Principles of Local and Global Grouping that Underlie Segmentation of Natural Texture Images

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The human visual system segments images using both high-level recognition mechanisms and low-level mechanisms that are largely independent of specific prior experience. The low-level mechanisms are essential for initiating recognition processes, and for learning to recognize new materials, objects, and contexts. Here we describe a hierarchical Bayesian observer (HBO) model of texture segmentation that is biologically plausible, takes into account the statistics of natural scenes, and does not depend on prior experience. The HBO model consists of five steps: local similarity grouping with local normalization, mutual similarity grouping (local grouping is strengthened if the neighboring regions are similar to the same set of other regions), transitive grouping (good continuation), confidence grouping (neighboring regions far from the same-different decision boundary guide grouping of regions near the decision boundary), and region grouping (similarity grouping of the regions from the initial segmentation). We find that a local similarity grouping process, trained to maximize accuracy, predicts human texture discrimination accuracy. We then find that the four additional steps accurately segment images with randomly shaped regions containing arbitrary natural textures. The success of the model depends on all the steps, but especially on local-similarity and transitive grouping. We also find that the transitive grouping allows correct segmentation of non-stationary texture regions (e.g., textures slanted in depth). Further, we find that when illumination varies across the image, local normalization enables both correct texture segmentation and estimation of illumination change. Finally, we find that unlike our model large state-of-the-art deep networks often fail on these stimuli.
Full text 1,893 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The human visual system segments images using both high-level recognition mechanisms and low-level mechanisms that are largely independent of specific prior experience. The low-level mechanisms are essential for initiating recognition processes, and for learning to recognize new materials, objects, and contexts. Here we describe a hierarchical Bayesian observer (HBO) model of texture segmentation that is biologically plausible, takes into account the statistics of natural scenes, and does not depend on prior experience. The HBO model consists of five steps: local similarity grouping with local normalization, mutual similarity grouping (local grouping is strengthened if the neighboring regions are similar to the same set of other regions), transitive grouping (good continuation), confidence grouping (neighboring regions far from the same-different decision boundary guide grouping of regions near the decision boundary), and region grouping (similarity grouping of the regions from the initial segmentation). We find that a local similarity grouping process, trained to maximize accuracy, predicts human texture discrimination accuracy. We then find that the four additional steps accurately segment images with randomly shaped regions containing arbitrary natural textures. The success of the model depends on all the steps, but especially on local-similarity and transitive grouping. We also find that the transitive grouping allows correct segmentation of non-stationary texture regions (e.g., textures slanted in depth). Further, we find that when illumination varies across the image, local normalization enables both correct texture segmentation and estimation of illumination change. Finally, we find that unlike our model large state-of-the-art deep networks often fail on these stimuli. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00