sonohysterography. Sonohysterography is useful in the diagnosis of endometrial thickness and to determine further investigations. MRI is accurate in the uterine adenomyosis diagnosis and is the imaging modality of choice for the preoperative endometrial cancer staging.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrium Endosonography Magnetic Resonance Imaging Uterine Diseases Endometrial Neoplasms Endometrium Female Humans Sensitivity and Specificity Uterine Diseases

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-26T06:08:41.316361+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:30.513821+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK