Association between parenting styles and dyslexia in primary school students: the mediating role of home literacy environment | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Association between parenting styles and dyslexia in primary school students: the mediating role of home literacy environment Wanyi Wen, Xuanzhi Zhang, Kusheng Wu, Liwen Guan, Anyan Huang, and 4 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background: Despite an increasing amount of research on the relationship between parenting styles and neurodevelopmental disorders, there has been minimal focus on how parenting styles impact children's reading abilities. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential mediating role of the home literacy environment in the connection between parenting styles and dyslexia. Methods: A total of 212 primary school students from grade 2 to 5 were recruited in this study. The Chinese Reading Ability Test was used to screen children with dyslexia. Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran questionnaire was used to assess the parenting style (emotional warmth, rejection, overprotecting and anxious rearing). The structural equation modelling was carried out to evaluate the direct, indirect, and total effects of parenting styles on dyslexia. Results: Dyslexic children had lower scores for emotional warmth, overprotecting and anxious rearing compared to normal children, especially among male dyslexic children (all P <0.01). Dyslexic children were lack of regular reading time (OR=2.69, 95%CI:1.04-6.97, P <0.05), and have higher homework pressure compared to normal children (OR=7.41, 95%CI:1.45-37.82, P <0.05). Additionally, emotional warmth, paternal overprotection and anxious rearing were negatively associated with dyslexia in children (all P <0.05). Our findings indicate a strong correlation between dyslexia, home literacy environment, and parenting styles. In a structural equation model, an indirect effect was found showing that the home literacy environment independently mediated the effect of parenting styles on dyslexia. The total indirect effect is 0.55 and 0.68, respectively. Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that home literacy environment serves as a mediato between parenting styles and dyslexia in children. This study offers fresh insights into the intricate connections between parenting styles and dyslexia, offering significantly important theoretical and practical implications. Dyslexia Parenting style Home literacy environment Reading ability Children Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction Developmental dyslexia (DD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder and is the most common learning disability in school-age children[ 1 ]. It is characterized by difficulties in word recognition, spelling and decoding[ 2 ]. Despite normal intelligence, complete sensory abilities, and adequate educational opportunities, children with dyslexia have serious and persistent problems in acquiring reading skills[ 1 ]. The previous studies have demonstrated that DD affects approximately 10% of children[ 3 ] and 3% to12.6% of school-age children in China [ 4 ], which can persist into adulthood. Unfortunately, dyslexia not only prevents children from enjoying reading, but also increases their learning difficulties and often deprives them of opportunities to develop other potential, which in turn has a considerable negative impact on mental health outcomes and behaviors[ 5 , 6 ]. Therefore, DD is an important public health issue that deserves attention. Many studies have shown that the occurrence of dyslexia is closely related to family environment[ 7 , 8 ]. The home literacy environment (HLE) is used to describe the interactions, resources, and attitudes that children experience at home related to literacy, such as parent–child literacy-related activities, family books, usage of electronic devices etc.[ 9 ]. Previous studies have studied the HLE from various aspects. Meanwhile, many research have shown the positive relationship between HLE and children’s reading development. The HLE explains 12 to 18.5 percent of the variation in children's language skills[ 10 ]. Frank Niklas et al. stated that the relationship between parental attitudes toward shared reading and children's language ability was mediated by the HLE[ 10 ]. A Finnish longitudinal study also found that the HLE plays a crucial role in the development of dyslexia in children[ 11 ]. Importantly, a good reading atmosphere at home was a conducive condition for promoting the development of children's early reading skills[ 12 ]. Rashid conducted a study among dyslexic children and found a significant correlation between HLE and children's passage comprehension as well as spelling scores[ 13 ]. Similarly, recent research has confirmed that Chinese children with dyslexia often come from homes with poor literacy environments[ 4 , 9 ]. Therefore, the HLE is a crucial factor in the development of reading ability in children. Parenting styles are the methods and forms commonly used by parents in the raising and education of their children, with a relatively stable style of behavior[ 14 ]. Parenting styles permeate the parent-child interaction process and have a significant impact on children's personality, mental health, and especially their academic performance[ 15 , 16 ]. More specifically, negative parenting styles seem to increase risk of emotional and behavioral problems among children[ 17 ]. Several studies have identified that the parents of dyslexic children are under great parenting pressure, and it is difficult to provide effective help, which reflects that there is a correlation between parenting styles and dyslexia[ 18 , 19 ]. On the other side, numerous studies have demonstrated that parenting care is necessary to meet the needs of children's brain development and that positive parenting reduces the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children[ 20 , 21 ]. Furthermore, a recent survey among Portuguese children has shown that parenting styles play a significant role in explaining higher reading processes, including syntactic and semantic[ 22 ]. Therefore, parenting styles are particularly crucial for children with dyslexia, as these variables can either increase risk or serve as protective factors. Despite the growing body of research on parenting styles and their impact on neurodevelopmental disorders, there has been limited focus on how parenting styles specifically influence dyslexic children. Therefore, further exploration of the mediating factors in the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia in children is necessary. We propose that the HLE could be a significant predictor of dyslexia, potentially interacting with parent–child interaction at home and influencing children’s literacy development. To date, no prior studies have specifically examined the relationships among parenting styles, HLE, and dyslexia in Chinese children. Therefore, the aim of this study is to address two key questions: (a) Is there a correlation between dyslexia and both parenting styles and HLE among Chinese children; (b) Could the HLE serve as a mediator in the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia. Methods Study populations In this study, 53 children with dyslexia diagnosed were selected as the case group in the Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College. The control group was normal development children in grades 2–5 from a randomly selected public primary school in Shantou, China. The case and control groups were matched 1:3 according to gender, age and grade. After clarifying the objective of the research, a total of 212 children and their parents (53 in the case group and 159 in the control group) voluntarily agreed to participate in the study following informed consent. The inclusion criteria of the dyslexia case group were consistent with the previous studies of our group[ 8 ]. In brief, we followed the following criteria as: (1) Intelligence Quotient (IQ) above 85 by the Combined Raven’s Test; (2) the score on the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children (DCCC) are two standard deviations higher than the average score of children in the same grade (Cronbach’s α = 0.97)[ 23 ]; (3) at least 1 standard deviation below the average level of their actual grade on the Chinese Vocabulary Test and Assessment Scale (Cronbach’s α = 0.75)[ 24 ]; (4) The Chinese language test score was below the 20th percentile among all students in the same grade; (5) The final diagnosis was made by a child psychiatrist based on the results of the Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT) (Cronbach’s α = 0.75)[ 24 ] and the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)[ 25 ]. Children with brain disease, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, visual and auditory dysfunction and other neurodevelopmental disorders were excluded from the study. Approval from the Ethics Committee of Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College was received before the initiation of this study and informed consent have been collected by all participants. Procedure After the trained investigators clearly explained the purpose of the study and obtained informed consent from all participants, questionnaires were administered to both the children and parents in the case and control groups. The DCCC and CRAT were completed by the child and their parents or other guardians according to written instructions, respectively. In addition, parents or other guardians were asked to complete questionnaires related to home literacy environment and parental rearing styles. The quality control process of students filling in the questionnaire in the control group was consistent with that in the case group. Measuring tools Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran for Children (EMBU-C) The EMBU-C is a powerful and objective tool which is used to evaluate the current relationship between parenting styles and children's mental health. The Chinese version (EMBU-C) for school-age children and adolescents, as translated and revised by Liming Tie et al., was applied in our study[ 26 ]. This version of the EMBU-C has shown good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82). The EMBU-C includes four dimensions, namely emotional warmth (EW), rejection (R), overprotecting (O) and anxious rearing (AR), made up of 10 items, respectively. The items were rated on a four-point Likert scale from never (1 point) to always (4 point) where the higher the score on a dimension, the greater the tendency to represent parenting styles on that dimension. The participants were asked to respond twice to each question item, evaluating the current parenting styles of their fathers and mothers, respectively. Home literacy environment (HLE) Based on the HLE scale designed by He et al. [ 9 ], this study made some changes to the items. Ten variables reflected the home literacy environment, such as Literacy-related activities, restrictions on using electronic devices, usage of electronic devices, shared TV, children's learning habits, completion of homework by children, whether the child participated in extracurricular activities, frequency of encouraging children to participate activities and hours of outdoor. Children's literacy-related behaviors were s regular reading time cored according to the assignment table of HLE variables. The higher the frequency of the behavior, the higher the score. The cumulative score of each item ranged from 0 to 24 among all the students. See the details in Table S1 . The Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT) The Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT) was used to diagnose Chinese dyslexic children[ 27 ]. It is composed of five subscales, respectively the phonological awareness (PA), morphological awareness (MA), rapid automatized naming (RAN), orthographic awareness (OA), and reading ability (RA). The PA consists of three tests: Rhyme Recognition, Onset Recognition and Tone Recognition. The MA asks the children to combine each character in the first column with a character in the second column to form a meaningful compound word, and record the completion time and score. In the RAN, children are asked to name of all numbers twice, from left to right, from top to bottom, as quickly and accurately as possible. The OA was used to measure children's knowledge of the structure of Chinese characters and their sensitivity to differentiate between Chinese and non-Chinese characters. The RA includes oral and written questions, as well as reading time. The higher the score and the shorter the time taken, the better the children have mastered the skill. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.75[ 24 ]. Statistical Analysis The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 26.0 Statistics for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R 4.2.3. (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The continuous variables were expressed using mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), and the categorical variables were expressed using frequencies and percentages. The individual sample t-test and chi-square test were used for group comparisons. Preliminarily, Spearman correlations were performed to examine the relationships among the home literacy variable, parenting styles and dyslexia to assess the multicollinearity of the variables [ 28 ]. Given the observed correlations, causality was examined using multiple logistic regression. The examination of the causality of the variables is necessary to carry out the mediation model [ 29 ]. Then, based on the hypothesis, we used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the mediation effects. We examined this association controlling for various child and family characteristics. After analyzing the missing data for patterns, we estimated missing data using the full information maximum likelihood option (MLR estimator) in M-plus version 8. For the indirect effects, we used a bootstrap resamples of 5,000 in order to obtain nonbiased 95% confidence intervals(CI)[ 30 ]. If the 95% CI did not contain zero, it indicated a significant mediating effect. All predictor variables were standardized to minimize multicollinearity. Besides, to examine the model fit, several fit indices were considered: Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR). The values of > 0.90 for CFI and TLI, < 0.08 for RMSEA and < 0.05 for SRMR represent a good fit [ 31 ]. The significant level was set to 0.05. Results General characteristics of the participants Table 1 displays the sociodemographic details of 53 dyslexic children and 159 controls. Concerning district, 43 (81.1%) children in the dyslexic group resided in urban areas, compared to 149 (93.1%) in the control group ( P = 0.007). A significant difference was also observed in monthly family income between the two groups ( P = 0.017). Compared to controls, the proportion of single-parent families (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = 0.037) and family history of dyslexia (7.5% vs 0.6%, P = 0.009) were much higher in dyslexic children. In terms of paternity, children with dyslexia were more likely to feel ignored and scolded by their parents (all P 0.05). Table 1 General characteristics of the participants. Variable Dyslexic ( n = 53) Control ( n = 159) P Sex, n (%) 1.000 Boys 38(71.7) 114(71.7) Girls 15(28.3) 45(28.3) Grade 1.000 2 18(34.0) 54(34.0) 3 16(30.2) 48(30.2) 4 12(22.6) 36(22.6) 5 7(13.2) 21(13.2) Single parent family 0.037 Yes 5(9.4) 3(1.9) No 48(90.6) 156(98.1) Place of residence 0.007 Rural 10(18.9) 10(6.3) City 43(81.1) 149(93.7) Family history of dyslexia 0.009 Yes 4(7.5) 1(0.6) No 49(92.5) 158(99.3) Learning training before age 3 0.628 Yes 20(37.7) 66(41.5) No 33(62.3) 93(58.5) Father’s educational level 0.127 Junior high school or below 18(34.0) 33(20.8) High school or equivalent 13(24.5) 54(34.0) Bachelor’s degree or above 22(41.5) 72(45.3) Mother’s educational level 0.237 Junior high school or below 15(28.3) 53(34.6) High school or equivalent 9(17.0) 38(23.9) Bachelor’s degree or above 29(54.7) 66(41.5) Monthly family income 0.017 10,000 14(26.4) 76(47.8) Be scolded by parents 0.005 Yes 48(81.6) 108(67.9) No 5(9.4) 51(32.1) Ignore children's feelings 0.035 Frequently 3(5.7) 4(2.7) General 35(66.0) 79(49.7) None 15(23.4) 76(47.8) Comparison of Parenting Styles and CRAT between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children The scores for the different types of parenting styles of dyslexic and control children were shown in Fig. 1 . The scores for emotional warmth and anxious rearing of parents in the dyslexic group were lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.01), and the scores for overprotecting of fathers were also significantly lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.001). Based on gender stratification analysis, the results showed that there were differences in the scores of parenting styles between dyslexic boys and normal boys, mainly in the five dimensions of emotional warmth, anxious rearing and overprotection of the father, and emotional warmth and anxious rearing of the mother. Male dyslexic children scored significantly lower than controls on all of these factors ( P < 0.05). However, among the maternal rearing style of girls, only anxious rearing had a statistically significant difference between the two groups ( P < 0.05), with the dyslexic group scoring lower than the controls ( P < 0.05). Regarding CRAT, there were significant differences in the five dimensions between the two groups (all P < 0.05). The case group scored lower than the children in the control group and took longer time to complete the test on all subscales ( Table S2 ). Correlation matrixes between the investigated factors Data were assessed for normality, outliers and multicollinearity prior to path analysis. No evidence of significant deviation from normality and outliers was observed. Besides, the Spearman correlation test results indicated that the correlations coefficients among variables were lower than 0.90, and multicollinearity was not present. The results indicated that reading ability were related to parenting styles and HLE in children ( Figure S1 ) . Association of dyslexia with HLE In Fig. 2 , we showed the association between dyslexia and HLE. No regular reading time (OR = 3.93, 95%CI: 1.92–8.02, P 2 hours everyday (OR = 7.41, 95%CI: 2.11–25.95, P < 0.05) were positively associated with dyslexia. Moreover, the case group had higher homework pressure (OR = 8.55, 95%CI:3.87–18.86, P < 0.05) and longer homework time (OR = 1.41,95%CI:1.04–1.90, P < 0.05) than the control group. While literacy-related activities (OR = 0.86, 95%CI: 0.77–0.95, P < 0.05), learning actively ( P < 0.05) and absence of homework pressure (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.07–0.88, P < 0.05) were protective factors for dyslexia. Likewise, we integrated the meaningful results into a multiple logistic regression model and demonstrated that dyslexia had a positive correlation with no regular reading time (OR = 2.69, 95%CI:1.04–6.97), high homework pressure (OR = 7.41, 95%CI:1.45–37.82), and time spending on TV > 2 hours everyday (OR = 6.16, 95%CI:1.30-29.15, all P < 0.05). However, we did not observe any significant association between the risk of dyslexia and literacy-related activities and homework time (Fig. 3 ) . Association between parenting styles and dyslexia Similarly, we used the same regression model to identify predictors of parenting styles for dyslexia. We found that emotional warmth (Father: OR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.88–0.98; Mother: OR = 0.94,95%CI:0.89–0.99), paternal overprotection (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.87–0.96) and anxious rearing (Father: OR = 0.90,95%CI: 0.85–0.97; Mother: OR = 0.89, 95%CI:0.83–0.97) were negatively associated with dyslexia in children (all P < 0.05, Fig. 4 ) . Test of the mediation model The results generated by M-plus version 8 were presented in Fig. 5 . The mediation analysis regarding parenting styles and dyslexia showed that after being adjusted for sex and grade, parenting styles were positive predictors of HLE (β = 0.721, 95% CI: 0.448–0.852, P 0.05). Additionally, HLE had a positive effect on dyslexia (β = 0.940, 95% CI: 0.576–1.462, P < 0.01), which was divided into four components (β = 0.525, − 0.120, − 0.485, − 0.835). The mediation analysis results showed that HLE had a total mediation effect on the association between parenting styles and dyslexia. The total indirect effects of mediation were 0.55 and 0.68, respectively. The path model was a good fit (RMSEA = 0.096, CFI = 0.969, TLI = 0.924, SRMR = 0.039). Discussion Developmental dyslexia, a common learning disability affecting numerous children, has garnered increasing attention in recent years[ 32 ]. Recent studies showed that children with dyslexia are at risk of academic failure and emotional problems[ 33 ]. Therefore, investigating the factors that influence dyslexia may lead to mitigating the consequences of this prevalent disease. In the present study, we aim to examine the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia among Chinese children, with a specific focus on the potential mediating role of HLE. Our findings indicate a strong correlation between dyslexia, HLE, and parenting styles. More importantly, HLE was found to have a complete mediation effect on the association between parenting styles and reading ability. This study builds upon previous research by introducing innovative models that connect parenting styles to dyslexia in children, thus offering valuable insights for future interventions and educational practices. Our findings indicate that the absence of regular reading time and high homework pressure are risk factors for dyslexia. In line with previous research, our results highlight a significant association between dyslexia and HLE in children[ 29 , 34 ]. Ensuring children have a designated reading time not only increases their overall reading exposure but also cultivates positive reading habits, thereby enhancing their vocabulary and reading skills. A longitudinal study spanning ages 2 to 15 found that the HLE positively impacts language and literacy development in preschoolers, leading to improved reading comprehension throughout childhood due to preschool-based skills and heightened motivation[ 11 ]. Several studies have also suggested that the relationship between HLE and children's reading ability may be reciprocal, with children's early reading ability influencing parental involvement in home literacy activities[ 34 , 35 ]. However, a study from Japan did not find such results, but rather linked access to literacy resources to early reading development[ 36 ]. We posit that this disparity may be attributed to the temporal nature of HLE effects, which diminish as children receive formal literacy instruction. Nevertheless, it is indisputable that a favorable HLE offers numerous opportunities for educational activities that foster children's language and literacy skills. On the other hand, consistent with our findings, there were pieces of evidence showing that a conscious learning habit had a significant impact on the occurrence of dyslexia[ 4 ]. Learning habit is an individual automatic learning behavior, conscious study habits are conducive to stimulate the enthusiasm and initiative of students to learn. Children with positive learning habits generally show positive learning attitudes in campus and home learning, and will actively and enthusiastically discuss with the teacher in the classroom or communicate with their classmates to learn after class, and express their views more actively, which greatly improves their language expression ability and expression opportunities. From this perspective, it can be explained that conscious and active learning habits can improve children's reading experience, which has an important impact on the acquisition of children's reading knowledge and skills, and thus reduces the risk of dyslexia[ 37 ]. In contrast, the presence of longer time and stressful difficulties in completing homework assignments in dyslexic children, in addition to a possible lack of conscious study habits, is more likely to be due to their poor reading skills related to difficulties in completing homework tasks[ 28 ] . In recent years, there has been a growing focus on parenting styles in the research community, yet little attention has been paid to the relationship between dyslexia and parenting styles[ 8 , 38 ]. Similar to prior researches[ 19 , 39 ], our research has found a strong correlation between parenting style and dyslexia. In particular, negative correlations were observed with regard to parental emotional warmth, anxious rearing, and fathers' overprotection. These results may reflect apathetic and neglectful attitudes of parents towards dyslexic children and inadequate care for dyslexic children, which is a negative rearing style. Research has shown that parents who adopt a neglectful parenting style demand less from their children and communicate less with them[ 40 ]. We suggest that negative parenting styles may be due to the fact that the academic underachievement of dyslexic children affects parents' parenting satisfaction and sense of efficacy, which leaves most parents disillusioned and appearing less protective and anxious than parents of typically developing children[ 41 ]. This may also partly explain our results. Consistent with our findings, a Finnish study found that parents of dyslexic children have high parenting stress and struggle to provide effective help [ 18 ]. That is, more adaptive parenting styles promote a better performance when compared with less adaptive parenting styles. Previous studies have indicated that parenting styles play an important role in explaining higher reading processes (syntactic and semantic) in children with dyslexia, as supported by main theories on dyslexia[ 22 ]. Therefore, our results add to the growing body of evidence highlighting the impact of parenting styles on children with dyslexia. In addition, we found that the relationship between boys' parenting style and dyslexia was more pronounced. To our knowledge, there is a general consensus among current researchers that boys are at a higher risk of developing dyslexia than girls[ 4 , 33 , 42 ]. In line with a prior study, the gender of children had an impact on parenting styles[ 15 ]. Boys are given more responsibility, and parents are harsher, more rejecting and neglectful of boys, especially fathers, who are more likely to be strict with boys in home education. However, parents are more willing to tolerate girls. Also, there are differences in the personalities of boys and girls; boys are active and disobedient, while girls are more obedient and well-behaved, so parents are harsher and prone to punishment and rejection of boys, and are more tolerant and provide emotional warmth to girl [ 43 ]. Thus, we should pay more attention to the way boys are parented, to be emotional warmth, tolerant and protective enough to help prevent dyslexia in boys. Furthermore, our research has established that the HLE acts as an independent mediator between parenting styles and dyslexia. This means that positive parenting styles create a richer HLE, which in turn reduces the risk of dyslexia. Children's early language skills are developed through their interactions with their parents[ 44 ]. More specifically, parental attitudes towards reading seem to influence the development of children’s reading skills [ 10 ]. As numerous studies have shown, the actions and characteristics of both children and parents can shape family interactions[ 45 ]. Parents' behaviors and attitudes, along with family communications and interactions, contribute to increasing children's reading activities and create a positive HLE. The behavior of individual family members impacts all other members, making it essential to consider the family and the overall environment when examining a child's behavior[ 46 ]. Given this, interventions that focus on effective parent-child communication can be a crucial part of rehabilitation training for children with dyslexia. Moreover, this study will enhance our understanding of the impact of parenting styles on children's dyslexia. In general, based on the findings of the present study, improving parenting styles, enhancing family interaction, and creating a positive family reading atmosphere can be considered crucial strategies for reducing the risk of dyslexia. In summary, parenting styles can either positively or negatively influence dyslexia in children through HLE, making this the most innovative contribution of this study. This study has several limitations that must be considered. Firstly, it is a case-control study, which limits the ability to establish causality. However, it provides valuable insights for future cohort or intervention studies seeking to verify these findings. Secondly, this study demonstrates that parenting styles impact children's reading ability through the home literacy environment. However, defining the specifics of a "good" home literacy environment and establishing the optimal level to prevent reading difficulties and improve reading challenges remains elusive. Thirdly, the evaluation of parenting styles was subjective and may be subject to recall bias. Additionally, there may be other factors not evaluated in this study that also influence the relationship between parenting styles and reading ability. Therefore, further research with a prospective design is needed to explore a broader range of potential mediators. To strengthen the generalizability of these findings, it is recommended to conduct future studies on samples from numerous regions to assess the reproducibility of these results. Conclusions In this study, we developed a robust mediation model to explore the potential relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia in children. Our findings suggest that the HLE serves as a mediator between parenting styles and dyslexia. This study highlights the critical role of parenting styles and the HLE in the development of interventions for dyslexic children. Our study offers fresh insights into the intricate connections between parenting styles and dyslexia, and the results carry significant theoretical and practical implications. This novel mediation model, never before utilized, aids in deepening our comprehension of the mechanisms that underlie the link between parenting styles and dyslexia. Additionally, the findings can inform the creation of clinical interventions and management programs aimed at reducing dyslexia occurrences among children. In conclusion, parenting styles appear to serve as a crucial factor in shaping individual differences in HLE and, ultimately, children's reading abilities. Given that these parenting styles vary across different family backgrounds, they represent a promising target for interventions designed to enhance the HLE and support children's reading development. Abbreviations HLE:Home Literacy Environment; DD: Developmental dyslexia; IQ: Intelligence Quotient; DCCC: Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children; CRAT: Chinese Reading Ability Test; DSM-5:the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; EMBU-C: Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran for Children; SD: standard deviation; SEM: Structural Equation Modeling; CFI: Comparative Fit Index; TLI: Tucker–Lewis Index; RMSEA: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR: Standardized Root Mean Square Residual. Declarations Availability of data and materials The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Acknowledgments The authors express our sincere gratitude to all subjects who participated in this study. Funding The research was funded by Special Fund for Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (grant no.: STKJ202209070), the Shantou Science and Technology Project (No. 230509116495730). The authors wish to thank all the students and teachers who participated in this project. Author information Authors and Affiliations Mental Health Center of Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China Wanyi Wen, Xuanzhi Zhang, Liwen Guan, Xinle Yu, Qianfei Gu, Yanhong Huang School of Public Health, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China Wanyi Wen, Liwen Guan, Qianfei Gu Shantou University Medical College—Faculty of Medicine of University of Manitoba Joint Laboratory of Biological Psychiatry, China Xuanzhi Zhang, Xinle Yu, Yanhong Huang Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China Kusheng Wu, Zhiya Liang Shantou Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China Anyan Huang Authors' contributions Wanyi Wen carried out the initial analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Xuanzhi Zhang, Liwen Guan, Anyan Huang, Zhiya Liang, Xinle Yu, and Qianfei Gu conducted a survey design, collected the data, and carried out the initial analyses. Yanhong Huang and Kusheng Wu conceptualized and designed the study, draft the initial manuscript, revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors significantly contributed to the revisions of the manuscript. The paper and data have not been published before. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Ethics approval and consent to participate Approval from the Ethics Committee of Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College was received before the initiation of this study and informed consent have been collected by all participants. Competing Interests The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Consent for publication Not applicable. References Peterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. Annual review of clinical psychology 2015, 11:283-307. Becker N, Vasconcelos M, Oliveira V, Santos FCD, Bizarro L, Almeida RMM, Salles JF, Carvalho MRS. Genetic and environmental risk factors for developmental dyslexia in children: systematic review of the last decade. Developmental neuropsychology 2017, 42(7-8):423-445. Doust C, Fontanillas P, Eising E, Gordon SD, Wang Z et al. Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia. Nature genetics 2022, 54(11):1621-1629. Feng Y, Liu Q, Xie X, Jiang Q, Zhu K, Xiao P, Wu X, Zuo P, Song R. The Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Children With Reading Disabilities in a Multiethnic City: A Cross-Sectional Study. Frontiers in pediatrics 2022, 10:864175. Xiao P, Zhu K, Feng Y, Jiang Q, Xiang Z et al. Associations between dyslexia and children's mental health: Findings from a follow-up study in China. Psychiatry research 2023, 324:115188. Soriano-Ferrer M, Morte-Soriano MR, Begeny J, Piedra-Martinez E. Psychoeducational Challenges in Spanish Children With Dyslexia and Their Parents' Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in psychology 2021, 12:648000. Dilnot J, Hamilton L, Maughan B, Snowling MJ. Child and environmental risk factors predicting readiness for learning in children at high risk of dyslexia. Development and psychopathology 2017, 29(1):235-244. Huang A, Sun M, Zhang X, Lin Y, Lin X, Wu K, Huang Y. Self-Concept in Primary School Student with Dyslexia: The Relationship to Parental Rearing Styles. International journal of environmental research and public health 2021, 18(18):9718. He Z, Shao S, Zhou J, Ke J, Kong R, Guo S, Zhang J, Song R. Does long time spending on the electronic devices affect the reading abilities? A cross-sectional study among Chinese school-aged children. Research in developmental disabilities 2014, 35(12):3645-3654. Niklas F, Wirth A, Guffler S, Drescher N, Ehmig SC. The Home Literacy Environment as a Mediator Between Parental Attitudes Toward Shared Reading and Children's Linguistic Competencies. Frontiers in psychology 2020, 11:1628. Torppa M, Vasalampi K, Eklund K, Niemi P. Long-term effects of the home literacy environment on reading development: Familial risk for dyslexia as a moderator. Journal of experimental child psychology 2022, 215:105314. Hamilton LG, Hayiou-Thomas ME, Hulme C, Snowling MJ. The Home Literacy Environment as a Predictor of the Early Literacy Development of Children at Family-Risk of Dyslexia. Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading 2016, 20(5):401-419. Rashid FL, Morris RD, Sevcik RA. Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities 2005, 38(1):2-11. Guo Y, Zhang YQ, Wu CA, Yin XN, Zhang JY et al. Bidirectional associations between parenting styles and conduct problems in Chinese preschool children: the Shenzhen Longhua Child Cohort Study. Psychol Health Med 2022, 27(9):2007-2020. Zhong Y, Huang X, Chen J, Li Y, Li Y, Chen R, Cong E, Xu Y. The role of only-child status in the effect of childhood trauma and parental rearing style on depressive symptoms in Shanghai adolescents. Frontiers in psychiatry 2023, 14:1196569. Watson A, Dumuid D, Maher C, Fraysse F, Mauch C, Tomkinson GR, Ferguson T, Olds T. Parenting Styles and Their Associations With Children's Body Composition, Activity Patterns, Fitness, Diet, Health, and Academic Achievement. Childhood obesity (Print) 2023, 19(5):316-331. Zou CS, Ding P, Geng ML, Wu XY, Li SY et al. [Effects of parental rearing patterns and their consistency on the emotional and behavioral problems of preschool children]. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine] 2020, 54(3):283-288. Natale K, Aunola K, Nurmi JE, Poikkeus AM, Lyytinen P, Lyytinen H. Mothers' causal attributions concerning the reading achievement of their children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Journal of learning disabilities 2008, 41(3):274-285. Carotenuto M, Messina A, Monda V, Precenzano F, Iacono D et al. Maternal Stress and Coping Strategies in Developmental Dyslexia: An Italian Multicenter Study. Frontiers in psychiatry 2017, 8:295. Chronis AM, Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Jr., Williams SH, Baumann BL, Kipp H, Jones HA, Rathouz PJ. Maternal depression and early positive parenting predict future conduct problems in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dev Psychol 2007, 43(1):70-82. Daelmans B, Darmstadt GL, Lombardi J, Black MM, Britto PR, Lye S, Dua T, Bhutta ZA, Richter LM. Early childhood development: the foundation of sustainable development. Lancet (London, England) 2017, 389(10064):9-11. Carreteiro RM, Justo JM, Figueira AP. Reading Processes and Parenting Styles. Journal of psycholinguistic research 2016, 45(4):901-914. Hou F, Qi L, Liu L, Luo X, Gu H, Xie X, Li X, Zhang J, Song R. Validity and Reliability of the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children. Frontiers in psychology 2018, 9:1915. Huang A, Wu K, Li A, Zhang X, Lin Y, Huang Y. The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children. International journal of environmental research and public health 2020, 17(10):3660. Ma F. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5). In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. edn. Edited by Gu D, Dupre ME. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 1414-1425. Liming T. LGWX The Chinese Version of Egma Minnen Av Bardndosnauppforstran for Children: Revision and Validation of a Parenting Style Scale. J China Med Univ 2018, 47:886-890. Lin Y, Zhang X, Huang Q, Lv L, Huang A, Li A, Wu K, Huang Y. The Prevalence of Dyslexia in Primary School Children and Their Chinese Literacy Assessment in Shantou, China. International journal of environmental research and public health 2020, 17(19):7140. Xiao P, Zhu K, Liu Q, Xie X, Jiang Q, Feng Y, Wu X, Tang J, Song R. Association between developmental dyslexia and anxiety/depressive symptoms among children in China: The chain mediating of time spent on homework and stress. Journal of affective disorders 2022, 297:495-501. Bigozzi L, Vettori G, Incognito O. The role of preschoolers' home literacy environment and emergent literacy skills on later reading and writing skills in primary school: A mediational model. Frontiers in psychology 2023, 14:1113822. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications; 2017. Klumparendt A, Nelson J, Barenbrügge J, Ehring T. Associations between childhood maltreatment and adult depression: a mediation analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19(1):36. Peterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. Lancet (London, England) 2012, 379(9830):1997-2007. Yang LP, Li CB, Li XM, Zhai MM, Zhao J, Weng XC. Prevalence of developmental dyslexia in primary school children: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. World journal of pediatrics : WJP 2022, 18(12):804-809. Georgiou GK, Inoue T, Parrila R. Developmental Relations Between Home Literacy Environment, Reading Interest, and Reading Skills: Evidence From a 3-Year Longitudinal Study. Child development 2021, 92(5):2053-2068. Silinskas G, Aunola K, Lerkkanen MK, Raiziene S. Parental Teaching of Reading and Spelling Across the Transition From Kindergarten to Grade 1. Frontiers in psychology 2020, 11:610870. Tanji T, Inoue T. Home literacy environment and early reading skills in Japanese Hiragana and Kanji during the transition from kindergarten to primary school. Frontiers in psychology 2023, 14:1052216. Romero-González M, Lavigne-Cerván R, Gamboa-Ternero S, Rodríguez-Infante G, Juárez-Ruiz de Mier R, Romero-Pérez JF. Active Home Literacy Environment: parents' and teachers' expectations of its influence on affective relationships at home, reading performance, and reading motivation in children aged 6 to 8 years. Frontiers in psychology 2023, 14:1261662. Kiuru N, Aunola K, Torppa M, Lerkkanen MK, Poikkeus AM et al. The role of parenting styles and teacher interactional styles in children's reading and spelling development. Journal of school psychology 2012, 50(6):799-823. Zou L, Huang A, Wu K, Zhang X, Zhang K, Wen W, Guan L, Huang Y. Home reading environment, sociometric and demographic factors associated with dyslexia in primary school students in China: A case-control study. Heliyon 2023, 9(11):e22100. Otani K, Suzuki A, Oshino S, Ishii G, Matsumoto Y. Effects of the "affectionless control" parenting style on personality traits in healthy subjects. Psychiatry research 2009, 165(1-2):181-186. Chen W-W. The relations between perceived parenting styles and academic achievement in Hong Kong: The mediating role of students' goal orientations. Learning and Individual Differences 2015, 37:48-54. Arnett AB, Pennington BF, Peterson RL, Willcutt EG, DeFries JC, Olson RK. Explaining the sex difference in dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2017, 58(6):719-727. Barnett RC, Baruch GK. Determinants of Fathers' Participation in Family Work. Journal of Marriage and Family 1987, 49(1):29-40. Glascoe FP, Leew S. Parenting behaviors, perceptions, and psychosocial risk: impacts on young children's development. Pediatrics 2010, 125(2):313-319. Shalani B, Azadfallah P, Farahani H, Brand S. Why Do Iranian Preschool-Aged Children Spend too Much Time in Front of Screens? A Preliminary Qualitative Study. Children (Basel, Switzerland) 2023, 10(7):1193. Setyanisa AR, Setiawati Y, Irwanto I, Fithriyah I, Prabowo SA. Relationship between Parenting Style and Risk of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Elementary School Children. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS 2022, 29(4):152-159. Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementalMaterial.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-3873207","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":268058245,"identity":"081174b4-070c-43d7-9e6d-f7aa509140bf","order_by":0,"name":"Wanyi Wen","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Wanyi","middleName":"","lastName":"Wen","suffix":""},{"id":268058246,"identity":"2b7a8cb2-2234-4e3c-aaea-3941f506769e","order_by":1,"name":"Xuanzhi Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xuanzhi","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":268058247,"identity":"7262d6c6-ce57-4176-8c7e-bdac53e1c7d3","order_by":2,"name":"Kusheng Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Kusheng","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""},{"id":268058248,"identity":"dbfe02ef-6821-468f-b354-9de019328c8b","order_by":3,"name":"Liwen Guan","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Liwen","middleName":"","lastName":"Guan","suffix":""},{"id":268058249,"identity":"f02275b7-b267-4f6c-9727-2bb06db49e42","order_by":4,"name":"Anyan Huang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou Maternity \u0026 Child Healthcare Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Anyan","middleName":"","lastName":"Huang","suffix":""},{"id":268058250,"identity":"1a10587b-2e40-455a-b3c5-bce783cb3f4f","order_by":5,"name":"Zhiya Liang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhiya","middleName":"","lastName":"Liang","suffix":""},{"id":268058251,"identity":"fed61668-fc6e-4548-8276-dc528b5f6cf2","order_by":6,"name":"Xinle Yu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xinle","middleName":"","lastName":"Yu","suffix":""},{"id":268058252,"identity":"b754e0b4-426b-43cc-b95b-c9e175cf516f","order_by":7,"name":"Qianfei Gu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qianfei","middleName":"","lastName":"Gu","suffix":""},{"id":268058253,"identity":"fbb106c9-a1c1-4f3b-ab6e-6a39ec34e9ee","order_by":8,"name":"Yanhong Huang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Shantou University Mental Health Center","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yanhong","middleName":"","lastName":"Huang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-01-17 14:59:18","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":50051246,"identity":"79bcebf2-5538-403d-8a53-8ea7857fe86e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:46:10","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57593,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eComparison of scores of parental rearing style between dyslexic group and control group. Abbreviations: EW, emotional warmth; R, rejection; O, overprotecting; AR, anxious rearing. Note: *\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05, **\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.01, ***\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.001; This part of the data analysis excluded children from single-parent families.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/9f4c5ef18b4d192071b4ba1b.jpg"},{"id":50052687,"identity":"fac070b1-9154-445e-b5ee-241333a7d21a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:54:09","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":75423,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAssociations (points) and 95% CI (bars) from\u003cstrong\u003e \u003c/strong\u003eUnivariate logistic regression analyses of home literacy environment and dyslexia. Solid vertical lines indicate the null values. Note: CI, confidence interval; LRA, literacy-related activities; Press. HW, Homework pressure; Hour. HW, hours of finishing homework; Time.TV, time spending on TV everyday; Hours.SA, hours of sports activities.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/7cb20eb76ff96d96a8c0d552.jpg"},{"id":50051241,"identity":"71e7bf40-b13a-4178-8ada-c41f3cfb86a4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:46:09","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":57525,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAssociations (points) and 95% CI (bars) from multivariate logistic regression analyses of home literacy environment and dyslexia.Solid vertical lines indicate the null values. Adjusted for family income per month, be scolded by parents, ignore children's feelingsand family history of dyslexia. Note: CI, confidence interval;LRA, literacy-related activities; Press.HW, Homework pressure; Hour.HW, hours of finishing homework; Time.TV, time spending on TV everyday.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/21d23bb4849ccf31cfe87f58.jpg"},{"id":50051242,"identity":"d30c2e8a-ba94-4eef-a744-51db1a1ecd87","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:46:09","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":49111,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eAssociations (points) and 95% CI (bars) from multivariate logistic regression analyses of parental rearing style and dyslexia. Solid vertical lines indicate the null values. Adjusted for single parent family and place of residence. Note: CI, confidence interval.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/24fd3dd56cb482e296b4a634.jpg"},{"id":50051244,"identity":"0cb739e2-66d3-43fc-8381-fb2fdff3d9f8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:46:10","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":31180,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe chart and path coefficients of the mediators in the relationship between parenting style and CRAT. Abbreviations: PS, parenting styles; HLE, home literacy environment; CRAT,the score of reading ability. *, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05; **, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.01.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/95a99791f565b70fdbc25bda.jpg"},{"id":50210372,"identity":"15261673-23e0-4170-bf37-abe67d6dd4d9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-26 10:58:35","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":594589,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/8efafbfc-b3f5-49c5-b3cc-2544eb6a2e79.pdf"},{"id":50051249,"identity":"2d2d6da5-5a7a-461f-a83a-af8b66641082","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-01-23 16:46:10","extension":"docx","order_by":11,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":293805,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMaterial.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-3873207/v1/dc3e53fe9039397356fbadac.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Association between parenting styles and dyslexia in primary school students: the mediating role of home literacy environment","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDevelopmental dyslexia (DD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder and is the most common learning disability in school-age children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. It is characterized by difficulties in word recognition, spelling and decoding[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite normal intelligence, complete sensory abilities, and adequate educational opportunities, children with dyslexia have serious and persistent problems in acquiring reading skills[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. The previous studies have demonstrated that DD affects approximately 10% of children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e] and 3% to12.6% of school-age children in China [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e], which can persist into adulthood. Unfortunately, dyslexia not only prevents children from enjoying reading, but also increases their learning difficulties and often deprives them of opportunities to develop other potential, which in turn has a considerable negative impact on mental health outcomes and behaviors[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, DD is an important public health issue that deserves attention.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMany studies have shown that the occurrence of dyslexia is closely related to family environment[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. The home literacy environment (HLE) is used to describe the interactions, resources, and attitudes that children experience at home related to literacy, such as parent\u0026ndash;child literacy-related activities, family books, usage of electronic devices etc.[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Previous studies have studied the HLE from various aspects. Meanwhile, many research have shown the positive relationship between HLE and children\u0026rsquo;s reading development. The HLE explains 12 to 18.5 percent of the variation in children's language skills[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. Frank Niklas et al. stated that the relationship between parental attitudes toward shared reading and children's language ability was mediated by the HLE[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. A Finnish longitudinal study also found that the HLE plays a crucial role in the development of dyslexia in children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Importantly, a good reading atmosphere at home was a conducive condition for promoting the development of children's early reading skills[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. Rashid conducted a study among dyslexic children and found a significant correlation between HLE and children's passage comprehension as well as spelling scores[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, recent research has confirmed that Chinese children with dyslexia often come from homes with poor literacy environments[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, the HLE is a crucial factor in the development of reading ability in children.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eParenting styles are the methods and forms commonly used by parents in the raising and education of their children, with a relatively stable style of behavior[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e]. Parenting styles permeate the parent-child interaction process and have a significant impact on children's personality, mental health, and especially their academic performance[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. More specifically, negative parenting styles seem to increase risk of emotional and behavioral problems among children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e]. Several studies have identified that the parents of dyslexic children are under great parenting pressure, and it is difficult to provide effective help, which reflects that there is a correlation between parenting styles and dyslexia[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. On the other side, numerous studies have demonstrated that parenting care is necessary to meet the needs of children's brain development and that positive parenting reduces the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders in children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, a recent survey among Portuguese children has shown that parenting styles play a significant role in explaining higher reading processes, including syntactic and semantic[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, parenting styles are particularly crucial for children with dyslexia, as these variables can either increase risk or serve as protective factors.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite the growing body of research on parenting styles and their impact on neurodevelopmental disorders, there has been limited focus on how parenting styles specifically influence dyslexic children. Therefore, further exploration of the mediating factors in the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia in children is necessary. We propose that the HLE could be a significant predictor of dyslexia, potentially interacting with parent\u0026ndash;child interaction at home and influencing children\u0026rsquo;s literacy development.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTo date, no prior studies have specifically examined the relationships among parenting styles, HLE, and dyslexia in Chinese children. Therefore, the aim of this study is to address two key questions: (a) Is there a correlation between dyslexia and both parenting styles and HLE among Chinese children; (b) Could the HLE serve as a mediator in the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy populations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn this study, 53 children with dyslexia diagnosed were selected as the case group in the Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College. The control group was normal development children in grades 2\u0026ndash;5 from a randomly selected public primary school in Shantou, China. The case and control groups were matched 1:3 according to gender, age and grade. After clarifying the objective of the research, a total of 212 children and their parents (53 in the case group and 159 in the control group) voluntarily agreed to participate in the study following informed consent.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe inclusion criteria of the dyslexia case group were consistent with the previous studies of our group[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. In brief, we followed the following criteria as: (1) Intelligence Quotient (IQ) above 85 by the Combined Raven\u0026rsquo;s Test; (2) the score on the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children (DCCC) are two standard deviations higher than the average score of children in the same grade (Cronbach\u0026rsquo;s α\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.97)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]; (3) at least 1 standard deviation below the average level of their actual grade on the Chinese Vocabulary Test and Assessment Scale (Cronbach\u0026rsquo;s α\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.75)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]; (4) The Chinese language test score was below the 20th percentile among all students in the same grade; (5) The final diagnosis was made by a child psychiatrist based on the results of the Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT) (Cronbach\u0026rsquo;s α\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.75)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e] and the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. Children with brain disease, traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, visual and auditory dysfunction and other neurodevelopmental disorders were excluded from the study. Approval from the Ethics Committee of Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College was received before the initiation of this study and informed consent have been collected by all participants.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eProcedure\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e After the trained investigators clearly explained the purpose of the study and obtained informed consent from all participants, questionnaires were administered to both the children and parents in the case and control groups. The DCCC and CRAT were completed by the child and their parents or other guardians according to written instructions, respectively. In addition, parents or other guardians were asked to complete questionnaires related to home literacy environment and parental rearing styles. The quality control process of students filling in the questionnaire in the control group was consistent with that in the case group.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMeasuring tools\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eEgna Minnen Betr\u0026auml;ffande Uppfostran for Children (EMBU-C)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe EMBU-C is a powerful and objective tool which is used to evaluate the current relationship between parenting styles and children's mental health. The Chinese version (EMBU-C) for school-age children and adolescents, as translated and revised by Liming Tie et al., was applied in our study[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. This version of the EMBU-C has shown good reliability (Cronbach\u0026rsquo;s alpha\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.82). The EMBU-C includes four dimensions, namely emotional warmth (EW), rejection (R), overprotecting (O) and anxious rearing (AR), made up of 10 items, respectively. The items were rated on a four-point Likert scale from never (1 point) to always (4 point) where the higher the score on a dimension, the greater the tendency to represent parenting styles on that dimension. The participants were asked to respond twice to each question item, evaluating the current parenting styles of their fathers and mothers, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHome literacy environment (HLE)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBased on the HLE scale designed by He et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e], this study made some changes to the items. Ten variables reflected the home literacy environment, such as Literacy-related activities, restrictions on using electronic devices, usage of electronic devices, shared TV, children's learning habits, completion of homework by children, whether the child participated in extracurricular activities, frequency of encouraging children to participate activities and hours of outdoor. Children's literacy-related behaviors were s regular reading time cored according to the assignment table of HLE variables. The higher the frequency of the behavior, the higher the score. The cumulative score of each item ranged from 0 to 24 among all the students. See the details in \u003cb\u003eTable \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/b\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Chinese Reading Ability Test (CRAT) was used to diagnose Chinese dyslexic children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e]. It is composed of five subscales, respectively the phonological awareness (PA), morphological awareness (MA), rapid automatized naming (RAN), orthographic awareness (OA), and reading ability (RA). The PA consists of three tests: Rhyme Recognition, Onset Recognition and Tone Recognition. The MA asks the children to combine each character in the first column with a character in the second column to form a meaningful compound word, and record the completion time and score. In the RAN, children are asked to name of all numbers twice, from left to right, from top to bottom, as quickly and accurately as possible. The OA was used to measure children's knowledge of the structure of Chinese characters and their sensitivity to differentiate between Chinese and non-Chinese characters. The RA includes oral and written questions, as well as reading time. The higher the score and the shorter the time taken, the better the children have mastered the skill. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.75[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 26.0 Statistics for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R 4.2.3. (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The continuous variables were expressed using mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation (mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD), and the categorical variables were expressed using frequencies and percentages. The individual sample t-test and chi-square test were used for group comparisons. Preliminarily, Spearman correlations were performed to examine the relationships among the home literacy variable, parenting styles and dyslexia to assess the multicollinearity of the variables [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. Given the observed correlations, causality was examined using multiple logistic regression. The examination of the causality of the variables is necessary to carry out the mediation model [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThen, based on the hypothesis, we used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the mediation effects. We examined this association controlling for various child and family characteristics. After analyzing the missing data for patterns, we estimated missing data using the full information maximum likelihood option (MLR estimator) in M-plus version 8. For the indirect effects, we used a bootstrap resamples of 5,000 in order to obtain nonbiased 95% confidence intervals(CI)[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. If the 95% CI did not contain zero, it indicated a significant mediating effect. All predictor variables were standardized to minimize multicollinearity. Besides, to examine the model fit, several fit indices were considered: Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker\u0026ndash;Lewis Index (TLI), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), and Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR). The values of \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.90 for CFI and TLI, \u0026lt; 0.08 for RMSEA and \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 for SRMR represent a good fit [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. The significant level was set to 0.05.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eGeneral characteristics of the participants\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eTable \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e displays the sociodemographic details of 53 dyslexic children and 159 controls. Concerning district, 43 (81.1%) children in the dyslexic group resided in urban areas, compared to 149 (93.1%) in the control group (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.007). A significant difference was also observed in monthly family income between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.017). Compared to controls, the proportion of single-parent families (9.4% vs 1.9%, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.037) and family history of dyslexia (7.5% vs 0.6%, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.009) were much higher in dyslexic children. In terms of paternity, children with dyslexia were more likely to feel ignored and scolded by their parents (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). No significant differences were observed in sex, grade distribution, learning training before age 3 or parental education levels between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGeneral characteristics of the participants.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDyslexic\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u003cem\u003en\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;53)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eControl\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e(\u003cem\u003en\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;159)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSex, n (%)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.000\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBoys\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38(71.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e114(71.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGirls\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15(28.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e45(28.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGrade\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.000\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18(34.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54(34.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e16(30.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48(30.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e12(22.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e36(22.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e7(13.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e21(13.2)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSingle parent family\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.037\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5(9.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3(1.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48(90.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e156(98.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003ePlace of residence\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.007\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRural\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10(18.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e10(6.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e43(81.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e149(93.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFamily history of dyslexia\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.009\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4(7.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1(0.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e49(92.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e158(99.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLearning training before age 3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.628\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e20(37.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66(41.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33(62.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e93(58.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFather\u0026rsquo;s educational level\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.127\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJunior high school or below\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e18(34.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e33(20.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh school or equivalent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e13(24.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e54(34.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBachelor\u0026rsquo;s degree or above\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22(41.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e72(45.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMother\u0026rsquo;s educational level\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.237\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eJunior high school or below\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15(28.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53(34.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh school or equivalent\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e9(17.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e38(23.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBachelor\u0026rsquo;s degree or above\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e29(54.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e66(41.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMonthly family income\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.017\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;5000\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e17(32.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30(18.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e~\u0026thinsp;10,000\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e22(41.5)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e53(33.3)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;10,000\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e14(26.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e76(47.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eBe scolded by parents\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.005\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eYes\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e48(81.6)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e108(67.9)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNo\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5(9.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e51(32.1)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIgnore children\u0026apos;s feelings\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.035\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFrequently\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3(5.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4(2.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGeneral\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e35(66.0)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e79(49.7)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eNone\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e15(23.4)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e76(47.8)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec9\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eComparison of Parenting Styles and CRAT between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe scores for the different types of parenting styles of dyslexic and control children were shown in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e. The scores for emotional warmth and anxious rearing of parents in the dyslexic group were lower than those in the control group (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01), and the scores for overprotecting of fathers were also significantly lower than those in the control group (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001). Based on gender stratification analysis, the results showed that there were differences in the scores of parenting styles between dyslexic boys and normal boys, mainly in the five dimensions of emotional warmth, anxious rearing and overprotection of the father, and emotional warmth and anxious rearing of the mother. Male dyslexic children scored significantly lower than controls on all of these factors (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). However, among the maternal rearing style of girls, only anxious rearing had a statistically significant difference between the two groups (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), with the dyslexic group scoring lower than the controls (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eRegarding CRAT, there were significant differences in the five dimensions between the two groups (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). The case group scored lower than the children in the control group and took longer time to complete the test on all subscales (\u003cstrong\u003eTable S2\u003c/strong\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eCorrelation matrixes between the investigated factors\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eData were assessed for normality, outliers and multicollinearity prior to path analysis. No evidence of significant deviation from normality and outliers was observed. Besides, the Spearman correlation test results indicated that the correlations coefficients among variables were lower than 0.90, and multicollinearity was not present. The results indicated that reading ability were related to parenting styles and HLE in children (\u003cstrong\u003eFigure \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eAssociation of dyslexia with HLE\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eIn Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, we showed the association between dyslexia and HLE. No regular reading time (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;3.93, 95%CI: 1.92\u0026ndash;8.02, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and time spending on TV\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2 hours everyday (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.41, 95%CI: 2.11\u0026ndash;25.95, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) were positively associated with dyslexia. Moreover, the case group had higher homework pressure (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;8.55, 95%CI:3.87\u0026ndash;18.86, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and longer homework time (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.41,95%CI:1.04\u0026ndash;1.90, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) than the control group. While literacy-related activities (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.86, 95%CI: 0.77\u0026ndash;0.95, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), learning actively (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) and absence of homework pressure (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.25, 95%CI: 0.07\u0026ndash;0.88, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) were protective factors for dyslexia. Likewise, we integrated the meaningful results into a multiple logistic regression model and demonstrated that dyslexia had a positive correlation with no regular reading time (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;2.69, 95%CI:1.04\u0026ndash;6.97), high homework pressure (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;7.41, 95%CI:1.45\u0026ndash;37.82), and time spending on TV\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;2 hours everyday (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6.16, 95%CI:1.30-29.15, all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). However, we did not observe any significant association between the risk of dyslexia and literacy-related activities and homework time (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eAssociation between parenting styles and dyslexia\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSimilarly, we used the same regression model to identify predictors of parenting styles for dyslexia. We found that emotional warmth (Father: OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.93, 95%CI: 0.88\u0026ndash;0.98; Mother: OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.94,95%CI:0.89\u0026ndash;0.99), paternal overprotection (OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.91, 95%CI: 0.87\u0026ndash;0.96) and anxious rearing (Father: OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.90,95%CI: 0.85\u0026ndash;0.97; Mother: OR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.89, 95%CI:0.83\u0026ndash;0.97) were negatively associated with dyslexia in children (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05, Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e)\u003c/strong\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eTest of the mediation model\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe results generated by M-plus version 8 were presented in Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e. The mediation analysis regarding parenting styles and dyslexia showed that after being adjusted for sex and grade, parenting styles were positive predictors of HLE (\u0026beta;\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.721, 95% CI: 0.448\u0026ndash;0.852, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01). While the direct effect of parenting styles on dyslexia was not statistically significant (\u0026beta;= \u0026minus;0.130, 95% CI: \u0026minus;0.652\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.162, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Additionally, HLE had a positive effect on dyslexia (\u0026beta;\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.940, 95% CI: 0.576\u0026ndash;1.462, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01), which was divided into four components (\u0026beta;\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.525, \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.120, \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.485, \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0.835). The mediation analysis results showed that HLE had a total mediation effect on the association between parenting styles and dyslexia. The total indirect effects of mediation were 0.55 and 0.68, respectively. The path model was a good fit (RMSEA\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.096, CFI\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.969, TLI\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.924, SRMR\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.039).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eDevelopmental dyslexia, a common learning disability affecting numerous children, has garnered increasing attention in recent years[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. Recent studies showed that children with dyslexia are at risk of academic failure and emotional problems[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, investigating the factors that influence dyslexia may lead to mitigating the consequences of this prevalent disease. In the present study, we aim to examine the relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia among Chinese children, with a specific focus on the potential mediating role of HLE. Our findings indicate a strong correlation between dyslexia, HLE, and parenting styles. More importantly, HLE was found to have a complete mediation effect on the association between parenting styles and reading ability. This study builds upon previous research by introducing innovative models that connect parenting styles to dyslexia in children, thus offering valuable insights for future interventions and educational practices.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur findings indicate that the absence of regular reading time and high homework pressure are risk factors for dyslexia. In line with previous research, our results highlight a significant association between dyslexia and HLE in children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Ensuring children have a designated reading time not only increases their overall reading exposure but also cultivates positive reading habits, thereby enhancing their vocabulary and reading skills. A longitudinal study spanning ages 2 to 15 found that the HLE positively impacts language and literacy development in preschoolers, leading to improved reading comprehension throughout childhood due to preschool-based skills and heightened motivation[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Several studies have also suggested that the relationship between HLE and children's reading ability may be reciprocal, with children's early reading ability influencing parental involvement in home literacy activities[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e35\u003c/span\u003e]. However, a study from Japan did not find such results, but rather linked access to literacy resources to early reading development[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR36\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e36\u003c/span\u003e]. We posit that this disparity may be attributed to the temporal nature of HLE effects, which diminish as children receive formal literacy instruction. Nevertheless, it is indisputable that a favorable HLE offers numerous opportunities for educational activities that foster children's language and literacy skills.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the other hand, consistent with our findings, there were pieces of evidence showing that a conscious learning habit had a significant impact on the occurrence of dyslexia[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e]. Learning habit is an individual automatic learning behavior, conscious study habits are conducive to stimulate the enthusiasm and initiative of students to learn. Children with positive learning habits generally show positive learning attitudes in campus and home learning, and will actively and enthusiastically discuss with the teacher in the classroom or communicate with their classmates to learn after class, and express their views more actively, which greatly improves their language expression ability and expression opportunities. From this perspective, it can be explained that conscious and active learning habits can improve children's reading experience, which has an important impact on the acquisition of children's reading knowledge and skills, and thus reduces the risk of dyslexia[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e37\u003c/span\u003e]. In contrast, the presence of longer time and stressful difficulties in completing homework assignments in dyslexic children, in addition to a possible lack of conscious study habits, is more likely to be due to their poor reading skills related to difficulties in completing homework tasks[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e] .\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn recent years, there has been a growing focus on parenting styles in the research community, yet little attention has been paid to the relationship between dyslexia and parenting styles[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e38\u003c/span\u003e]. Similar to prior researches[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e39\u003c/span\u003e], our research has found a strong correlation between parenting style and dyslexia. In particular, negative correlations were observed with regard to parental emotional warmth, anxious rearing, and fathers' overprotection. These results may reflect apathetic and neglectful attitudes of parents towards dyslexic children and inadequate care for dyslexic children, which is a negative rearing style. Research has shown that parents who adopt a neglectful parenting style demand less from their children and communicate less with them[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e40\u003c/span\u003e]. We suggest that negative parenting styles may be due to the fact that the academic underachievement of dyslexic children affects parents' parenting satisfaction and sense of efficacy, which leaves most parents disillusioned and appearing less protective and anxious than parents of typically developing children[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e41\u003c/span\u003e]. This may also partly explain our results. Consistent with our findings, a Finnish study found that parents of dyslexic children have high parenting stress and struggle to provide effective help [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. That is, more adaptive parenting styles promote a better performance when compared with less adaptive parenting styles. Previous studies have indicated that parenting styles play an important role in explaining higher reading processes (syntactic and semantic) in children with dyslexia, as supported by main theories on dyslexia[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, our results add to the growing body of evidence highlighting the impact of parenting styles on children with dyslexia.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition, we found that the relationship between boys' parenting style and dyslexia was more pronounced. To our knowledge, there is a general consensus among current researchers that boys are at a higher risk of developing dyslexia than girls[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e42\u003c/span\u003e]. In line with a prior study, the gender of children had an impact on parenting styles[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. Boys are given more responsibility, and parents are harsher, more rejecting and neglectful of boys, especially fathers, who are more likely to be strict with boys in home education. However, parents are more willing to tolerate girls. Also, there are differences in the personalities of boys and girls; boys are active and disobedient, while girls are more obedient and well-behaved, so parents are harsher and prone to punishment and rejection of boys, and are more tolerant and provide emotional warmth to girl [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e43\u003c/span\u003e]. Thus, we should pay more attention to the way boys are parented, to be emotional warmth, tolerant and protective enough to help prevent dyslexia in boys.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurthermore, our research has established that the HLE acts as an independent mediator between parenting styles and dyslexia. This means that positive parenting styles create a richer HLE, which in turn reduces the risk of dyslexia. Children's early language skills are developed through their interactions with their parents[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e44\u003c/span\u003e]. More specifically, parental attitudes towards reading seem to influence the development of children\u0026rsquo;s reading skills [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. As numerous studies have shown, the actions and characteristics of both children and parents can shape family interactions[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e45\u003c/span\u003e]. Parents' behaviors and attitudes, along with family communications and interactions, contribute to increasing children's reading activities and create a positive HLE. The behavior of individual family members impacts all other members, making it essential to consider the family and the overall environment when examining a child's behavior[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e46\u003c/span\u003e]. Given this, interventions that focus on effective parent-child communication can be a crucial part of rehabilitation training for children with dyslexia. Moreover, this study will enhance our understanding of the impact of parenting styles on children's dyslexia. In general, based on the findings of the present study, improving parenting styles, enhancing family interaction, and creating a positive family reading atmosphere can be considered crucial strategies for reducing the risk of dyslexia. In summary, parenting styles can either positively or negatively influence dyslexia in children through HLE, making this the most innovative contribution of this study.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study has several limitations that must be considered. Firstly, it is a case-control study, which limits the ability to establish causality. However, it provides valuable insights for future cohort or intervention studies seeking to verify these findings. Secondly, this study demonstrates that parenting styles impact children's reading ability through the home literacy environment. However, defining the specifics of a \"good\" home literacy environment and establishing the optimal level to prevent reading difficulties and improve reading challenges remains elusive. Thirdly, the evaluation of parenting styles was subjective and may be subject to recall bias. Additionally, there may be other factors not evaluated in this study that also influence the relationship between parenting styles and reading ability. Therefore, further research with a prospective design is needed to explore a broader range of potential mediators. To strengthen the generalizability of these findings, it is recommended to conduct future studies on samples from numerous regions to assess the reproducibility of these results.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, we developed a robust mediation model to explore the potential relationship between parenting styles and dyslexia in children. Our findings suggest that the HLE serves as a mediator between parenting styles and dyslexia. This study highlights the critical role of parenting styles and the HLE in the development of interventions for dyslexic children. Our study offers fresh insights into the intricate connections between parenting styles and dyslexia, and the results carry significant theoretical and practical implications. This novel mediation model, never before utilized, aids in deepening our comprehension of the mechanisms that underlie the link between parenting styles and dyslexia. Additionally, the findings can inform the creation of clinical interventions and management programs aimed at reducing dyslexia occurrences among children. In conclusion, parenting styles appear to serve as a crucial factor in shaping individual differences in HLE and, ultimately, children's reading abilities. Given that these parenting styles vary across different family backgrounds, they represent a promising target for interventions designed to enhance the HLE and support children's reading development.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Abbreviations","content":"\u003cp\u003eHLE:Home Literacy Environment; DD: Developmental dyslexia; IQ: Intelligence Quotient; DCCC: Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children; CRAT: Chinese Reading Ability Test; DSM-5:the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; EMBU-C: Egna Minnen Betr\u0026auml;ffande Uppfostran for Children; SD: standard deviation; SEM: Structural Equation Modeling; CFI: Comparative Fit Index; TLI: Tucker\u0026ndash;Lewis Index; RMSEA: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR: Standardized Root Mean Square Residual.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors express our sincere gratitude to all subjects who participated in this study.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research was funded by Special Fund for Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (grant no.: STKJ202209070), the Shantou Science and Technology Project (No. 230509116495730). The authors wish to thank all the students and teachers who participated in this project.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor information\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors and Affiliations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMental Health Center of Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWanyi Wen, Xuanzhi Zhang, Liwen Guan, Xinle Yu, Qianfei Gu, Yanhong Huang\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSchool of Public Health, Shantou University, Shantou, Guangdong, China\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWanyi Wen, Liwen Guan, Qianfei Gu\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShantou University Medical College\u0026mdash;Faculty of Medicine of University of Manitoba Joint Laboratory of Biological Psychiatry, China\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eXuanzhi Zhang, Xinle Yu, Yanhong Huang\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKusheng Wu, Zhiya Liang\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShantou Maternity \u0026amp; Child Healthcare Hospital, Shantou, Guangdong, China\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnyan Huang\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWanyi Wen carried out the initial analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Xuanzhi Zhang, Liwen Guan, Anyan Huang, Zhiya Liang, Xinle Yu, and Qianfei Gu conducted a survey design, collected the data, and carried out the initial analyses. Yanhong Huang and Kusheng Wu conceptualized and designed the study, draft the initial manuscript, revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors significantly contributed to the revisions of the manuscript. The paper and data have not been published before. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eApproval from the Ethics Committee of Mental Health Center, Shantou University Medical College was received before the initiation of this study and informed consent have been collected by all participants.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting Interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declare no conflicts of interest.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eAnnual review of clinical psychology \u003c/em\u003e2015, 11:283-307.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBecker N, Vasconcelos M, Oliveira V, Santos FCD, Bizarro L, Almeida RMM, Salles JF, Carvalho MRS. Genetic and environmental risk factors for developmental dyslexia in children: systematic review of the last decade. \u003cem\u003eDevelopmental neuropsychology \u003c/em\u003e2017, 42(7-8):423-445.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoust C, Fontanillas P, Eising E, Gordon SD, Wang Z et al. Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eNature genetics \u003c/em\u003e2022, 54(11):1621-1629.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeng Y, Liu Q, Xie X, Jiang Q, Zhu K, Xiao P, Wu X, Zuo P, Song R. The Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Children With Reading Disabilities in a Multiethnic City: A Cross-Sectional Study. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in pediatrics \u003c/em\u003e2022, 10:864175.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXiao P, Zhu K, Feng Y, Jiang Q, Xiang Z et al. Associations between dyslexia and children\u0026apos;s mental health: Findings from a follow-up study in China. \u003cem\u003ePsychiatry research \u003c/em\u003e2023, 324:115188.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSoriano-Ferrer M, Morte-Soriano MR, Begeny J, Piedra-Martinez E. Psychoeducational Challenges in Spanish Children With Dyslexia and Their Parents\u0026apos; Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2021, 12:648000.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDilnot J, Hamilton L, Maughan B, Snowling MJ. Child and environmental risk factors predicting readiness for learning in children at high risk of dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eDevelopment and psychopathology \u003c/em\u003e2017, 29(1):235-244.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang A, Sun M, Zhang X, Lin Y, Lin X, Wu K, Huang Y. Self-Concept in Primary School Student with Dyslexia: The Relationship to Parental Rearing Styles. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of environmental research and public health \u003c/em\u003e2021, 18(18):9718.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHe Z, Shao S, Zhou J, Ke J, Kong R, Guo S, Zhang J, Song R. Does long time spending on the electronic devices affect the reading abilities? A cross-sectional study among Chinese school-aged children. \u003cem\u003eResearch in developmental disabilities \u003c/em\u003e2014, 35(12):3645-3654.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiklas F, Wirth A, Guffler S, Drescher N, Ehmig SC. The Home Literacy Environment as a Mediator Between Parental Attitudes Toward Shared Reading and Children\u0026apos;s Linguistic Competencies. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2020, 11:1628.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTorppa M, Vasalampi K, Eklund K, Niemi P. Long-term effects of the home literacy environment on reading development: Familial risk for dyslexia as a moderator. \u003cem\u003eJournal of experimental child psychology \u003c/em\u003e2022, 215:105314.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHamilton LG, Hayiou-Thomas ME, Hulme C, Snowling MJ. The Home Literacy Environment as a Predictor of the Early Literacy Development of Children at Family-Risk of Dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eScientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading \u003c/em\u003e2016, 20(5):401-419.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRashid FL, Morris RD, Sevcik RA. Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. \u003cem\u003eJournal of learning disabilities \u003c/em\u003e2005, 38(1):2-11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuo Y, Zhang YQ, Wu CA, Yin XN, Zhang JY et al. Bidirectional associations between parenting styles and conduct problems in Chinese preschool children: the Shenzhen Longhua Child Cohort Study. \u003cem\u003ePsychol Health Med \u003c/em\u003e2022, 27(9):2007-2020.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhong Y, Huang X, Chen J, Li Y, Li Y, Chen R, Cong E, Xu Y. The role of only-child status in the effect of childhood trauma and parental rearing style on depressive symptoms in Shanghai adolescents. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychiatry \u003c/em\u003e2023, 14:1196569.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWatson A, Dumuid D, Maher C, Fraysse F, Mauch C, Tomkinson GR, Ferguson T, Olds T. Parenting Styles and Their Associations With Children\u0026apos;s Body Composition, Activity Patterns, Fitness, Diet, Health, and Academic Achievement. \u003cem\u003eChildhood obesity (Print) \u003c/em\u003e2023, 19(5):316-331.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZou CS, Ding P, Geng ML, Wu XY, Li SY et al. [Effects of parental rearing patterns and their consistency on the emotional and behavioral problems of preschool children]. \u003cem\u003eZhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine] \u003c/em\u003e2020, 54(3):283-288.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNatale K, Aunola K, Nurmi JE, Poikkeus AM, Lyytinen P, Lyytinen H. Mothers\u0026apos; causal attributions concerning the reading achievement of their children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of learning disabilities \u003c/em\u003e2008, 41(3):274-285.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarotenuto M, Messina A, Monda V, Precenzano F, Iacono D et al. Maternal Stress and Coping Strategies in Developmental Dyslexia: An Italian Multicenter Study. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychiatry \u003c/em\u003e2017, 8:295.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChronis AM, Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Jr., Williams SH, Baumann BL, Kipp H, Jones HA, Rathouz PJ. Maternal depression and early positive parenting predict future conduct problems in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. \u003cem\u003eDev Psychol \u003c/em\u003e2007, 43(1):70-82.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaelmans B, Darmstadt GL, Lombardi J, Black MM, Britto PR, Lye S, Dua T, Bhutta ZA, Richter LM. Early childhood development: the foundation of sustainable development. \u003cem\u003eLancet (London, England) \u003c/em\u003e2017, 389(10064):9-11.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCarreteiro RM, Justo JM, Figueira AP. Reading Processes and Parenting Styles. \u003cem\u003eJournal of psycholinguistic research \u003c/em\u003e2016, 45(4):901-914.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHou F, Qi L, Liu L, Luo X, Gu H, Xie X, Li X, Zhang J, Song R. Validity and Reliability of the Dyslexia Checklist for Chinese Children. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2018, 9:1915.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHuang A, Wu K, Li A, Zhang X, Lin Y, Huang Y. The Reliability and Validity of an Assessment Tool for Developmental Dyslexia in Chinese Children. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of environmental research and public health \u003c/em\u003e2020, 17(10):3660.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMa F. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5). In: \u003cem\u003eEncyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging.\u003c/em\u003e edn. Edited by Gu D, Dupre ME. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 1414-1425.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiming T. LGWX The Chinese Version of Egma Minnen Av Bardndosnauppforstran for Children: Revision and Validation of a Parenting Style Scale. \u003cem\u003eJ China Med Univ \u003c/em\u003e2018, 47:886-890.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLin Y, Zhang X, Huang Q, Lv L, Huang A, Li A, Wu K, Huang Y. The Prevalence of Dyslexia in Primary School Children and Their Chinese Literacy Assessment in Shantou, China. \u003cem\u003eInternational journal of environmental research and public health \u003c/em\u003e2020, 17(19):7140.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eXiao P, Zhu K, Liu Q, Xie X, Jiang Q, Feng Y, Wu X, Tang J, Song R. Association between developmental dyslexia and anxiety/depressive symptoms among children in China: The chain mediating of time spent on homework and stress. \u003cem\u003eJournal of affective disorders \u003c/em\u003e2022, 297:495-501.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBigozzi L, Vettori G, Incognito O. The role of preschoolers\u0026apos; home literacy environment and emergent literacy skills on later reading and writing skills in primary school: A mediational model. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2023, 14:1113822.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford publications; 2017.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKlumparendt A, Nelson J, Barenbr\u0026uuml;gge J, Ehring T. Associations between childhood maltreatment and adult depression: a mediation analysis. \u003cem\u003eBMC Psychiatry \u003c/em\u003e2019, 19(1):36.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeterson RL, Pennington BF. Developmental dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eLancet (London, England) \u003c/em\u003e2012, 379(9830):1997-2007.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYang LP, Li CB, Li XM, Zhai MM, Zhao J, Weng XC. Prevalence of developmental dyslexia in primary school children: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. \u003cem\u003eWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP \u003c/em\u003e2022, 18(12):804-809.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGeorgiou GK, Inoue T, Parrila R. Developmental Relations Between Home Literacy Environment, Reading Interest, and Reading Skills: Evidence From a 3-Year Longitudinal Study. \u003cem\u003eChild development \u003c/em\u003e2021, 92(5):2053-2068.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilinskas G, Aunola K, Lerkkanen MK, Raiziene S. Parental Teaching of Reading and Spelling Across the Transition From Kindergarten to Grade 1. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2020, 11:610870.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTanji T, Inoue T. Home literacy environment and early reading skills in Japanese Hiragana and Kanji during the transition from kindergarten to primary school. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2023, 14:1052216.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRomero-Gonz\u0026aacute;lez M, Lavigne-Cerv\u0026aacute;n R, Gamboa-Ternero S, Rodr\u0026iacute;guez-Infante G, Ju\u0026aacute;rez-Ruiz de Mier R, Romero-P\u0026eacute;rez JF. Active Home Literacy Environment: parents\u0026apos; and teachers\u0026apos; expectations of its influence on affective relationships at home, reading performance, and reading motivation in children aged 6 to 8 years. \u003cem\u003eFrontiers in psychology \u003c/em\u003e2023, 14:1261662.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKiuru N, Aunola K, Torppa M, Lerkkanen MK, Poikkeus AM et al. The role of parenting styles and teacher interactional styles in children\u0026apos;s reading and spelling development. \u003cem\u003eJournal of school psychology \u003c/em\u003e2012, 50(6):799-823.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZou L, Huang A, Wu K, Zhang X, Zhang K, Wen W, Guan L, Huang Y. Home reading environment, sociometric and demographic factors associated with dyslexia in primary school students in China: A case-control study. \u003cem\u003eHeliyon \u003c/em\u003e2023, 9(11):e22100.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOtani K, Suzuki A, Oshino S, Ishii G, Matsumoto Y. Effects of the \u0026quot;affectionless control\u0026quot; parenting style on personality traits in healthy subjects. \u003cem\u003ePsychiatry research \u003c/em\u003e2009, 165(1-2):181-186.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen W-W. The relations between perceived parenting styles and academic achievement in Hong Kong: The mediating role of students\u0026apos; goal orientations. \u003cem\u003eLearning and Individual Differences \u003c/em\u003e2015, 37:48-54.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eArnett AB, Pennington BF, Peterson RL, Willcutt EG, DeFries JC, Olson RK. Explaining the sex difference in dyslexia. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry \u003c/em\u003e2017, 58(6):719-727.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarnett RC, Baruch GK. Determinants of Fathers\u0026apos; Participation in Family Work. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Marriage and Family \u003c/em\u003e1987, 49(1):29-40.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGlascoe FP, Leew S. Parenting behaviors, perceptions, and psychosocial risk: impacts on young children\u0026apos;s development. \u003cem\u003ePediatrics \u003c/em\u003e2010, 125(2):313-319.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShalani B, Azadfallah P, Farahani H, Brand S. Why Do Iranian Preschool-Aged Children Spend too Much Time in Front of Screens? A Preliminary Qualitative Study. \u003cem\u003eChildren (Basel, Switzerland) \u003c/em\u003e2023, 10(7):1193.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSetyanisa AR, Setiawati Y, Irwanto I, Fithriyah I, Prabowo SA. Relationship between Parenting Style and Risk of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Elementary School Children. \u003cem\u003eThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS \u003c/em\u003e2022, 29(4):152-159.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Dyslexia, Parenting style, Home literacy environment, Reading ability, Children","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eBackground: Despite an increasing amount of research on the relationship between parenting styles and neurodevelopmental disorders, there has been minimal focus on how parenting styles impact children's reading abilities. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential mediating role of the home literacy environment in the connection between parenting styles and dyslexia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMethods: A total of 212 primary school students from grade 2 to 5 were recruited in this study. The Chinese Reading Ability Test was used to screen children with dyslexia. Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran questionnaire was used to assess the parenting style (emotional warmth, rejection, overprotecting and anxious rearing). The structural equation modelling was carried out to evaluate the direct, indirect, and total effects of parenting styles on dyslexia.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResults: Dyslexic children had lower scores for emotional warmth, overprotecting and anxious rearing compared to normal children, especially among male dyslexic children (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.01). Dyslexic children were lack of regular reading time (OR=2.69, 95%CI:1.04-6.97, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05), and have higher homework pressure compared to normal children (OR=7.41, 95%CI:1.45-37.82, \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05). Additionally, emotional warmth, paternal overprotection and anxious rearing were negatively associated with dyslexia in children (all \u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026lt;0.05). Our findings indicate a strong correlation between dyslexia, home literacy environment, and parenting styles. In a structural equation model, an indirect effect was found showing that the home literacy environment independently mediated the effect of parenting styles on dyslexia. The total indirect effect is 0.55 and 0.68, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusions: The findings of this study indicate that home literacy environment serves as a mediato between parenting styles and dyslexia in children. This study offers fresh insights into the intricate connections between parenting styles and dyslexia, offering significantly important theoretical and practical implications.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Association between parenting styles and dyslexia in primary school students: the mediating role of home literacy environment","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-01-23 16:46:03","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3873207/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"0cf4dafb-47d0-4544-acfc-01b32c28ae79","owner":[],"postedDate":"January 23rd, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-01-26T10:50:28+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-01-23 16:46:03","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-3873207","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-3873207","identity":"rs-3873207","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.