Intro
TAZ, which functions as a transcriptional coactivator was known to be regulated by
nuclei-cytoplasmic localization in a phosphorylation-dependent manner under the
Hippo signaling pathway ( Lei et al., 2008 ).
The Hippo signaling pathway which is well conserved in mammals was first discovered
in drosophila ( Badouel & McNeill,
2011 ). The Hippo signaling is known to play an anti-tumor function by
limiting organ size via regulating various cellular processes such as cell
proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation ( Kim
& Jho, 2018 ).
Recently, several studies reported on the Hippo signaling factors in the endometrium.
STK3/4 and YAP were regulated by estrogen during the estrous cycle in the mouse
uterus ( Moon et al., 2019 , 2022 ). Moreover, several main downstream
targets of YAP/TAZ such as Cyr61 ( MacLaughlan et
al., 2007 ), Ctgf ( Maybin et al.,
2012 ), Amot, Amotl1, and Amotl2 ( Huang
et al., 2018 ), Birc5 ( Cho et al.,
2020 ) were regulated by steroid hormones in the uterine tissue or
endometrial cells. These suggest that the Hippo signaling factors act as an
important signaling pathway in the endometrium that is dynamically regulated by
ovarian steroid hormones.
Also, Chen et al. reported that YAP showed high expression in human decidual cells
compared to ESCs and induces the decidualization of ESCs ( Chen et al., 2017 ). Yu et al. suggested that YAP was essential
for uterine decidualization in mouse uterine stromal cells ( Yu et al., 2022 ). Also, TAZ expression was increased in
pregnant mice uteri compared to non-pregnant mice and induced decidualization in
mouse ESCs ( Huang et al., 2018 ). These
results imply that the normal regulation of the Hippo signaling pathway plays a role
in dynamic uterine signaling mechanisms for a successful pregnancy.
TAZ activates target genes involved in various physiological cellular events such as
cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, differentiation, and senescence by
interacting with TEADs transcriptional factors ( Varelas et al., 2008 ; Di Palma et al.,
2009 ; Zhang et al., 2009 ; Jeong et al., 2010 ; Wang et al., 2016 ; Kim et
al., 2019 ). The uterus undergoes various cellular processes including
cell proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation during the estrous cycle ( Evans et al., 1990 ). Collectively, TAZ, the
main downstream factor of the Hippo signaling, may be an important signaling factor
that contributes to the dynamic changes in the uterine endometrium. However, the
studies on the regulation of TAZ by hormones in the uterus have not been elucidated.
Therefore, this report investigated the expression pattern of TAZ during the estrous
cycle in the mouse uterus and the effect of estrogen and progesterone on TAZ
expression in the OVX mouse uterus.
In the present study, we showed that Taz mRNA is highly expressed in
various mouse tissues, especially in the kidney, lung, and ovary ( Fig. 1A ). This data was consistent with a
previous study ( Yue et al., 2014 ).
Interestingly, Taz expression was also high in the uterus compared
to other tissues, suggesting that Taz may play a major role in the
uterine endometrium.
Since this study focused on Taz expression in mouse uterus, we
investigated the regulation of TAZ expression in the mouse uterus during the estrous
cycle. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that the TAZ nuclear localization of both
epithelial and stromal cells was predominantly observed in the estrus than in other
stages ( Fig. 2C ). The mouse estrous cycle
consists of four phases: proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus. The estrus
stage is the period immediately after ovulation which is induced by a surge in
luteinizing hormone due to a persistent increase in estrogen levels during the
proestrus. Wood et al. reported that LE and stromal cell
( p <0.05) proliferation rate reached the maximum level in the
estrus ( Wood et al., 2007 ). Also, they
demonstrated that the apoptosis rate of luminal, glandular epithelial cells, and
stromal cells were lowest at the estrus stage ( Wood et al., 2007 ). The transcriptional activity of TAZ is known to be
regulated by nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation. Upon entering the nucleus, TAZ
functions as a coactivator that promotes gene targets by interacting with TEADs
( Mahoney et al., 2005 ; Zhang et al., 2009 ). TAZ overexpression was
known to promote cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast
epithelial cell lines ( Lei et al., 2008 ).
Also, Yu et al. demonstrated that TAZ overexpression induced proliferation and
prevented apoptosis in mouse ESCs ( Yu et al.,
2021 ). Collectively, these results suggest that TAZ may play a role in
promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis, particularly LE and stromal
cells through nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation regulated by fluctuations of ovarian
hormones, estrogen, and progesterone at the estrus.
Next, we investigated the effect of steroid hormones on TAZ expression using the OVX
mouse model as in previous studies ( Kim et al.,
2017 ; Cho et al., 2020 ). Estrogen
induced both mRNA and protein levels of TAZ time-dependently in the OVX mouse uterus
( Fig. 4 ). Taz mRNA was
highest in 4 h and was higher than 0 h uteri up to 24 h ( Fig. 4A and B ), whereas protein showed a statistically
significant increase from 6 h to 12 h and then showed a marked decrease at 24 h
after estrogen treatment ( Fig. 4C and D ). These
results, showing different increase patterns between mRNA and protein, suggest that
estrogen may be involved not only in the transcriptional induction of the
Taz gene but also in the post-translational modification of the
TAZ protein via several non-genomic pathways. Consistent with the western blot
result, immunofluorescence showed that expression level and nuclear translocation of
TAZ were increased after estrogen treatment in a time-dependent manner ( Fig 4E ). Finally, estrogen-induced TAZ protein
was efficiently decreased after pretreatment of estrogen receptor antagonist ICI
182,780 ( Fig. 5 ). Several studies have reported
that estrogen stimulates the proliferation of uterine epithelial cells in OVX mice,
and high expression of TAZ was usually involved in inducing cell proliferation
( Quarmby & Korach, 1984 ; Lei et al., 2008 ; Zhang et al., 2009 ). Collectively, these suggest that
estrogen induces TAZ expression and activates its transcriptional activity to induce
epithelial cell proliferation through estrogen receptors in the uterine
endometrium.
Unlike the normal uterus ( Fig. 2C ), TAZ was
dominantly located in luminal and glandular epithelium and rarely in stromal cells
in the OVX mouse uterus ( Fig. 4E ). Then TAZ
expression was increased from glandular and LE cells to stromal cells after estrogen
treatment ( Fig. 4E ). This implies that estrogen
may play an important role in inducing TAZ expression in stromal cells.
Interestingly, TAZ expression was increased in the uterus of OVX mice ( Fig. 4 ), but there was no significant change in
the total amount of mRNA or protein of TAZ according to the estrous cycle ( Fig. 2 ). These results might be due to technical
problems, but several reasons can be present. The first reason is that the normal
uterine endometrium undergoes a dynamic remodeling controlled by the synergetic
effects of estrogen and progesterone during the estrous cycle ( Evans et al., 1990 ; Dharma
et al., 2001 ; Wood et al., 2007 ;
Bertolin & Murphy, 2014 ).
However, such synergetic effects are almost excluded in the uterus of the OVX mouse
model. The present study showed that the TAZ expression of OVX mouse uterus was not
significantly changed in both mRNA and protein levels after progesterone treatment
( Fig. 3 ). These results imply that
progesterone alone may not significantly affect the TAZ expression. However, Yu et
al. reported that TAZ showed high expression in pregnant mouse uterus compared to
non-pregnant mouse and played an essential role in decidualization of mouse ESCs
( Yu et al., 2021 ). Decidualization
occurs through a series of regulations of estrogen and progesterone for successful
implantation. So, there may be a possibility that there is a synergetic effect of
estrogen and progesterone on TAZ expression. The second reason is, since there is a
difference between the serum estrogen level in a normal mouse and the OVX model
experimentally administered with estrogen (200 ng/mouse), there may be differences
in estrogen-mediated changes in TAZ expression.
However, we need further studies for a better understanding of the regulatory
mechanisms between estrogen and TAZ expression in the mouse uterus. First, it is
necessary to examine the change of phosphorylated TAZ (pTAZ) levels by estrogen in
the uterus. The transcriptional activity of TAZ was known to be regulated by the
phosphorylation of several regions by LATS1/2 kinases. When Ser89 of TAZ is
phosphorylated by LATS1/2, cytoplasmic sequestration of TAZ occurs by interacting
with 14-3-3 protein ( Lei et al., 2008 ). On
the other hand, if LATS1/2 phosphorylate Ser311 of TAZ, Casein kinase 1 (Ck1)
subsequently phosphorylates Ser314, leading to its polyubiquitylation and
proteasomal degradation by the SCF/CRL1 ( β -TrCP) E3 ligase
( Liu et al., 2010 ). Therefore, the
mechanisms regulating nuclei-cytoplasmic migration and protein stability of TAZ are
important factors in increasing its protein levels so the need for further studies
on the expression of pTAZ by estrogen is raised. Second, it is necessary to
investigate which non-genomic pathways of estrogen receptor (ER) contributed to
inducing TAZ expression. The increase of TAZ expression occurring at 6 h is usually
considered to be the early response by estrogen ( Groothuis et al., 2007 ). Estrogen can activate signal-transduction
mechanisms through membrane-bound ER or GPER that result in fast estrogen-induced
biological responses ( Lösel &
Wehling, 2003 ). Extra-nuclear ER signaling pathways involve the
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways and protein kinase B
(known as AKT). Several studies reported the regulation of TAZ expression through
these signaling cascades by several RTKs under the Hippo signaling ( Azad et al., 2018 ; van Soldt & Cardoso, 2020 ). Also, Zhou et al. reported
that estrogen activated TAZ by increasing nuclear localization by inhibiting LATS1/2
activity of phosphorylation on Ser89 in breast cancer cells ( Zhou et al., 2015 ). These suggest the possibility that
estrogen may induce TAZ expression may be caused by several non-genomic signaling
pathways of E2 in the uterine endometrium.
Finally, several studies also reported on the association between the main downstream
of Hippo signaling, YAP/TAZ, and endometrial diseases. High expression of YAP was
associated with endometriosis in several studies ( Pei et al., 2019 ). Romero-Pérez et al. observed that high TAZ
expression correlated with the most aggressive endometrial cancer, and its
overexpression promoted tumorigenicity, such as mobility and invasiveness of
endometrial cancer cell lines ( Romero-Pérez
et al., 2015 ). Also, Zhan et al. reported that TAZ was predominantly
expressed in the nucleus of the endometrioid adenocarcinoma tissue ( Zhan et al., 2016 ). These imply that abnormal
expressions of YAP/TAZ may result in endometrial diseases. Disruption of the tightly
regulated balance of estrogen and progesterone can potentially lead to uterine
diseases ( Azad et al., 2018 ). Therefore, it
is considered that the study on the correlation between TAZ regulation and uterine
hormones may be important research in the therapeutic study of uterine diseases.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that TAZ transcriptional activity is dynamically
regulated through the estrous cycle and is induced and activated by estrogen via
estrogen receptors in the endometrium. Although more studies are needed, our
findings will provide a better understanding of the relationship between the
dynamically regulated uterine environment and the Hippo signaling pathway, further
providing good clues for studying the mechanisms of endometrial diseases.
Results
To investigate the physiological regulation of Taz , we performed
RT-PCR analysis using total RNAs from various mouse tissues including the small
intestine, stomach, kidney, spleen, liver, heart, brain, lung, ovary, and
uterus. The result showed that Taz was highly expressed in the
kidney, lung, and ovary ( Fig. 1A ). This was
consistent with previous data ( Yue et al.,
2014 ). Interestingly, Taz expression was also high
in the uterus compared to other tissues. This suggests that Taz
may play an important role in the uterine endometrium.
(A) The total RNA was isolated from 7-week-old female mice. RT-PCR
analysis of Taz mRNA in several mouse tissues; small
intestine, stomach, kidney, spleen, liver, heart, brain, lung, ovary,
and uterus. Gapdh was used as an internal control. (B,
C) RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis for Taz transcripts in
the mouse uteri at each stage of the estrous cycle. In each stage, the
total RNA was isolated from the uteri of 7-week-old mice. The fold
changes were evaluated by comparing them to the level of
Taz mRNA at the proestrus. The relative expression
level of Taz was normalized with Rpl7
mRNA. (D) Vaginal smear assay was used to confirm each stage of estrous
cycle. The black scale bars indicate 50 μm. Taz ,
transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif. P, proestrus; E,
estrus; M, metestrus; D, diestrus; NE, nucleated epithelial cells; CE,
cornified epithelial cells; LK, leukocytes; RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reactions.
Then RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis were performed to examine the expression
patterns of Taz in the uterus during the estrous cycle ( Fig. 1B and C ). A vaginal smear assay was
used to differentiate the uterus during the estrous cycle which consists of four
stages: proestrus, estrus, metestrus, and diestrus ( Fig. 1D ). RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis showed that
Taz mRNA expression was slightly low in the proestrus
compared to the other stages, but it didn’t show a statistically
significant difference between the estrous cycle. Collectively, these results
suggest that the expression of Taz is not significantly
regulated according to the estrous cycle.
To investigate the expression level of TAZ protein during the estrous cycle, a
western blot analysis was performed. β -actin was used as
a loading control to investigate the relative expression level of the TAZ
protein. Different from the mRNA result, TAZ expression was a little higher at
the estrus compared to the other stages, but there was no statistically
significant difference between the estrous cycle ( Fig. 2A and B ).
(A) Western blot analysis of TAZ in the mouse uterus at each stage during
the estrous cycle. β-actin was used for loading control. (B) The
relative protein intensity of TAZ in the uterus during the estrous cycle
was analyzed using the ImageJ program. The relative expression value was
based on the proestrus stage. Data are shown with mean±SEM. (C)
Immunofluorescence staining of TAZ (red) and DAPI (blue) in the
7-week-old mouse uteri at each stage of the estrous cycle. Normal rabbit
IgG (IgG control) was used as negative control staining. The white scale
bars indicate 20 μm. P, proestrus; E, estrus; M, metestrus; D,
diestrus; LE, luminal epithelium; GE, glandular epithelium; S, stroma;
Taz , transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding
motif.
In the next study, we performed immunofluorescence analysis to observe the
location of the TAZ protein. Consistent with the western blot result, TAZ
expression was slightly high at the estrus and its location was dynamically
regulated during the estrous cycle ( Fig
2C ). TAZ protein was expressed in both epithelial and stromal cells
during all stages, but nuclear TAZ expression, especially in the luminal
epithelium (LE) was highest in the estrus compared to other stages ( Fig. 2C ). Collectively, these results suggest
that TAZ protein is involved in the morphological and functional dynamics that
occur during the estrous cycle through nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation.
Two major ovarian steroid hormones, estrogen, and progesterone regulate dynamic
morphological changes in the uterus during the estrous cycle. Therefore, the OVX
mouse model was used to investigate the effect of these hormones on TAZ
expression in the uterus.
First, OVX mice were treated with progesterone, then the uteri were collected at
0, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h later. To investigate the hormonal responsiveness to
progesterone, mRNA expression of Amphiregulin ( Areg ) ( Das et al., 1995 ), and Homeobox A10
( Hoxa10 ) ( Taylor et al.,
1998 ) which are known as progesterone-induced genes were investigated
using the qRT-PCR ( Supplementary Fig.
1B ).
To investigate the Taz mRNA expression, we performed RT-PCR and
qRT-PCR analysis. The results showed that the Taz mRNA
expression did not change significantly over time after progesterone treatment
( Fig. 3A and B ). Furthermore, we
performed western blot analysis to investigate the protein level of TAZ after
progesterone treatment. Consistent with mRNA data, the expression of TAZ protein
showed no difference according to progesterone treatment ( Fig. 3C and D ). These results suggest that TAZ expression is
not affected by progesterone in the uterus.
(A, B) RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis for relative expression levels of
Taz transcripts in uteri of OVX mice after
progesterone (P 4 , 2 mg/mouse) treatment. The uteri were
harvested at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after P 4 treatment. The
fold changes were evaluated by comparing the level of
Taz mRNA at an oil treated OVX mouse uterus (0 h).
Relative expression levels were normalized against
Rpl7 . Data is presented as the mean
intensity±SEM. (C) Expression of TAZ was analyzed by western blot
analysis in the uteri of the OVX mice after P 4 treatment for
0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. β-actin was used as an internal
control. (D) Relative level of TAZ protein intensity in the uterus of
OVX mice after P 4 treatment. The relative expression value
was based on the value at 0 h after the P 4 treatment. Data
are presented as the mean intensity±SEM. Taz ,
transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif; RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reactions; OVX, ovariectomized.
In the next study, since estrogen is another important regulatory hormone in the
uterus, the expression of TAZ is affected by estrogen being investigated. OVX
mice were administered estrogen, and uteri were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and
24 h. Hormone responsiveness to estrogen was referenced by evaluating mRNA
levels of Cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 ( Cyr61 ) ( Walmer et al., 1992 ; MacLaughlan et al., 2007 ), Ras Related
Dexamethasone Induced 1 ( Rasd1 ) ( Kim et al., 2017 ), and Lactoferrin ( Ltf )
( Walmer et al., 1992 ) which are
known as estrogen-induced genes ( Supplementary
Fig. 1A ).
RT-PCR and qRT-PCR were analyzed to find out the effect of estrogen on the
Taz mRNA level. The Taz expression was
increased time-dependent manner after estrogen treatment, and peaks at 4 h
( Fig. 4A and B ). We also performed a
western blot to investigate the protein level of TAZ. Expression of TAZ protein
showed a dramatic increase at 6 h and 12 h compared to 0 h and dropped to 24 h
( Fig. 4C and D ).
(A) Expression of TAZ was analyzed by western blot analysis in the uterus
of the OVX mice after E 2 treatment for 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24
h. β-actin was used as an internal control. (B) Relative level of
TAZ protein intensity in the uterus of OVX mice after E 2
treatment. The relative expression value was based on the value at 0 h
after E 2 treatment. Data are presented as the mean
intensity±SEM. The one-way ANOVA analysis was used to calculate
the p-value, *** p <0.001.
(C) Immunofluorescence images represent the localization and expression
level of TAZ (red) in the uterus of the OVX mice treated with
E 2 . Normal rabbit IgG (IgG control) was used as a
negative control. DAPI (blue) was used for nuclei staining. The scale
bars indicate 20 μm. Taz , transcriptional
coactivator with PDZ-binding motif; LE, luminal epithelium; GE,
glandular epithelium; S, stroma. OVX, ovariectomized.
Interestingly, different from the normal uterus, TAZ expression was dominantly
expressed in luminal and glandular epithelium and rarely expressed in stromal
cells in OVX mouse uterus ( Fig. 4E ). After
estrogen treatment, TAZ expression was induced from glandular and LE cells to
stromal cells ( Fig. 4E ). Then TAZ
expression was significantly decreased and restricted to luminal and glandular
epithelium at 24 h as same as at 0 h ( Fig.
4E ). In addition, TAZ was predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm at
0 h to 4 h but was expressed both in the nucleus and cytoplasm at 6 h and 12 h
( Fig. 4E ). Collectively, these results
imply that estrogen induces the expression level of TAZ and activates the
transcriptional activity of TAZ in both glandular, LE cells and stromal
cells.
To determine whether the estrogen-induced accumulation of TAZ protein is mediated
via estrogen receptors-dependent, the OVX mice were pretreated with an estrogen
receptor selective antagonist ICI 182,780 (ICI) 30 min before estrogen
administration. The expression of TAZ protein was examined 6 h after estrogen
treatment. Western blot analysis showed that estrogen-induced TAZ protein was
significantly blocked by ICI treatment ( Fig. 5A
and B ).
(A, B) OVX mice were treated with an estrogen receptor selective
antagonist ICI 182,780 (ICI, 500 μg/mouse) 30 min before estrogen
(E 2 , 200 ng/mouse) injection and sacrificed at 6 h after
E 2 administration. TAZ expression was analyzed by western
blot analysis. The relative protein intensity of TAZ in western blot was
analyzed by the ImageJ program. Data were shown with mean±SEM.
The one-way ANOVA analysis and Tukey’s test were used to
calculate the p-value, ** p <0.01,
*** p <0.001. (C)
Immunofluorescence images showed the localization and expression of TAZ
(red) in uteri of OVX mice treated with oil, E 2 , or a
combination of ICI and E 2 . Normal rabbit IgG (IgG control)
was used as a negative control. DAPI (blue) was used for nuclei
staining. The scale bars indicate 20 μm. Taz ,
transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif; LE, luminal
epithelium; GE, glandular epithelium; OVX, ovariectomized.
Also, immunofluorescence analysis showed that ICI treatment suppressed
estrogen-induced TAZ expression and nuclear translocation in epithelial and
stromal cells to a similar extent to that of oil treated uterus ( Fig. 5C ). Taken together, these results
suggest that estrogen induces the expression of TAZ by estrogen
receptor-mediated pathway in the epithelium and stromal cells of the uterus.
Materials|Methods
All mice experiments were performed on 7-week-old ICR mice provided by JA BIO
(Suwon, Korea). Mice were housed and fed ad libitum under temperature- and
light-controlled conditions with lights on for 12 h daily. Animal care and use
were performed following the guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals, and this study was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC, Approval No. KU22074).
The estrous stages were distinguished using the vaginal smear assay as in
previous studies ( Lee et al., 2021 ). A
little amount (0.1–0.2 mL) of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was
inserted into the entrance of the mouse vaginal and drawn back into the pipette
four to five times. Hematoxylin and eosin staining method was used in staining
epithelial cells. Collected PBS containing a few drops of cell suspension was
expelled onto Histobond® adhesive Slide Glass (Ducksan General Science,
Seoul, Korea), dried on a 65°C heat block, and then stained with
hematoxylin (Merch, Darmstadt, Germany) for 30 seconds. Slides were rinsed with
tap water for 5 min and incubated in 50%, 75%, and 90% ethanol for 5 min. After
staining it with eosin Y (Cancer Diagnostics, Durham, CA, USA) for 5 min, the
slides were washed in 90% ethanol and 100% ethanol for 5 min. Finally, the
slides incubated in xylene were mounted with GEL/MOUTN™ (Biomeda, Foster
City, CA, USA). Staining was observed using a microscope, and each stage of the
estrous cycle was discriminated by determining the relative numbers of three
cell types including nucleated epithelial cells, cornified epithelial cells, and
leukocytes. After determining the estrous cycle, the uteri of each stage were
collected. Some of the uteri are used for RNA and protein preparation, and the
remainder were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde to be used in making paraffin blocks
for immunostaining.
To examine the effects of ovarian steroid hormones on the expression of TAZ in
mouse uterus, 7-week-old ICR mice were ovariectomized (OVX) and recovered for
2–3 weeks before E2 and P4 treatment as in previous studies ( Moon et al., 2019 ; Cho et al., 2020 ). The mice were anesthetized by
intraperitoneal injection of (0.4–0.5 mL) 2.5% 2,2,2-Tribromoethanol
(Avertin) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The mouse skin of the dorsal
abdomen was cut, then the ovaries underneath the fat pad were carefully removed.
To suture the sclera, sterile suture (ALEE CO, Busan, Korea) was used and the
leather was sutured using a wound clip applier (Roboz Surgical Instrument, San
Diego, CA, USA). The suture site was disinfected with povidin (Firson, Cheonan,
Korea) and mice were placed on a 42°C heat warmer to observe the
condition until they woke up from anesthesia. After a 2-week recovery, the OVX
mice were treated subcutaneously with β -estradiol (E2,
200 ng/mouse, Sigma-Aldrich) or progesterone (P4, 2 mg/mouse, Sigma-Aldrich). To
investigate the time-dependent effects of estrogen and progesterone, uteri were
collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h after E2 and P4 injection. To determine
whether the expression of TAZ in the mouse uterus is dependent on estrogen
receptors, an estrogen receptor antagonist ICI 182,780 (500 μg/mouse,
Medchemexpress, Princeton, NJ, USA) was pretreated 30 min before estrogen
treatment ( Moon et al., 2019 ). Sesame
oil (100 μL/mouse, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) was used for control
mice. Mice were sacrificed and uteri were collected for histological analyses,
RNA, and protein extraction.
Uteri were collected from mice and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total
RNAs were extracted from uteri using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany)
following the manufacturer’s instruction. After RNA preparation,
potential genomic DNA was digested with DNase I (RNase-free) (NEB, Ipswich, MA,
USA). The total RNA (1 μg) was reverse transcribed to synthesize
complementary DNA (cDNA) using SensiFAST™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Meridian
Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s
instruction. RT-PCR was performed using the Proflex PCR system (Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The PCR temperature cycling conditions were as
follows: initial denaturation for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles: denaturation at
95°C for 30 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 30 s, and extension at
72°C for 20 s. The products were stained with Loading Star (Dyne Bio,
Seoul, Korea) and analyzed by gel electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel using
Chemidoc™ XRS+ system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). QuantStudio™ 1
Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). was used to perform qRT-PCR
analysis.
The iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Life Sciences) was used for
amplification and qRT-PCR conditions were as follows: 40 cycles of denaturation
at 95°C for 15 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 15 s, and extension
at 72°C for 1 min followed by 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1
min, and 95°C for 1 s for melt curve. Relative gene expression was
calculated by the 2-ΔΔCT method giving the ratios between target
genes and a reference gene (Rpl7) ( Livak
& Schmittgen, 2001 ). At least 3 animals per experimental group
were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Primer sequences for RT-PCR and qRT-PCR are described
in Table 1 .
Taz , transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding
motif; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions;
qRT-PCR, quantitative RT-PCR.
Uteri collected from mice were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at
4°C for histology and immunostaining. After sufficient dehydration and
clearing process, the hardened tissues were embedded in paraffin mold at
60°C and stored at –20°C, until the molten paraffin is
sufficiently hardened. Paraffin-embedded uteri were sectioned at a thickness of
5 μm using a microtome (Macroteck, Goyang, Korea) and placed on
Histobond® adhesive Slide Glass (Ducksan General Science, Seoul,
Korea).
The slides were heated at 60°C–65°C for 5 min to allow the
tissue to better adhere to the slides. Then slides were treated two times in
xylene for 7 min to be deparaffinized. In the rehydration process, the slides
were incubated in 100%, 95%, 70%, and 50% ethanol in the order of once for 5
min, and then finally washed with tap water for 5 min. Next, the slides were
boiled in antigen retrieval buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween20, ph 6.0)
using antigen retrieval steamer (IHC world, Suwon, Korea) for 45 min and cooled
at room temperature (RT) for 30 min. Antigen retrieval buffer was washed by
incubating the slides one time in tap water and two times in PBS for 5 min. A
hydrophobic wall was drawn around the tissues with an ImmEdgepen (Vector Labs,
Burlingame, CA, USA) and then incubated with 5% goat serum in 0.3% PBS-T (PBS
containing 0.3% Triton X-100) at RT for 2 h. After blocking, the sections were
treated with anti-TAZ rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:100 dilution, 4883S, Cell
Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) overnight at 4°C. The primary antibody was
washed with 0.1% PBS-T (PBS containing 0.1% tween20) three times for 5 min. Then
sections were incubated with a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa-Fluor
antibody 546 (1:500 dilution, A-11010, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at RT.
The slides were washed with 0.2% PBS-T (PBS containing 0.2% Tween20) three times
for 5 min and mounted coverslip with Mounting Medium with DAPI (Abcam,
Cambridge, UK). Both primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in 0.1% PBS-T
(PBS containing 0.1% tween20). Immunofluorescence analyses were performed using
paraffin-embedded uteri obtained from at least 3 animals per experimental group.
Finally, slides were observed using a confocal microscope.
Uteri from mice were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen
tissues were homogenized with Tissue Lyser LT (Qiagen) in 20 μL/mg RIPA
lysis buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor mix (NaF
50 mM, Na3VO4 5 mM, β -glycerophosphate 50 mM).
Homogenized samples were incubated on ice for 30 min while vortexing every 5
min. After incubation, the samples were centrifuged at 8,000 g for 20 min at
4°C. Following the manufacturer’s instruction, protein
concentration was measured by Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo
Fisher Scientific).
A 10–20 μg of total protein was loaded and separated by SDS-PAGE
(12% gradient gel) and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes
(Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). After transfer, the membranes were blocked with 5%
DifcoTM Skim milk (BD Biosciences, Franklin, NJ, USA) in 0.1% PBS-T (PBS
containing 0.1% Tween20) overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed in
0.1% PBS-T three times for 5 min and subjected to anti-TAZ mouse monoclonal
antibody (1:1,000 dilution, 560235, BD Biosciences) diluted in 4% BSA (Bovogen,
Williams, Australia) for 2 h at RT. After three washes with 0.1% PBS-T for 5
min, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated antibody
(1:10,000, SC-2005, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) diluted in 5% skim milk for 1 h
at RT. Secondary antibodies were washed with 0.1% PBS-T three times and the
blots were developed in Pierce Supersignal Pico ECL substrate (Thermo Fisher
Scientific). The chemiluminescence signal was detected with the ChemiDOCTM
XRS+system (Bio-Rad) and relative band intensity was quantified using Image J.
β-actin antibody (1:10,000 dilution, sc-47778 HRP, Santa Cruz) was used
as a loading control on the same blot to normalize the target protein
expression. Raw western blot analyses were performed using proteins obtained
from at least 3 animals per experimental group ( Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 ).
All experimental data are reported as mean±SEM. Results were analyzed
using one-way ANOVA for statistical evaluation was used for multiple comparisons
after the ANOVA in the Statistics Kingdom (https://www.statskingdom.com). For
all analyses, p -value less than 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Materials
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.