Abstract
Skill learning relies on both corrective feedback and predictive feedforward control, yet how these processes evolve and interact during the acquisition of a new motor skill remains unclear. We addressed this question by examining how humans learned a continuous visuomotor mirror reversal tracking task over five days. To dissociate feedback- and feedforward-related contributions, we combined frequency-based analyses with responses to brief cursor perturbations and measurements of the initial direction in point-to-point reaches. Learning exhibited both temporal and frequency-dependent structure. Early improvements were dominated by rapid online feedback corrections expressed primarily at low movement frequencies. In contrast, predictive feedforward control emerged more gradually and became increasingly important at higher frequencies, where delayed feedback is insufficient for accurate control. A recurrent neural network model, in which an adaptive cerebellar-like feedback controller provides a teaching signal to a recurrent cortical predictive controller, reproduced these key behavioral signatures and suggested a mechanistic account in which feedback-driven error signals shape the gradual emergence of predictive control. Together, these findings support a framework in which de novo motor learning arises through distinct but interacting feedback and feedforward processes that co-evolve across practice under the constraints imposed by sensorimotor delays.
Full text
1,653 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Skill learning relies on both corrective feedback and predictive feedforward control, yet how these processes evolve and interact during the acquisition of a new motor skill remains unclear. We addressed this question by examining how humans learned a continuous visuomotor mirror reversal tracking task over five days. To dissociate feedback- and feedforward-related contributions, we combined frequency-based analyses with responses to brief cursor perturbations and measurements of the initial direction in point-to-point reaches. Learning exhibited both temporal and frequency-dependent structure. Early improvements were dominated by rapid online feedback corrections expressed primarily at low movement frequencies. In contrast, predictive feedforward control emerged more gradually and became increasingly important at higher frequencies, where delayed feedback is insufficient for accurate control. A recurrent neural network model, in which an adaptive cerebellar-like feedback controller provides a teaching signal to a recurrent cortical predictive controller, reproduced these key behavioral signatures and suggested a mechanistic account in which feedback-driven error signals shape the gradual emergence of predictive control. Together, these findings support a framework in which de novo motor learning arises through distinct but interacting feedback and feedforward processes that co-evolve across practice under the constraints imposed by sensorimotor delays.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
New analysis and results, New computational model, Supplemental files updated.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.