Satisfaction with Life in relation to Sleep Health among a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Adults

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose To investigate associations between life satisfaction and sleep health among adults in the United States. Methods We analyzed cross-sectional, nationally-representative data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Life satisfaction was dichotomized as ‘very satisfied/satisfied’ vs. ‘dissatisfied/very dissatisfied.’ Sleep duration was defined as ‘recommended’ vs. ‘short’ (≥7 vs.<7 hours), frequent insomnia symptoms as difficulty falling/staying asleep: ‘yes’ [most days/every day to either] vs. ‘no’ [never/some days for both]), and restorative sleep as feeling well rested in the past 30 days: ‘yes’ [never/some days] vs. ‘no’ [most days/every day]. Using survey-weighted Poisson regression with robust variance adjusting for confounders, we estimated prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) overall and by age, sex, race, and ethnicity to test for effect modification. Results Among 25,090 adults (mean age of 48.1±0.17 years; 54% women), 96.0% reported life satisfaction with comparable prevalence across age: 18-30 years [96.3%], 31-49 years [96.6%], and ≥50 years [95.3%]; and among men [95.8%] along with women [96.1%]. Prevalence by race and ethnicity ranged from 93.5% [non-Hispanic (NH)-Multiracial/other] to 98.3% [NH-Asian]. Life satisfaction vs. dissatisfaction was associated with recommended sleep duration (aPR:1.14 [95% CI:1.07-1.21]), restorative sleep (aPR:1.61 [95% CI:1.45 −1.79]), and infrequent insomnia symptoms (aPR:1.25 [95% CI:1.16-1.33]) even after further adjustment. Although life satisfaction varied by age, sex, race, and ethnicity, they did not modify associations between life satisfaction and sleep. Conclusions Life satisfaction was associated with recommended sleep duration, infrequent insomnia symptoms, and restorative sleep. Pathways underlying the life satisfaction-sleep relationship should be identified to inform interventions.
Full text 3,418 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To investigate associations between life satisfaction and sleep health among adults in the United States.

Methods

We analyzed cross-sectional, nationally-representative data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Life satisfaction was dichotomized as ‘very satisfied/satisfied’ vs. ‘dissatisfied/very dissatisfied.’ Sleep duration was defined as ‘recommended’ vs. ‘short’ (≥7 vs.<7 hours), frequent insomnia symptoms as difficulty falling/staying asleep: ‘yes’ [most days/every day to either] vs. ‘no’ [never/some days for both]), and restorative sleep as feeling well rested in the past 30 days: ‘yes’ [never/some days] vs. ‘no’ [most days/every day]. Using survey-weighted Poisson regression with robust variance adjusting for confounders, we estimated prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) overall and by age, sex, race, and ethnicity to test for effect modification.

Results

Among 25,090 adults (mean age of 48.1±0.17 years; 54% women), 96.0% reported life satisfaction with comparable prevalence across age: 18-30 years [96.3%], 31-49 years [96.6%], and ≥50 years [95.3%]; and among men [95.8%] along with women [96.1%]. Prevalence by race and ethnicity ranged from 93.5% [non-Hispanic (NH)-Multiracial/other] to 98.3% [NH-Asian]. Life satisfaction vs. dissatisfaction was associated with recommended sleep duration (aPR:1.14 [95% CI:1.07-1.21]), restorative sleep (aPR:1.61 [95% CI:1.45 −1.79]), and infrequent insomnia symptoms (aPR:1.25 [95% CI:1.16-1.33]) even after further adjustment. Although life satisfaction varied by age, sex, race, and ethnicity, they did not modify associations between life satisfaction and sleep.

Conclusions

Life satisfaction was associated with recommended sleep duration, infrequent insomnia symptoms, and restorative sleep. Pathways underlying the life satisfaction-sleep relationship should be identified to inform interventions. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This work was funded by the Intramural Program at the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z1AES103325 (CLJ)). Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Data Availability The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00