Full text
40,791 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Whole genome assembly and annotation of the acorn weevil, Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) | bioRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-M677548'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search New Results Whole genome assembly and annotation of the acorn weevil, Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) View ORCID Profile Daniel D. Davis , Michael A. Charles , Duane D. McKenna , Paul B. Frandsen doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.18.665623 Daniel D. Davis 1 Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University , Provo, UT 84602, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Daniel D. Davis For correspondence: d.qubed9{at}gmail.com Michael A. Charles 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38152, USA 3 Center for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Duane D. McKenna 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38152, USA 3 Center for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis , Memphis, TN 38152, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Paul B. Frandsen 1 Department of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University , Provo, UT 84602, USA 4 Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University , Provo UT, 84602, USA Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Preview PDF Abstract The acorn weevil Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a seed predator that lays its eggs inside developing acorns and hickory nuts in the western United States. The female weevil uses her elongated rostrum to excavate a hole into the seed, creating a protected site for oviposition. Natural history traits among Curculio species—such as host-specificity and variation in larval diapause—suggest a dynamic evolutionary relationship with their host plants. These traits are best studied through a comparative genomic framework, but such analyses cannot currently be undertaken due to the lack of whole genome assemblies for Curculio species. To address this gap, we generated a whole genome assembly for C. nanulus using PacBio HiFi sequencing. The resulting assembly is ∼1.5 Gbp in length, with high contiguity (contig N50 = 7.7 Mbp) and gene completeness (USCO score: 97.46%). To enable comparative analysis, we also assembled the genome of the pecan weevil, Curculio caryae , using publicly available PacBio HiFi reads. For both species, we annotated repetitive elements and protein-coding genes, and compared these features with those of other weevil genomes. Our results reveal a marked expansion of repetitive elements within Curculio and its close relatives. These genomic resources provide a foundation for investigating seed predation, co-speciation, and host-parasite evolutionary dynamics in Curculio and related taxa, as well as their impacts on forest ecology. Introduction Nut and acorn weevils of the genus Curculio (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) comprise a diverse lineage of seed predators with a distinctive life history. Females use their elongated rostrum to bore into developing hard-shelled seeds—typically those of oak, hazel, hickory, or chestnut—to deposit their eggs within the seed’s interior ( Matsumura et al. 2021 ). This protected, nutrient-rich environment promotes larval development, but the presence of larvae simultaneously compromises the host seed’s viability, often preventing germination ( Higaki 2016 ). In response to such predation pressure, many oak species have evolved masting behavior—synchronized cycles of high and low seed production across populations ( Kelly 1994 ). During mast years, trees produce a surplus of acorns, exceeding the consumption capacity of local seed predators like Curculio . In non-mast years, the reduced seed output curtails weevil reproduction, potentially lowering population densities ( Higaki 2016 ). This cyclical mismatch between resource availability and consumer abundance represents an ecological and evolutionary strategy to limit seed predation. Curculio species, in turn, have evolved counter-adaptations. After larvae exit their host seeds, they enter a period of diapause within the soil, which may last for one or more years. This dormancy allows populations to persist through low-resource periods and potentially synchronize emergence with future mast events. The duration and dynamics of diapause vary widely both among and within Curculio species ( Higaki 2016 ; Espelta et al. 2017 ; Menu and Desouhant 2002 ), suggesting ongoing evolutionary adaptation to host reproductive cycles ( Maeto and Ozaki 2003 ). This co-evolutionary relationship between host and seed predator has likely shaped key traits such as host specificity, life cycle timing, and ecological resilience. Despite their ecological significance, the genetic basis of these traits in Curculio remains poorly understood. The lack of whole genome assemblies for Curculio species has prevented investigations into the molecular underpinnings of diapause regulation, host-plant interactions, and adaptive evolution. To address this, we sequenced and assembled the genome of Curculio nanulus , a western U.S. acorn weevil, using PacBio HiFi technology. To enable comparative analyses, we also assembled the genome of the pecan weevil, Curculio caryae, using publicly available PacBio HiFi reads generated by the United States Department of Agriculture (NCBI SRA: SRR18245025). These assemblies serve as a foundation for future evolutionary and ecological studies in Curculio and other seed-parasitic insects. Methods DNA Extraction and Sequencing We collected a larval specimen of Curculio nanulus from an acorn found underneath an oak tree on the Brigham Young University campus in Provo, UT, USA, in September 2022. We extracted high molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA from the specimen using the Qiagen genomic-tip DNA extraction kit. We sheared purified DNA to 18 kbp with a Diagenode Megaruptor and used a BluePippin system (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA) to collect fractions containing >15 kbp fragments for library preparation. We prepared genomic DNA libraries using the SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0 and associated protocol (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA, USA) and sequenced the library on a single PacBio Revio flow cell at the BYU DNA Sequencing Center. Additionally, we downloaded publicly available PacBio HiFi sequencing reads from the NCBI SRA for the pecan weevil, Curculio caryae (SRR18245025), to support comparative analyses. Assembly and Refinement We assembled the PacBio HiFi reads for each species using hifiasm v0.16.1-r375 ( Cheng et al. 2021 ). We subsequently used purge_dups v1.2.5 to remove duplicated haplotigs ( Guan et al. 2020 ). Purge_dups uses contig similarity and depth of coverage to assess whether a contig represents haplotypic variation rather than a true duplication. Contigs identified as haplotypic duplicates were excluded from the assembly. We identified and removed contaminant contigs using BlobTools v1.1.1 ( Laetsch and Blaxter 2017 ; Laetsch et al. 2017 ) based on closest taxonomic match from a blastn v2.12.0 search against the NCBI nt database, GC proportion, and sequencing coverage. We located, circularized, and annotated the mitochondrial genomes for each species using MitoHiFi (Uliano-Silva et al. 2023) with the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais , (NC_030764.1, 18105 bp, 37 genes) ( Ojo et al. 2016 ) mitochondrial genome as a reference. Circular representations of the contigs were visualized with OrganellarGenomeDraw v1.3.1 ( Greiner, Lehwark, and Bock 2019 ). Identification Following whole genome sequencing, we discovered that the sequenced larval specimen could not be identified to the species-level using a morphological key because no such key exists for the Curculio larvae of the western United States. To aid in our identification, we collected larval specimens from the same locality and reared the larvae to adulthood in a moist coconut coir substrate kept between 65 and 72°F. We identified adult specimens to species using the key from Gibson (1969) and imaged the specimens with an Olympus DP75 camera mounted on a SZX-ILLB100 microscope ( Fig. S1 ). We generated COI-5P barcodes for two identified adult and two larval specimens using the primers LCO1490-L and HCO2198-L ( Nelson, Wallman, and Dowton 2007 ), to aid in confirming the identification of the sequenced specimen. To determine whether the species from which we sequenced the whole genome was the same species as those we reared, we extracted the COI gene from the mitochondrial genome assembly and aligned it with the COI-5P barcodes from the identified specimens using MUSCLE as implemented in MEGA v11.0.13 ( Tamura, Stecher, and Kumar 2021 ). MEGA v11.0.13 was used both to calculate pairwise distances and to construct the maximum likelihood tree using default parameters. Quality Control For each purged and decontaminated genome assembly, we used assembly_stats.py ( Trizna 2020 ) to measure assembly statistics including N50, L50, genome size, number of contigs, and GC content. The average sequencing coverage was calculated for each assembly by dividing the assembly size by the total read lengths of the respective sequencing runs. We used compleasm to estimate gene completeness, by estimating the number of universal single-copy orthologs (USCOs) that each genome shares with the endopterygota_odb10 ortholog set ( Huang and Li 2023 ). Genome Annotation We identified repetitive regions in each genome ab initio with RepeatModeler v2.0.5 and subsequently soft-masked repetitive regions using RepeatMasker v4.1.5 with the default parameters ( Flynn et al. 2020 ). We conducted further analysis of repetitive elements with Earl Grey v4.4.0 ( Baril, Galbraith, and Hayward 2024 ). We completed structural annotations on the soft-masked assemblies using the GALBA v1.0.11 pipeline ( Brůna et al. 2023 ; H. Li 2023 ; Buchfink, Xie, and Huson 2015 ; Stanke et al. 2006 ; Hoff and Stanke 2019 ) with the protein annotation from the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus as a reference ( Sudalaimuthuasari et al. 2024 ). Completeness of each annotation was evaluated with compleasm v0.2.5 ( Huang and Li 2023 ) in protein mode with the endopterygota_odb10 ortholog set. Functional annotations were completed using Blast2GO v1.5.1 ( Conesa and Götz 2008 ). Comparison of repetitive elements We used Earl Grey v4.4.0 ( Baril, Galbraith, and Hayward 2024 ) to annotate the repetitive elements of six additional curculionid genomes and one brentid genome available from GenBank ( Table 1 ). We arranged visualizations of the repetitive elements on a phylogeny constructed using the protein sequences from compleasm annotations. To construct the phylogeny, we aligned the amino acid sequences from each single-copy compleasm locus with MAFFT v7.526. We scored the alignments with Aliscore v02.2 and trimmed them with ALICUT V2.31. We estimated the final phylogenetic tree using two methods: first, by concatenating the aligned sequences and conducting a partitioned model search followed by maximum likelihood construction with IQtree v2.1.3; and second, by constructing a gene tree for each locus with IQtree v2.1.3 followed by species tree estimation with Astral III v5.7.1, using the gene trees as input. The phylogeny was rooted using Cylas formicarius (Brentidae: Cyladinae) and then visualized using FigTree v1.4.4 ( http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ ). We arranged plots showing the change in the repetitive elements over time for each species on the phylogeny. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Genomes used in comparison of repetitive elements. Comparison to available Curculionidae genomes There are 38 genome assemblies representing 24 species belonging to the weevil family Curculionidae in GenBank. We evaluated all 38 genomes for contiguity using assembly_stats.py ( Trizna 2020 ) and completeness using compleasm with the endopterygota_odb10 ortholog set. For downstream analyses, we included the best genome for each species based on the compleasm completeness statistic. The curculionid genomes that we used are available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/?taxon=7042 . Results Species verification The COI sequence from the Curculio nanulus whole genome assembly differed by no more than 0.3% from verified C. nanulus specimens ( Table S1 ). Phylogenetic analysis also placed our sequenced specimen (GenBank: JBEWYK010000000) firmly within the C. nanulus clade ( Fig. S2 ), strongly supporting its species identity. Genome sequencing and assembly Sequencing of C. nanulus generated 81.8 Gbp of data across 5,212,942 PacBio HiFi reads. The initial assembly ( Table 2 ) totaled 1.6 Gbp across 898 contigs, with 51x sequencing coverage, a contig L50 of 57 contigs, and a contig N50 of 7.19 Mbp. Following refinement via purge_dups and BlobTools, the assembly was reduced to 1.5 Gbp across 652 contigs, improving contiguity (N50 = 7.71 Mbp; L50 = 51 contigs) and sequencing coverage (54x). View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 2. Contiguity and completeness statistics for the Curculio nanulus initial, intermediate and final genome assemblies as well as completeness for gene annotations. Sequencing coverage was calculated by dividing the number of base pairs in the raw sequencing reads by the assembly size. Compleasm was run with the endopterygota_odb10 database. After refinement, the C. nanulus assembly contained 98.97% complete universal single copy orthologs (USCOs). Complete and single-copy USCOs increased from 95.90% to 97.46%, while duplicated USCOs decreased from 3.11% to 1.51%, indicating improved assembly quality and reduced haplotypic duplication, with only a minimal (∼0.04%) decrease in total completeness. The mitochondrial genome of C. nanulus was 18,823 bp in size (Fig. 3), encoding 37 genes, the same number present in the reference and C. caryae (20,075 bp). Gene order was generally conserved between C. nanulus and C. caryae , with only minor differences in the positions of tRNAs relative to the reference. The C. nanulus assembly is highly contiguous, and contiguity improved with post-assembly refinement using purge_dups ( Guan et al. 2020 ). Notably, despite their close relationship, the refined C. nanulus assembly was ∼1.51 Gbp—approximately 634 Mbp smaller than the C. caryae assembly (∼2.14 Gbp; Table S2 ). Further results for the C. caryae assembly can be found in the supplemental material. Repetitive elements and genome size The C. nanulus assembly was 79.11% repetitive (1,195.1 Mbp), whereas the C. caryae assembly was 84.16% repetitive (1,805.1 Mbp) ( Fig. 1 ). The sizes of non-repetitive regions were comparable: 315.5 Mbp in C. nanulus and 339.8 Mbp in C. caryae ( Fig. 2B ). Therefore, the 634 Mbp difference in total genome size is attributable primarily to greater expansion in the repetitive content of the C. caryae genome, especially unclassified repeats, DNA transposons, LINEs, and LTR retrotransposons. In both Curculio genomes, the majority of the repetitive elements were unclassified: 34.6% of the C. nanulus genome and 30.7% of the C. caryae genome. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Repetitive elements identified in the genomes assemblies of eight curculionid and one brentid species. The species are ordered according to the cladogram shown. The top plot shows changes in total repetitive elements across time. The second plot compares genome assembly sizes broken into repetitive and non-repetitive DNA. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Repetitive elements of eight curculionid and one brentid species. A) Repetitive elements across time split into classes. B) Comparison of total base pairs of major repeat classes broken down by species. “Other” includes simple repeats, microsatellites, and repetitive RNA. The maximum likelihood tree constructed from concatenated sequences and the ASTRAL species tree had identical topologies. Mapping repeat landscapes onto this phylogeny ( Fig. 1 ) showed a shared recent expansion of repetitive elements in the clade containing C. nanulus , C. caryae , and Kuschelorhynchus macadamiae . This expansion continued within Curculio, though certain repeat types (e.g., unclassified elements, SINEs, and rolling-circle elements) plateaued in K. macadamiae ( Fig. 2A ). In contrast, K. macadamiae exhibited substantial growth of Penelope elements, which now occupy 6-9 times more sequence than in Curculio, yet still comprise just 4.9% of the genome. Among Curculio , C. caryae exhibited greater repetitive element expansion than C. nanulus , explaining its larger genome size. Except for Dendroctonus valens , all analyzed weevil genomes contained at least 57% repetitive content ( Fig. 1 ). Independent repeat expansions were evident in the lineages leading to A. grandis grandis , L. oregonensis , R. ferrugineus, and S. oryzae, distinct from the Curculio/Kuschelorhynchus expansion. In C. nanulus , unclassified elements comprised 43.7% of repetitive elements (34.6% of the genome), while in C. caryae , they accounted for 36.6% of repetitive elements (30.7% of the genome). This pattern aligns with findings from other weevils (e.g., Sylvester et al. 2024 ) and other non-model insects, where an average of 40.5% of repeats remain undescribed outside of Drosophila ( Sproul et al. 2023 ). Gene annotation The C. nanulus genome annotation yielded 19,235 genes using the GALBA pipeline, with a single-copy USCO completeness of 79.10% and duplicated completeness of 16.24%, for a total completeness of 95.34% ( Table 2 ). Similarly, in C. caryae , 20,473 genes were annotated, with 78.39% single-copy completeness, and 15.91% duplicated completeness, for a total completeness of 94.84% ( Table S2 ). For comparison, the reference annotation used in the GALBA pipeline, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (PRJNA950221), included 29,666 genes with 98.26% total USCO completeness (77.64% single-copy and 20.62% duplicated). Blast2GO assigned Gene Ontology (GO) terms to 85% of predicted C. nanulus genes, with 72% receiving functional annotations. For C. caryae, 84% of genes were assigned GO terms, and 69% were functionally annotated. Genome Comparison The C. nanulus assembly ranked among the highest-quality of the 24 publicly available curculionid genomes. It was amongst the four highest contig N50s and nine highest USCO completeness scores ( Table S3 ). Discussion Genomic resources for studying co-evolution Species evolve within ecological networks shaped by complex webs of interspecies interactions. For seed-parasitic insects like Curculio , evolutionary trajectories are intimately tied to their host plants. The newly assembled genome of C. nanulus provides an essential resource for studying co-evolutionary processes at the genomic level. Curculio species can profoundly influence forest biodiversity by reducing the reproductive success of dominant tree species, potentially benefiting understory or competing plants (Q.-Y. Li et al. 2021 ). The ecological consequences of this predation depend on the host species targeted and the broader forest context. High-quality genome assemblies offer a means to investigate the genomic basis of plant-feeding habits in seed predators, and how the actions of such herbivores shape plant communities. This assembly also enables investigation into the genomic basis of diapause, a key adaptation in Curculio . Diapause synchronizes weevil emergence with host seed availability, enabling persistence through masting cycles. Genes regulating circadian rhythms have been implicated in diapause control in arthropods such as Drosophila ( Yamada and Yamamoto 2011 ) and Daphnia ( Schwarzenberger, Chen, and Weiss 2020 ). Circadian clock genes such as these are likely candidates for similar diapause-regulating functions in Curculio . Understanding how these genes evolve in response to host phenology may reveal how quickly Curculio can shift hosts in response to environmental change or host decline. This, in turn, will improve predictions of co-extinction risk and resilience in host-parasite systems. Repetitive Elements Repetitive elements are a dominant feature of eukaryotic genomes and play a central role in genome evolution, regulation, and architecture ( Bourque et al. 2018 ; Gilbert, Peccoud, and Cordaux 2021 ). For instance, repetitive elements have been found to influence 3-dimensional genomic architecture in ground beetles, as well as strongly reflect species boundaries ( Sproul, Barton, and Maddison 2020 ). Our analysis shows that repeat expansion is a defining feature of Curculio genome evolution. The substantial repeat content—particularly unclassified elements—suggests that novel or rapidly evolving repeat families contribute significantly to genome size differences within the genus. Repeat expansion in Curculio and its close relatives appears to have occurred independently of other curculionid lineages, indicating a lineage-specific dynamic. Notably, the large difference in genome size between C. nanulus and C. caryae can be attributed almost entirely to differences in repeat content, especially unclassified elements, LINEs, DNA transposons, and LTR retrotransposons. These genome assemblies and annotations are valuable resources for characterizing novel repeats in non-model insects and understanding how repeat dynamics influence genome evolution, species divergence, and adaptation in the species rich family Curculionidae. Data Availability This Whole Genome Shotgun project for Curculio nanulus has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JBEWYK000000000. The version described in this paper is version JBEWYK010000000. The PacBio HiFi reads are available under BioProject PRJNA1129540. Reviewer Link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA1129540?reviewer=vnloe7khr72o2f09rij27sbm7f Annotations and intermediate assemblies are available at https://byu.box.com/s/yzplmri8g6fwm6v5zhqrvpjd84azz21h (will be uploaded to Figshare if manuscript is accepted) The PacBio HiFi reads generated by the Ag100Pest Initiative for Curculio caryae are available in sequencing run SRR18245025. Conflict of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding This research was funded by a College Undergraduate Research Award from the Brigham Young University College of Life Sciences and by the Charles Redd Center for Western Studies. Supplemental Material Results for C. caryae assembly Publicly available PacBio HiFi reads for Curculio caryae totaled 92.7 Gbp across 10,074,085 reads. The initial assembly ( Table S2 ) consisted of 2.2 Gbp across 1,146 contigs, with 42x coverage, a contig L50 of 131, and a contig N50 of 5.02 Mbp. After refinement, the assembly length was reduced to 2.1 Gbp across 826 contigs, with slightly improved metrics: 43x coverage, contig L50 of 125, and contig N50 of 5.12 Mbp. Completeness metrics for the C. caryae assembly remained high after refinement. While the total USCO completeness score decreased from 98.82% to 98.59%, complete and single-copy USCOs rose from 97.41% to 97.79%, and duplicated USCOs dropped from 1.41% to 0.80%. Fragmented and missing genes remained unchanged, indicating minimal compromise to completeness while removing redundancy and contaminants. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S1. Photographs of Curculio nanulus. A) Lateral view of adult (specimen V0017). B) Lateral view of adult (specimen V0024). Download figure Open in new tab Figure S2. Phylogeny of Curculio nanulus specimens constructed using COI-5P barcodes placing the genome specimen (JBEWYK010000000) within C. nanulus. V0007 and V0008 are larval specimens collected from the same tree concurrent with JBEWYK010000000. V0015 and V0016 were collected from a nearby oak tree, reared to adulthood, and identified to the species level. Download figure Open in new tab Figure S3. Visualisations of the mitochondrial genome assemblies generated with OrganellarGenomeDraw v1.3.1. A) Curculio nanulus ; B) C. caryae ; C) Sitophilus zeamais , the reference mitochondrial genome. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table S1. Pairwise distances between the COI-5P barcodes of identified C. nanulus specimens and the COI gene extracted from the likely C. nanulus genome. View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table S2. Contiguity and completeness statistics for the Curculio caryae initial, intermediate and final genome assemblies as well as completeness for gene annotations. Sequencing coverage was calculated by dividing the number of base pairs in the raw sequencing reads by the assembly size. Compleasm was run with the endopterygota_odb10 database. View this table: View inline View popup Table S3 Assembly statistics for each of the 24 species of weevil (Curculionidae) genomes represented in GenBank, as well as the two Curculio genomes assembled in this study (rows bolded and highlighted). Rows are ordered by Contig N50 measured in kilobase pairs. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Ag100Pest Initiative for generating the sequencing reads for Curculio caryae (SRR18245025), the Brigham Young University DNA Sequencing Center for extracting and sequencing the DNA from the provided Curculio nanulus sample, and Riley Nelson for his photography training. References 1. ↵ Baril , Tobias , James Galbraith , and Alex Hayward . 2024 . “ Earl Grey: A Fully Automated User-Friendly Transposable Element Annotation and Analysis Pipeline .” Molecular Biology and Evolution 41 ( 4 ): msae068 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae068 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 2. ↵ Bourque , Guillaume , Kathleen H. Burns , Mary Gehring , Vera Gorbunova , Andrei Seluanov , Molly Hammell , Michaël Imbeault , et al. 2018 . “ Ten Things You Should Know about Transposable Elements .” Genome Biology 19 ( 1 ): 199 . doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 3. ↵ Brůna , Tomáš , Heng Li , Joseph Guhlin , Daniel Honsel , Steffen Herbold , Mario Stanke , Natalia Nenasheva , Matthis Ebel , Lars Gabriel , and Katharina J. Hoff . 2023 . “ GALBA: Genome Annotation with Miniprot and AUGUSTUS .” bioRxiv . doi: 10.1101/2023.04.10.536199 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 4. ↵ Buchfink , Benjamin , Chao Xie , and Daniel H. Huson . 2015 . “ Fast and Sensitive Protein Alignment Using DIAMOND .” Nature Methods 12 ( 1 ): 59 – 60 . doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 5. ↵ Cheng , Haoyu , Gregory T. Concepcion , Xiaowen Feng , Haowen Zhang , and Heng Li . 2021 . “ Haplotype-Resolved de Novo Assembly Using Phased Assembly Graphs with Hifiasm ”. Nature Methods 18 ( 2 ): 170 – 75 . doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 . OpenUrl CrossRef 6. ↵ Conesa , Ana , and Stefan Götz . 2008 . “ Blast2GO: A Comprehensive Suite for Functional Analysis in Plant Genomics .” International Journal of Plant Genomics 2008 : 619832 . doi: 10.1155/2008/619832 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 7. ↵ Espelta , Josep Maria , Harold Arias-LeClaire , Marcos Fernández-Martínez , Enrique Doblas-Miranda , Alberto Muñoz , and Raúl Bonal . 2017 . “ Beyond Predator Satiation: Masting but Also the Effects of Rainfall Stochasticity on Weevils Drive Acorn Predation .” Ecosphere 8 ( 6 ): e01836 . doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1836 . OpenUrl CrossRef 8. ↵ Flynn , Jullien M. , Robert Hubley , Clément Goubert , Jeb Rosen , Andrew G. Clark , Cédric Feschotte , and Arian F. Smit . 2020 . “ RepeatModeler2 for Automated Genomic Discovery of Transposable Element Families .” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 ( 17 ): 9451 – 57 . doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921046117 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 9. ↵ Gibson , Lester P . 1969 . “ Monograph of The Genus Curculio in the New World (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Part I. United States and Canada .” In Monograph of The Genus Curculio in the New World (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Part I. United States and Canada , 6 : 241 . Entomological Society of America. doi: 10.4182/LDPY3443.6-5.241 . OpenUrl CrossRef 10. ↵ Gilbert , Clément , Jean Peccoud , and Richard Cordaux . 2021 . “ Transposable Elements and the Evolution of Insects .” Annual Review of Entomology 66 (Volume 66, 2021): 355 – 72 . doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-070720-074650 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Greiner , Stephan , Pascal Lehwark , and Ralph Bock . 2019 . “ OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) Version 1.3.1: Expanded Toolkit for the Graphical Visualization of Organellar Genomes .” Nucleic Acids Research 47 ( W1 ): W59 – 64 . doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz238 . OpenUrl CrossRef 12. ↵ Guan , Dengfeng , Shane A. McCarthy , Jonathan Wood , Kerstin Howe , Yadong Wang , and Richard Durbin . 2020 . “Identifying and Removing Haplotypic Duplication in Primary Genome Assemblies.” Bioinformatics (Oxford , England ) 36 ( 9 ): 2896 – 98 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Higaki , Morio . 2016 . “ Prolonged Diapause and Seed Predation by the Acorn Weevil, Curculio robustus , in Relation to Masting of the Deciduous Oak Quercus acutissima .” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 159 ( 3 ): 338 – 46 . doi: 10.1111/eea.12444 . OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Hoff , Katharina J. , and Mario Stanke . 2019 . “ Predicting Genes in Single Genomes with AUGUSTUS .” Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 65 ( 1 ): e57 . doi: 10.1002/cpbi.57 . OpenUrl CrossRef 15. ↵ Huang , Neng , and Heng Li . 2023 . “ Compleasm: A Faster and More Accurate Reimplementation of BUSCO .” Bioinformatics 39 ( 10 ): btad595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad595 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 16. ↵ Kelly , Dave . 1994 . “ The Evolutionary Ecology of Mast Seeding .” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9 ( 12 ): 465 – 70 . doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90310-7 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 17. ↵ Laetsch , Dominik R. , and Mark L. Blaxter . 2017 . “ BlobTools: Interrogation of Genome Assemblies .” F1000Research . doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12232.1 . OpenUrl CrossRef 18. ↵ Laetsch , Dominik R. , Georgios Koutsovoulos , Tim Booth , Jason Stajich , and Sujai Kumar . 2017 . “ DRL/Blobtools: BlobTools v1.0.1 .” Zenodo . doi: 10.5281/zenodo.845347 . OpenUrl CrossRef 19. ↵ Li , Heng . 2023 . “ Protein-to-Genome Alignment with Miniprot .” Bioinformatics 39 ( 1 ): btad014 . doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad014 . OpenUrl CrossRef 20. ↵ Li , Qian-Ya , Xing-Hua Hu , De-Chen Liu , Ao Ouyang , Xin Tong , Yong-Jin Wang , Rong Wang , and Xiao-Yong Chen . 2021 . “ High Diversity and Strong Variation in Host Specificity of Seed Parasitic Acorn Weevils .” Insect Conservation and Diversity 14 ( 3 ): 367 – 76 . doi: 10.1111/icad.12462 . OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Maeto , Kaoru , and Kennichi Ozaki . 2003 . “ Prolonged Diapause of Specialist Seed-Feeders Makes Predator Satiation Unstable in Masting of Quercus crispula .” Oecologia 137 ( 3 ): 392 – 98 . doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1381-6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Matsumura , Yoko , Mohsen Jafarpour , Michał Reut , Bardiya Shams Moattar , Abolfazl Darvizeh , Stanislav N. Gorb , and Hamed Rajabi . 2021 . “ Excavation Mechanics of the Elongated Female Rostrum of the Acorn Weevil Curculio glandium (Coleoptera; Curculionidae) .” Applied Physics A 127 ( 5 ): 348 . doi: 10.1007/s00339-021-04353-8 . OpenUrl CrossRef 23. ↵ Menu , Frédéric , and Emmanuel Desouhant . 2002 . “ Bet-Hedging for Variability in Life Cycle Duration: Bigger and Later-Emerging Chestnut Weevils Have Increased Probability of a Prolonged Diapause .” Oecologia 132 ( 2 ): 167 – 74 . doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0969-6 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 24. ↵ Nelson , L. A. , J. F. Wallman , and M. Dowton . 2007 . “ Using COI Barcodes to Identify Forensically and Medically Important Blowflies .” Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21 ( 1 ): 44 – 52 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00664.x . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 25. ↵ Ojo , James Adebayo , M. Carmen Valero , Weilin Sun , Brad S. Coates , Adebayo Amos Omoloye , and Barry R. Pittendrigh . 2016 . “ Comparison of Full Mitochondrial Genomes for the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae and the Maize Weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) .” Agri Gene 2 ( December ): 29 – 37 . doi: 10.1016/j.aggene.2016.09.007 . OpenUrl CrossRef 26. ↵ Schwarzenberger , Anke , Luxi Chen , and Linda C. Weiss . 2020 . “ The Expression of Circadian Clock Genes in Daphnia magna Diapause .” Scientific Reports 10 ( 1 ): 19928 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77065-3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Sproul , John S , Lindsey M Barton , and David R Maddison . 2020 . “ Repetitive DNA Profiles Reveal Evidence of Rapid Genome Evolution and Reflect Species Boundaries in Ground Beetles .” Systematic Biology 69 ( 6 ): 1137 – 48 . doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa030 . OpenUrl CrossRef 28. ↵ Sproul , John S. , Scott Hotaling , Jacqueline Heckenhauer , Ashlyn Powell , Dez Marshall , Amanda M. Larracuente , Joanna L. Kelley , Steffen U. Pauls , and Paul B. Frandsen . 2023 . “ Analyses of 600+ Insect Genomes Reveal Repetitive Element Dynamics and Highlight Biodiversity-Scale Repeat Annotation Challenges .” Genome Research 33 ( 10 ): 1708 – 17 . doi: 10.1101/gr.277387.122 . OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 29. ↵ Stanke , Mario , Oliver Schöffmann , Burkhard Morgenstern , and Stephan Waack . 2006 . “ Gene Prediction in Eukaryotes with a Generalized Hidden Markov Model That Uses Hints from External Sources .” BMC Bioinformatics 7 ( 1 ): 62 . doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-62 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Sudalaimuthuasari , Naganeeswaran , Biduth Kundu , Khaled M. Hazzouri , and Khaled M. A. Amiri . 2024 . “ Near-Chromosomal-Level Genome of the Red Palm Weevil ( Rhynchophorus ferrugineus ), a Potential Resource for Genome-Based Pest Control .” Scientific Data 11 ( 1 ): 45 . doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02910-3 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 31. ↵ Sylvester , Terrence , Richard Adams , Wayne B Hunter , Xuankun Li , Bert Rivera-Marchand , Rongrong Shen , Na Ra Shin , and Duane D McKenna . 2024 . “ The Genome of the Invasive and Broadly Polyphagous Diaprepes Root Weevil, Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera), Reveals an Arsenal of Putative Polysaccharide-Degrading Enzymes .” Journal of Heredity 115 ( 1 ): 94 – 102 . doi: 10.1093/jhered/esad064 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Tamura , Koichiro , Glen Stecher , and Sudhir Kumar . 2021 . “ MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11 .” Molecular Biology and Evolution 38 ( 7 ): 3022 – 27 . doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 33. ↵ Trizna , Mike . 2020 . “ Assembly_stats 0.1.4 .” Zenodo . doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3968775 . Uliano-Silva, Marcela, João Gabriel R. N. Ferreira, Ksenia Krasheninnikova, Mark Blaxter, OpenUrl CrossRef 34. Nova Mieszkowska , Neil Hall , Peter Holland , et al. 2023 . “ MitoHiFi: A Python Pipeline for Mitochondrial Genome Assembly from PacBio High Fidelity Reads .” BMC Bioinformatics 24 ( 1 ): 288 . doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05385-y . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. ↵ Yamada , Hirokazu , and Masa-Toshi Yamamoto . 2011 . “ Association between Circadian Clock Genes and Diapause Incidence in Drosophila triauraria .” PLOS ONE 6 ( 12 ): e27493 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027493 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted July 22, 2025. Download PDF Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Whole genome assembly and annotation of the acorn weevil, Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Whole genome assembly and annotation of the acorn weevil, Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Daniel D. Davis , Michael A. Charles , Duane D. McKenna , Paul B. Frandsen bioRxiv 2025.07.18.665623; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.18.665623 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Whole genome assembly and annotation of the acorn weevil, Curculio nanulus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Daniel D. Davis , Michael A. Charles , Duane D. McKenna , Paul B. Frandsen bioRxiv 2025.07.18.665623; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.18.665623 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Genomics Subject Areas All Articles Animal Behavior and Cognition (7618) Biochemistry (17635) Bioengineering (13859) Bioinformatics (41846) Biophysics (21401) Cancer Biology (18534) Cell Biology (25423) Clinical Trials (138) Developmental Biology (13352) Ecology (19860) Epidemiology (2067) Evolutionary Biology (24286) Genetics (15582) Genomics (22463) Immunology (17700) Microbiology (40298) Molecular Biology (17141) Neuroscience (88429) Paleontology (666) Pathology (2825) Pharmacology and Toxicology (4813) Physiology (7633) Plant Biology (15107) Scientific Communication and Education (2042) Synthetic Biology (4284) Systems Biology (9808) Zoology (2267)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.