Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review of Regional Evidence

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major family and global public health concern with consequences for victim safety, mental health, family functioning, and intergenerational well-being. Risk for IPV interacts with structural, relational, and individual factors, yet regional evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesized published evidence on the risk and protective factors associated with IPV in Southeast Asia. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) were searched for studies published between January 2005 and May 2025. Eligible studies included adults aged 18 and above residing in Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, or Vietnam that examined IPV risk or protective factors. Findings were synthesized using textual narrative synthesis. Results Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, representing at least 91,042 participants. Nineteen studies recruited women-only samples. Thailand was the most represented country, whereas Laos and Timor-Leste were the least. Frequently reported risk factors included socioeconomic hardship, childhood and intergenerational exposure to violence, inequitable gender norms and relationship power imbalances, and psychosocial vulnerabilities such as alcohol misuse, depression, and suicidal behavior. Protective factors included higher educational attainment, greater socioeconomic resources, attitudes rejecting violence, and awareness of gender rights. Conclusions Findings highlight IPV in Southeast Asia as a socially patterned form of family violence shaped by economic stress, gendered power relations, prior violence exposure, and psychosocial adversity. Strengthening prevention and response efforts will require culturally responsive family violence services, trauma-informed interventions, and policies addressing structural inequality. Future research should clarify causal pathways and improve representation across regional populations.
Full text 240,232 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review of Regional Evidence | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Systematic Review Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review of Regional Evidence Dominique Calilung, Angelica Alejandro, Rowalt Alibudbud This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Purpose Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major family and global public health concern with consequences for victim safety, mental health, family functioning, and intergenerational well-being. Risk for IPV interacts with structural, relational, and individual factors, yet regional evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesized published evidence on the risk and protective factors associated with IPV in Southeast Asia. Methods Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) were searched for studies published between January 2005 and May 2025. Eligible studies included adults aged 18 and above residing in Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, or Vietnam that examined IPV risk or protective factors. Findings were synthesized using textual narrative synthesis. Results Thirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, representing at least 91,042 participants. Nineteen studies recruited women-only samples. Thailand was the most represented country, whereas Laos and Timor-Leste were the least. Frequently reported risk factors included socioeconomic hardship, childhood and intergenerational exposure to violence, inequitable gender norms and relationship power imbalances, and psychosocial vulnerabilities such as alcohol misuse, depression, and suicidal behavior. Protective factors included higher educational attainment, greater socioeconomic resources, attitudes rejecting violence, and awareness of gender rights. Conclusions Findings highlight IPV in Southeast Asia as a socially patterned form of family violence shaped by economic stress, gendered power relations, prior violence exposure, and psychosocial adversity. Strengthening prevention and response efforts will require culturally responsive family violence services, trauma-informed interventions, and policies addressing structural inequality. Future research should clarify causal pathways and improve representation across regional populations. Psychology Health Policy Psychiatry Gender Studies intimate partner violence southeast asia risk factors protective factors family violence systematic review Figures Figure 1 Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) defines intimate partner violence (IPV) as behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, sexual, or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behaviors. IPV remains a major public mental health and human rights challenge. Globally, around 27% of ever-partnered women aged 15–49 years have experienced physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetime (Sardinha et al., 2022 ). IPV is also highly prevalent across Southeast Asia, including Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. These countries span two WHO regions, with estimated lifetime prevalence of IPV of approximately 33% in the South-East Asia Region and 20% in the Western Pacific Region (The Lancet Regional Health–Southeast Asia, 2022 ; WHO, 2024). Although IPV affects people across socioeconomic groups, its patterns are shaped by local structural, relational, and individual determinants. In Southeast Asia, socio-cultural influences such as entrenched gender norms, expectations around marriage and family roles, and community traditions may normalize coercion and constrain disclosure and help-seeking (Valdez et al., 2022 ; Eisenbruch, 2018 ). These intersect with structural determinants including legislative frameworks, policy implementation, and access to health and social care responses (Jaising et al., 2009). At relationship and individual levels, factors such as controlling behaviors, substance use, and psychosocial stressors may increase risk, while education, economic resources, and social support may be protective (Abramsky et al., 2011). Despite the scale and contextual complexity of IPV, there is no contemporary synthesis consolidating quantitative evidence on associated risk and protective factors across Southeast Asian countries. A region-specific synthesis is needed to inform policy, services, and culturally responsive prevention strategies, particularly considering regional priorities such as the ASEAN Regional Plan of Action on the Elimination of Violence against Women (WHO, 2025). Objectives This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize non-randomised quantitative studies published in English between 2005 and 2025 that examined risk and protective factors associated with IPV among ever-partnered adults aged 18 years and above living in Southeast Asian countries, including both heterosexual and same-sex relationships. A secondary aim was to organise these determinants across socio-cultural, psychological, and structural domains in order to inform culturally sensitive prevention, intervention, and policy. Methodology Eligibility Criteria The review followed PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251078682). Ethical approval and informed consent were not required. The review included quantitative studies of ever-partnered adults aged 18 years and above residing in a Southeast Asian country who had experienced or perpetrated IPV, and which reported associated risk and/or protective factors. Eligible countries were Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. Studies were included if they were primary quantitative research, had an abstract in English, were published between 2005 and 2025, and reported on IPV types such as physical, sexual, psychological, emotional, verbal, financial, or controlling behaviors. Studies were excluded if they were qualitative, mixed-methods without extractable quantitative findings, reviews, opinion papers, conference proceedings, theses, dissertations, protocols, or involved mixed-age samples including participants below 18 years. Studies of second-generation immigrant populations in Western countries and populations with mixed non-Southeast Asian ethnicity were also excluded. Search Strategy Five scientific databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus. These were selected to maximise retrieval across biomedical, public health, psychological, nursing, allied health, and interdisciplinary literature. The most recent search was conducted on 16th June 2025. The search strategy for each source included specific keywords, with filters and limits applied, such as publication date range. The search strategy and keywords utilised for this review were adapted from the MEsH keywords after a facet analysis of the PEO components: (“intimate partner violence” or "partner violence" or “domestic violence” or "domestic abuse" or “gender-based violence” or “relationship violence” or "physical violence" or "physical abuse" or “spousal abuse” or “partner abuse” or "psychological abuse" or "emotional abuse" or "intimidation" or "coercion" or "rape" or “Battery” or "Domestic Battery" or "Couple Violence" or "Coercive" or "Intimate Terrorism") AND (“risk factors” or “protective factors” or “predictors” or “determinants” or “associated factors” or “socioeconomic factors” or "economic factors" or "legal factors” or "psychosocial factors" or "sociocultural factors" or “cultural factors” or "social factors" or “social support” or “gender norms” or “education” or "employment" or "religion" or "drug use" or "substance use" or "legal protection" or "policy" or "legal framework") AND (“Southeast Asia” or “Brunei” or “Cambodia” or “East Timor” or “Timor-Leste” or “Indonesia” or “Laos” or “Malaysia” or “Myanmar” or “Burma” or “Philippines” or “Singapore” or “Thailand” or “Vietnam” or "Bruneian" or "Cambodian" or "Khmer" or "Indonesian" or "Laotian" or "Malaysian" or "Burmese" or "Myanma" or "Filipino" or "Filipina" or "Singaporean" or "Thai" or * Vietnam: or "Vietnamese" or "Timorese" or "Maubere") AND ("marital" or "spouse" or “women” or “female” or “teenage” or "teenager" or “adults” or “young women” or “victims”). Study Selection The search retrieved 1,817 references, which were exported to RefWorks for deduplication; 746 duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening of 1,071 records, 867 were excluded as clearly irrelevant or ineligible. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, then assessed 204 full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Following full-text screening, 32 studies met inclusion criteria summarised in Table 1. Reasons for exclusion included mixed age categories, mixed-methods design without separable quantitative results, and studies in which IPV functioned as a risk factor instead of the independent variable. The PRISMA diagram is available in Figure 1. Data Synthesis and Risk of Bias The results were synthesized using textual narrative synthesis, a method that organizes studies into more homogenous groups and has been shown to be effective in synthesizing evidence (Barnett-Page & Thomas, 2009). This approach involves reporting study characteristics, context, and findings in a standardized format, enabling comparisons of similarities and differences across studies. Subsequently, structured summaries are developed and elaborated (Barnett-Page & Thomas, 2009). The Risk of Bias (RoB; Table 2) in the included studies was assessed and noted as a limitation, primarily based on the study design and issues related to the study setting and generalizability. Results Characteristics of the Study Population 32 studies were included in the review. 30 studies reported a sample size encompassing Southeast Asian participants, yielding a total of at least 91,042. The largest single dataset was the Singapore linked administrative cohort analyzed by Xu et al. (2024) (N = 51,839; 26,724 female; 25,115 male), while several multi-country analyses were drawn from the UN Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence and related datasets (e.g., Postmus, 2023; Laslett et al., 2021; Fulu et al., 2017; Jewkes et al., 2017; 2025). In terms of geographic coverage, Thailand was the most represented country, analyzed in 9 studies, followed by Cambodia, Vietnam, and Indonesia, which were each represented in 5 studies. Malaysia and Philippines were each represented in 3 studies, while Myanmar and Singapore were each represented in 2 studies. Laos and Timor-Leste were each represented by 1 study. One study was conducted in Taiwan but focused on Vietnamese immigrant women (Kanai et al., 2020). Several studies focused on specific populations. Five studies recruited pregnant or perinatal groups (combined N = 3,689), including postpartum women in Thailand (Sonthon et al., 2024), postnatal women in Malaysia (Haron, 2021), women attending antenatal care/general outpatient services in Thailand (Pengpid et al., 2018), and two studies of pregnant Thai women (Thananowan, 2008; Thananowan & Heidrich, 2008). Other key groups included men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand (Seeya, 2024; N = 382), men with HIV in Vietnam (Hershow et al., 2020; N = 313), and migrant/ethnic minority women at the Thailand–Myanmar border (Koning, 2024; N = 534). Two studies analyzed administrative populations, namely a Singapore study linking administrative data including Personal Protection Order applicants (Xu et al., 2024), and a Malaysia study referring to a number of shelter or refuge case files (Awang & Hariharan, 2011). Associated Risk Factors Across the included studies, the most frequently reported associated risk factors clustered into three categories: (1) socioeconomic and material conditions, (2) exposure to intergenerational and childhood forms of violence, and (3) gender norms and attitudes supportive of violence and unequal relational power. Socioeconomic and material correlates were the most common domain, reported in 16 studies. These included poverty, low levels of education, lack of or unstable employment, food insecurity or scarcity, housing disadvantage, and financial dynamics such as women earning or contributing more within households (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang & Le, 2025; Koning, 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Tarigan & Himawan, 2023; Hanafi et al., 2022; O’Hara & Tan, 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016; Awang & Hariharan, 2011; Xu et al., 2011; Ansara & Hindin, 2009; Thananowan & Heidrich, 2008). Childhood trauma and maltreatment, including authoritarian and neglectful parenting or witnessing parental violence, were the second most common domain, reported in 15 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Koning, 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Haron et al., 2021; Hershow et al., 2020; Ayuwat & Sananikone, 2018; Fulu et al., 2017; Jewkes et al., 2017; Laeheem & Boonprakarn, 2017; Yount et al., 2016; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara & Hindin, 2009; Fehringer & Hindin, 2009; Kyu & Kanai, 2005). Gender norms and attitudes supportive of IPV, including patriarchal beliefs, acceptance of IPV, inequitable gender attitudes, dominance, and power imbalance, were reported in 13 studies (e.g., Dang & Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Hanafi et al., 2022; Laslett et al., 2021; Haron et al., 2021; Lee, 2020; Laeheem & Boonprakarn, 2017; Tsai, 2017; Xu et al., 2011; Ansara & Hindin, 2009; Kyu & Kanai, 2005). A second tier of commonly noted correlates included substance use, especially alcohol. Substance use (alcohol and/or drugs/smoking) appeared in 11 studies, with alcohol cited in 10 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Sonthon, 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Laslett et al., 2021; Hershow et al., 2020; Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara & Hindin, 2009; Kyu & Kanai, 2005). Demographic and life-course factors such as younger age, parity or multiparity, unmarried status, unwanted pregnancy, and children or adolescents in the household were reported in 8 studies (Dang & Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; O’Hara & Tan, 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Pengpid et al., 2018; Awang & Hariharan, 2011; Thananowan, 2008; Thananowan & Heidrich, 2008). Psychosocial and mental health-related factors such as depression, other mental illness, poor emotional health, suicidal behavior, male attachment insecurity, low self-esteem, and low social support were reported in 7 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Tarigan & Himawan, 2023; Ayuwat & Sananikone, 2018; Pengpid et al., 2018; Thananowan, 2008). Relationship-level dynamics in the context of control, including coercion and controlling behaviors related to household management and financial decision-making, appeared in 6 studies (e.g., Postmus et al., 2023; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jewkes et al., 2017; Tsai, 2017; Yount et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2011). A smaller number of studies explicitly listed other grouped factors, such as: (1) geographic variation across urban and rural regions or provinces (e.g., Dang & Le, 2025; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara & Hindin, 2009), (2) vulnerabilities related to migration, sociopolitical conflict, and legal status discrimination (Dang & Le, 2025; Haron et al., 2021; Tarigan & Himawan, 2023), and (3) infidelity and overt relationship conflict (Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016). Factors identified by only a single study were health system inequality, reflected in inadequate antenatal care (Haron et al., 2021); exposure to a natural disaster, specifically an earthquake (Ayyagari et al., 2024); homophobic discrimination (Seeya et al., 2024); and risk histories involving non-partner sexual violence during adolescence and forced or coerced first sexual intercourse (Jansen et al., 2016). Associated Protective Factors Protective factors were reported less consistently than risk factors across the 32 included studies, with 17 studies identifying none. Among the remaining studies, higher educational attainment was the most frequently reported protective factor, identified in eight studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang & Le, 2025; Xu et al., 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Haron et al., 2021; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016; Luke et al., 2007). Employment, particularly skilled or white-collar work, was identified in five studies (Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang & Le, 2025; Haron et al., 2021; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Ansara & Hindin, 2009), while age-related demographic factors (e.g., being older, having an older partner, or having a wider age difference between partners) were also reported in five studies as being associated with a lower likelihood of IPV (Seeya et al., 2024; Hanafi et al., 2022; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara & Hindin, 2009; Luke et al., 2007). Higher income, wealth, assets, or savings were identified in four studies (Dang & Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016), as were attitudes rejecting IPV, disapproval of violence, and more positive gender attitudes or rights awareness (Ayyagari et al., 2024; Hanafi et al., 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Luke et al., 2007). Social support and autonomy-related factors, including family support, women’s social autonomy, self-efficacy, social organization, and local language ability, were reported in three studies (Dang & Le, 2025; Koning, 2024; Haron et al., 2021). Alcohol abstinence was identified in two studies (Sonthon et al., 2024; Hershow et al., 2020). Other protective factors were reported only once and appeared to be more context-specific, including positive emotional health (Ayuwat & Sananikone, 2018), regular church attendance (Ansara & Hindin, 2009), exposure to television dramas as an informational source associated with attitudes rejecting IPV (Hanafi et al., 2022), joint decision-making (Fehringer & Hindin, 2009), higher educational attainment associated with reduced likelihood of a Personal Protection Order (PPO) application (Xu et al., 2024), and stable resettlement in the context of sociopolitical displacement, such as having permanent legal status or living in a camp residence (Koning, 2024). Another study also reported factors that were negatively associated with IPV victimization among men who have sex with men, which included older age, higher educational attainment, and higher income (Seeya et al., 2024). Although not identified as a directly measured protective factor for IPV, Ayyagari et al. (2024) suggested that post-earthquake reconstruction programs may have had a context-specific protective influence on attitudes toward domestic violence. Specifically, the authors proposed that reconstruction and recovery efforts may have improved household economic conditions, restored housing and infrastructure, and supported greater female participation in community decision-making, which may have mitigated the adverse effects of earthquake exposure on acceptance of domestic violence. These protective factors were heterogeneous and comparatively underexplored, although education emerged as the most consistently reported associated protective domain. Discussion Principal Findings This review identified a relatively small and uneven evidence base across a 20-year period. A number of these studies used cross-sectional data, as well as secondary data from previous surveys focusing on other primary variables aside from IPV. This reflects the global reality cited by the WHO (2024): countries have differing levels of reporting, with some nations reporting IPV statistics once every decade. High-income countries largely provide more data to the WHO. In our review, geographic representation was notably skewed. Thailand was represented by nine studies, whereas Timor-Leste, which has some of the highest rates of IPV globally, was represented by only one study. Despite rapid globalization and advancements in Southeast Asia over the last 20 years, our review suggests that the prevalence of IPV remains largely stagnant. This mirrors the WHO 2023 Violence Against Women prevalence estimates, which found that the global lifetime decrease in IPV is only 0.2% per annum, representing less than 5% improvement over the last 20 years. Our review sought to synthesize regional evidence alongside global data to identify the drivers of and barriers to progress in Southeast Asia. The inclusion of nearly 100,000 participants (N = 91,042) across 32 studies demonstrated relatively balanced sampling between women and men. However, most studies focused on women. Marginalized sub-cohorts were also represented in some studies, including perinatal women, migrants, ethnic minorities, men who have sex with men, and men living with HIV, reflecting increasingly positive attitudes toward these populations in the region, such as those seen in recent policies in Thailand regarding state recognition of LGBTQ+ rights (Alibudbud, 2025 a; Alibudbud, 2025 b). Structural and Sociocultural Implications Rapid urbanization and educational gains in Southeast Asia may act as external indicators of progress, especially in capital cities. However, more data are needed to compare urban and rural realities. Furthermore, the domestic sphere, where traditional risk factors persist, appears to have remained resistant to changes in broader societal structures. Therefore, it is imperative to determine the prevalence and associated factors of IPV to better reflect differing societal realities across Southeast Asia, including urban and rural areas, and to identify services that address diverse community needs. One study identified that acute traumatic events, such as natural disasters, did not shift beliefs regarding IPV in the long term. Thus, while effective reconstruction programs or risk management policies could potentially mitigate secondary trauma in the short term, the findings of this review suggest that they did little to shift the long-standing status quo of patriarchal norms toward women. This resistance to long-term attitudinal change was further underscored by several studies, which observed that women earning more than their partner or managing finances independently can paradoxically experience an increased risk of IPV. Additionally, while previous studies show that the independent socioeconomic capacity of women may offer protection against IPV (Hoang Dang & Le, 2024; Mabena et al., 2025 ), women in Southeast Asia may be subject to prevailing patriarchal and religious norms regarding women’s subservience, potentially overriding the benefits of such socioeconomic independence (Abesamis & Alibudbud, 2024 ; Alibudbud, 2023 ). This review supports current advocacy by the WHO and other NGOs to prioritize the education of girls and women to promote personal agency, highlighting that higher levels of education may reduce IPV prevalence among men and women. Trauma, Mental Health, and Substance Use As presented, authoritarian parenting styles and exposure to IPV or other violence in childhood were associated with an increased risk of perpetuating IPV, either as a victim or perpetrator. Likewise, consistent with studies elsewhere, the reviewed studies show that adverse childhood events have lifelong effects on mental health and risk of substance misuse. The findings also show that alcohol use and depressive symptoms can increase the risk of IPV. In particular, even in the absence of other mental health difficulties, frequent alcohol consumption was strongly associated with increased IPV risk. Thus, the findings suggest that a cycle in which trauma leads to substance misuse, and substance use facilitates further trauma, appears pervasive across both heterosexual and non-heterosexual relationships. Nonetheless, prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the nature and characteristics of such IPV cycles and their potential effects on the prevalence of mental disorders, such as PTSD and depression (Nathanson et al., 2012 ). Limitations The dominance of cross-sectional designs has limited understanding of the trajectory of abuse over the life course. This review was unable to map how pervasive risk factors and shifting socioeconomic stressors shape the typology of IPV over time. Additionally, many studies failed to specify or distinguish between rural and urban classifications, which may mask geographic disparities. Therefore, it is essential to further explore IPV risk factors and typologies across varied settings through longitudinal studies. While higher quality surveys categorizing types of IPV (physical, sexual, emotional, economic) have emerged in the last two decades, a significant disclosure gap remains. In this review, several participants were included in samples because they were accessing services such as perinatal services, sexual health clinics, and other hospital services. This leaves those outside the healthcare system unaccounted for. Therefore, community-based surveys are recommended to fully capture people experiencing IPV outside healthcare systems. Likewise, according to the WHO, 55%–95% of women who survive violence do not disclose or seek any type of services. IPV experienced by men, individuals in non-heterosexual relationships, and individuals experiencing IPV in humanitarian settings also remain underrepresented. Moreover, sub-cohorts such as migrants, refugees, and members of the LGBTQ+ community face structural bias, stigma, and state-level discrimination that render them socially and legally invisible. Finally, there is a significant gap in understanding IPV across changing life stages, as most studies excluded peri- and postmenopausal women. Hence, anonymized and confidential face-to-face surveys are needed to address the underrepresentation of those experiencing IPV, especially from marginalized communities, and to help alleviate fears of retaliation, shame, and lack of awareness. Implications for Practice, Policy, and Research Global IPV data and research remain highly heterogeneous, with low-income countries frequently underrepresented despite having some of the highest prevalence of IPV. To address this, healthcare systems should implement standardized, acts-based screening within high-contact settings such as antenatal, mental health, and sexual health services. Clinical guidelines must prioritize screening for alcohol misuse and depression, as these function as synergistic risk multipliers for violence. Furthermore, integrating pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy with material assistance can effectively address the interconnected economic and psychological consequences of abuse. Government policies should prioritize IPV prevention by de-normalizing gender inequality through both formal education and strategic media-based advocacy. National frameworks must also ensure equal legal protection and explicit safeguards for women, LGBTQ+, and other minority populations within an inclusive legal structure. Finally, future research must use purposeful, diverse sampling to include marginalized cohorts such as LGBTQ+ individuals, ethnic minorities, men, and older women, ensuring that interventions reflect the region’s full demographic reality. Research on perpetrators of IPV can also provide further insight into the dynamics that lead to and perpetuate IPV. Research should also shift toward longitudinal designs to further investigate the complex biopsychosocial pathways linking adverse childhood experiences to adult IPV. Conclusion The review highlights several potential risk and protective factors associated with IPV that may help inform programs and policy development in Southeast Asia. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening protections for marginalized groups in the region, particularly women and LGBTQ+ individuals, who may face a heightened risk of experiencing IPV. As a starting point, educational initiatives and policy measures should aim to promote healthy family environments and advance gender equality. Such efforts can be reinforced through policies that ensure equal protection and legal safeguards for women and LGBTQ+ populations. In addition, psychosocial support programs could play an important role by providing material assistance and mental health services to survivors, helping to reduce the economic and psychological consequences of IPV. Nonetheless, the limitations of the studies included in this review highlight the need for further research. Future studies should seek to clarify the causal relationships between the identified factors and improve the representation of diverse populations across the region. Strengthening the evidence base in this way may help guide more effective interventions and contribute to a more gender-equitable Southeast Asia, where IPV is not only addressed but meaningfully reduced. References Abesamis LEA, Alibudbud R (2024) From the bathroom to a national discussion of LGBTQ+ rights: A case of discrimination in the Philippines. J Lesbian Stud 28(1):84–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2023.2251775 ‌Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L (2011) What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health 11:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-109 Alibudbud R (2025) LGBTQ+ rights and health: A shifting landscape. Lancet 405(10483):974–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00267-3 Alibudbud R (2025) Moving forward with pride: LGBTQ+ health and contemporary rights movements in Asia. Am J Health Promotion 39(2):197–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241279783 Alibudbud RA (2023) Gender and sexuality in mental health: Perspectives on lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender (LGBT) rights and mental health in the ASEAN region. Front Sociol 8:1174488. ttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174488 Ansara DL, Hindin MJ (2009) Perpetration of intimate partner aggression by men and women in the Philippines: Prevalence and associated factors. J interpers Violence 24(9):1579–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508323660 Awang H, Hariharan S (2011) Determinants of domestic violence: Evidence from Malaysia. J Family Violence 26(6):459–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9380-6 Ayuwat D, Sananikone S (2018) Influential factors among male population, which associated with the economic violence against women in Laos. Gend Issues 35(4):330–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-018-9213-5 Ayyagari P, La Mattina G, Lv L (2024) Natural disasters and acceptance of domestic violence. Fem Econ 30(4):180–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413392 Barnett-Page E, Thomas J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 9:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59 Chuemchit M, Chernkwanma S, Rugkua R, Daengthern L, Abdullakasim P, Wieringa SE (2018) Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. J Family Violence 33(5):315–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9960-9 Dang TNH, Le DD (2025) Socioeconomic inequalities in intimate partner violence: Evidence from Vietnam. J interpers Violence 40(3–4):1037–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241245375 Eisenbruch M (2018) Violence Against Women in Cambodia: Towards a Culturally Responsive Theory of Change. Cult Med Psychiatry 42(2):350–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-017-9564-5 Fehringer JA, Hindin MJ (2009) Like parent, like child: Intergenerational transmission of partner violence in Cebu, the Philippines. J Adolesc Health 44(4):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.012 Fulu E, Miedema S, Roselli T, McCook S, Chan KL, Haardörfer R, Jewkes R, Friel S, Garcia-Moreno C (2017) Pathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: Findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. Lancet Global Health 5(5):e512–e522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30103-1 Hanafi WSWM, Ismail TAT, Ghazali AK, Sulaiman Z, Daud A (2022) Factors associated with attitudes towards rejecting intimate partner violence among young adults in Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(9):5718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095718 Haron K, Shaffie Z, Ghazi HF, Isa ZM (2021) Women's Attitude and Its Influence on Violence During Pregnancy in Northern State of Peninsular Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Study. J interpers Violence 36(5–6):NP2576–NP2600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759059 Hershow RB, Reyes HLM, Ha TV, Chander G, Mai NVT, Sripaipan T, Frangakis C, Dowdy DW, Latkin C, Hutton HE, Pettifor A, Maman S, Go VF (2020) Longitudinal analysis of alcohol use and intimate partner violence perpetration among men with HIV in northern Vietnam. Drug Alcohol Depend 213:108098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108098 Jaising I, Basu A, Dutta B (2009, June) Domestic violence legislation and its implementation: An analysis for ASEAN countries based on international standards and good practices. UN Development Fund for Women. https://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/unifem/2009/en/72716 Jansen HAFM, Nguyen TVN, Hoang TA (2016) Exploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: Results from a cross-sectional national survey. Int J Public Health 61(8):923–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0879-8 Jewkes R, Fulu E, Naved RT, Chirwa E, Dunkle K, Haardörfer R, Garcia-Moreno C (2017) Women’s and men’s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women’s risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific. PLoS Med 14(9):e1002381. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381 Jewkes R, Naved RT, Abrahams N, Shai N, Ramsoomar L, Dekel B, Gibbs A, Nöthling J, Willan S, Chirwa E (2025) Impact of witnessing abuse of their mother and childhood trauma on men’s perpetration of intimate partner violence in the cross-sectional UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. SSM - Mental Health 7:100391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100391 Koning SM (2024) Protracted chains of violence: How chronic conflict and displacement structure intimate partner violence at the Thailand-Myanmar border. Popul Res Policy Rev 43 Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09855-2 Kyu N, Kanai A (2005) Prevalence, antecedent causes and consequences of domestic violence in Myanmar. Asian J Soc Psychol 8(3):244–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00170.x Laeheem K, Boonprakarn K (2017) Factors predicting domestic violence among Thai Muslim married couples in Pattani province. Kasetsart J Social Sci 38(3):352–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.005 Laslett A-M, Graham K, Wilson IM, Wilsnack SC (2021) Does drinking modify the relationship between men’s gender-inequitable attitudes and their perpetration of intimate partner violence? A meta-analysis of surveys of men from seven countries in the Asia Pacific region. Addiction 116(7):1887–1899. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15485 Lee F-H (2020) Factors Influencing Marital Violence Among Vietnamese Women in Taiwan. J transcultural nursing: official J Transcultural Nurs Soc 31(2):128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619849474 Luke N, Schuler SR, Bui TTM, Pham VT, Tran HM (2007) Exploring couple attributes and attitudes and marital violence in Vietnam. Violence Against Women 13(1):5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206295112 Mabena K, Tsabedze W, Mazibuko X (2025) Socio-economic determinants of intimate-partner physical violence among women in South Africa. Front Psychol 16:1499263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499263 Nathanson AM, Shorey RC, Tirone V, Rhatigan DL (2012) The prevalence of mental health disorders in a community sample of female victims of intimate partner violence. Partn Abuse 3(1):59–75. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.1.59 O’Hara CA, Tan RKJ (2022) Intimate partner violence before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a cross-sectional study in Singapore. Sex Health 19(3):192–201. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH21229 Pengpid S, Peltzer K, Laosee O, Suthisukon K (2018) Intimate partner sexual violence and risk for femicide, suicidality and substance use among women in antenatal care and general out-patients in Thailand. BMC Women’s Health 18(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0526-z Postmus JL, Lin H-F, Nikolova K, Johnson L (2023) Perpetrating economic abuse across the globe: Results from the U.N. Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. J Aggress Maltreatment Trauma 32(12):1686–1704. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2159906 Sardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, Stöckl H, Meyer SR, García-Moreno C (2022) Global, regional, and National Prevalence Estimates of Physical or sexual, or both, Intimate Partner Violence against Women in 2018. Lancet 399(10327):803–813 Seeya A, Auemaneekul N, Sujirarat D, Powwattana A, Satitvipawee P, Keawpan W (2024) A structural equation model of factors influencing intimate partner violence victimization and health outcomes among men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. J Public Health Dev 22(2):273–285. https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2024/220222 Sonthon P, Janma N, Wichaidit W (2024) Variations in the association between polygyny and experience of intimate partner violence by husband’s alcohol consumption: A cross-sectional study among postpartum women in Thailand. BMC Public Health 24(1):2735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20281-7 Tarigan GNE, Himawan KK (2023) When love hurts: The role of adult romantic attachment as a predictor of domestic violence among married women in Jakarta. Int J Interdisciplinary Social Community Stud 18(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v18i02/93-115 Thananowan N (2008) Intimate partner violence (IPV), risk factors, and health outcomes in adult pregnant women. Thai J Nurs Res 12(4):310–323. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5868/5072/0 Thananowan N, Heidrich SM (2008) Intimate partner violence among pregnant Thai women. Violence Against Women 14(5):509–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315525 Tsai LC (2017) Household financial management and women’s experiences of intimate partner violence in the Philippines: A study using propensity score methods. Violence Against Women 23(3):330–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216642869 The Lancet Regional Health–Southeast Asia (2022) Stronger laws to stop violence against women in southeast Asia. Lancet Reg Health–Southeast Asia 6., Article 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100104 Valdez IKM, Arevalo MVPN, Robredo JPG, Gacad SLS, Villaceran MAJ, Libang GR, Paz D, Rubin EP, K. S. T. A., Eala MAB (2022) Violence against women in the Philippines: barriers to seeking support. Lancet Reg health Western Pac 23:100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100471 World Health Organization (2024), March 25 Violence against Women . World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women World Health Organization (2025) Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2023: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and non-partner sexual violence against women . https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/383559 Xu X, Kerley KR, Sirisunyaluck B (2011) Understanding gender and domestic violence from a sample of married women in urban Thailand. J Fam Issues 32(6):791–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10386306 Xu X, Ong HL, Lai P, Ting MH, Wong WM, Chu CM (2024) Understanding the risk factors of spousal violence victimization using machine learning and network approaches. J Family Violence 39:1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00573-z Yount KM, Krause KH, VanderEnde KE, Minh TH, Schuler SR (2016) Economic coercion and partner violence against wives in Vietnam: A unified framework? J interpers Violence 31(20):3307–3331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584350 Tables Table 1 Summary of the Reviewed Studies’ Research Design, Population, Sample, IPV Prevlance, and Findings Year Country Authors Research Design, Population, and Sample IPV Prevalence Associated Risk Factors Associated Protective Factors 2025 Multi-country (Cambodia) Jewkes, R. et al. Cross sectional. N=1,473 Cambodian men aged 18-49 witnessing IPV. Pooled across 6 countries No reported prevalence for Cambodia. Food Insecurity, alcohol use. childhood trauma (neglect, sexual/ emotional/ witnessing abuse), depression. Attended high school or higher education. Employed. 2025 Vietnam Dang, T.N.H., & Le, D.D. Cross sectional. Multi-stage sampling strategy. 15% sample list from 2009 Population and Housing Census, N = 4019 Vietnamese women aged 18-60 who have ever had a partner or husband. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Cited national Vietnamese estimates of 58% lifetime IPV in 2010 and 63% in 2019. Kinh ethnicity (OR 1.629, 95% CI 1.318–2.014); women earning money (OR1.657, 95% CI 1.243–2.210); residence in Red River Delta (OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.033–1.670), Central Highlands (OR 2.158, 95% CI 1.668–2.792), and Southeast (OR 1.858, 95% CI 1.423–2.428). Women’s higher education (OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.945–0.989)]; family support (OR 0.704, 95% CI 0.555–0.892); residence in North Central and Central Coastal (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.610–0.946); husband’s extra schooling (OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.945-0.989); and skilled occupation (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.653–0.895). 2024 Bangkok Seeya, A. et al. Cross sectional. N=382 MSM aged 18 or older and members of Rainbow Sky Association of Thailand (RSAT) in Bangkok. Any IPV in last 12 months 82.9% (317/382); emotional 77.5%; physical 58.1%; sexual 57.3%. Younger age (β -0.073), alcohol use (β 0.0141), positive attitude toward IPV (β 0.243), parenting: authoritarian (β 0.013), neglectful (β 0.039); living in risky community (DE β 0.171; TE β 0.159), homophobic discrimination (β 0.195), open sexual orientation (β -0.103). Higher education (β -0.114) and income (β -0.039); parenting: authoritative (β -0.162), permissive (β -0.040). 2024 Multi-country (Thailand, Myanmar) Koning, S.M. Cross sectional. Migrant women at Myanmar-Thailand border aged 18 or older. 534 women: Shan (66%), Thai (8%), other highland minority groups. 9% experienced ever IPV and 8% current IPV. Over 6% of women feared their partner. By generation: second-generation women had the highest IPV prevalence — 19% ever and 17% current. 1st generation vs multigeneration women: indirect effect through conflict and early-life adversity OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.10; through border violence or adversity OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11–2.41; displacement-duration risk factors OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.47-4.02. Second-generation vs multigeneration women had higher total IPV odds after displacement-duration factors were added (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.67–22.16), and after adjusting for protective resettlement factors (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.32–31.73). Advanced Thai language ability and permanent resident legal status. Higher perceived community safety 43.6% lower IPV odds (p<0.05). Higher self-efficacy 64.5% lower IPV odds (p<0.001). 2024 Singapore Xu, X. et al. Cross sectional. N=51,839 (married) from the 1980 and 1985 birth cohorts; records of Personal Protection Order (PPO) indicating allegation of victimization of spousal violence. This paper did not report IPV prevalence directly. It used a PPO application as a proxy outcome. PPO applicants were 830/51,839 (1.6%). Lower educational attainment, early marriage, early parenthood, staying in a public rental flat, childhood maltreatment, and prior PPO respondent history had direct associations with PPO application, while criminal history and mental illness were indirectly linked through other adversities. 2024 Thailand Sonthon, P. et al. Cross sectional. 1,207 Thai women > 18 yrs with normal delivery at public hospital in 2023. IPV during pregnancy was <5% overall in the sample. Among husbands who binge drank, prevalence was 20.8% in monogynous vs 46.2% in polygynous relationships. Polygyny vs monogyny (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 0.94–5.26; adjusted association not statistically significant overall). Among binge-drinking husbands, polygyny had much higher IPV odds (aOR 9.54, 95% CI 1.10–82.54). Interaction is not significant (Breslow-Day p=0.259). 2024 Indonesia Ayyagari, P. et al. Longitudinal study. No reported number of respondents. Married men and women who experienced 2006 earthquake in Yogyakarta and Central Java. Not explicitly reported for the sample. The outcome for this paper is attitudes toward wife beating, not directly IPV occurrence. Main finding is that the earthquake had no statistically significant effect on acceptance of domestic violence. 2023 Multi-country (Cambodia, Indonesia) Postmus, J. L. et al. Cross-sectional study. No specific mention how many participants were from Southeast Asian countries. 21.9% lifetime economic abuse perpetration; 17.9% physical IPV; 35.3% psychological, 12.6% sexual and 6.6% economic. Food scarcity (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19–1.64); age 25-34 vs 35-49 (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.41); married (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.34–2.18); problematic alcohol use (OR 3.85, 95% CI 3.27–4.53); depressive symptoms (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04–1.06); primary education or less vs some high school (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02–1.51); men deciding on large investments (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17–1.75); gender inequity beliefs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13–1.20). 2023 Indonesia Tarigan, G.N.E., & Himawan, K.K. Cross-sectional study. Advertised survey on social media, snowball and purposive sampling. 300 married women. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Attachment anxiety β = .420, p<.001; avoidance β = .256, p<.001. Younger age β = -.192, p<.05, lower education β = -.101, p<.05, longer marriage duration β = .174, p<.05, and lower income contribution β = -.142, p<.05. One-way ANOVA suggested higher domestic violence scores among housewives (M 40.26, SD 16.35, p < .001) and Hindu participants (M 52.87, SD 10.73, p < .001). Higher age, higher education, and greater income contribution to household. 2022 Singapore O’Hara, C.A., & Tan, R.K.J. Cross-sectional. Self-report. Recruitment on social media. N=259, 59.2% heterosexual, 86.6% Chinese, 71.5% religious, 73.4% living in public housing, 57.6% with degree-and above educational attainment, 66.8% in full-time work, 58.3% not WFH. Before lockdown: restriction of contact 17.2%, verbal abuse 25.0%, finances 16.7%, physical violence 17.6%, pressured sex 17.5%, forced sex 18.5%. During lockdown: 17.4%, 19.8%, 14.7%, 13.5%, 14.7%, 15.2%, respectively. Younger age and more youths aged <18 in the household were consistently associated with higher prevalence of multiple IPV outcomes (aPRs reported); Chinese ethnicity, higher income, and non-heterosexuality were associated with some outcomes during lockdown, with caution for small subgroup sizes. 2022 Malaysia Hanafi, W. S. W. M. et al. Cross-sectional. Four districts in Kelantan. MYPAIPVQ questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses. N=405 (173 males, 232 females.) This paper measures attitudes toward rejecting IPV, not IPV occurrence. 50.4% had attitudes toward rejecting IPV. Risk toward not rejecting IPV attitudes: self-employment (AdjOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09–0.40). Protective toward rejecting IPV attitudes: older age (AdjOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03–1.19); female sex (AdjOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.54–4.03); drama as IPV information source (AdjOR 3.66, 95% CI 2.26–5.91). 2021 Multi-country (Cambodia, Indonesia, Timor- Leste) Laslett, A.-M. et al. Secondary analysis of cross- sectional datasets: logistic regression and random effect meta-analysis accounting for country and site clustering. SEA subsamples: Cambodia: 1,474, Indonesia: 2,447, Timor Leste: 768. Past-year physical or sexual IPV perpetration 13% (95% CI 9–16%). Less equitable GEM score pooled OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.04–1.09); regular heavy episodic drinking pooled OR 3.42 (95% CI 2.43–4.81); significant interaction between inequitable attitudes and RHED (p=0.001). 2021 Malaysia Haron, K. Cross-sectional. Hospital-based. Validated Malay version of WHO Women’s Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire. 1,200 postnatal women who have been admitted to hospital. Any violence during pregnancy 35.9% (95% CI 0.33–0.39); emotional 29.8% (95% CI 0.27–0.32); physical 12.9% (95% CI 0.11–0.15); sexual 9.8% (95% CI 0.08–0.12). Drug use towards emotional violence (AOR 6.96, 95% CI 1.26–38.43) and physical violence (AOR 43.66, 95% CI 7.17–265.71); childhood violence exposure towards emotional violence (AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05–2.19); multiparity towards sexual violence (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.59); inadequate antenatal care towards physical violence (AOR 2.61, 95% CI 1.85–3.68); and violence-supporting attitudes towards IPV outcomes. Agreeing that a woman can choose her own friends was associated with lower odds of emotional violence (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53–0.91). 2020 Vietnam Hershow, R.B. et al. Secondary analysis of longitudina data from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam (2016- 2018). 313 married or cohabiting men with HIV. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Higher average heavy drinking (aOR 1.05, p=0.002) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) (aOR 4.74, p<0.0001) were associated with increased odds of IPV perpetration; time-specific increases in AUD were also associated with increased odds (aOR 2.95, p=0.001) Higher average proportion of days' alcohol abstinent was associated with decreased odds of IPV perpetration (aOR 0.43, p=0.03); time-specific increases in alcohol abstinence also protective (aOR 0.39, p=0.02). 2020 Taiwan Lee, F.-H. Cross-sectional. Immigrant Vietnamese women in Taiwan. Regression analysis. N=250 women, employed (89.2%), naturalised Taiwanese citizens (77.6%), adapted to life in Taiwan (87.2%), financially dependent on husbands (78.0%); most husbands employed (89.2%). Past-year marital violence 70.4% overall; physical violence 40.0%; sexual violence 28.8%; psychological violence 70.4%. Not depending on husband’s income associated with higher violence frequency (β -11.34, 95% CI -15.61 to -7.08; t=-5.28; p<.001. Stronger views objecting to marital violence were also associated with higher violence frequency (β 4.58, 95% CI 1.81–7.35; t=3.25; p=.001). 2018 Laos Ayuwat, D., & Sananikone, S. Cross-sectional. N=350 men Sangthong district, Vientiane Capital. Multiple regression analysis. In primary (46%) or secondary (43.7%) education, worked in agriculture. Economic violence perpetration was reported by 40.6% of men; 35.4% reported not liking the idea of letting their wives work outside the home. Experienced violence in childhood (β 0.440, p=0.000), witness of violence in childhood (β 0.363, p=0.003), and poorer emotional health (β -0.170, p=0.028) were the three significant predictors in the final regression model (R²=0.285; F=4.247; p=0.000). 2018 Thailand Pengpid, S. et al. Cross-sectional. N=14,288. Women attending antenatal care and general outpatient clinics in 9 randomly selected Thai hospitals. All were Thai, most had at least secondary education, were married or co-habiting, and were living with abusive partner. 1.5% positive for past-12-month IPV; among the 207 women with IPV in the analytic sample, 27.5% reported sexual assault in the past 12 months. Psychological 82.1%, physical 67.1%, combined psychological, physical, sexual violence 21.3%. Psychological abuse associated with sexual assault (AOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.07–11.01). Factors in bivariate analysis: older age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00–1.07), general outpatient recruitment (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.37–5.83), more children (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14–2.15), high physical violence (OR 4.55, 95% CI 2.13–9.75), suicidal behaviour (OR 4.58, 95% CI 2.16–9.74). High physical violence (AOR 2.42, 95% CI 0.95–6.16) and suicidal behaviour (AOR 2.62, 95% CI 0.94–7.31) approached significance. 2018 Thailand Chuemchit, M. et al. Cross-sectional. N=2,462 women. Questionnaire adapted from WHO study on women’s health and domestic violence. High school or higher education (59.1%); primary (23.5%), secondary (16.3%), and no formal education (1%). 10.7% were housewives or had no occupation. Others: employed. Lifetime psychological or physical or sexual IPV 15.4%; among those reporting within the past 12 months, psychological violence was most common (60-68%), then sexual (62-63%), physical (52-65%). Controlling behaviors 4.6%-29.3%. Residence in Phitsanulok vs Chonburi (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.34–4.06); greater controlling behaviors by male partner (39.3% of abused women reported 4–7 controlling acts vs 8.2% of non-abused women; p<0.0001; mean number of acts 2.6 vs 1.0, p<0.0001). Women with sufficient income and savings had lower odds of lifetime IPV than those with insufficient income (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17–0.41) or sufficient income without savings (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.72). Residence in Khonkaen (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26–0.49) and Suratthani (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13–0.27) vs Chonburi was also associated with lower odds. 2017 Thailand Laeheem, K., & Boonparakarn, K. Cross-sectional. N=1,536 Thai Muslim wives with associate or equivalent degree (36.33%), primary educ. (35.16%), secondary (17.19%), or bachelor's degree or higher (11.32%). Occupation in agriculture (40.17%), trading (35.61%). Not explicitly reported for the sample. Strict upbringing (B=0.16, p<.001), violent behaviour in childhood (B=0.07, p<.001), and inferior status of women (B=0.66, p<.001) positively predicted domestic violence; overall model R²=0.875, p<.001. 2017 Philippines Tsai, L. C. Longitudinal study. Filipino mothers from Metropolitan Cebu. 2,202 women participated in the 1998 follow-up; 2,102 in 2002; and 2,018 in 2005. Women managing finances independently vs jointly reported physical IPV in the last 12 months: 88.06% vs 91.21%, IPV scale score of 1-2: 8.48% vs 6.90%, 3-4: 2.79% vs 1.68%, 5+: 0.67% vs 0.21%. Independently managing: 2.24x the severity of violence versus joint. Independent household financial management was associated with greater IPV severity than joint financial management. Main finding is causal direction via propensity score methods rather than a multivariable list of risk factors. 2017 Multi-country (Cambodia, Indonesia) Fulu, E. et al. Cross-sectional. Standardized household surveys in 2011-2012. SEA subsamples: 4,865 ever-partnered participants (Cambodia: 1,812 men and 477 women; Indonesian men: 815 rural site, 868 urban, 893 Jayapura). No Indonesian women included. Cambodia: men, 57.3–57.4% any IPV perpetration (12.1% physical only, 16.5% sexual only, 4.5% physical and sexual, 24.2% emotional or economic); women, 56.7% any IPV victimization (16.0% PV 3.2% SV, 5.9% PV and SV, 31.5% emotional or economical). Indonesia: 41.3-41.4% any IPV perp. (7.4%, 14.1%, 3.9%, 16.0%, respectively); urban, 48.8% (6.1%, 17.7%, 6.5%, 18.5%); Jayapura, 70.8% (16.1%, 22.3%, 21.4%, 11.0%). Among women, all forms of childhood trauma were significantly associated with physical IPV and both physical and sexual IPV; witnessing abuse of the mother was not significantly associated with sexual-only IPV or frequent emotional or financial IPV. 2017 Cambodia Jewkes, R. et al. Cross-sectional. Men and women aged 18-49 from 4 countries: Cambodia, China, Papua New Guinea (PNG), and Sri Lanka. SEA subsample: Cambodia: 1805 (1,395 partnered men, 410 women). Cambodian subsample: 56.6% of women any past-year IPV victimization (3.2% sexual only, 16.2% physical only, 5.9% both, 31.4% emotional/economic); men 57.3% any past-year IPV perpetration (16.5%, 12.1%, 4.5%, 24.2%, respectively). Four main risk-factor groups were identified for women’s past-year physical/sexual IPV: poverty, all childhood trauma, frequent quarrelling and limited relationship control, and partner factors including substance abuse, unemployment, and infidelity; currently married women were also at greater risk. Less of poverty, higher education, and more gender-equitable attitudes and relationship skills were associated with lower IPV risk. 2016 Vietnam Yount, K. M. et al. Cross sectional. 533 married women aged 18-50 surveyed in July-Aug 2012 in Mỹ Hào district. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Witnessing mother being hit associated with co-occurring economic coercion + IPV (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.84–6.83) and IPV only (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.00–3.06); being hit/beaten as a child associated with IPV only (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.04–2.56); lower household standard of living associated with IPV only (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.89, inverse direction indicating worse living standard = higher IPV risk). 2016 Vietnam Jansen, H.A.F.M. et al. Cross sectional. 4838 female respondents aged 18–60 years. Lifetime physical or sexual IPV 34% and past 12-month physical or sexual IPV 9%. Sexual violence by others since age 15 (AOR 5.46, 95% CI 2.17–13.73); childhood sexual abuse (AOR 2.77, 1.07–7.15); first sex coerced/forced (AOR 4.17, 1.47–11.82); mother beaten by partner (AOR 2.27, 1.61–3.22); partner’s daily alcohol use (AOR 7.06, 3.39–14.69), weekly (3.32, 1.59–6.94), monthly (2.97, 1.48–5.98); partner fights with other men (AOR 5.27, 2.95–5.82); partner extramarital relationships (AOR 3.37, 1.95–5.82); partner’s mother abused (AOR 2.75, 1.71–4.42); partner abused as child (AOR 1.71, 1.02–2.86); woman contributing financially more than partner (AOR 2.40, 1.58–3.65); higher-risk regions included Red River Delta (AOR 2.03, 1.05–3.93) and Central Highlands (AOR 2.17, 1.23–3.83). Higher education (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.87); partner age 30–39 (AOR 0.47, 0.22–0.98) and 40–49 (AOR 0.37, 0.15–0.90) vs <30; no children vs one child (AOR 0.39, 0.17–0.89); high household assets (AOR 0.55, 0.30–0.99). 2011 Malaysia Awang, H., & Hariharan, S. Cross sectional. Secondary analysis of 164 Women’s Aid Organisation case files of women who sought shelter services during 2002 to 2005. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Older perpetrator age and having an income were associated with more frequent violence. Compared with perpetrators aged ≥40, survivors whose partners were aged 30–39 had lower odds of nearly daily abuse (Exp(B) 0.375); survivors with no income had lower odds of nearly daily abuse than survivors with income (Exp(B) 0.311); survivors with partners aged ≤29 had higher odds of abuse once or twice/month (Exp(B) 15.34). Having ≥3 children indicated greater weekly abuse than having 1–2 children. 2011 Thailand Xu, X. et al. Cross sectional. 770 married women in Bangkok. Not explicitly reported for the sample. Approval of wife abuse and husband alcohol abuse consistently associated with higher psychological violence, physical assault, and physical injury (Tobit coefficients reported); status or resource inequality associated with higher violence. Wife employment, arranged marriage, and older age at first marriage were associated with lower violence frequency (Tobit coefficients). 2009 Philippines Fehringer, J.A., & Hindin, M.J. Cross-sectional. Secondary analysis of 472 cohabitating or married women from Cebu, Philippines. Perpetration: 55.8% female respondents, 25.1% male; victimization 27.7% and 30.5% respectively; reciprocal violence 24.2%, 23.5%. Witnessing maternal perpetration predicted victimization (RRR 4.18); longer relationship duration predicted victimization and reciprocal violence, e.g. victimization at 37–48 months RRR 5.79 and >48 months RRR 4.85; reciprocal violence at 13–24 months RRR 3.48, 25–36 months RRR 3.49, 37–48 months RRR 3.03, >48 months RRR 5.20. Rural residence was associated with perpetration (RRR 1.70). Greater parental joint decision-making protective for victimization (RRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97) and reciprocal violence (RRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99); being male lowers risk of victimization and reciprocal violence; among males, higher maternal church attendance protective for reciprocal violence (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16–0.99). 2009 Philippines Ansara, D.L. & Hindin, M.J. Cross-sectional. Secondary analysis of survey in 2002: 1,861 women either married or living with partner at the time. Any physical aggression in past year 26.0%; wife-only 9.9%; husband-only 5.9%; reciprocal 10.3%. Frequent psychological aggression by either partner 32.0%. Husband’s sexual coercion during relationship 22.0%. Violence between wife’s parents and wife’s alcohol use identified across perpetration groups; wife-only perpetration associated with multinuclear household living; husband-only perpetration with husband dominance/control, financial difficulty, and urban residence; reciprocal perpetration with household alcohol expenditure, husband dominance, and urban residence. Supporting adjusted RRRs included wife alcohol use: wife-only 1.79, husband-only 1.66, reciprocal 2.15; husband dominance: husband-only 1.63, reciprocal 2.35; husband control: husband-only 1.70; difficulty coping with major expenses: husband-only 1.94; urban residence: husband-only 2.11, reciprocal 2.28. Regular church attendance by wife was protective for wife-only perpetration; regular church attendance by both spouses was protective for reciprocal perpetration; husband working for pay was protective for husband-only perpetration. Supporting adjusted RRRs: husband works for pay 0.43 for husband-only perpetration. 2008 Thailand Thananowan, N. Cross-sectional. 600 adult pregnant women from a university hospital. Young age (≤25 years; n=296) vs older group (>25 years; n=304): ever abused 26.0% vs 25.0%; physical abuse in last year 15.2% vs 13.2%; physical abuse during pregnancy 5.1% vs 3.0%; sexual abuse in last year 8.1% vs 10.5%; emotional abuse 10.8% vs 8.9%. Younger age during pregnancy more likely to experience physical, sexual, and emotional IPV compared to older pregnant women. 2008 Thailand Thananowan, N., & Heidrich, S.M. Cross-sectional. N=475 pregnant women in antenatal clinic visits to five hospitals in Bangkok. 13.1% ever abused; 4.8% physical abuse during pregnancy. Women abused during pregnancy more likely to be younger, unmarried, have low income, be unemployed, and report pregnancy was unwanted. 2007 Vietnam Luke, N. et al. Cross-sectional. 465 women aged 18-35 and their husbands aged 20-44 in February 2002 from Vietnam. 36.8–37.0% ever physically hit by husband; 14.6% hit in the past year; 18.2% of ever-abused women reported injury. Husband’s age (OR 1.06–1.09 per year); husband 1–3 years older than wife vs 4+ years (OR 1.77); husband having lower education than wife; and low household economic status. The paper also found that husbands with lower resources or status than wives were more likely to have been abused. Husband’s higher education (secondary OR 0.54–0.64; higher secondary or postsecondary OR 0.30–0.44 vs none/primary); high economic status (45% lower odds); more equitable couple gender-attitude interaction, with each additional point associated with 12–13% lower odds of violence. 2005 Myanmar Kanai, A., & Kyu, N. Cross-sectional. 286 women. 69% psychological aggression, 27% physical assault in the past year. Witnessing parental violence; husband’s unemployment and frequent alcohol use; women’s more liberal or feminist attitudes; lack of strong social support; being fooled into marriage. Table 2. Risk of Bias and GRADE Rating Abbreviations based on Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. C1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?; C2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?; C3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?; C4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?; C5: Were confounding factors identified?; C6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?; C7: Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?; C8: Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Year Author Title C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 Risk of Bias GRADE 2025 Jewkes, R. et al. Impact of witnessing abuse of their mother and childhood trauma on men's perpetration of intimate partner violence in the cross-sectional UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2025 Dang, T.N.H., & Le, D.D. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Vietnam ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2024 Seeya, A. et al. A structural equation model of factors influencing intimate partner violence victimization and health outcomes among men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2024 Koning, S.M. Protracted Chains of Violence: How Chronic Conflict and Displacement Structure Intimate Partner Violence at the Thailand-Myanmar Border ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2024 Xu, X. et al. Understanding the Risk Factors of Spousal Violence Victimization Using Machine Learning and Network Approaches ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2024 Sonthon, P. et al. Variations in the association between polygyny and experience of intimate partner violence by husband’s alcohol consumption: a cross-sectional study among postpartum women in Thailand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2024 Ayyagari, P. et al. Natural Disasters and Acceptance of Domestic Violence ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Moderate 2023 Postmus, J. L. et al. Perpetrating Economic Abuse across the Globe: Results from the U.N. Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2023 Tarigan, G.N.E., & Himawan, K.K. When Love Hurts: The Role of Adult Romantic Attachment as a Predictor of Domestic Violence among Married Women in Jakarta ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2022 O’Hara, C.A., & Tan, R.K.J. Intimate partner violence before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: findings from a cross-sectional study in Singapore ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2022 Hanafi, W. S. W. M. et al. Factors Associated with Attitudes towards Rejecting Intimate Partner Violence among Young Adults in Malaysia ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ Low Low 2021 Laslett, A.-M. et al. Does drinking modify the relationship between men's gender-inequitable attitudes and their perpetration of intimate partner violence? A meta-analysis of surveys of men from seven countries in the Asia Pacific region ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2021 Haron, K. et al. Women's Attitude and Its Influence on Violence During Pregnancy in Northern State of Peninsular Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Study ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ Low Low 2020 Hershow, R.B. et al. Longitudinal analysis of alcohol use and intimate partner violence perpetration among men with HIV in northern Vietnam ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✓ Low Moderate 2020 Lee, F.-H. Factors Influencing Marital Violence Among Vietnamese Women in Taiwan ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✘ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2018 Ayuwat, D., & Sananikone, S. Influential Factors Among Male Population, Which Associated with the Economic Violence Against Women in Laos ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2018 Pengpid, S. et al. Intimate partner sexual violence and risk for femicide, suicidality and substance use among women in antenatal care and general out-patients in Thailand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2018 Chuemchit, M. et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2017 Laeheem, K., & Boonparakarn, K. Factors predicting domestic violence among Thai Muslim married couples in Pattani province ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2017 Tsai, L. C. Household Financial Management and Women’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in the Philippines: A Study Using Propensity Score Methods ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2017 Fulu, E. et al. Pathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2017 Jewkes, R. et al. Women's and men's reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women's risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multi-country cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2016 Yount, K. M. et al. Economic Coercion and Partner Violence Against Wives in Vietnam: A Unified Framework? ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2016 Jansen, H.A.F.M. et al. Exploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: results from a cross-sectional national survey ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2011 Awang, H., & Hariharan, S. Determinants of Domestic Violence: Evidence from Malaysia ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2011 Xu, X. et al. Understanding Gender and Domestic Violence From a Sample of Married Women in Urban Thailand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2009 Fehringer, J.A., & Hindin, M.J. Like Parent, Like Child: Intergenerational Transmission of Partner Violence in Cebu, the Philippines ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2009 Ansara, D. L., & Hindin, M. J. Perpetration of intimate partner aggression by men and women in the Philippines: prevalence and associated factors ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2008 Thananowan, N. Intimate partner violence (IPV), risk factors, and health outcomes in adult pregnant women ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2008 Thananowan, N., & Heidrich, S.M. Intimate partner violence among pregnant Thai women ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2007 Luke, N. et al. Exploring Couple Attributes and Attitudes and Marital Violence in Vietnam ✓ ✓ ✓ ✘ ✘ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low 2005 Kanai, A., & Kyu, N. Prevalence, antecedent causes and consequences of domestic violence in Myanmar ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Low Low Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9556661","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Systematic Review","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":631233743,"identity":"9dbccfcd-c200-4d33-9b57-4df9650c5fd6","order_by":0,"name":"Dominique Calilung","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3527-6926","institution":"Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery \u0026 Palliative Care, King’s College London","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Dominique","middleName":"","lastName":"Calilung","suffix":""},{"id":631233744,"identity":"680793c6-b793-454f-97c0-1f30bda6bcc3","order_by":1,"name":"Angelica Alejandro","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Angelica","middleName":"","lastName":"Alejandro","suffix":""},{"id":631233745,"identity":"191c77a2-a038-4344-aac5-c7fbcd9c4ede","order_by":2,"name":"Rowalt Alibudbud","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2609-794X","institution":"Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rowalt","middleName":"","lastName":"Alibudbud","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-28 16:28:03","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108409595,"identity":"2d99b17f-ffba-45ec-87c7-eb2aa9627ed2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-04 10:01:34","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":88221,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePRISMA flow chart.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9556661/v1/2f6cfc5a8905e8ada94ec877.jpg"},{"id":108803818,"identity":"8d0d4280-f525-4831-ab91-d30368011eb5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-08 15:08:22","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":805952,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9556661/v1/2b5c07cc-177e-4069-886b-2f805967e1f0.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eRisk and Protective Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review of Regional Evidence\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe World Health Organization (WHO) defines intimate partner violence (IPV) as behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, sexual, or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse, and controlling behaviors. IPV remains a major public mental health and human rights challenge. Globally, around 27% of ever-partnered women aged 15\u0026ndash;49 years have experienced physical and/or sexual IPV in their lifetime (Sardinha et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). IPV is also highly prevalent across Southeast Asia, including Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, Lao People\u0026rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. These countries span two WHO regions, with estimated lifetime prevalence of IPV of approximately 33% in the South-East Asia Region and 20% in the Western Pacific Region (The Lancet Regional Health\u0026ndash;Southeast Asia, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; WHO, 2024). Although IPV affects people across socioeconomic groups, its patterns are shaped by local structural, relational, and individual determinants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn Southeast Asia, socio-cultural influences such as entrenched gender norms, expectations around marriage and family roles, and community traditions may normalize coercion and constrain disclosure and help-seeking (Valdez et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Eisenbruch, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). These intersect with structural determinants including legislative frameworks, policy implementation, and access to health and social care responses (Jaising et al., 2009). At relationship and individual levels, factors such as controlling behaviors, substance use, and psychosocial stressors may increase risk, while education, economic resources, and social support may be protective (Abramsky et al., 2011). Despite the scale and contextual complexity of IPV, there is no contemporary synthesis consolidating quantitative evidence on associated risk and protective factors across Southeast Asian countries. A region-specific synthesis is needed to inform policy, services, and culturally responsive prevention strategies, particularly considering regional priorities such as the ASEAN Regional Plan of Action on the Elimination of Violence against Women (WHO, 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eObjectives\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize non-randomised quantitative studies published in English between 2005 and 2025 that examined risk and protective factors associated with IPV among ever-partnered adults aged 18 years and above living in Southeast Asian countries, including both heterosexual and same-sex relationships. A secondary aim was to organise these determinants across socio-cultural, psychological, and structural domains in order to inform culturally sensitive prevention, intervention, and policy.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Methodology","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEligibility Criteria\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe review followed PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251078682). Ethical approval and informed consent were not required. The review included quantitative studies of ever-partnered adults aged 18 years and above residing in a Southeast Asian country who had experienced or perpetrated IPV, and which reported associated risk and/or protective factors. Eligible countries were Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, and Vietnam. Studies were included if they were primary quantitative research, had an abstract in English, were published between 2005 and 2025, and reported on IPV types such as physical, sexual, psychological, emotional, verbal, financial, or controlling behaviors. Studies were excluded if they were qualitative, mixed-methods without extractable quantitative findings, reviews, opinion papers, conference proceedings, theses, dissertations, protocols, or involved mixed-age samples including participants below 18 years. Studies of second-generation immigrant populations in Western countries and populations with mixed non-Southeast Asian ethnicity were also excluded.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eSearch Strategy\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFive scientific databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus. These were selected to maximise retrieval across biomedical, public health, psychological, nursing, allied health, and interdisciplinary literature. The most recent search was conducted on 16th June 2025. The search strategy for each source included specific keywords, with filters and limits applied, such as publication date range. The search strategy and keywords utilised for this review were adapted from the MEsH keywords after a facet analysis of the PEO components: (“intimate partner violence” or \"partner violence\" or “domestic violence” or \"domestic abuse\" or “gender-based violence” or “relationship violence” or \"physical violence\" or \"physical abuse\" or “spousal abuse” or “partner abuse” or \"psychological abuse\" or \"emotional abuse\" or \"intimidation\" or \"coercion\" or \"rape\" or “Battery” or \"Domestic Battery\" or \"Couple Violence\" or \"Coercive\" or \"Intimate Terrorism\") AND \u0026nbsp;(“risk factors” or “protective factors” or “predictors” or “determinants” or “associated factors” or “socioeconomic factors” or \"economic factors\" or \"legal factors” or \"psychosocial factors\" or \"sociocultural factors\" or “cultural factors” or \"social factors\" or “social support” or “gender norms” or “education” or \"employment\" or \"religion\" or \"drug use\" or \"substance use\" or \"legal protection\" or \"policy\" or \"legal framework\") AND (“Southeast Asia” or “Brunei” or “Cambodia” or “East Timor” or “Timor-Leste” or “Indonesia” or “Laos” or “Malaysia” or “Myanmar” or “Burma” or “Philippines” or “Singapore” or “Thailand” or “Vietnam” or \"Bruneian\" or \"Cambodian\" or \"Khmer\" or \"Indonesian\" or \"Laotian\" or \"Malaysian\" or \"Burmese\" or \"Myanma\" or \"Filipino\" or \"Filipina\" or \"Singaporean\" or \"Thai\" or * Vietnam: or \"Vietnamese\" or \"Timorese\" or \"Maubere\") AND (\"marital\" or \"spouse\" or “women” or “female” or “teenage” or \"teenager\" or “adults” or “young women” or “victims”).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStudy Selection\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe search retrieved 1,817 references, which were exported to RefWorks for deduplication; 746 duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening of 1,071 records, 867 were excluded as clearly irrelevant or ineligible. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts, then assessed 204 full-text articles. Disagreements were resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. Following full-text screening, 32 studies met inclusion criteria summarised in Table 1. Reasons for exclusion included mixed age categories, mixed-methods design without separable quantitative results, and studies in which IPV functioned as a risk factor instead of the independent variable. The PRISMA diagram is available in Figure 1.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData Synthesis and Risk of Bias\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe results were synthesized using textual narrative synthesis, a method that organizes studies into more homogenous groups and has been shown to be effective in synthesizing evidence (Barnett-Page \u0026amp; Thomas, 2009). This approach involves reporting study characteristics, context, and findings in a standardized format, enabling comparisons of similarities and differences across studies. Subsequently, structured summaries are developed and elaborated (Barnett-Page \u0026amp; Thomas, 2009). The Risk of Bias (RoB; Table 2) in the included studies was assessed and noted as a limitation, primarily based on the study design and issues related to the study setting and generalizability.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCharacteristics of the Study Population\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e32 studies were included in the review. 30 studies reported a sample size encompassing Southeast Asian participants, yielding a total of at least 91,042. The largest single dataset was the Singapore linked administrative cohort analyzed by Xu et al. (2024) (N = 51,839; 26,724 female; 25,115 male), while several multi-country analyses were drawn from the UN Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence and related datasets (e.g., Postmus, 2023; Laslett et al., 2021; Fulu et al., 2017; Jewkes et al., 2017; 2025).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn terms of geographic coverage, Thailand was the most represented country, analyzed in 9 studies, followed by Cambodia, Vietnam, and Indonesia, which were each represented in 5 studies. Malaysia and Philippines were each represented in 3 studies, while Myanmar and Singapore were each represented in 2 studies. Laos and Timor-Leste were each represented by 1 study. One study was conducted in Taiwan but focused on Vietnamese immigrant women (Kanai et al., 2020).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSeveral studies focused on specific populations. Five studies recruited pregnant or perinatal groups (combined N = 3,689), including postpartum women in Thailand (Sonthon et al., 2024), postnatal women in Malaysia (Haron, 2021), women attending antenatal care/general outpatient services in Thailand (Pengpid et al., 2018), and two studies of pregnant Thai women (Thananowan, 2008; Thananowan \u0026amp; Heidrich, 2008). Other key groups included men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand (Seeya, 2024; N = 382), men with HIV in Vietnam (Hershow et al., 2020; N = 313), and migrant/ethnic minority women at the Thailand–Myanmar border (Koning, 2024; N = 534). Two studies analyzed administrative populations, namely a Singapore study linking administrative data including Personal Protection Order applicants (Xu et al., 2024), and a Malaysia study referring to a number of shelter or refuge case files (Awang \u0026amp; Hariharan, 2011).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAssociated Risk Factors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAcross the included studies, the most frequently reported associated risk factors clustered into three categories: (1) socioeconomic and material conditions, (2) exposure to intergenerational and childhood forms of violence, and (3) gender norms and attitudes supportive of violence and unequal relational power.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSocioeconomic and material correlates were the most common domain, reported in 16 studies. These included poverty, low levels of education, lack of or unstable employment, food insecurity or scarcity, housing disadvantage, and financial dynamics such as women earning or contributing more within households (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Koning, 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Tarigan \u0026amp; Himawan, 2023; Hanafi et al., 2022; O’Hara \u0026amp; Tan, 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016; Awang \u0026amp; Hariharan, 2011; Xu et al., 2011; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Thananowan \u0026amp; Heidrich, 2008). Childhood trauma and maltreatment, including authoritarian and neglectful parenting or witnessing parental violence, were the second most common domain, reported in 15 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Koning, 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Haron et al., 2021; Hershow et al., 2020; Ayuwat \u0026amp; Sananikone, 2018; Fulu et al., 2017; Jewkes et al., 2017; Laeheem \u0026amp; Boonprakarn, 2017; Yount et al., 2016; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Fehringer \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Kyu \u0026amp; Kanai, 2005). Gender norms and attitudes supportive of IPV, including patriarchal beliefs, acceptance of IPV, inequitable gender attitudes, dominance, and power imbalance, were reported in 13 studies (e.g., Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Hanafi et al., 2022; Laslett et al., 2021; Haron et al., 2021; Lee, 2020; Laeheem \u0026amp; Boonprakarn, 2017; Tsai, 2017; Xu et al., 2011; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Kyu \u0026amp; Kanai, 2005). A second tier of commonly noted correlates included substance use, especially alcohol. Substance use (alcohol and/or drugs/smoking) appeared in 11 studies, with alcohol cited in 10 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Sonthon, 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Laslett et al., 2021; Hershow et al., 2020; Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Kyu \u0026amp; Kanai, 2005).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDemographic and life-course factors such as younger age, parity or multiparity, unmarried status, unwanted pregnancy, and children or adolescents in the household were reported in 8 studies (Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; O’Hara \u0026amp; Tan, 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Pengpid et al., 2018; Awang \u0026amp; Hariharan, 2011; Thananowan, 2008; Thananowan \u0026amp; Heidrich, 2008). Psychosocial and mental health-related factors such as depression, other mental illness, poor emotional health, suicidal behavior, male attachment insecurity, low self-esteem, and low social support were reported in 7 studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2024; Postmus et al., 2023; Tarigan \u0026amp; Himawan, 2023; Ayuwat \u0026amp; Sananikone, 2018; Pengpid et al., 2018; Thananowan, 2008). Relationship-level dynamics in the context of control, including coercion and controlling behaviors related to household management and financial decision-making, appeared in 6 studies (e.g., Postmus et al., 2023; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jewkes et al., 2017; Tsai, 2017; Yount et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2011).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA smaller number of studies explicitly listed other grouped factors, such as: (1) geographic variation across urban and rural regions or provinces (e.g., Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009), (2) vulnerabilities related to migration, sociopolitical conflict, and legal status discrimination (Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Haron et al., 2021; Tarigan \u0026amp; Himawan, 2023), and (3) infidelity and overt relationship conflict (Jewkes et al., 2017; Jansen et al., 2016). Factors identified by only a single study were health system inequality, reflected in inadequate antenatal care (Haron et al., 2021); exposure to a natural disaster, specifically an earthquake (Ayyagari et al., 2024); homophobic discrimination (Seeya et al., 2024); and risk histories involving non-partner sexual violence during adolescence and forced or coerced first sexual intercourse (Jansen et al., 2016).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAssociated Protective Factors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eProtective factors were reported less consistently than risk factors across the 32 included studies, with 17 studies identifying none. Among the remaining studies, higher educational attainment was the most frequently reported protective factor, identified in eight studies (e.g., Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Xu et al., 2024; Seeya et al., 2024; Haron et al., 2021; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016; Luke et al., 2007). Employment, particularly skilled or white-collar work, was identified in five studies (Jewkes et al., 2025; Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Haron et al., 2021; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009), while age-related demographic factors (e.g., being older, having an older partner, or having a wider age difference between partners) were also reported in five studies as being associated with a lower likelihood of IPV (Seeya et al., 2024; Hanafi et al., 2022; Jansen et al., 2016; Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009; Luke et al., 2007). Higher income, wealth, assets, or savings were identified in four studies (Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Seeya et al., 2024; Chuemchit et al., 2018; Jansen et al., 2016), as were attitudes rejecting IPV, disapproval of violence, and more positive gender attitudes or rights awareness (Ayyagari et al., 2024; Hanafi et al., 2022; Haron et al., 2021; Luke et al., 2007). Social support and autonomy-related factors, including family support, women’s social autonomy, self-efficacy, social organization, and local language ability, were reported in three studies (Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2025; Koning, 2024; Haron et al., 2021). Alcohol abstinence was identified in two studies (Sonthon et al., 2024; Hershow et al., 2020). Other protective factors were reported only once and appeared to be more context-specific, including positive emotional health (Ayuwat \u0026amp; Sananikone, 2018), regular church attendance (Ansara \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009), exposure to television dramas as an informational source associated with attitudes rejecting IPV (Hanafi et al., 2022), joint decision-making (Fehringer \u0026amp; Hindin, 2009), higher educational attainment associated with reduced likelihood of a Personal Protection Order (PPO) application (Xu et al., 2024), and stable resettlement in the context of sociopolitical displacement, such as having permanent legal status or living in a camp residence (Koning, 2024). Another study also reported factors that were negatively associated with IPV victimization among men who have sex with men, which included older age, higher educational attainment, and higher income (Seeya et al., 2024).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough not identified as a directly measured protective factor for IPV, Ayyagari et al. (2024) suggested that post-earthquake reconstruction programs may have had a context-specific protective influence on attitudes toward domestic violence. Specifically, the authors proposed that reconstruction and recovery efforts may have improved household economic conditions, restored housing and infrastructure, and supported greater female participation in community decision-making, which may have mitigated the adverse effects of earthquake exposure on acceptance of domestic violence. These protective factors were heterogeneous and comparatively underexplored, although education emerged as the most consistently reported associated protective domain.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePrincipal Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis review identified a relatively small and uneven evidence base across a 20-year period. A number of these studies used cross-sectional data, as well as secondary data from previous surveys focusing on other primary variables aside from IPV. This reflects the global reality cited by the WHO (2024): countries have differing levels of reporting, with some nations reporting IPV statistics once every decade. High-income countries largely provide more data to the WHO. In our review, geographic representation was notably skewed. Thailand was represented by nine studies, whereas Timor-Leste, which has some of the highest rates of IPV globally, was represented by only one study. Despite rapid globalization and advancements in Southeast Asia over the last 20 years, our review suggests that the prevalence of IPV remains largely stagnant. This mirrors the WHO 2023 Violence Against Women prevalence estimates, which found that the global lifetime decrease in IPV is only 0.2% per annum, representing less than 5% improvement over the last 20 years. Our review sought to synthesize regional evidence alongside global data to identify the drivers of and barriers to progress in Southeast Asia.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe inclusion of nearly 100,000 participants (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;91,042) across 32 studies demonstrated relatively balanced sampling between women and men. However, most studies focused on women. Marginalized sub-cohorts were also represented in some studies, including perinatal women, migrants, ethnic minorities, men who have sex with men, and men living with HIV, reflecting increasingly positive attitudes toward these populations in the region, such as those seen in recent policies in Thailand regarding state recognition of LGBTQ+ rights (Alibudbud, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003ea; Alibudbud, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003eb).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStructural and Sociocultural Implications\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRapid urbanization and educational gains in Southeast Asia may act as external indicators of progress, especially in capital cities. However, more data are needed to compare urban and rural realities. Furthermore, the domestic sphere, where traditional risk factors persist, appears to have remained resistant to changes in broader societal structures. Therefore, it is imperative to determine the prevalence and associated factors of IPV to better reflect differing societal realities across Southeast Asia, including urban and rural areas, and to identify services that address diverse community needs.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOne study identified that acute traumatic events, such as natural disasters, did not shift beliefs regarding IPV in the long term. Thus, while effective reconstruction programs or risk management policies could potentially mitigate secondary trauma in the short term, the findings of this review suggest that they did little to shift the long-standing status quo of patriarchal norms toward women. This resistance to long-term attitudinal change was further underscored by several studies, which observed that women earning more than their partner or managing finances independently can paradoxically experience an increased risk of IPV. Additionally, while previous studies show that the independent socioeconomic capacity of women may offer protection against IPV (Hoang Dang \u0026amp; Le, 2024; Mabena et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2025\u003c/span\u003e), women in Southeast Asia may be subject to prevailing patriarchal and religious norms regarding women\u0026rsquo;s subservience, potentially overriding the benefits of such socioeconomic independence (Abesamis \u0026amp; Alibudbud, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e; Alibudbud, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). This review supports current advocacy by the WHO and other NGOs to prioritize the education of girls and women to promote personal agency, highlighting that higher levels of education may reduce IPV prevalence among men and women.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eTrauma, Mental Health, and Substance Use\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAs presented, authoritarian parenting styles and exposure to IPV or other violence in childhood were associated with an increased risk of perpetuating IPV, either as a victim or perpetrator. Likewise, consistent with studies elsewhere, the reviewed studies show that adverse childhood events have lifelong effects on mental health and risk of substance misuse. The findings also show that alcohol use and depressive symptoms can increase the risk of IPV. In particular, even in the absence of other mental health difficulties, frequent alcohol consumption was strongly associated with increased IPV risk. Thus, the findings suggest that a cycle in which trauma leads to substance misuse, and substance use facilitates further trauma, appears pervasive across both heterosexual and non-heterosexual relationships. Nonetheless, prospective and longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the nature and characteristics of such IPV cycles and their potential effects on the prevalence of mental disorders, such as PTSD and depression (Nathanson et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLimitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe dominance of cross-sectional designs has limited understanding of the trajectory of abuse over the life course. This review was unable to map how pervasive risk factors and shifting socioeconomic stressors shape the typology of IPV over time. Additionally, many studies failed to specify or distinguish between rural and urban classifications, which may mask geographic disparities. Therefore, it is essential to further explore IPV risk factors and typologies across varied settings through longitudinal studies.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhile higher quality surveys categorizing types of IPV (physical, sexual, emotional, economic) have emerged in the last two decades, a significant disclosure gap remains. In this review, several participants were included in samples because they were accessing services such as perinatal services, sexual health clinics, and other hospital services. This leaves those outside the healthcare system unaccounted for. Therefore, community-based surveys are recommended to fully capture people experiencing IPV outside healthcare systems. Likewise, according to the WHO, 55%\u0026ndash;95% of women who survive violence do not disclose or seek any type of services. IPV experienced by men, individuals in non-heterosexual relationships, and individuals experiencing IPV in humanitarian settings also remain underrepresented.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoreover, sub-cohorts such as migrants, refugees, and members of the LGBTQ+ community face structural bias, stigma, and state-level discrimination that render them socially and legally invisible. Finally, there is a significant gap in understanding IPV across changing life stages, as most studies excluded peri- and postmenopausal women. Hence, anonymized and confidential face-to-face surveys are needed to address the underrepresentation of those experiencing IPV, especially from marginalized communities, and to help alleviate fears of retaliation, shame, and lack of awareness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImplications for Practice, Policy, and Research\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal IPV data and research remain highly heterogeneous, with low-income countries frequently underrepresented despite having some of the highest prevalence of IPV. To address this, healthcare systems should implement standardized, acts-based screening within high-contact settings such as antenatal, mental health, and sexual health services. Clinical guidelines must prioritize screening for alcohol misuse and depression, as these function as synergistic risk multipliers for violence. Furthermore, integrating pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy with material assistance can effectively address the interconnected economic and psychological consequences of abuse.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGovernment policies should prioritize IPV prevention by de-normalizing gender inequality through both formal education and strategic media-based advocacy. National frameworks must also ensure equal legal protection and explicit safeguards for women, LGBTQ+, and other minority populations within an inclusive legal structure. Finally, future research must use purposeful, diverse sampling to include marginalized cohorts such as LGBTQ+ individuals, ethnic minorities, men, and older women, ensuring that interventions reflect the region\u0026rsquo;s full demographic reality. Research on perpetrators of IPV can also provide further insight into the dynamics that lead to and perpetuate IPV. Research should also shift toward longitudinal designs to further investigate the complex biopsychosocial pathways linking adverse childhood experiences to adult IPV.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe review highlights several potential risk and protective factors associated with IPV that may help inform programs and policy development in Southeast Asia. These findings underscore the importance of strengthening protections for marginalized groups in the region, particularly women and LGBTQ+ individuals, who may face a heightened risk of experiencing IPV. As a starting point, educational initiatives and policy measures should aim to promote healthy family environments and advance gender equality. Such efforts can be reinforced through policies that ensure equal protection and legal safeguards for women and LGBTQ+ populations.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, psychosocial support programs could play an important role by providing material assistance and mental health services to survivors, helping to reduce the economic and psychological consequences of IPV. Nonetheless, the limitations of the studies included in this review highlight the need for further research. Future studies should seek to clarify the causal relationships between the identified factors and improve the representation of diverse populations across the region. Strengthening the evidence base in this way may help guide more effective interventions and contribute to a more gender-equitable Southeast Asia, where IPV is not only addressed but meaningfully reduced.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbesamis LEA, Alibudbud R (2024) From the bathroom to a national discussion of LGBTQ+ rights: A case of discrimination in the Philippines. J Lesbian Stud 28(1):84\u0026ndash;99. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2023.2251775\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10894160.2023.2251775\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u0026zwnj;Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L (2011) What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health 11:109. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-109\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1471-2458-11-109\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlibudbud R (2025) LGBTQ+ rights and health: A shifting landscape. Lancet 405(10483):974\u0026ndash;975. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00267-3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00267-3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlibudbud R (2025) Moving forward with pride: LGBTQ+ health and contemporary rights movements in Asia. Am J Health Promotion 39(2):197\u0026ndash;199. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241279783\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/08901171241279783\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAlibudbud RA (2023) Gender and sexuality in mental health: Perspectives on lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender (LGBT) rights and mental health in the ASEAN region. Front Sociol 8:1174488. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ettps://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174488\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"ttps://10.3389/fsoc.2023.1174488\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAnsara DL, Hindin MJ (2009) Perpetration of intimate partner aggression by men and women in the Philippines: Prevalence and associated factors. J interpers Violence 24(9):1579\u0026ndash;1590. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508323660\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0886260508323660\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAwang H, Hariharan S (2011) Determinants of domestic violence: Evidence from Malaysia. J Family Violence 26(6):459\u0026ndash;464. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9380-6\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10896-011-9380-6\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAyuwat D, Sananikone S (2018) Influential factors among male population, which associated with the economic violence against women in Laos. Gend Issues 35(4):330\u0026ndash;338. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-018-9213-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12147-018-9213-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAyyagari P, La Mattina G, Lv L (2024) Natural disasters and acceptance of domestic violence. Fem Econ 30(4):180\u0026ndash;208. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2024.2413392\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/13545701.2024.2413392\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBarnett-Page E, Thomas J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 9:59. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-59\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/1471-2288-9-59\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChuemchit M, Chernkwanma S, Rugkua R, Daengthern L, Abdullakasim P, Wieringa SE (2018) Prevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand. J Family Violence 33(5):315\u0026ndash;323. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9960-9\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10896-018-9960-9\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDang TNH, Le DD (2025) Socioeconomic inequalities in intimate partner violence: Evidence from Vietnam. J interpers Violence 40(3\u0026ndash;4):1037\u0026ndash;1058. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/08862605241245375\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/08862605241245375\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEisenbruch M (2018) Violence Against Women in Cambodia: Towards a Culturally Responsive Theory of Change. Cult Med Psychiatry 42(2):350\u0026ndash;370. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-017-9564-5\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11013-017-9564-5\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFehringer JA, Hindin MJ (2009) Like parent, like child: Intergenerational transmission of partner violence in Cebu, the Philippines. J Adolesc Health 44(4):363\u0026ndash;371. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eFulu E, Miedema S, Roselli T, McCook S, Chan KL, Haard\u0026ouml;rfer R, Jewkes R, Friel S, Garcia-Moreno C (2017) Pathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: Findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. Lancet Global Health 5(5):e512\u0026ndash;e522. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30103-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30103-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHanafi WSWM, Ismail TAT, Ghazali AK, Sulaiman Z, Daud A (2022) Factors associated with attitudes towards rejecting intimate partner violence among young adults in Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19(9):5718. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095718\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph19095718\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHaron K, Shaffie Z, Ghazi HF, Isa ZM (2021) Women's Attitude and Its Influence on Violence During Pregnancy in Northern State of Peninsular Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Study. J interpers Violence 36(5\u0026ndash;6):NP2576\u0026ndash;NP2600. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759059\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0886260518759059\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHershow RB, Reyes HLM, Ha TV, Chander G, Mai NVT, Sripaipan T, Frangakis C, Dowdy DW, Latkin C, Hutton HE, Pettifor A, Maman S, Go VF (2020) Longitudinal analysis of alcohol use and intimate partner violence perpetration among men with HIV in northern Vietnam. Drug Alcohol Depend 213:108098. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108098\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108098\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJaising I, Basu A, Dutta B (2009, June) Domestic violence legislation and its implementation: An analysis for ASEAN countries based on international standards and good practices. UN Development Fund for Women. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/unifem/2009/en/72716\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.refworld.org/reference/themreport/unifem/2009/en/72716\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJansen HAFM, Nguyen TVN, Hoang TA (2016) Exploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: Results from a cross-sectional national survey. Int J Public Health 61(8):923\u0026ndash;934. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0879-8\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00038-016-0879-8\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJewkes R, Fulu E, Naved RT, Chirwa E, Dunkle K, Haard\u0026ouml;rfer R, Garcia-Moreno C (2017) Women\u0026rsquo;s and men\u0026rsquo;s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women\u0026rsquo;s risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific. PLoS Med 14(9):e1002381. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJewkes R, Naved RT, Abrahams N, Shai N, Ramsoomar L, Dekel B, Gibbs A, N\u0026ouml;thling J, Willan S, Chirwa E (2025) Impact of witnessing abuse of their mother and childhood trauma on men\u0026rsquo;s perpetration of intimate partner violence in the cross-sectional UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific. SSM - Mental Health 7:100391. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100391\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100391\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKoning SM (2024) Protracted chains of violence: How chronic conflict and displacement structure intimate partner violence at the Thailand-Myanmar border. Popul Res Policy Rev 43 Article 11. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09855-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11113-023-09855-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKyu N, Kanai A (2005) Prevalence, antecedent causes and consequences of domestic violence in Myanmar. Asian J Soc Psychol 8(3):244\u0026ndash;271. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00170.x\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/j.1467-839X.2005.00170.x\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaeheem K, Boonprakarn K (2017) Factors predicting domestic violence among Thai Muslim married couples in Pattani province. Kasetsart J Social Sci 38(3):352\u0026ndash;358. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.005\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.kjss.2016.10.005\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLaslett A-M, Graham K, Wilson IM, Wilsnack SC (2021) Does drinking modify the relationship between men\u0026rsquo;s gender-inequitable attitudes and their perpetration of intimate partner violence? A meta-analysis of surveys of men from seven countries in the Asia Pacific region. Addiction 116(7):1887\u0026ndash;1899. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1111/add.15485\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1111/add.15485\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee F-H (2020) Factors Influencing Marital Violence Among Vietnamese Women in Taiwan. J transcultural nursing: official J Transcultural Nurs Soc 31(2):128\u0026ndash;134. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619849474\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1043659619849474\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLuke N, Schuler SR, Bui TTM, Pham VT, Tran HM (2007) Exploring couple attributes and attitudes and marital violence in Vietnam. Violence Against Women 13(1):5\u0026ndash;27. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206295112\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1077801206295112\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMabena K, Tsabedze W, Mazibuko X (2025) Socio-economic determinants of intimate-partner physical violence among women in South Africa. Front Psychol 16:1499263. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499263\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499263\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eNathanson AM, Shorey RC, Tirone V, Rhatigan DL (2012) The prevalence of mental health disorders in a community sample of female victims of intimate partner violence. Partn Abuse 3(1):59\u0026ndash;75. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.1.59\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1891/1946-6560.3.1.59\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eO\u0026rsquo;Hara CA, Tan RKJ (2022) Intimate partner violence before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a cross-sectional study in Singapore. Sex Health 19(3):192\u0026ndash;201. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1071/SH21229\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1071/SH21229\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePengpid S, Peltzer K, Laosee O, Suthisukon K (2018) Intimate partner sexual violence and risk for femicide, suicidality and substance use among women in antenatal care and general out-patients in Thailand. BMC Women\u0026rsquo;s Health 18(1):37. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0526-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12905-018-0526-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePostmus JL, Lin H-F, Nikolova K, Johnson L (2023) Perpetrating economic abuse across the globe: Results from the U.N. Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific. J Aggress Maltreatment Trauma 32(12):1686\u0026ndash;1704. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2022.2159906\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/10926771.2022.2159906\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSardinha L, Maheu-Giroux M, St\u0026ouml;ckl H, Meyer SR, Garc\u0026iacute;a-Moreno C (2022) Global, regional, and National Prevalence Estimates of Physical or sexual, or both, Intimate Partner Violence against Women in 2018. Lancet 399(10327):803\u0026ndash;813\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSeeya A, Auemaneekul N, Sujirarat D, Powwattana A, Satitvipawee P, Keawpan W (2024) A structural equation model of factors influencing intimate partner violence victimization and health outcomes among men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand. J Public Health Dev 22(2):273\u0026ndash;285. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2024/220222\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.55131/jphd/2024/220222\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSonthon P, Janma N, Wichaidit W (2024) Variations in the association between polygyny and experience of intimate partner violence by husband\u0026rsquo;s alcohol consumption: A cross-sectional study among postpartum women in Thailand. BMC Public Health 24(1):2735. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20281-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12889-024-20281-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTarigan GNE, Himawan KK (2023) When love hurts: The role of adult romantic attachment as a predictor of domestic violence among married women in Jakarta. Int J Interdisciplinary Social Community Stud 18(2):93\u0026ndash;115. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v18i02/93-115\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v18i02/93-115\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThananowan N (2008) Intimate partner violence (IPV), risk factors, and health outcomes in adult pregnant women. Thai J Nurs Res 12(4):310\u0026ndash;323. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5868/5072/0\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/download/5868/5072/0\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThananowan N, Heidrich SM (2008) Intimate partner violence among pregnant Thai women. Violence Against Women 14(5):509\u0026ndash;527. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208315525\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1077801208315525\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsai LC (2017) Household financial management and women\u0026rsquo;s experiences of intimate partner violence in the Philippines: A study using propensity score methods. Violence Against Women 23(3):330\u0026ndash;350. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216642869\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/1077801216642869\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThe Lancet Regional Health\u0026ndash;Southeast Asia (2022) Stronger laws to stop violence against women in southeast Asia. Lancet Reg Health\u0026ndash;Southeast Asia 6., Article 100104. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100104\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100104\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eValdez IKM, Arevalo MVPN, Robredo JPG, Gacad SLS, Villaceran MAJ, Libang GR, Paz D, Rubin EP, K. S. T. A., Eala MAB (2022) Violence against women in the Philippines: barriers to seeking support. Lancet Reg health Western Pac 23:100471. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100471\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100471\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization (2024), March 25 \u003cem\u003eViolence against Women\u003c/em\u003e. World Health Organization. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWorld Health Organization (2025) \u003cem\u003eViolence against women prevalence estimates, 2023: Global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and non-partner sexual violence against women\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://iris.who.int/handle/10665/383559\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/383559\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu X, Kerley KR, Sirisunyaluck B (2011) Understanding gender and domestic violence from a sample of married women in urban Thailand. J Fam Issues 32(6):791\u0026ndash;819. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10386306\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0192513X10386306\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eXu X, Ong HL, Lai P, Ting MH, Wong WM, Chu CM (2024) Understanding the risk factors of spousal violence victimization using machine learning and network approaches. J Family Violence 39:1581\u0026ndash;1592. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00573-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10896-023-00573-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYount KM, Krause KH, VanderEnde KE, Minh TH, Schuler SR (2016) Economic coercion and partner violence against wives in Vietnam: A unified framework? J interpers Violence 31(20):3307\u0026ndash;3331. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584350\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1177/0886260515584350\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSummary of the Reviewed Studies\u0026rsquo; Research Design, Population, Sample, IPV Prevlance, and Findings\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"914\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eYear\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCountry\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResearch Design, Population, and Sample\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eIPV Prevalence\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAssociated Risk Factors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAssociated Protective Factors\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2025\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMulti-country (Cambodia)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJewkes, R. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. N=1,473 Cambodian men aged 18-49 witnessing IPV.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePooled across 6 countries No reported prevalence for Cambodia.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFood Insecurity, alcohol use. \u0026nbsp;childhood trauma (neglect, sexual/ emotional/ witnessing abuse), depression.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAttended high school or higher education. Employed.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2025\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDang, T.N.H., \u0026amp; Le, D.D.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. Multi-stage \u0026nbsp;sampling strategy. 15% sample list from 2009 Population and Housing Census, N = 4019 Vietnamese women aged 18-60 who have ever had a partner or husband.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample. Cited national Vietnamese estimates of 58% lifetime IPV in 2010 and 63% in 2019.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKinh ethnicity (OR 1.629, 95% CI 1.318\u0026ndash;2.014); women earning money (OR1.657, 95% CI 1.243\u0026ndash;2.210); residence in Red River Delta (OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.033\u0026ndash;1.670), Central Highlands (OR 2.158, 95% CI 1.668\u0026ndash;2.792), and Southeast (OR 1.858, 95% CI 1.423\u0026ndash;2.428).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen\u0026rsquo;s higher education (OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.945\u0026ndash;0.989)]; family support (OR 0.704, 95% CI 0.555\u0026ndash;0.892); residence in North Central and Central Coastal (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.610\u0026ndash;0.946); husband\u0026rsquo;s extra schooling (OR 0.967, 95% CI 0.945-0.989); and skilled occupation (OR 0.765, 95% CI 0.653\u0026ndash;0.895).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBangkok\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSeeya, A. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. N=382 MSM aged 18 or older and members of Rainbow Sky Association of Thailand (RSAT) in Bangkok.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAny IPV in last 12 months 82.9% (317/382); emotional 77.5%; physical 58.1%; sexual 57.3%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYounger age (\u0026beta; -0.073), alcohol use (\u0026beta; 0.0141), positive attitude toward IPV (\u0026beta; 0.243), parenting: authoritarian (\u0026beta; 0.013), neglectful (\u0026beta; 0.039); living in risky community (DE \u0026beta; 0.171; TE \u0026beta; 0.159), homophobic discrimination (\u0026beta; 0.195), open sexual orientation (\u0026beta; -0.103).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigher education (\u0026beta; -0.114) and income (\u0026beta; -0.039); parenting: authoritative (\u0026beta; -0.162), permissive (\u0026beta; -0.040).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMulti-country (Thailand, Myanmar)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKoning, S.M.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. Migrant women at Myanmar-Thailand border aged 18 or older. 534 women: Shan (66%), Thai (8%), other highland minority groups.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9% experienced ever IPV and 8% current IPV. Over 6% of women feared their partner. By generation: second-generation women had the highest IPV prevalence \u0026mdash; 19% ever and 17% current.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1st generation vs multigeneration women: indirect effect through conflict and early-life adversity OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.10; through border violence or adversity OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.11\u0026ndash;2.41; displacement-duration risk factors OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.47-4.02. Second-generation vs multigeneration women had higher total IPV odds after displacement-duration factors were added (OR 6.08, 95% CI 1.67\u0026ndash;22.16), and after adjusting for protective resettlement factors (OR 6.47, 95% CI 1.32\u0026ndash;31.73).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAdvanced Thai language ability and permanent resident legal status. Higher perceived community safety 43.6% lower IPV odds (p\u0026lt;0.05). Higher self-efficacy 64.5% lower IPV odds (p\u0026lt;0.001).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSingapore\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eXu, X. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. N=51,839 (married) from the 1980 and 1985 birth cohorts; records of Personal Protection Order (PPO) indicating allegation of victimization of spousal violence.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThis paper did not report IPV prevalence directly. It used a PPO application as a proxy outcome. PPO applicants were 830/51,839 (1.6%).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLower educational attainment, early marriage, early parenthood, staying in a public rental flat, childhood maltreatment, and prior PPO respondent history had direct associations with PPO application, while criminal history and mental illness were indirectly linked through other adversities.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSonthon, P. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. 1,207 Thai women \u0026gt; 18 yrs with normal delivery at public hospital in\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;2023.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIPV during pregnancy was \u0026lt;5% overall in the sample. Among husbands who binge drank, prevalence was 20.8% in monogynous vs 46.2% in polygynous relationships.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePolygyny vs monogyny (aOR 2.23, 95% CI 0.94\u0026ndash;5.26; adjusted association not statistically significant overall). Among binge-drinking husbands, polygyny had much higher IPV odds (aOR 9.54, 95% CI 1.10\u0026ndash;82.54). Interaction is not significant (Breslow-Day p=0.259).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndonesia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAyyagari, P. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal study. No reported number of respondents. Married men and women who \u0026nbsp;experienced 2006 earthquake in\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Yogyakarta and Central Java.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe outcome for this paper is attitudes toward wife beating, not directly IPV occurrence. Main finding is that the earthquake had no statistically significant effect on acceptance of domestic violence.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMulti-country (Cambodia, Indonesia)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePostmus, J. L. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional study. No specific mention how many participants were from Southeast Asian countries.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21.9% lifetime economic abuse perpetration; 17.9% physical IPV; 35.3% psychological, 12.6% sexual and 6.6% economic.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFood scarcity (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.19\u0026ndash;1.64); age 25-34 vs 35-49 (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05\u0026ndash;1.41); married (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.34\u0026ndash;2.18); problematic alcohol use (OR 3.85, 95% CI 3.27\u0026ndash;4.53); depressive symptoms (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04\u0026ndash;1.06); primary education or less vs some high school (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02\u0026ndash;1.51); men deciding on large investments (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17\u0026ndash;1.75); gender inequity beliefs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13\u0026ndash;1.20).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndonesia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTarigan, G.N.E., \u0026amp; Himawan, K.K.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional study. Advertised survey on social media, snowball and purposive sampling. 300 married women.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAttachment anxiety \u0026beta; = .420, p\u0026lt;.001; avoidance \u0026beta; = .256, p\u0026lt;.001. Younger age \u0026beta; = -.192, p\u0026lt;.05, lower education \u0026beta; = -.101, p\u0026lt;.05, longer marriage duration \u0026beta; = .174, p\u0026lt;.05, and lower income contribution \u0026beta; = -.142, p\u0026lt;.05. One-way ANOVA suggested higher domestic violence scores among housewives (M 40.26, SD 16.35, p \u0026lt; .001) and Hindu participants \u0026nbsp;(M 52.87, SD 10.73, p \u0026lt; .001).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigher age, higher education, and greater income contribution to household.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSingapore\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eO\u0026rsquo;Hara, C.A., \u0026amp; Tan, R.K.J. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Self-report. Recruitment on social media. \u0026nbsp;N=259, 59.2% heterosexual, 86.6% Chinese, 71.5% religious, 73.4% living in public housing, 57.6% with degree-and above educational attainment, 66.8% in full-time work, 58.3% not WFH.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBefore lockdown: restriction of contact 17.2%, verbal abuse 25.0%, finances 16.7%, physical violence 17.6%, pressured sex 17.5%, forced sex 18.5%. During lockdown: 17.4%, 19.8%, 14.7%, 13.5%, 14.7%, 15.2%, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYounger age and more youths aged \u0026lt;18 in the household were consistently associated with higher prevalence of multiple IPV outcomes (aPRs \u0026nbsp;reported); Chinese ethnicity, higher income, and non-heterosexuality were associated with some outcomes during lockdown, with caution for small subgroup sizes.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHanafi, W. S. W. M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Four districts in Kelantan. MYPAIPVQ questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses. N=405 (173 males, 232 females.)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThis paper measures attitudes toward rejecting IPV, not IPV occurrence. 50.4% had attitudes toward rejecting IPV.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRisk toward not rejecting IPV attitudes: self-employment (AdjOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09\u0026ndash;0.40).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eProtective toward rejecting IPV attitudes: older age (AdjOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03\u0026ndash;1.19); female sex (AdjOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.54\u0026ndash;4.03); drama as IPV information source (AdjOR 3.66, 95% CI 2.26\u0026ndash;5.91).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMulti-country (Cambodia, Indonesia, Timor- Leste)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaslett, A.-M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSecondary analysis of cross-\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;sectional datasets: logistic regression and random effect meta-analysis accounting for country and site clustering.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSEA subsamples:\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;Cambodia: 1,474, Indonesia: 2,447, Timor Leste: 768.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePast-year physical or sexual IPV perpetration 13% (95% CI 9\u0026ndash;16%).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLess equitable GEM score pooled OR 1.07 (95% CI 1.04\u0026ndash;1.09); regular heavy episodic drinking pooled OR 3.42 (95% CI 2.43\u0026ndash;4.81); significant interaction between inequitable attitudes and RHED (p=0.001).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHaron, K.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. \u0026nbsp;Hospital-based. Validated Malay version of WHO Women\u0026rsquo;s Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire. 1,200 postnatal women who have been admitted to hospital.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAny violence during pregnancy 35.9% (95% CI 0.33\u0026ndash;0.39); emotional 29.8% (95% CI 0.27\u0026ndash;0.32); physical 12.9% (95% CI 0.11\u0026ndash;0.15); sexual 9.8% (95% CI 0.08\u0026ndash;0.12).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDrug use towards emotional violence (AOR 6.96, 95% CI 1.26\u0026ndash;38.43) and physical violence (AOR 43.66, 95% CI 7.17\u0026ndash;265.71); childhood violence exposure towards emotional violence (AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.05\u0026ndash;2.19); multiparity towards sexual violence (AOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10\u0026ndash;1.59); inadequate antenatal care towards physical violence (AOR 2.61, 95% CI 1.85\u0026ndash;3.68); and violence-supporting attitudes towards IPV outcomes.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAgreeing that a woman can choose her own friends was associated with lower odds of emotional violence (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53\u0026ndash;0.91).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHershow, R.B. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSecondary analysis of longitudina data from a 3-arm randomized\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;controlled trial in Thai Nguyen, Vietnam (2016- 2018). 313 married or cohabiting men with HIV.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigher average heavy drinking (aOR 1.05, p=0.002) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) (aOR 4.74, p\u0026lt;0.0001) were associated with increased odds of IPV perpetration; time-specific increases in AUD were also associated with increased odds (aOR 2.95, p=0.001)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigher average proportion of days\u0026apos; alcohol abstinent was associated with decreased odds of IPV perpetration (aOR 0.43, p=0.03); time-specific increases in alcohol abstinence also protective (aOR 0.39, p=0.02).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTaiwan\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLee, F.-H.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Immigrant Vietnamese women in Taiwan. Regression analysis. N=250 women, employed (89.2%), naturalised Taiwanese citizens (77.6%), adapted to life in Taiwan (87.2%), financially dependent on husbands (78.0%); most husbands employed (89.2%).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePast-year marital violence 70.4% overall; physical violence 40.0%; sexual violence 28.8%; psychological violence 70.4%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot depending on husband\u0026rsquo;s income associated with higher violence frequency (\u0026beta; -11.34, 95% CI -15.61 to -7.08; t=-5.28; p\u0026lt;.001. Stronger views objecting to marital violence were also associated with higher violence frequency (\u0026beta; 4.58, 95% CI 1.81\u0026ndash;7.35; t=3.25; p=.001).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaos\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAyuwat, D., \u0026amp; Sananikone, S.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. N=350 men Sangthong district, Vientiane Capital. Multiple regression analysis. In primary (46%) or secondary (43.7%) education, worked in agriculture.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEconomic violence perpetration was reported by 40.6% of men; 35.4% reported not liking the idea of letting their wives work outside the home.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eExperienced violence in childhood (\u0026beta; 0.440, p=0.000), witness of violence in childhood (\u0026beta; 0.363, p=0.003), and poorer emotional health (\u0026beta; -0.170, p=0.028) were the three significant predictors in the final regression model (R\u0026sup2;=0.285; F=4.247; p=0.000).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePengpid, S. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. N=14,288. Women attending antenatal care and general outpatient clinics in 9 randomly selected Thai hospitals. All were Thai, most had at least secondary education, were married or co-habiting, and were living with abusive partner.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.5% positive for past-12-month IPV; among the 207 women with IPV in the analytic sample, 27.5% reported sexual assault in the past 12 months. Psychological 82.1%, physical 67.1%, combined psychological, physical, sexual violence 21.3%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePsychological abuse associated with sexual assault (AOR 3.42, 95% CI 1.07\u0026ndash;11.01). Factors in bivariate analysis: older age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00\u0026ndash;1.07), general outpatient recruitment (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.37\u0026ndash;5.83), more children (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.14\u0026ndash;2.15), high physical violence (OR 4.55, 95% CI 2.13\u0026ndash;9.75), suicidal behaviour (OR 4.58, 95% CI 2.16\u0026ndash;9.74). High physical violence (AOR 2.42, 95% CI 0.95\u0026ndash;6.16) and suicidal behaviour (AOR 2.62, 95% CI 0.94\u0026ndash;7.31) approached significance.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChuemchit, M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. N=2,462 women. Questionnaire adapted from WHO study on women\u0026rsquo;s health and domestic violence. High school or higher education (59.1%); primary (23.5%), secondary (16.3%), and no formal education (1%). 10.7% were housewives or had no occupation. Others: employed.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLifetime psychological or physical or sexual IPV 15.4%; among those reporting within the past 12 months, psychological violence was most common (60-68%), then sexual (62-63%), physical (52-65%). Controlling behaviors 4.6%-29.3%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eResidence in Phitsanulok vs Chonburi (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.34\u0026ndash;4.06); greater controlling behaviors by male partner (39.3% of abused women reported 4\u0026ndash;7 controlling acts vs 8.2% of non-abused women; p\u0026lt;0.0001; mean number of acts 2.6 vs 1.0, p\u0026lt;0.0001).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen with sufficient income and savings had lower odds of lifetime IPV than those with insufficient income (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17\u0026ndash;0.41) or sufficient income without savings (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30\u0026ndash;0.72). Residence in Khonkaen (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.26\u0026ndash;0.49) and \u0026nbsp;Suratthani (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13\u0026ndash;0.27) vs Chonburi was also associated with lower odds.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaeheem, K., \u0026amp; Boonparakarn, K.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. N=1,536 Thai Muslim wives with associate or equivalent degree (36.33%), primary educ. (35.16%), secondary (17.19%), or bachelor\u0026apos;s degree or higher (11.32%). Occupation in agriculture (40.17%), trading (35.61%).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStrict upbringing (B=0.16, p\u0026lt;.001), violent behaviour in childhood (B=0.07, p\u0026lt;.001), and inferior status of women (B=0.66, p\u0026lt;.001) positively predicted domestic violence; overall model R\u0026sup2;=0.875, p\u0026lt;.001.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhilippines\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTsai, L. C.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal study. Filipino mothers from Metropolitan Cebu. 2,202 women participated in the 1998 follow-up; 2,102 in 2002; and 2,018 in 2005.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen managing finances independently vs jointly reported physical IPV in the last 12 months: 88.06% vs 91.21%, IPV scale score of 1-2: 8.48% vs 6.90%, 3-4: 2.79% vs 1.68%, 5+: 0.67% vs 0.21%. Independently managing: 2.24x the severity of violence versus joint.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIndependent household financial management was associated with greater IPV severity than joint financial management. Main finding is causal direction via propensity score methods rather than a multivariable list of risk factors.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMulti-country (Cambodia, Indonesia)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFulu, E. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Standardized household surveys in 2011-2012. SEA subsamples: 4,865 ever-partnered participants (Cambodia: 1,812 men and 477 women; Indonesian men: 815 rural site, 868 urban, 893 Jayapura). No Indonesian women included.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCambodia: men, 57.3\u0026ndash;57.4% any IPV perpetration (12.1% physical only, 16.5% sexual only, 4.5% physical and sexual, 24.2% emotional or economic); women, 56.7% any IPV victimization (16.0% PV 3.2% SV, 5.9% PV and SV, 31.5% emotional or economical). Indonesia: 41.3-41.4% any IPV perp. (7.4%, 14.1%, 3.9%, 16.0%, respectively); urban, 48.8% (6.1%, 17.7%, 6.5%, 18.5%); Jayapura, 70.8% (16.1%, 22.3%, 21.4%, 11.0%).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAmong women, all forms of childhood trauma were significantly associated with physical IPV and both physical and sexual IPV; witnessing abuse of the mother was not significantly associated with sexual-only IPV or frequent emotional or financial IPV.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCambodia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJewkes, R. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Men and women aged 18-49 from 4 countries: Cambodia, China, Papua New Guinea (PNG), and Sri Lanka. SEA subsample: Cambodia: 1805 (1,395 partnered men, 410 women).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCambodian subsample: 56.6% of women any past-year IPV victimization (3.2% sexual only, 16.2% physical only, 5.9% both, 31.4% emotional/economic); men \u0026nbsp;57.3% any past-year IPV perpetration (16.5%, 12.1%, 4.5%, 24.2%, respectively).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFour main risk-factor groups were identified for women\u0026rsquo;s past-year physical/sexual IPV: poverty, all childhood trauma, frequent quarrelling and limited relationship control, and partner factors including substance abuse, unemployment, and infidelity; currently married women were also at greater risk.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLess of poverty, higher education, and more gender-equitable attitudes and relationship skills were associated with lower IPV risk.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2016\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYount, K. M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. 533 married women aged 18-50 surveyed in July-Aug 2012 in Mỹ H\u0026agrave;o district.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWitnessing mother being hit associated with co-occurring economic coercion + IPV (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 1.84\u0026ndash;6.83) and IPV only (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.00\u0026ndash;3.06); being hit/beaten as a child associated with IPV only (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.04\u0026ndash;2.56); lower household standard of living associated with IPV only (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63\u0026ndash;0.89, inverse direction indicating worse living standard = higher IPV risk).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2016\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJansen, H.A.F.M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. 4838 female respondents aged 18\u0026ndash;60 years.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLifetime physical or sexual IPV 34% and past 12-month physical or sexual IPV 9%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSexual violence by others since age 15 (AOR 5.46, 95% CI 2.17\u0026ndash;13.73); childhood sexual abuse (AOR 2.77, 1.07\u0026ndash;7.15); first sex coerced/forced (AOR 4.17, 1.47\u0026ndash;11.82); mother beaten by partner (AOR 2.27, 1.61\u0026ndash;3.22); partner\u0026rsquo;s daily alcohol use (AOR 7.06, 3.39\u0026ndash;14.69), weekly (3.32, 1.59\u0026ndash;6.94), monthly (2.97, 1.48\u0026ndash;5.98); partner fights with other men (AOR 5.27, 2.95\u0026ndash;5.82); partner extramarital relationships (AOR 3.37, 1.95\u0026ndash;5.82); partner\u0026rsquo;s mother abused (AOR 2.75, 1.71\u0026ndash;4.42); partner abused as child (AOR 1.71, 1.02\u0026ndash;2.86); woman contributing financially more than partner (AOR 2.40, 1.58\u0026ndash;3.65); higher-risk regions included Red River Delta (AOR 2.03, 1.05\u0026ndash;3.93) and Central Highlands (AOR 2.17, 1.23\u0026ndash;3.83).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigher education (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30\u0026ndash;0.87); partner age 30\u0026ndash;39 (AOR 0.47, 0.22\u0026ndash;0.98) and 40\u0026ndash;49 (AOR 0.37, 0.15\u0026ndash;0.90) vs \u0026lt;30; no children vs one child (AOR 0.39, 0.17\u0026ndash;0.89); high household assets (AOR 0.55, 0.30\u0026ndash;0.99).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMalaysia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAwang, H., \u0026amp; Hariharan, S.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. Secondary analysis of 164 Women\u0026rsquo;s Aid Organisation case files of women who sought shelter services during 2002 to 2005.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eOlder perpetrator age and having an income were associated with more frequent violence. Compared with perpetrators aged \u0026ge;40, survivors whose partners were aged 30\u0026ndash;39 had lower odds of nearly daily abuse (Exp(B) 0.375); survivors with no income had lower odds of nearly daily abuse than survivors with income (Exp(B) 0.311); survivors with partners aged \u0026le;29 had higher odds of abuse once or twice/month (Exp(B) 15.34). Having \u0026ge;3 children indicated greater weekly abuse than having 1\u0026ndash;2 children.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eXu, X. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross sectional. 770 married women in Bangkok.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNot explicitly reported for the sample.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eApproval of wife abuse and husband alcohol abuse consistently associated with higher psychological violence, physical assault, and physical injury (Tobit coefficients reported); status or resource inequality associated with higher violence.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWife employment, arranged marriage, and older age at first marriage were associated with lower violence frequency (Tobit coefficients).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhilippines\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFehringer, J.A., \u0026amp; Hindin, M.J.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Secondary analysis of 472 cohabitating or married women from Cebu, Philippines.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerpetration: 55.8% female respondents, 25.1% male; victimization 27.7% and 30.5% respectively; reciprocal violence 24.2%, 23.5%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWitnessing maternal perpetration predicted victimization (RRR 4.18); longer relationship duration predicted victimization and reciprocal violence, e.g. victimization at 37\u0026ndash;48 months RRR 5.79 and \u0026gt;48 months RRR 4.85; reciprocal violence at 13\u0026ndash;24 months RRR 3.48, 25\u0026ndash;36 months RRR 3.49, 37\u0026ndash;48 months RRR 3.03, \u0026gt;48 months RRR 5.20. Rural residence was associated with perpetration (RRR 1.70).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGreater parental joint decision-making protective for victimization (RRR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70\u0026ndash;0.97) and reciprocal violence (RRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83\u0026ndash;0.99); being male lowers risk of victimization and reciprocal violence; among males, higher maternal church attendance protective for reciprocal violence (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16\u0026ndash;0.99).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePhilippines\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAnsara, D.L. \u0026amp; Hindin, M.J.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. Secondary analysis of survey in 2002: 1,861 women either married or living with partner at the time.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAny physical aggression in past year 26.0%; wife-only 9.9%; husband-only 5.9%; reciprocal 10.3%. Frequent psychological aggression by either partner 32.0%. Husband\u0026rsquo;s sexual coercion during relationship 22.0%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eViolence between wife\u0026rsquo;s parents and wife\u0026rsquo;s alcohol use identified across perpetration groups; wife-only perpetration associated with multinuclear household living; husband-only perpetration with husband dominance/control, financial difficulty, and urban residence; reciprocal perpetration with household alcohol expenditure, husband dominance, and urban residence. Supporting adjusted RRRs included wife alcohol use: wife-only 1.79, husband-only 1.66, reciprocal 2.15; husband dominance: husband-only 1.63, reciprocal 2.35; husband control: husband-only 1.70; difficulty coping with major expenses: husband-only 1.94; urban residence: husband-only 2.11, reciprocal 2.28.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRegular church attendance by wife was protective for wife-only perpetration; regular church attendance by both spouses was protective for reciprocal perpetration; husband working for pay was protective for husband-only perpetration. Supporting adjusted RRRs: husband works for pay 0.43 for husband-only perpetration.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2008\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThananowan, N.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. 600 adult pregnant women from a university hospital.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYoung age (\u0026le;25 years; n=296) vs older group (\u0026gt;25 years; n=304): ever abused 26.0% vs 25.0%; physical abuse in last year 15.2% vs 13.2%; physical abuse during pregnancy 5.1% vs 3.0%; sexual abuse in last year 8.1% vs 10.5%; emotional abuse 10.8% vs 8.9%.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYounger age during pregnancy more likely to experience physical, sexual, and emotional IPV compared to older pregnant women.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2008\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThananowan, N., \u0026amp; Heidrich, S.M.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. N=475 pregnant\u0026nbsp;\u003cbr\u003e\u0026nbsp;women in antenatal clinic visits to five hospitals in Bangkok.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13.1% ever abused; 4.8% physical abuse during pregnancy.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen abused during pregnancy more likely to be younger, unmarried, have low income, be unemployed, and report pregnancy was unwanted.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2007\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLuke, N. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. 465 women aged 18-35 and their husbands aged 20-44 in February 2002 from Vietnam.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36.8\u0026ndash;37.0% ever physically hit by husband; 14.6% hit in the past year; 18.2% of ever-abused women reported injury.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHusband\u0026rsquo;s age (OR 1.06\u0026ndash;1.09 per year); husband 1\u0026ndash;3 years older than wife vs 4+ years (OR 1.77); husband having lower education than wife; and low household economic status. The paper also found that husbands with lower resources or status than wives were more likely to have been abused.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHusband\u0026rsquo;s higher education (secondary OR 0.54\u0026ndash;0.64; higher secondary or postsecondary OR 0.30\u0026ndash;0.44 vs none/primary); high economic status (45% lower odds); more equitable couple gender-attitude interaction, with each additional point associated with 12\u0026ndash;13% lower odds of violence.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 72px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMyanmar\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 76px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKanai, A., \u0026amp; Kyu, N.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 151px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCross-sectional. 286 women.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 189px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e69% psychological aggression, 27% physical assault in the past year.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 227px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWitnessing parental violence; husband\u0026rsquo;s unemployment and frequent alcohol use; women\u0026rsquo;s more liberal or feminist attitudes; lack of strong social support; being fooled into marriage.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 161px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTable 2. Risk of Bias and GRADE Rating\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAbbreviations based on Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. C1: Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined?; C2: Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?; C3: Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?; C4: Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?; C5: Were confounding factors identified?; C6: Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?; C7: \u0026nbsp;Were the outcomes measured in a valid and reliable way?; C8: Was appropriate statistical analysis used?\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" width=\"881\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eYear\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 60px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 340px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTitle\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC1\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC2\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC3\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC4\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC5\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC6\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC7\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eC8\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRisk of Bias\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eGRADE\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2025\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJewkes, R. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eImpact of witnessing abuse of their mother and childhood trauma on men\u0026apos;s perpetration of intimate partner violence in the cross-sectional UN multi-country study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2025\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDang, T.N.H., \u0026amp; Le, D.D.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSocioeconomic Inequalities in Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence from Vietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSeeya, A. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eA structural equation model of factors influencing intimate partner violence victimization and health outcomes among men who have sex with men in Bangkok, Thailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKoning, S.M.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eProtracted Chains of Violence: How Chronic Conflict and Displacement Structure Intimate Partner Violence at the Thailand-Myanmar Border\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eXu, X. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnderstanding the Risk Factors of Spousal Violence Victimization Using Machine Learning and Network Approaches\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSonthon, P. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariations in the association between polygyny and experience of intimate partner violence by husband\u0026rsquo;s alcohol consumption: a cross-sectional study among postpartum women in Thailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2024\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAyyagari, P. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNatural Disasters and Acceptance of Domestic Violence\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePostmus, J. L. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerpetrating Economic Abuse across the Globe: Results from the U.N. Multi-Country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2023\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTarigan, G.N.E., \u0026amp; Himawan, K.K.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWhen Love Hurts: The Role of Adult Romantic Attachment as a Predictor of Domestic Violence among Married Women in Jakarta\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eO\u0026rsquo;Hara, C.A., \u0026amp; Tan, R.K.J. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntimate partner violence before and during the COVID-19 lockdown: findings from a cross-sectional study in Singapore\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2022\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHanafi, W. S. W. M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFactors Associated with Attitudes towards Rejecting Intimate Partner Violence among Young Adults in Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaslett, A.-M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDoes drinking modify the relationship between men\u0026apos;s gender-inequitable attitudes and their perpetration of intimate partner violence? A meta-analysis of surveys of men from seven countries in the Asia Pacific region\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2021\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHaron, K. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen\u0026apos;s Attitude and Its Influence on Violence During Pregnancy in Northern State of Peninsular Malaysia: Cross-Sectional Study\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHershow, R.B. et al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLongitudinal analysis of alcohol use and intimate partner violence perpetration among men with HIV in northern Vietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2020\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLee, F.-H.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFactors Influencing Marital Violence Among Vietnamese Women in Taiwan\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAyuwat, D., \u0026amp; Sananikone, S.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eInfluential Factors Among Male Population, Which Associated with the Economic Violence Against Women in Laos\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePengpid, S. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntimate partner sexual violence and risk for femicide, suicidality and substance use among women in antenatal care and general out-patients in Thailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2018\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChuemchit, M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePrevalence of intimate partner violence in Thailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLaeheem, K., \u0026amp; Boonparakarn, K.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFactors predicting domestic violence among Thai Muslim married couples in Pattani province\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTsai, L. C.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHousehold Financial Management and Women\u0026rsquo;s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in the Philippines: A Study Using Propensity Score Methods\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFulu, E. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePathways between childhood trauma, intimate partner violence, and harsh parenting: findings from the UN Multi-country Study on Men and Violence in Asia and the Pacific\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJewkes, R. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eWomen\u0026apos;s and men\u0026apos;s reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women\u0026apos;s risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multi-country cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2016\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYount, K. M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEconomic Coercion and Partner Violence Against Wives in Vietnam: A Unified Framework?\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2016\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJansen, H.A.F.M. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eExploring risk factors associated with intimate partner violence in Vietnam: results from a cross-sectional national survey\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAwang, H., \u0026amp; Hariharan, S.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDeterminants of Domestic Violence: Evidence from Malaysia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2011\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eXu, X. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eUnderstanding Gender and Domestic Violence From a Sample of Married Women in Urban Thailand\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFehringer, J.A., \u0026amp; Hindin, M.J.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLike Parent, Like Child: Intergenerational Transmission of Partner Violence in Cebu, the Philippines\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2009\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAnsara, D. L., \u0026amp; Hindin, M. J.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePerpetration of intimate partner aggression by men and women in the Philippines: prevalence and associated factors\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2008\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThananowan, N.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntimate partner violence (IPV), risk factors, and health outcomes in adult pregnant women\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2008\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThananowan, N., \u0026amp; Heidrich, S.M.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIntimate partner violence among pregnant Thai women\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2007\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLuke, N. et al.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eExploring Couple Attributes and Attitudes and Marital Violence in Vietnam\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✘\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 43px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"2\" valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eKanai, A., \u0026amp; Kyu, N.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 331px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePrevalence, antecedent causes and consequences of domestic violence in Myanmar\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 38px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e✓\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 66px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\" style=\"width: 69px;\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLow\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"King's College London","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"intimate partner violence, southeast asia, risk factors, protective factors, family violence, systematic review","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003ePurpose\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntimate partner violence (IPV) is a major family and global public health concern with consequences for victim safety, mental health, family functioning, and intergenerational well-being. Risk for IPV interacts with structural, relational, and individual factors, yet regional evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesized published evidence on the risk and protective factors associated with IPV in Southeast Asia.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eMethods\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFive databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) were searched for studies published between January 2005 and May 2025. Eligible studies included adults aged 18 and above residing in Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Timor-Leste, or Vietnam that examined IPV risk or protective factors. Findings were synthesized using textual narrative synthesis.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThirty-two studies met inclusion criteria, representing at least 91,042 participants. Nineteen studies recruited women-only samples. Thailand was the most represented country, whereas Laos and Timor-Leste were the least. Frequently reported risk factors included socioeconomic hardship, childhood and intergenerational exposure to violence, inequitable gender norms and relationship power imbalances, and psychosocial vulnerabilities such as alcohol misuse, depression, and suicidal behavior. Protective factors included higher educational attainment, greater socioeconomic resources, attitudes rejecting violence, and awareness of gender rights.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusions\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFindings highlight IPV in Southeast Asia as a socially patterned form of family violence shaped by economic stress, gendered power relations, prior violence exposure, and psychosocial adversity. Strengthening prevention and response efforts will require culturally responsive family violence services, trauma-informed interventions, and policies addressing structural inequality. Future research should clarify causal pathways and improve representation across regional populations.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review of Regional Evidence","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-05-04 10:01:30","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9556661/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"31a8cd9a-6dee-43c3-bd64-af3a8f216806","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 4th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":67186265,"name":"Psychology"},{"id":67186266,"name":"Health Policy"},{"id":67186267,"name":"Psychiatry"},{"id":67186268,"name":"Gender Studies"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-04T10:01:30+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-05-04 10:01:30","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9556661","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9556661","identity":"rs-9556661","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00